throbber

`
`
`
`

`
`
`
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ew antiepileptic agents
`
`{Harold Kohn and Judith o. Conley
`
`is
`times as the ‘falling sickness‘.
`_ Epilepsy, known since ancient
`- characterised by convulsive seizures and momentary lapses of awareness
`.. or body function. The generic term cornesfrom the Greekfpiiepsia which
`means ‘to take hold of or seize’. Recent research suggeststhat 2 m people
`in the US and 500000 people in this country suffer with epilepsy. But,
`despite this, there has been little in the way of new drugs over the past
`decade to help epileptics lead a more normal life. This situation is now
`changing. The shortcomings of conventional drug therapy have spurred
`chemists to seek drugs that are safer, more potent and more effective than
`the existing medication. Functionalised amino acids are the latest in a
`series of potent new agents for the treatment of epilepsy.
`
`and phenobarbital ll‘ }—were discovered
`by Locock in 1857 and by Hauptmann in
`1912 respectively, by serendipity.
`The situation changed in ‘[926 with
`the discovery of the convulsive action of
`pentylenetetrazole and then in 1937
`Putman and Merrittdeveloped an eiectro-
`shock model for epilepsy whereby they
`screened around 70 compounds against
`electrically induced convulsions in cats.
`As a result of
`their work the anti-
`convulsant
`activity
`of
`5,5-diphenyI~
`hydantoin (phenytoin, Dilantinl [21 was
`established}? Phenytoin is still the most
`widely used anticonvulsant despite its
`serious side effects. In ‘I948 Goodrnann
`and his coworkers standardised the
`maximal electroshock seizure (MES) test
`and later introduced the subcutaneous
`pentylenetetrazole (Melrazo|l
`lsc Met}
`seizure threshold test.
`In the MES seizure test, animals are
`stimulated by using an alternating
`current applied through corneal elec-
`trodes for a short duration. Drugs with
`markedactivity bythistestarethoughtto
`prevent seizure spread and are likely to
`be effective in grandrnalseizures. The sc
`Met seizure test measures the ability of
`the anticonvulsant drug to protect against
`seizures induced by a subcutaneous
`injection of pentylenetetrazole. The dose
`used is the amount ofconvulsant required
`to cause seizures in 97 per cent of the
`animals
`tested. Drugs with marked
`activitybythistestarethoughttoelevate
`the seizure threshold and are likelyto be
`effective against petrt mar‘ seizures.‘
`These two tests are the most useful
`laboratory testsforscreening large num-
`bers of chemical compounds. In recent
`years, additional models for epileptic
`seizures have been advanced. These
`include inducing seizures by auditory
`stimulation,
`photostimulation,
`hyper-
`thermia, or
`introducing irritant sub-
`
`Epilepsy was recognised as a unique and
`terrible affliction as far back as the
`Babylonian times. Full clinical descrip-
`tions were first given around 4008C in
`the Hippocratic monograph On the sacred
`_ disease and later in the New Testament
`l {Mark 9:37). In the 19th century, major
`} and minor seizures became known as
`3 grand me! and petrr mar‘ respectively.‘
`3 The signs and symptoms depend on the
`1 motor, sensory autonomic and mental
`p functions ofthose regionsinthe brainin
`x which a neuronal discharge arises or to
`fl which it spreads.
`if the discharge is
`it
`violent, prolonged and ubiquitous, the
`maximal seizure of grand ma! develops
`characterised by a sudden fall with a
`tonic spasm {rigidity and stiffening of the
`_ bodylfollowed bycionic spasms [general-
`:
`. isedjerkinglwith the victim's skin some-
`_
`'3 times becoming blue. lf the discharge is
`5 limitedinstrength,varioussortsofrninor
`nu seizures occur. An essential feature of
`M grandrnalisthe abnormal ease by which
`:2; neuronal discharges spread from the
`at origin of excessive discharge to other
`4 areas of the brain. Perir mall is restricted
`
`1?til
`it
`
`I 9
`
`ei_I_ to brief, frequent attacks l5~‘l0Oper clay}
`3%‘. of
`impaired consciousness associated
`5: with staring and eyelid movements, and
`lOCC3SlDI"'|a”Y.
`loss of posture and arm
`fiqiajerks. No specific cause is known forpetft
`lime! and this disorder occurs most
`‘iiicommonly before puberty?
`
`S’aExperimenta| models
`gr.-r=ln the past, drug research was hindered
`5?‘g_by the lack of experimental models for
`Srgepileptic seizures. Not surprisingly, there-
`fore, the early history of treatment is
`mgmaved with failure. In fact some of the
`remedies tried, for example ashes of
`lviifasses‘ hooves,
`storl<‘s dung and the
`7”".-varm blood of a gladiator, probably made
`flygaatients Suffer more. The first anti-
`Hatonvulsant drugs—potassiurn bromide
`-CHEMISTRY IN BRITAIN MARCII 1983
`.n.‘-*-
`
`Development of antiepileptic agents
`With the discovery of new laboratory
`procedures to screen anticonvulsant
`compounds, an intense era of anti-
`epileptic drug development was initiated
`during the 1940s and 19509. Thousands
`of candidate agents were evaluated and
`a cluster of new antiepileptic drugs were
`introduced—-—two hydantoins lmepheny-
`toin {3} and ethotoin {4}}, a barbiturate
`lmetharbital i511, and a deoxybarbiturate
`{primidone {6}} were developed and
`marketed for the treatment of grandma!
`seizures and two oxazolinediones {para-
`rnethadione {7} and trimethadione {8}}
`were introduced for the control of pen"!
`ma! seizures? Similarly, several phenyl-
`succinimides [9] were found to prevent
`pentylenetetrazole-induced seizures and
`control peril ma! seizures.‘
`Progress in antiepilepticdrug research
`slowed down in the early 1950s. By this
`time it was reaiised that most of the
`drugs in use contained a modified ureide
`moietyl101ernbeddedwithintheirchemi-
`cal framework. This structural theme had
`been extensively developed, prompting
`some researchersto suggestthatfurther
`elaboration would probably not lead to an
`improved drug. Moreover, the search for
`new antiepileptic agents had failed to
`produce significant numbers ofnew lead
`compounds possessing novel structures.
`in the late 1960s research in anti-
`convuisant drug developmentwas stimu-
`lated by the creation of the Epilepsy
`Branch and the Epilepsy Advisory Com-
`mittee within the United States National
`
`Institute of Neurological and Communi-
`cative Disorders and Stroke lNINCDSl.
`Programmes were established to collate
`and review the neuroscience literature
`pertinent
`to epilepsy.
`to support con-
`trolled laboratory and clinical trials of
`drugs which needed proof of efficacy for
`marketing approval, and to screen large
`numbers of potentially new antican-
`vulsant
`agents. These programmes
`helped pave the way for the eventual
`introduction of three drugs. containing a
`novel
`structural moiety,
`for
`seizure
`management
`in the US. They were
`carbamazepine (Ill, an iminostiibene;
`clonazepam {I2}, a benzodiazepine; and
`vaiproic acid {I3}, a fatty acid. Both
`valproic acid and carbamazepine were
`already in use in Europe. Another benze-
`231
`
`stances to the experimental anirnalsfi
`
`|PR2014-01126-1019, p. 1
`
`VENNOOT, SANDOZ, SUN
`
`ACTAVIS, AMNEAL,
`AUROBINDO,
`BRECKENRIDGE,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`
`\. Ea'r_ly_fa'Itticon.vulsantdr1.tgs.
`
`:
`
`diazepine. clorazepate dipotassium (14).
`was also approved as an adjunctive drug
`for the treatment of epilepsy.’
`To date the most widely used anti-
`convulsants are phenytoin {Z}. pheno-
`barbital {I}, primidone {6} and carba-
`rnazepinelf 1}. However, they all promote
`adverse side-effects such as drowsiness.
`dizziness, nausea. swelling ol the gums
`and liverdamage. Some search began in
`the late 1970s for new drugs that are
`safer, more potent and more widely
`effective than the existing medications.
`As a result, many new chemical classes
`have been identified that possess anti-
`convulsant activity but are less toxic and
`theretore potentially safer than those
`currently in use. Notable examples”
`include
`2,3:4-,5-bis-0-(1-methyi~ethyl-
`ide ne)-,6—o-fructopyranose [15 l, 3-[3-(tri-
`fluoromethy|)phenoxy]-1—azetidinecarbox-
`amide
`{T6}.
`10,11-dihydro~5-rnethyI-
`5H-dibenzo[a,d]cycloheptene-5.1 0-imine
`ll’ 7], N-(2.6-dimethy|phenyll-p—amino-
`benzamide {I8} and more
`recently
`functionalised amino acid derivatives
`{I9}.
`
`Amino acids
`In the past amino acids and their
`derivatives were not considered as
`potential antiepileptic agents. probably
`because these polar compounds do not
`readily
`penetrate
`the
`blood—brain
`barrie r.‘° Despite this, several amino acid
`derivatives have recently been shown to
`be effective in preventing seizure. These
`include derivatives of alicyclic and aro-
`matic amino acids," phosphono deriva-
`tives of aliphatic amino acids,” N-
`ben2oyl-
`and N-phenylacetylglycine
`amides.“ and structural analogues of
`the inhibitory neurotransmitter, y-amino-
`butyric acid (GABA}.“‘ The endogenous
`neuropeptides. Met- and Leu-enkephalin,
`have
`also
`exhibited
`anticonvulsant
`activity in a variety of test animals and
`may play an important
`rate in the
`prevention of a static convulsive state or
`in the maintenance of normal brain
`function.“
`.
`.
`Our investigation of chemotherapeutic
`agents possessing CNS depressant and
`anticonvulsant
`activity suggested a
`common structural motif. Three lunc-
`tionalities were prevalent
`in many of
`these compounds:
`_
`I a vicinal diarnine linkage;
`0 an oxygen atom on the ethene chain
`bridging the two amino groups; and
`0 an aromatic ring one carbon removed
`from an amino residue."
`This empirical blueprint suggested to
`' us that tunctionalised amino acids and
`_ peptides U9} could provide a rich source
`of future arttiepileptic agents and this in
`fact led to our initial-discovery that N-
`acetyl~o.L—alanine-N-benzylamide . {Z0}
`. was an anticonvulsant
`in mice." ._To
`_ elucidate the scope of the anticonvulsant
`_j activity of (20), we did systematic struc—.
`tural variations. initially; at three sites in
`I19): the-ct"-mrhon [Fl1(R3}}.'-the_ amide
`-_ -substituent - {fit}, and the-' N-acyt group '
`_ {W}. in all cases, where appropriate. the
`-. .,°-'-‘-'.3°."’-"'."'3.“*$ .=.Wl‘-‘f9 5Y|‘|_1h35l$9_C_|.' -The; "
`'
`.132 2
`
`initial pharmacologicalstudieswere done
`' on mice through the Epilepsy Branch of
`the NJNCDS and later at the Eli Lilly
`Research Laboratories.
`-
`
`.
`
`aromatic rings. both ot which were one
`carbon removed from an amino residue.“
`We then went on to show that com-
`pounds (20-22) were comparable to
`phenobarbital {1} in the prevention 07
`electroshock-induced seizures in rnit-‘E
`_ and perhaps more sig niiica ntly were less
`toxic after injection and oral adminis-
`tration than phenytoin or phenobarbital.
`Moreover. these compounds displayed
`significantly different activity profiles
`compared to the conventional
`aflll‘
`epileptic agents when tested a93l"'51
`several chemical convulsants. r'e peflill‘
`enetetrazote, bicuculline, picrotoxin, and
`- strychnine, suggesting that these com-
`‘ pounds represented. a new irnputtani
`class of antioonvulsant agents.”
`-The activity at our functionalised amim '
`acid racemates coupled with the legal?"
`aw bi0l°9ica|_.si=ecifi=_:itY .07 mi"?
`p.2
` ' "' _*=='*.|'_=—,_'_~tI.S'1:”I'-"i'.'I1_~t. anrr»_t_I.N.MAP?.¢H 1”” '
`
`.
`
`.
`
`/
`
`
`
`-
`
`Our results for . analogues of (20)
`revealed several significant factors‘
`_
`I The principal biological activity of
`these compounds resided in their ability
`to prevent seizures in the MES test.
`I Stringent steric and electronic requi're— .
`mentsexistedinttslatboththea-carbon
`[Fl’lR3,l] and the amide substituents {R*l _
`for maximal activity.
`-
`. o I-lomologation of the at-carbon by as
`carbon atom to generate a 1.3-diamine
`linkage led to reduced CNS activity.
`- _. I Pronounced activity was observed for
`'
`7 N-acetyl-o,L»alanine-N—m—fiuorobenzyl-_-
`amide 121} and N-acetvt-_o.L-phenyI—- ..
`‘glycine-_N-benzylarnidel22} in addition to _
`_-
`-.
`{go}, of ngotegcmpaund{22} containstwo_ _;.:~
`"
`'
`"
`I"
`'
`"IPR2014-O1126- Exhibit 1019,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`!
`
`"
`
`#
`
`$
`
`!
`
`"
`
`"
`
`
`
`%
`
`$
`
`&
`
`'
`
`(
`
`)
`
`*
`
`)
`
`+
`
`"
`
`!
`
`"
`
`,
`
`
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`E5-7500 Kan
`590- Rep. e.c?r?'fi2‘?1J
`S
`Telex: 1 772132303
`leading manufactu
`
`
`_
`re
`andan eXpe"e”C9dDarttner
`
`Pharmaceur 3;
`
`SynthesisIntgrmgggtggunds
`CUSiOm S t
`~
`Vn heels and Development
`
`
`
`__'._f_I-u0¢_o_‘
`
`n
`
`"-‘-“"''..’.ef_-'-_“n'a'n'.a'o'-'.’o‘.'..'
`
`Acetylenedicarboxylic acid salts and esters
`
`Adenine-9-L3-D-Arabinofuranoside (Vidarabine)
`
`2-Amino-6-Chloropurine
`
`5-Bromo-2’-deoxyuridine [Broxuridine)
`
`Calcium Folinate (Leucovorin calcium), pure -
`
`Dacarbazine USP 21
`
`'
`
`2-Deoxycytidine
`
`2-Deoxy-d-ribose
`
`2-Deoxyuridine
`
`5-Fluorocyto-sine (Flucytosine) USP 21
`
`5-Fluoro-2’-Deoxyuridine (Floxuridine) USP 21
`
`5-Iodo-2’-Deoxycytidine
`
`5-Iodo-2’-Deoxyuridine (ldoxuridine) USP 21
`
`Methotrexate USP 21
`
`Thioacetic acid -
`
`B-Thymidine
`
`Trmuorothymidine
`
`Protected amino acids.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`!
`
`"
`
`#
`
`$
`
`!
`
`"
`
`"
`
`
`
`%
`
`$
`
`&
`
`'
`
`(
`
`)
`
`*
`
`)
`
`+
`
`"
`
`!
`
`"
`
`,
`
`-
`
`.
`
`/
`
`0
`
`

`
`'-Promisi.I_1g
`'a_n_ti_epileptic'drugcandidate?»-
`‘ .cH,oso',i_1
`
`Acknowledgements‘ We are gratetul to
`the Anticonvulsant Screening Project of
`the National Instiluteof Neurological and
`Communicative Disorders and Stroke
`ININCDS} and the Eli Lilly ‘Research
`Laboratories for kindly performing the
`pharmacological studies. We also thank
`Drs D. Robertson and D. Leander {Lilly}
`and J. Stables and H. Kupferberg
`{NlNCDS) for their comments.
`
`-
`I
`
`Harold Kohn is professor of chemistry in
`the department of chemr'stry. University
`of Houston, Houston. Texas 77004.
`Judith D. Conley is a researcher in the
`same department.
`
`
`
`
`._.——.—£‘:.—"T—u.-v-'.2;‘....-.—lC
`
`' i
`
`i
`
`'
`
`"i
`
`1 tr‘?! -
`
`acidlalntie lileptiedrugn
`
`1
`
`"
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`'
`
`5
`
`_
`
`tiocrl'tj'1a.-
`_ rrtnectsvs'irioexota'drugis'tlie
`-_£Ioseneededtoobseneto:ricmanife=rt:rrt'ionsi1't5u '-
`percent of the animals sr.-reertedvs the dose '
`equlrodtooroter:t50peroentotdreanirnaistested' .-
`
`.
`
`
`References
`1. B. J. Wilder. and J. Bruni, Seizure
`disorders.‘ a pharmacologicalapproach to
`treatment. NowYork: Haven. 1981.
`2. A. Spinks and W. S. Waring. Prog. Med.
`Chem., 1963. 3, 261.
`3. D. M. Woodbury, J. K. Penry and C. E.
`Pippenger, Anti}:-pHep1r'c drugs. 2nd Erin.
`New York: Raven, 1982.
`4. W.
`(J. Foye. Principles of medI'ci'nal
`chemistry. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger.
`1981.
`5. D. P. Purpura er al. Experirnentalmodels
`of epr'i'epsy—-a 'manual for the laboratory
`worker. New York: Raven, 1972.
`G. Chen and R, Portman, J. Pharmacol.
`Exp. Ther., 1951, 103. 54.
`Ft. J. Porter et all Cleveland C!r'n. 0..
`1 984, 51 , 293.
`Ft. Dagani, Chem. Eng. News. 1986. 54.
`23.
`£lI.2l;.9C|ark eral, J Med Chernt. 1985, 23.
`10. P. S. Callery at at‘. J. Neurochem.. 1932.
`38,1063. -
`based substrates prompted us to examine
`11. A. M. Crider et aL J. Pharm. Scr'..1934-
`73, 1612; A. J. Belt: and A. A. Larson.
`whether the observed activity resided in
`Eur. J. Pharmacai, 1935. 114, 181. U.
`a single enantiomer. Surprisingly. pre-
`Ere: or an‘, Eur. J. Pharmacol'., 1985, 1 10.
`31 .
`vious pharmacological differentiation of
`12. M. J. Croucher. J. E. Collins and B. S.
`enantiomeric antiepileptic agents had
`Meldrum. Science, 1 982. 21 6, 899; LA.
`proved to be largely unsuccessful. Most
`Cates et at J. Pharm. Sci, 1984, 73.
`currently used drugs are not chiral, eg
`1550.
`Conclusions
`phenytoin {2}, valproic acid {13} and
`13. T. Takahashi erai. Swr'sspatent393355.
`phenobarbital {I l. But in those instances
`October 30, 1965; D. E. Thorrte, Us
`The pharmacological profiles exhibited
`paterrt3657341', April 13, 1972.
`‘_
`by functionalised oi.-amino acid deriva-
`where a single chiral centre exists,
`14. P. Krogsgaard-Larsen. J. Scheel-Kruger
`tives estahlishes that this class of com-
`. anticonvulsant
`activity
`is
`typically
`and H. Kofod, GABA-neurorransmmers.
`observed for both stereoisorners. with
`pounds is worthy of further detailed
`pharmacochemical.
`biochemical.
`and
`one of the two enantiorners exhibiting
`inspection. The specific activities of
`pharmacological aspects. New York:
`Academic, 1979; S. J. Enna. Biachent
`these compounds in the MES, sc Met.
`only marginally enhanced activity. For
`Pharmacol,
`1981." 30, 907;
`J.
`P-
`example. Nirvanol
`(23) displays the
`- and toxicity tests can be independently
`Chambon er at Arzneim. -Forsi:h., 1984.
`largest pharmacological differentiation
`modulated by altering the substitution
`34.1017.
`_
`15. F. C. Tortella and A. Cowan. Life Sci-
`in activity in animal studies for its two
`pattern at the at-carbon atom, the N—acyI,
`1982.31,2225.
`'
`' enantiomers. The {R}-stereoisomer is 3.8
`and the N-amido moieties. The pharma-
`- 16. Other models have been proposed. F0‘
`times more potent than the {S}-isomer
`cological evaluation of the individual
`a comprehensive discussion as ml‘
`enantiomersof[20}andl22lshowedthat
`_ against seizures induced by electroshock‘
`as
`review, see: A. Carnerman and
`in mice.” In other cases, enantiomeric
`N. Cartterrnan in Antfepfleptfc drt-lg‘-3’
`the anticortvulsant
`activity observed
`_ mechanism of action; G. H. Glaser Bf 3’
`discrimination is considerably less.”
`resided primarily in the o-stereoisomers
`(eds). p223. New York: Haven. 19393
`However. in our most potent amino
`and represents the greatest pharma-
`M. G. Wong. J- A- Define and P. 4-
`_ acid derivatives. I20} and B2}. we found
`'
`.
`cological stereochemical differentiation -.
`Andrews. J. Med. Chem., 1 986, 29. 562-
`' 17. S. Cortes er al, J. Med. Chem, 1985. 23-
`reported to date among antiepileptic
`_ that the o-stereoisomers were over to
`601.
`times more effective in the MES test than
`agents possessing a single chiral centre.
`-- 18. .J. D-Conle-{and H. Kohrt, J. Med. Chem-
`the corresponding L—enantiorners when
`These observations may provide the first '
`1987, 30. 537.
`-
`injected in mice. Differentiation between -
`important step for the identification oi a -
`19. E. A. Andrews and L C. Marluflnesthe-'v"
`iolaml. 1982, 57. 314.‘
`'___the two stereoisomers of (20) was "
`- potential receptor site for this series of
`20. D. T. Witiak e!‘ at J. Med. Chem. 1975.
`": further magnified {1 3.1 times} when the
`amino- acid anticonvulsants.
`lnvesti'- '
`.-
`_ 19. .1419; L Turski, s. s. Meldrum and
`drugs were given oraliy. All compounds
`_
`' gations currently in progress are aimed.
`J. F. Collins, Brain Res". 1985. 335. 1523
`1 "tested were less toxic after oral adrninis- '
`. P. V. Taberner and F. Roberts. Eur. J.
`at elucidating the generality-o_f these ;_ __
`
`Pharmatcofi, 1978. 52. 231.‘ O. Goldbefil
`-
`- observations as well as determir_:in'g the ‘
`-' andv. l. Teichberg.J. Med. Chem..1_985.
`mode at action of these new medicinal
`-'
`._ 23,1957.
`'
`--
`-
`—
`'-agents} including the origin of the
`. 2.1. J. D. Conley and H. l(ohn, un'publisl’I°5
`. results: H. Kuhn. .1. o. Conley and J. D.
`observed higlt-ertatttiospecificity in this :_-
`
`SySteI'l1_
`.
`..
`l.aamler.Br_a:'rr Res. submitted.
`;
`__
`. "
`'. IPR2014-01126- Exhibit 1019, p. 4
`c;ii'm_i.«.-i_iin«'ti~i entrain riuiisii
`
`E-99°!‘-19‘
`
`.
`
`,
`
`..
`'
`
`-
`__
`
`-
`
`.
`
`/
`
`#
`
`"- 5°
`
`'
`
`'
`
`'
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`!
`
`"
`
`#
`
`$
`
`!
`
`"
`
`"
`
`
`
`%
`
`$
`
`&
`
`'
`
`(
`
`)
`
`*
`
`)
`
`+
`
`"
`
`!
`
`"
`
`.
`
`
`
`tration than after intraperitoneal injec-
`tion. Significantly, the low toxicity of the
`D-isomers as well as the racemates
`contributed to their
`large protective
`indices* {Pl}, which approached that of
`phenytoinfi‘

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket