throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`ZHONGSHAN BROAD OCEAN MOTOR CO., LTD.
`Petitioner
`
`NIDEC MOTOR CORPORATION
`
`Patent Owner
`
`Case IPR2014—01 121
`
`Patent 7,626,349
`
`PETITIONER’S MOTION TO SUBMIT A CORRECTED
`
`EXHIBIT AND MAINTAIN FILING DATE
`
`PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. §42.104(c)
`
`NY 7"/'6545v.!
`
`

`

`I.
`
`STATEMENT OF PRECISE RELIEF REQUESTED
`
`Petitioner moves to (1) submit a corrected Exhibit 1005 (an English
`
`translation of Japanese Patent Publication JP 2003348885 which includes an
`
`affidavit attesting to the accuracy of the English translation and is provided
`
`herewith);
`
`(2) expunge the version of Exhibit 1005 currently on file; and
`
`(3) maintain the July 3, 2014 filing date.
`
`II.
`
`STATEMENT OF MATERIAL FACTS
`
`1.
`
`On September 25, 2013, Patent Owner Nidec Motor Corporation filed
`
`the patent infringement suit, Nidec Motor Corporation 12. Broad Ocean Motor LLC
`
`er a[., Civil Action No. 4:13—CV—0l895—JCH (E.D. M0.) (the “Litigation”) which
`
`asserted US. Patent No. 7,626,349 (EX. 1001) against Petitioner.
`
`2.
`
`As part of developing its defenses against the Litigation, Petitioner
`
`identified Japanese Patent Publication JP 2003—348885 and obtained an English
`
`translation thereofi 3 Ex. 1012, Rees Declaration at 115.
`
`3.
`
`On July 3, 2014, Petitioner filed a petition for inter partes review of
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,626,349.
`
`The Petition identified Nathan J. Rees
`
`(Reg.
`
`No. 63,820) as Lead Counsel and Daniel A. Prati (Reg. No. 65,869) as Back—Up
`
`Counsel. fie Paper No. 1 at p. 2.
`
`4.
`
`Along with its petition, Petitioner submitted Exhibit 1003 (JP 2003-
`
`348885 in Japanese), Exhibit 1004 (an English Abstract of JP 2003-34885), and
`
`NY 776545v.l
`
`1
`
`

`

`Exhibit 1005 (an English translation of JP 2003648885). Then Lead Counsel
`
`Rees intended to file an attesting affidavit with the translation. Ex. 1012, Rees
`
`Decl. at 116. The failure to do so was unintentional and inadvertent. Ex. 1012,
`
`Rees Decl. at 1114.
`
`5.
`
`The English language translation of JP 2003 -348885 was obtained by
`
`Petitioner’s litigation counsel Charles S. Baker in furtherance of Petitioner’s
`
`defense of the Litigation. Because the English translation of JP 2003-348 885 was
`
`obtained for use in the Litigation,
`
`then Lead Counsel Rees assumed that an
`
`affidavit attesting to the accuracy of the translation had been obtained from the
`
`translator at the time of translation and had been included as part of Exhibit 1005.
`
`E Ex. 1012, Rees Decl. at $16.
`
`6.
`
`On July 25, 2014, the Patent Office issued the Notice Of Filing Date
`
`Accorded To Petition which identified, as a defect, that the Exhibits lacked a label
`
`with the petitioner’s name and exhibit number. flee Paper No. 4 at p. 2.
`
`7.
`
`I On July 28, 2014, Petitioner filed its Response To Notice Of Filing
`
`Date Accorded To Petition, and therein noted tha
`
`“the first page of each
`
`[corrected] Exhibit has been labeled with the Petitioner’s name and Exhibit number
`
`in accordance With the Notice.” E Paper No. 6 at p. 2.
`
`8.
`
`During the course of placing the label on the first page of
`
`Exhibit 1005, then Lead Counsel Rees did not notice that an affidavit attesting to
`
`NY 776545v.1
`
`2
`
`

`

`the accuracy of the English translation of JP 2003 -3 488 85 was not included as the
`
`last page of Exhibit 1005.
`
`_S,_e5_: EX. 1012, Rees Decl. at W10-11. This oversight
`
`Was also unintentional and inadvertent.
`
`fie-,e_ Ex. 1012, Rees Decl. at 1114.
`
`9.
`
`On July 31, 2014, the Patent Office accepted the corrected petition
`
`filed on July 28, 2014. §e_e_ Paper No. 8.
`
`10.
`
`On October 3, 2014, Petitioner moved to have Messrs. Reesand Prati
`
`of Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P. withdrawn as its counsel in this proceeding. E
`
`Paper No. 9. Petitioner is now represented in this proceeding by Steven F. Meyer
`
`(Reg. No. 36,513) and Charles S. Baker (pro hac vice) of Locke Lord LLP as lead
`
`counsel and back-up counsel, respectively.
`
`§_e_e_: Paper No. 15. Messrs. Rees and
`
`Prati are not associated with Locke Lord LLP. §e_e EX. 1012, Rees Decl. at 112.
`
`11.
`
`In its Preliminary Response filed on October 24, 2014, the Patent
`
`Owner argued that Exhibit 1005 did not satisfy the requirements of 37 C.F.R.
`
`§42.63(b) because there was no attesting affidavit accompanying the English
`
`translation of JP 2003—348885.
`
`12. Unable to locate an attesting affidavit, replacement Lead Counsel
`
`Meyer arranged to obtain the attached affidavit from the translator who prepared
`
`the English translation of JP 2003~348885 that was filed with the original petition
`
`on July 3, 2014 as Exhibit 1005.
`
`NY 776545v.1
`
`3
`
`

`

`III. DISCUSSION
`
`Section 42.104(c) permits the correction of clerical errors Without changing
`
`the filing date of the petition. E 37 C.F.R. §42.104(c). Because 37 C.F.R.
`
`§42.104(c)
`
`is remedial
`
`in nature,
`
`it
`
`is entitled to a “liberal
`
`interpretation”.
`
`Syntroleum Corp. v. Neste Oil Oyj, 1PR2013—00178, Paper No.21 (Decision --
`
`Motion to Correct Petition) at p. 4. For instance,
`
`in Arthrex, Inc. v. Bonutti
`
`Skeletal Innovations, LLC, IPR2013—0063 1, Paper No. 15 (Decision), the petitioner
`
`was allowed to correct its petition by filing two originally omitted foreign language
`
`patents, which is a more substantive omission than that presented here.
`
`Petitioner
`
`submits
`
`that
`
`the omission of an attesting affidavit
`
`from
`
`Exhibit 1005 as originally filed on July 3, 2014 was a clerical error that
`correctable under 37 C.F.R. §42.104(c).
`The error arose when counsel
`
`is
`for
`
`Petitioner believed that an attesting affidavit had been obtained for evidentiary
`
`purposes in the Litigation and had been included at the end of Exhibit 1005. gee
`
`Ex. 1012, Rees Decl. at 116. Counsel for Petitioner at that time was unaware that no
`
`such attesting affidavit had been included with Exhibit 1005. E Ex. 1012, Rees
`
`Decl. at 1114.
`
`This clerical error was not noticed when a corrected version of Exhibit 1005
`
`was filed on July 28, 2014. E EX. 1012, Rees Decl. at 1110-11. The correction
`
`to Exhibit 1005 was limited to placing a label with the Petitioner’s name and
`
`NY 776545v.1
`
`4
`
`

`

`Exhibit numberion the first page of Exhibit 1005. E Paper No. 6 at p. 2. There
`
`was no separate, independent review of the entirety of Exhibit 1005 undertaken at
`that time. Exhibit 1005 was merely refiled with a new label on its first page.
`
`This clerical error had no effect on Patent OWner’s ability to file a
`
`Preliminary Response, which it did on October 24, 2014. Q. 77 Fed. Reg. 48680,
`
`48699 (Aug. 14, 2012). Patent Owner has not been prejudiced by the omission of
`
`an attesting affidavit. The substance of the English translation is not being
`
`corrected in any Way nor has Patent Owner alleged that the English translation
`
`submitted by Exhibit 1005 is inaccurate. Because Exhibit 1003 presented JP 2003-
`
`348885 itself (in Japanese), Patent Owner could have obtained its own English
`
`translation which would be necessary in order to identify any alleged error in
`
`Petitioner’s translation. In the event that a trial is instituted, Patent Owner can then
`
`object to the admissibility of the English translation for unreliability on the basis of
`
`any alleged errors in the transiation. E 37 C.F .R. §42.64(b)(1).
`
`IV.
`
`CONCLUSION
`
`Petitioner requests that its Motion To Submit A Corrected Exhibit And
`
`Maintain Filing Date Pursuant To 37 C.F.R. §42.104(c) be granted.
`
`Dated: November 10, 2014
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/ Steven F. Meyer /
`Steven F. Meyer (Reg. No. 35,613)
`Counsel for Petitioner
`
`NY 776545v.l
`
`5
`
`

`

`ATTACHMENT TO MOTION
`
`AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING TO ACCURACY
`OF THE ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF
`
`JP 2003648885
`
`NY 77654-5v.I
`
`

`

`It
`
`If
`
`
`
`Verification
`
`I, Nam Z/7/61’!/\
`
`, being fluent in both the Japanese and English languages,"
`
`hereby certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that
`
`JP2003~348885,. and
`Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication No.
`the atfached English language translation thereof, are accurate and conqfilete
`
`renditions of each other, understand1'ng that willful false statelncnts and the like are
`
`punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both (18 U.S.C. §1001).
`
`L73?’
`
`ex?
`
`\*cl'
`
`Signature
`
`.
`
`Executed this.
`
`38
`
`dayof
`
`05$.
`
`M, 2014,
`
`

`

`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §42.6(e) and 37 C.F.R. §42.lO5(b), the undersigned
`hereby certifies that on November 10, 2014, a complete and entire copy of the
`foregoing Petitioner’s Motion To Submit A Corrected Exhibit And Maintain Filing
`Date Pursuant To
`37 CPR.
`§42.104(c)
`and attached Declaration were
`electronically served in their entirety on the Patent Owner of record (as agreed
`upon by counsel) at sbroWn@hoveywilIiams.com, mwalters@hoveywilliams.coin,
`and 1itigation@hoveywilliams.com.
`
`the undersigned certifies that on November 10, 2014, a
`Additionally,
`complete and entire copy of the foregoing Petitioner's Motion To Submit A
`Corrected Exhibit And Maintain Filing Date Pursuant To 37 C.F.R. §42.104(c) and
`attached Declaration were electronically served on the Patent Owner’s below-listed
`counsel
`of
`record
`at
`jschwent@thompsoncoburn.com,
`djinkir1s@
`tl1OII1pSOI1C0lI)1.1l'I1.COII1,
`and syoo@thompsoncoburn.com,
`in
`the
`co~pending
`litigation Nidec Motor Corporation v. Broad Ocean Motor LLC et al., Civil Action
`No. 4:13-CV-01895-JCH (E.D. M0,), as agreed upon by the parties.
`
`Dated: November 10, 2014
`
`/ Steven F. Meyer /
`Steven F. Meyer (Reg. No. 35,613)
`LOCKE LORD LLP
`
`Three World Financial Center
`
`New York, New York 10281-2101
`(212) 415-8535
`sn1eyer@1ockelord.com
`
`Attorneys for Petitioner Zhongshan
`Broad Ocean Motor Co., Ltd. ;
`
`Broad Ocean Motor LLC; and
`
`Broad Ocean Technologies, LLC
`
`NY 776545v.1
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket