throbber
Anticonvulsant Properties of N-Substituted a,a-Diamino Acid Derivatives
`
`l
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`
`HAROLD KOHNtx, KAILASH N. SAWHNEYt, DAVID W. ROBERTSON~§, AND J. DAVID lEANDERt
`
`Received April 19, 1993, from the tDepartment of Chemistry, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77204-5641,
`IUffy_ Re_search Laboratories, Eli Ul/y and Company, Ul/y Corporate Center, Indianapolis, IN 46285.
`Accepted for
`pubhcat1on November 24, 1993111
`§Current address: Ugand Pharmaceuticals, 9393 Towne Center Dr., Suite 100,
`•
`San Diego, CA 92121.
`
`Abstract D Recent studies have demonstrated that functionalized
`a,a-diamino acids (1) display excellent activity when evaluated in the
`maximal electroshock seizure (MES) test in mice. The synthesis and
`pharmacological evaluation of 14 select analogues within this series
`of compounds are detailed. Included in this survey were 10 N-acyl
`derivatives in which the basic C(a) N-group in 1 was replaced by a
`neutral N-substituent and four dipeptides where the amino acid fusion
`point was the a-carbon site. N-Acylation of 1 led to decreased
`anticonvulsant activity. The importance of these findings in relation
`to the requirements of the C(a) substituent for anticonvulsant activity
`in 1 are briefly discussed.
`
`~, ,rfl
`N
`I
`1
`RNH-C-C-ff
`I
`I
`H 0
`
`.1
`
`0
`rf
`0
`I
`I
`I
`CH3CNH- CH- CNHCH2Ph
`
`I
`I
`I
`l
`I
`I
`
`Introduction
`
`Recent studies have shown that a,a-diamino acid derivatives
`(1) and related compounds are surprisingly stable and readily
`accessible materials.l-S Moreover, we have demonstrated that
`a-amino, a-hydrazino, and a-N-hydroxylamino adducts display
`excellent anticonvulsant activity when evaluated in the maximal
`electroshock seizure (MES) test in mice.s For example, the
`median effective dose (ED50) values after intraperitoneal injection
`for the a-N-ethylamino (2a) (42.4 mg/kg) and a-N2-(benzyloxy(cid:173)
`carbonyl)hydrazino (2b) (55.6 mg/kg) derivatives approached
`the ED50 of phenobarbital& (21.8 mg/kg), whereas the EDsoS of
`the a-methoxyamino (2c) (6.2 mg/kg) and the a-[(methoxy(cid:173)
`methyl)amino] (2d) (6.7 mg/kg) adducts exceeded the ED50 of
`phenytoin6 (9.5 mg/kg). Both 2c and 2d exhibited these potent
`anticonvulsant effects at doses much lower than those which
`produced neuromotor impairment on the horizontal screen (HS)
`test (46.0 and 50.5 mg/kg were the ED50 doses for 2c and 2d on
`the HS test). 5 These fmdings prompted our investigation of the
`pharmacological activity of the racemic N-substituted a,a(cid:173)
`diamino acid derivatives (2e-r) (Table 1). TheN-acyl derivatives
`(2e-n) were evaluated to determine the effect of conversion of
`thebasicC(a)-aminogroupin2a-dtoaneutralC(a)-carbamate
`(2e, 2f), urea (2g-2i), thiourea (2j, 2k), amide (21, 2n), or suc(cid:173)
`cinimide (2m) substituent on anticonvulsant activity. Also
`included in our study were the unique dipeptides 2o-r, where
`the amino acid fusion point was the a-carbon site.
`
`Experimental Section
`
`Chemical Methods-Melting points were determined with a Thomas(cid:173)
`Hoover melting point apparatus and are uncorrected. Infrared spectra
`(ffi) were run on a Perkin-Elmer 1330 and 283 spectrometers and
`calibrated against the 1601-an-1 band of polystyrene. Absorption values
`are expressed in wavenumbers (cm-1). Proton (lH NMR) and carbon
`(l3(; NMR) nuclear magnetic resonance spectra were taken on Nicolet
`NT-300andGeneralEiectricQE-300NMRinstruments. Chemicalshift.s
`(a)areinpartspermillion(ppm)relativetoMe~iandcouplingconstants
`(Jvalues) are in hertz. Low-resolution mass spectra (MS) were rerorded
`at an ionizing voltage of 70 e V from a Varian MAT CH-5 spectrometer
`attheLillyResearchLabo~tories. MicroiUWyseswereprovidedbythe
`
`• Abstract published in Advance ACS Abstrocts, February 1, 1994.
`
`@ 1994, ATnerican Ch6mlcal Society and
`.• American Pharrnacsutical Association
`
`11 rf = NHC{O)CH2NHC(O)OC!¥'h
`a rf = NHCH~(O)OCH3
`Q rf = NHCH~(O)OCt¥:tfa
`a rf • NHCH~(O)oety>h
`r RZ-'NH~~w
`S rf-N~
`1 rf-Br
`u rf • ~(Ctfah, BF 4-
`X rf • NHC(O)Ctfa
`lilt rf • NHC(O)CF3
`
`Zil ~ = NHCH2CH3
`tl rf = NHNHC~~Ph
`.c rf = NH(OC~
`d rf,.N(C~Ha
`.11. rf • NHC(O)OCHa
`1 rf = NHC(O)OPh
`Q rf = NHC(O)NHCH3
`h rf • NHC(O)NHPh
`i rf • NHC(O)NHS(QVPh
`j rf • NHC(S)NHCH3
`k rf = NHC(S)NHPh
`1 rf .. NHC(O)Ph(2'C~)
`0
`
`mrf·N)
`
`0
`
`Physical Chemistry Department of the Lilly Research Laboratories. All
`compounds gave satisfactory elemental analyses {C, H, N> that were
`within :1:0.4% of theoretical values. Thin-and thick-layer chromatog(cid:173)
`raphy were run on precoated silica gel GHLF microscope slides (2.5 X
`10 em; Analtech No. 21521) or silica gel GHLF (20 X 20 em; Analtech
`11187).
`Chemical Synthesis-General Proeedure for the Synthesis of
`Functionalized Amino Acid Derivatives 2e-k-A tetrahydrofuran
`{THF) solution containing 285 and either the aeylating agent (1.06-LIO
`equiv) and triethylamine (1.20 equiv) or the isocyanate (isothiocyanate)
`(1.(}--1.1 equiv) was heated. The reaction was then filtered to remove
`any salts formed and purified, and the product was recrystallized if
`necessary. The reaction temperatures, times, and recrystallization
`solvents (if appropriate) were as follows: (2e) ~ •c, 2 h, EtOH; (2t)
`45-50 •c, 2 h, MeOH; (2g) 45-50 •c, 2 h, MeOH; (%h) 45--50 •c, 2 h;
`(2i) 50-55 •c, 22 h; {2j) 65 •c, 4 h, EtOH; (2k) 65 •c, 3 h, EtOIL
`Synthesis of 1\t[Acetamido(benzylcarbamoyl)methyl]phthalamic
`Acid (21). To a warm pyridine solution (7.0 mL) containing 2s (0.63
`g, 2.83 mmol) was added phthalic anhydride (0.43 g, 2..87 mmol), and
`the reaction was stirred at 5(H)5 •c (5 h). Pyridine was removed by
`distillation in vacuo and the residue was treated with H:z() (20 mL). The
`aqueousmixturewasextractedwithEtOAe(2X20mL)andthenacidified
`with aqueous 1 N HClsolution. The white solid (0.70 g, 70%) that
`precipitated was filtered, washed withH:z() (10mL},anddried;mp 186-:-
`188 ·c.

`Synthsisof2-Acetamido-N-bellzyl-%-(1\tsuceinimidyl)aeetamlde
`(2m). A cooled (-78 "C) THF solution (150 mL> of %15 {prepared from
`2-acetamido-N-benzyl-2-ethozyaceta:mide7.S(2..00g,8.0mmol)andBBrs
`(2..51 g, 10.05 mmol)} was added slowly into a cooled {-:78 •C) THF.
`suspension (50 mL) of sodium suecinimide (3.06 g, 25.25 mmol). The
`
`IPR2014-01126- Exhibit 1026 p. 1
`
`

`
`reaction mixture was stirred at-78 "C (30 min) and at room temperature
`(90 min), and then treated with a 10% aqueous citric acid solution (50
`mL). The resulting solution was neutralized with a saturated aqueous
`NaHC03 solution, and the reaction mixture extracted with EtOAc (3 X
`100 mL). The combined extracts were dried (Na2S04), and the volatile
`materials were removed by distillation in vacuo. The residue was purified
`by flash column chromatography on Si02 gel (6% MeOH/CHCla) to give
`1.10 g (45%) of 2m; mp 181-183 "C (recrystallized from EtOH).
`Synthesis of N·(Benzyloxy)-N-[acetamido(benzylcarbamoyl)(cid:173)
`methyl]malondiamide (2n). 4-Methylmorpholine (0.35 g, 3.56 mmol)
`was added to a solution of N-CBZ.glycine (0.74 g, 3.55 mmol) in THF
`(75 mL) at -10 to -15 "C. The solution was stirred (5 min), and then
`isobutyl chloroformate (0.49 g, 3.55 mmol) was added and the mixture
`was stirred for an additional20 min. A cooled (-10 "C) solution of 2s
`(0.79 g, 3.55 mmol) in THF (125 mL) was then added slowly (30 min).
`The reaction mixture was stirred at this temperature (2 h) and then at
`room temperature (2 h). The insoluble materials were flltered, and the
`flltrate was concentrated in vacuo. The residue was triturated with
`EtOAc (20 mL) and the white solid (0.60 g) that remained was flltered,
`washed with H20, and dried to give 2n. The initial insoluble material
`on trituration with H20 gave an additional 0.40 g of2n to give a combined
`yield of 1.00 g (68% ); mp 177-179 "C (recrystallized from EtOH).
`Synthesis of Methyl N-[Acetamido(benzylcarbamoyl)methyl](cid:173)
`glycinate (2o). A methanolic solution (50 mL) containing 2n5 (1.00 g,
`2.85 mmol) and methyl glycinate (prepared from methyl glycinate
`hydrochloride (1.01 g, 8.55 mmol), and NaOMe (0.38 g, 7.10 mmol)) was
`heated to reflux (2 h). The reaction was concentrated in vacuo to give
`an oily residue that was purified by flash column chromatography on
`Si02gel (3% MeOH/CHCla) togive0.60g (72%) of2o;mp 144-146 "C
`(recrystallized from EtOAc).
`Synthesis of Ethyl N-[Acetamido(benzylcarbamoyl)methyl](cid:173)
`glycinate (2p). A methanolic solution (70 mL) containing 2n5 (1.50 g,
`4.28 mmol) and ethyl glycinate [prepared from ethyl glycinate hydro(cid:173)
`chloride (3.10 g, 22.2 mmol) and NaOMe (1.17 g, 21.7 4 mmol)] was heated
`to reflux (2 h). The reaction was concentrated in vacuo to give an oily
`residue that was purified by flash column chromatography on Si02 gel
`(5% MeOH/CHCia> to give 0.60 g (46%) of 2p; mp 125-127 "C
`(recrystallized from EtOAc).
`Synthesis of Benzyl N-[Acetamido(benzylcarbamoyl)methyl](cid:173)
`glycinate (2q). A suspension of benzyl glycinate hydrochloride (5.00
`g, 24.8 mmol) in THF (400 mL) containing EtaN ( 4.90 g, 48.5 mmol) was
`stirred (4 h) at room temperature. The reaction mixture was cooled
`(-78 "C) and then a cooled (-78 "C) THF solution (150 mL) of 2t5
`[prepared from 2-acetamido-N-benzyl-2-ethoxyacetamide7.B (4.00 g,16.0
`mmol) and BBra (1 Min CH2Cl2. 20.0 mL, 20.0 mmol)] was added (30
`min). The reaction mixture was stirred at -78 °C (30 min) and then at
`room temperature (16 h). The insoluble materials were flltered, the
`flltrate was concentrated in vacuo, and the residue was purified by flash
`column chromatrgraphy on Si02 gel (3% MeOH/CHCla) to give 1.56 g
`(26%) of2q as a white solid; mp 133-135 °C (recrystallized from EtOH).
`Synthesis of N-[Acetamido(benzylcarbamoyl)methyl]glycine
`(2r). A solution of methyl N-[acetamido(benzylcarbamoyl)methyl](cid:173)
`glycinate (2o) (0.60 g, 2.05 mmol) and KOH (0.30 g, 5.36 mmol) in 90%
`aqueous EtOH (50 mL) was stirred at room temperature (48 h). The
`volatile materials were then removed in vacuo, and the residue dissolved
`in H20 (10 mL). The aqueous solution was extracted with EtOAc (2 X
`20 mL}, and the aqueous layer was acidified to pH -2.0 with aqueous
`1 N HCL A column containing ion-exchange resin Dowex SOX W 4 was
`prepared using 10% aqueous pyridine. The column was thoroughly
`washed with HaQ. The acidic aqueous reaction solution was added to
`the top of the column, and the column was eluted with H20 (300 mL
`or until the eluate was neutral). The column was then eluted with 10%
`aqueous pyridine (400 mL). The aqueous pyridine fraction was
`concentrated in vacuo to give a white solid, dried in vacuo and then
`triturated with absolute EtOH (7 mL) •. The insoluble materials that
`... remained were filtered and dried togive0.29 g (50%) of2r;mp 124-126
`.·· "Cdec..
`· PharmaeologicalEvalnation-All tests were performed with male
`, ., . CF~1 mice from Charles River Breeding Laboratories (Portage, Ml). All
`· · ' cOmpounds were dissolved in 30% poly( ethylene glycol) 400 and

`· administered in an injection volume ofl mL/100g ofbodyweight.Initial
`;/ . ·. anticonvulsant evaluation of :e-:r was conducted with two dose levels
`·• (30,100mg/kg}adminiSteredintraperitoneally. Four mice at each dose
`·· level were tested at0.5,1, and 4 h after administration, unless otherwise
`£;·:·intliiea·te.din ':['able 1, to determine if there was protection against MES
`
`._ ··';'
`
`Table 1-Physlcal and Pharmacological Data In Mice for
`NSubstHuted a,a-Diamlno Acid Derlvatlves-
`o
`fi!
`0
`II
`I
`II
`CH3CNH- CH- CNHCH2Ph
`
`No.
`
`R2
`
`mpb
`
`MEScED50
`
`NHC(O)OCH3
`
`202-204
`
`NHC(O)OPh
`NHC{O)NHCH3
`NHC{O)NHPh
`NHC(O)NHS(02)Ph
`NHC{S)NHCH3
`NHC{S)NHPh
`NHC(O)Ph(2' -C02H)
`
`201-203
`229-230
`242-244
`188-191
`162-163
`196-197
`186-188
`181-183
`
`NC(O)CH2CH2C(O)
`NHC{O)CH2NHC(O)OCH2Ph 177-179
`144-146
`NHCH2C(O)OCH3
`125-127
`NHCH2C(O)OCH2CH3
`133-135
`NHCH2C(O)OCH~h
`124-126
`+NH~H2C02-
`
`2e
`
`2f
`2g
`2h
`21
`21
`2k
`21
`2m
`
`2n
`2o
`2p
`2q
`2r
`phenytoin'
`
`phenobarbital'
`
`valproate'
`
`48.0
`(37.7-56.7)
`>100
`>100
`>100
`>100
`>100d
`>100d
`>100
`>100
`
`"'30"
`>100
`>100
`>100
`>10Qd
`9.5
`(8.1-10.4)
`21.8
`(15.0-22.5)
`272
`(247-338)
`
`8 The compounds were administered intraperitoneally. ED50 values
`are in milligrams per kilogam. Numbers in parentheses are 95%
`confidence intervals. A dose-response curve was generated for all
`compounds that displayed sufficient activity. The dose-effect data
`for these compounds were obtained at 0.5 h ("time of peak effect").
`b Melting points (0 C) are uncorrected. c MES =maximal electroshock
`seizure test. All compounds were suspended in 30% PEG. d The
`compound was tested only at 0.5 and 1 h due to insufficient supply
`of sample. "Unable to definitively define an E050 value and confidence
`limits because of insufficient supply of sample. 'Reference 6.
`
`MES seizures were elicited by electrical current (ac, 60 cps, 50 mA,
`0.2 s) applied via corneal electrodes. A drop of 0.9% saline was instilled
`on each eye prior to application of the electrodes to ensure electrical
`contact. Abolition of the hind limb tonic extension component of the
`seizure was deimed as protection in the MES test. This is the identical
`protocol used by the Antiepileptic Drug Development Program of the
`Epilepsy Branch of NlNCDS, NIH.6.9
`After the time of peak anticonvulsant activity and the approximate
`dose range were determined, a dose-response curve was generated at
`the time of peak activity with at least three or four doses and 1o-12 mice
`per dose. TheMES EDso is the calculated dose required to protect 50%
`of the mice in the MES test. For those compounds with significant
`anticonvulsant activity, the doses that caused neuromotor impairment
`on the horizontal screen (HS) test also were determined. to Previously
`trainedmiceweredosedwiththecompoundandthenplacedindividually
`on top of a square (13 X 13 em) wire screen which was mounted on a
`vertical rod. The rod was rotated 180°, and the number of mice that
`returned to the top of the screen in one minute were counted.
`
`ResuHs and Discussion
`
`Chemistry-Several preparative routes were utilized for the
`construction of the targeted compounds. In most cases, 2-ac·
`etamido-N-benzyl-2-aminoacetamideS (2s) served as the starting
`material Treatment of 2s With the appropriate chloroformate,
`isocyanate, isothiocyanate, or anhydride, or use of the mixed
`anhydride protocol advanced for peptide synthesis, u led to the
`preparation of the N-acyl substituted adducts 2e-l and 2n.
`.Correspondingly, the preformed a-bromo derivatiVeS: 2t. was
`
`IPR2014-01126- Exhibit 1026 p. 2
`
`

`
`Table 2-Key Spectral Properties of ~ubstHuted a,a-Diamlno
`Acid Derivatives
`
`R2 0
`0
`I
`•
`u
`CH3CNH-CH-CNHCH~h
`a
`
`1HNMRI>
`
`13C NMRC
`
`No.
`
`IR•
`
`CaH
`
`CH2Ph
`
`2e 1650
`1630, 1700
`2f
`2g 1630
`2h 1600 (br)
`1630 (br)
`21
`1620
`21
`2k 1620
`1620 (br)
`21
`2m 1620 (br)
`2n 1640 (br)
`2o 1610,1710
`2p 1600, 1710
`2q 1620, 1710
`2r 1630
`
`5.56 (t, 7.8) 4.27 (d, 5.6)
`5.66 (t, 7.6) 4.29-4.35 (m)
`5.59 (t, 7.8) 4.26 (d, 5.8)
`57.92 157.30
`5.67 (t, 7.6) 4.30 (d. 5.9)
`57.59 153.98
`5.47 (t, 7.7) 4.24 (d, 5.7)
`57.14 150.36
`6.10 (br, s) 4.27 (d, 5.8)
`61.33 -II
`5.24 (t, 6.9) 4.32 (d. 5.8)
`61.18 180.02
`5.92 (t, 7.2) 4.36 (d. 6.0)
`57.44 _Jt
`6.31 (d, 9.0) 4.23-4.36 (m) 55.19 176.33
`5.79 (t, 7.7) 4.28 (d. 5.8)
`56.77 167.86
`5.00 (t, 7.8) 4.28 (d. 6.0)
`63.98 46.09
`5.01 (t, 8.2) 4.28 (d, 5.8)
`63.96 46.22
`5.02 (t, 8.2) 4.27 (d. 6.1)
`63.94 46.22
`4.98 (d. 8.2) 4.29 (d. 5.7)
`64.08 47.48
`
`CaH CaNRC
`58.57 __.
`58.69 _,
`
`MSd
`
`279
`341
`279
`340
`405
`294
`356
`370
`3041
`413
`294
`342
`370
`-1
`
`• Infrared spectra were taken with KBr discs and values are reported
`in cnr 1• b All spectra were recorded with DMSO-de. The number in
`each entry is the chemical shift value (~) observed in ppm relative to
`DMSO-!fe, followed by the multiplicity of the signal and the coupDng
`constant in hertz. 1H NMR spectra were recorded at 300 MHz. c 13C
`NMR spectra were obtained at 75 MHz and the values referenced to
`DMSO-c:fe. d All spectra were recorded using FD-MS unless otherwise
`indicated. Molecular ions reported refer to either M+ or W + 1 ions.
`• The carbamate carbonyl carbon resonance was not detected. The
`attached NHC(O)O~ signal was observed at o 51.46. 'The carbamate
`carbonyl carbon resonance was not detected. The attached
`NHC(O)CeH5 signals were observed at o 121.70, 125.18, 129.30, and
`150.91. gThe thiocarbonyl carbon resonance was not detected. The
`attached NHC(S)NHQ-13 signal was observed at o 30.92. h The amide
`carbonyl resonance could not be readily assigned. Signals corre(cid:173)
`sponding to four carbonyl peaks were observed at o 167.85, 167.93,
`168.48, and 169.47. 'Value refers toW+ 1 ion observed by FAB(cid:173)
`MS. I Spectrum was not taken.
`
`employed as the immediate precursor for 2m and 2q, while
`2-acetamido-N-benzyl-2-(trimethylammonio)acetamide tetraflu(cid:173)
`oroborateS (2u) was utilized for the synthesis of2o and 2p. Finally,
`alkaline hydrolysis of 2o, followed by neutralization of the
`dipeptide by passage through an ion-exchange resin yielded 2r.
`Key spectral data (i.e., ffi, tH NMR, l:JC NMR, MS) observed
`for 2e-r are recorded in Table 2 and were consistent with both
`the proposed structures and previously reported trends.5
`Pharmacological Evaluation-The N-substituted a,a-di(cid:173)
`amino acid derivatives 2e-r were tested for anticonvulsant
`activity by using the procedures described by Krall et al.,9 which
`have become standard testing procedures for the Antiepileptic
`Drug Development Program of the Epilepsy Branch of the
`National Institutes of Health. All compounds were administered
`intraperitoneally (ip) to mice. Table llists the median effective
`dose (ED50) values required to prevent seizures in theMES test
`by racemic 2.. Inspection of the results revealed several important
`observations. First, most of the N-acyl substituted derivatives
`(2e-n) evaluated were inactive in theMES test at doses of 100
`mg/kg or less, and all were significantly less potent than 2c and
`2d. Only 2e and 2n displayed noticeable activity. One note(cid:173)
`worthy difference about the anticonvulsant effect of 2n is that
`it also produced neuromotor impairment on the HS test at the·
`same doses that blockedMES seizures. Thus. this anticonvulsant
`effect is qualitatively different than that previously seen with
`2c and 2d.5 These findings were of interest since the N-acyl
`
`derivatives 2e-n, unlike 2a-d, are not protonated at physiological
`pH values, thereby demonstrating that replacement of the basic
`C(a)-amino group in functionalized amino acids 2a-d by the
`neutral C(a) N-substituents in 2e-n did not lead to improved
`anticonvulsant activity. This observation was consistent with
`results previously obtained for two other N-acyl derivatives, 2,2-
`diacetamido-N-benzylacetamide (2v) and 2-acetamido-N-benzyl-
`2-(trifluoroacetamido)acetamide (2w).5 Both 2v and 2w did
`not prevent maximal electroshock seizures at doses of 100 mg
`or less. Of the two active N-acyl derivatives, 2n can also be
`viewed as a functionalized dipeptide as well as an N-acyl a,a(cid:173)
`diamino acid adduct. Previously, we prepared and evaluated
`functionalized dipeptides 3 and 4.11 These compounds differed
`
`w TH3 w w
`
`CH3CNH-cH-CNHCH~NHCH~h
`
`w w TH3 w
`
`CHaCNHCH2CNH-cH -CNHCH~h
`
`from 2o-r in that the two amino acid units were joined through
`an amide bond. Both 3 and 4 were inactive in both the maximal
`electroshock and subcutaneous pentylenetetrazole seizure test;s6.9
`when administered to mice at dose levels up to and including
`600 mg/kg.12
`
`Conclusions
`
`The composite data indicated that most structural modifi(cid:173)
`cations at the a-amino site in functionalized a,a-diamino acids
`led to a decrease in the anticonvulsant activity after intraperi(cid:173)
`toneal administration to mice when compared to the simple
`N-ethylamino adduct 2a,s while none of the compounds ap(cid:173)
`proached the superior activity observed for the N-hydroxylamino
`derivatives 2c and 2d. 5 These results documented that excellent
`protection against MES-induced sei2ures by 1 can be achieved
`by incorporation of a basic C(a)-amino substituent.
`
`References and Notes
`
`1. Katritzky, A. R; Urogdi, L.; Mayence, A. J. Chem. Soc .. Chem.
`Commun. 1989,337-338.
`2. Katritzky, A. R; Urogdi, L.; Mayence, A. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55,
`2206-2214.
`.
`3. Bock, M.G.; DiPardo, R M.; Freidinger, R M.J. Org. Chem.l986,
`51, 3718-3720.
`4. Fischer, B.; Hassner, A. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 5225-5229.
`5. Kohn, H.; Sawhney, K. N.; LeGall, P.; Robertson, D. W.; Leander,
`J. D. J. Med. Chem. 1991, 34, 2444-2452.
`6. Porter, R J.; Cereghin?, J. J.; G~dding, G. D.; Hessie, ~· J.;
`Kupferberg, H. J.; Scovllle, B.; White, B. G. Cleveland Clin. Q.
`1984, 51, 293-305.
`7. Kohn, H.; Sawhney, K. N.; LeGaJi P.; Conley, J. D.; Robertson,
`D. W.; Leander, J.D. J. Med. Chem. 1990, 33, 919-926.
`8. LeGall, P.; Sawhney, K. N.; Conley, J.D.; Kohn, H. Int. J. Pept.
`Protein Res. 1988, 32, 279-291.
`9. Krall,R.L.;Penry,J.K.;White,B.G.;Kupferberg,H.J..;Swinyard,
`E. A. Epilepsia 1978, 19, 409-428.
`10. Coughenour, L. L.; McLean, R R; Parker, R B. Pha.rmc.col.
`Biochem. Behau. 1917,6, 351-353.
`11. Anderson, G. W.; Zimmerman, J. E.; Callahan, F. ?.L J.Am. Chem..
`Soc.1967,89,5012-5017.
`12. Conley, J. D..; Kohn, H. J. Med. Chem.1981, 30, 567.:074.
`
`Acknowledgments
`
`We thank Dr. Dennis Zimmerman, Dennis Thompson, and H. Lawson
`(Lilly Research Laboratories) for theiussistance. · ·

`
`Jct.mal of Pbsrmaceutlcal S<:/enCBIJ/6t1·
`VoL 83. No. .s. May .1994
`
`IPR2014-01126- Exhibit 1026 p. 3

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket