throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`Paper 71
`Entered: December 10, 2015
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`
`ZHONGSHAN BROAD OCEAN MOTOR CO., LTD.,
`BROAD OCEAN MOTOR LLC, and
`BROAD OCEAN TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`NIDEC MOTOR CORPORATION,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2014-011211
`Patent 7,626,349 B2
`
`____________
`
`
`
`
`
`Before BENJAMIN D. M. WOOD, JAMES A. TARTAL, and
`PATRICK M. BOUCHER, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`BOUCHER, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of the Proceeding
`37 C.F.R. §§ 42.5, 42.121
`
`
`
`1 Case IPR2015-00762 has been joined with this proceeding.
`
`

`
`IPR2014-01121
`Patent 7,626,349 B2
`
`
`
`On December 10, 2015, a conference call was held with the parties,
`
`initiated by Patent Owner to comply with the requirement of conferring with
`
`the Board prior to filing a Motion to Amend.
`
`Entry of proposed substitute claims is not automatic, but only upon
`
`Patent Owner demonstrating the patentability of each proposed substitute
`
`claim. See 37 C.F.R. § 42.20(c). The Motion to Amend (1) may propose
`
`substitute claims that only narrow, not broaden, the scope of a claim; (2)
`
`may propose a reasonable number of substitute claims; and (3) should
`
`respond to a ground of unpatentability in the trial. 37 C.F.R. § 42.121(a)(3).
`
`Guidance regarding the mechanics and substance of motions to amend
`
`appears in Idle Free Systems, Inc. v. Bergstrom, Inc., IPR2012-00027
`
`(PTAB June 11, 2013) (Paper 26), as well as MasterImage 3D, Inc. v. RealD
`
`Inc., IPR2015-00040 (PTAB July 15, 2015) (Paper 42). The latter paper
`
`clarifies certain guidance provided in the former. We also directed the
`
`parties to the Federal Circuit’s recent decision in Prolitec, Inc. v. Scentair
`
`Techs., Inc., --- F.3d ---, 2015 WL 7873637 (Fed. Cir. 2015).
`
`Patent Owner explained that it intends to file a conditional Motion to
`
`Amend the three challenged independent claims of the subject patent. Patent
`
`Owner further confirmed that such amendment will be responsive to the
`
`Hideji ground added to this proceeding on October 5, 2015. Paper 67. In
`
`light of Patent Owner’s intention to file a Motion to Amend, some
`
`modification of the Supplemental Scheduling Order (Paper 70) may be
`
`warranted. The parties will confer to discuss stipulation of an adjustment to
`
`2
`
`

`
`IPR2014-01121
`Patent 7,626,349 B2
`
`
`
`the schedule with respect to DUE DATES 3 and/or 4, as authorized by the
`
`Supplemental Scheduling Order. Paper 70, 2.
`
`The Motion to Amend should demonstrate that each proposed
`
`substitute claim is supported by the written description of the application
`
`upon which the substitute claims rely, and should address the patentability of
`
`each proposed substitute claim over the prior art of record and the prior art
`
`known to Patent Owner, accounting for the basic knowledge and skill
`
`possessed by a person of ordinary skill in the art, even without reliance on
`
`any particular prior-art reference. See 37 C.F.R. § 42.121(b). Although the
`
`Motion to Amend should thus address the prior art involved in the
`
`proceeding before the addition of the Hideji ground, the Motion to Amend is
`
`not to be used as an opportunity to reargue positions as earlier developed
`
`with respect to that prior art. Further, the Motion to Amend should include
`
`claim constructions for any new term used in a proposed substitute claim
`
`where the meaning of such terms reasonably can be anticipated to be
`
`disputed. The plain and ordinary meaning of terms should be provided in
`
`the Motion, together with the supporting evidence.
`
`
`
`It is
`
`ORDERED that Patent Owner has satisfied the requirement of
`
`conferring with the Board prior to filing a Motion to Amend under 37 C.F.R.
`
`§ 42.121(a).
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`
`IPR2014-01121
`Patent 7,626,349 B2
`
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Steven Meyer
`ptopatentcommunication@lockelord.com
`
`Charles Baker
`cbaker@lockelord.com
`
`Joseph Farco
`JFarco@lockelord.com
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Scott Brown
`jcrawford@hoveywilliams.com
`
`Matthew Walters
`mwalters@hoveywilliams.com
`
`
`
`
`
`4

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket