throbber
2006 to Present
`
`
`
`1994 -2006
`
`Ivan T. Hofmann, C.P.A., C.F.F., C.L.P.
`Curriculum Vitae
`
`
`
`Professional History
`
`Gleason IP, a division of Gleason & Associates, P.C. – Managing Director/Shareholder
`
`Ivan Hofmann is a managing director and shareholder at Gleason IP. He has years of professional experience
`with a deep specialization in complex intellectual property matters. Mr. Hofmann's IP expertise includes
`extensive litigation support and testifying experience in quantifying financial damages related to patent
`infringement and other intellectual property issues, as well as breach of contract claims, class action law suits and
`other litigation-related matters. His experience includes using statistical, financial, and economic analysis and
`models related to various technical issues. He provides value-added services in all phases of litigation in various
`capacities, including assistance with discovery, depositions, expert opinions, and testimony during trial.
`
`Mr. Hofmann's experience with intellectual property matters includes false advertising cases, theft of trade
`secrets, and trademark infringement matters. He has performed analysis of irreparable harm in preliminary
`injunction hearings and regularly performs analysis of commercial success in connection with secondary
`considerations of nonobviousness. Mr. Hofmann has experience with intellectual property issues in numerous
`industries, including extensive experience in the pharmaceutical industry.
`
`As a Certified Licensing Professional (CLP), Mr. Hofmann has demonstrated knowledge and experience in
`analyzing license agreements and royalty terms. He assists companies in licensing negotiations with economic
`analysis in licensing agreements. He also has performed royalty audits on behalf of universities and corporations.
`Mr. Hofmann’s extensive knowledge of licensing is useful in his analysis of reasonable royalties in patent
`infringement cases.
`
`Also, Mr. Hofmann has experience in the areas of accounting, auditing, forensic accounting, fraud investigations
`and due diligence work. He has been involved in matters in state and federal courts, as well as domestic and
`international arbitration and other forums for dispute resolution. His experience includes matters with public and
`private companies in a broad range of industries including pharmaceuticals, communications, health care,
`manufacturing, retail, oil and gas, coal, utilities, land development, hospitality, and others.
`
`Deloitte & Touche LLP – Senior Manager
`
`Mr. Hofmann was a senior manager with the global firm of Deloitte & Touche LLP in the Forensic and Dispute
`Services and Assurance and Advisory services departments. He served numerous clients in various industries
`ranging in size from small, privately held companies to large, multi-national Fortune 500 companies.
`
`Education and Certification
`
`Bachelor of Business Administration, double major in Accounting and Economics, Magna Cum Laude,
` University of Notre Dame, 1994
`Certified Public Accountant, Pennsylvania 1996
`Certified in Financial Forensics, 2008
`Certified Licensing Professional 2010
`
`Professional and Business Affiliations
`
`American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, Member
`Pennsylvania Institute of Certified Public Accountants, Member
`Licensing Executives Society, Member
`
`Civic Affiliations
`
`Notre Dame Club of Pittsburgh
`
`
`
`
`Gleason IP, a division of Gleason & Associates, P.C. One Gateway Center, Suite 525 420 Fort Duquesne Boulevard Pittsburgh, PA 15222
`
`BOM Exhibit 1019
`BOM v. Nidec
`IPR2014-01121
`
`1
`
`

`
`
`Ivan T. Hofmann CPA/CFF, CLP
`Cases in which Mr. Hofmann has testified
`at deposition or at trial in the past four years.
`
`LIST OF CASES PURSUANT TO 26(a)(2)(B)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Roxane Laboratories, Inc. – United States District Court for the
`District of New Jersey, 2015 (Deposition)
`
`Apotex Corp. v. ViiV Healthcare Co. and ViiV Healthcare UK LTD. – United States Patent Trial
`and Appeal Board, 2015 (Deposition, Declaration)
`
`Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Roxane Laboratories, Inc. (13-cv-03288), Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc.
`v. Ranbaxy Laboratories LTD., Ranbaxy Inc. and Ranbaxy Pharmaceuticals Inc. (13-cv-04343),
`Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Ranbaxy Laboratories LTD., Ranbaxy Inc., and Ranbaxy
`Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (13-cv-08597), Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Grunenthal GmBH v. Teva
`Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. and Barr Laboratories, Inc. (13-cv-08060), Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc.
`and Grunenthal GmBH v. Impax Laboratories, Inc. and Thorx Laboratories, Inc. (12-cv-8317), Endo
`Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Grunenthal GmBH v. Impax Laboratories, Inc. (13-cv-435), Endo
`Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Actavis Inc. and Actavis South Atlantic LLC (12-cv-8985), Endo
`Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Grunenthal GmBH v. Actavis Inc., Actavis South Atlantic, LLC and
`Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (13-cv-0436 ), and Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Grunenthal GmBH
`v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLC and Amneal Pharmaceuticals of New York, LLC (12-cv-8115) –
`United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, 2015 (Trial)
`
`Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. v. Alembic Pharmaceuticals Limited, Alembic Limited, Alembic
`Global Holdings SA, and Alembic Pharmaceuticals Inc. – United States District Court for the
`District of New Jersey, 2015 (Temporary Restraining Order Hearing)
`
`Kangaroo Media, Inc. and Immersion Entertainment, LLC v. YinzCam, Inc. – United States District
`Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, 2015 (Deposition)
`
`Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Roxane Laboratories, Inc. (13-cv-03288), Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc.
`v. Ranbaxy Laboratories LTD., Ranbaxy Inc. and Ranbaxy Pharmaceuticals Inc. (13-cv-04343),
`Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Ranbaxy Laboratories LTD., Ranbaxy Inc., and Ranbaxy
`Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (13-cv-08597), Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Grunenthal GmBH v. Teva
`Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. and Barr Laboratories, Inc. (13-cv-08060), Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc.
`and Grunenthal GmBH v. Impax Laboratories, Inc. and Thorx Laboratories, Inc. (12-cv-8317), Endo
`Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Grunenthal GmBH v. Impax Laboratories, Inc. (13-cv-435), and Endo
`Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Grunenthal GmBH v. Sandoz Inc. (12-cv-8318) – United States District
`Court for the Southern District of New York, 2015 (Deposition)
`
`Intendis GmBH, Intraserv GmBH & Co. KG, and Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v.
`Glenmark Generics Limited and Glenmark Generics, Inc. USA – United States District Court for the
`District of Delaware, 2015 (Trial)
`
`1
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`
`Ivan T. Hofmann CPA/CFF, CLP
`Cases which Mr. Hofmann has testified at
`deposition or at trial in the past four years.
`
`LIST OF CASES PURSUANT TO 26(a)(2)(B)
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`Shire Development LLC, Shire Pharmaceutical Development Inc., Cosmo Technologies Limited,
`and Nogra Pharma Limited, v. Cadila Healthcare Limited (d/b/a Zydus Cadila) and Zydus
`Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc. – United States District Court for the District of Delaware, 2014
`(Deposition)
`
`Millenium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Accord Healthcare, Inc., Actavis LLC f/k/a Actavis Inc., and
`Sandoz, Inc. – United States District Court for the District of Delaware, 2014 (Trial)
`
`Merck Eprova AG v. Gnosis S.P.A. and Gnosis Bioresearch S.A. – United States District Court for
`the Southern District of New York, 2014 (Declaration)
`
`Intendis GmBH, Intraserv GmBH & Co. KG, and Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v.
`Glenmark Generics Limited and Glenmark Generics, Inc. USA – United States District Court for the
`District of Delaware, 2014 (Deposition)
`
`Laboratorios Silanes, S.A. De C.V., Instituto Bioclon, S.A. De C.V. and Rare Disease Therapeutics,
`Inc. v. BTG International, Inc. – United States Patent Trial and Appeal Board, 2014 (Declaration)
`
`Millenium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Accord Healthcare, Inc., Actavis LLC f/k/a Actavis Inc., and
`Sandoz, Inc. – United States District Court for the District of Delaware, 2014 (Deposition)
`
`Pfizer, Inc., Wyeth, LLC, Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc., PF Prism, CV v. Apotex, Inc., Apotex Corp.,
`Breckenridge Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Alembic Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Lupin LTD, Lupin
`Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Mylan, Inc., Roxane Laboratories, Inc., Sandoz,
`Inc., Watson Laboratories, Inc. Florida, Wockhardt LTD., Wockhardt USA, LLC, Zydus
`Pharmaceuticals (USA), LLC, and Cadila Healthcare Limited – United States District Court for the
`District of Delaware, 2014 (Deposition)
`
`Apotex, Inc. and Apotex Corp. vs. Acorda Therapeutics, Inc. – United States District Court for the
`Southern District of New York, 2014 (Deposition)
`
`Drawbridge Special Opportunities Fund LP and Fortress Value Recovery Fund I LLC f/k/a D.B.
`Zwirn Special Opportunities Fund, L.P. v. PRC Williston LLC – In the Court of Chancery of the
`State of Delaware, 2014 (Preliminary Injunction Hearing, Deposition)
`
`Shire LLC, Shire Development, Inc., and Shire Development, LLC v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals,
`LLC, Roxane Laboratories, Inc., Sandoz, Inc., Mylan, Inc., Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Actavis,
`Inc., Actavis, LLC, Actavis Elizabeth LLC, Johnson Matthey, Inc., and Johnson Matthey
`Pharmaceuticals Materials – United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, 2014
`(Deposition)
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`
`Ivan T. Hofmann CPA/CFF, CLP
`Cases which Mr. Hofmann has testified at
`deposition or at trial in the past four years.
`
`LIST OF CASES PURSUANT TO 26(a)(2)(B)
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`Gnosis S.P.A., Gnosis Bioresearch S.A., and Gnosis U.S.A., Inc. v. South Alabama Medical Science
`Foundation and Gnosis S.P.A., Gnosis Bioresearch S.A., and Gnosis U.S.A., Inc. v. Merck & Cie –
`United States Patent Trial and Appeal Board, 2013 (Deposition)
`
`Warner Chilcott Company, LLC v. Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc. and Cadila Healthcare
`Limited (d/b/a Cadila Healthcare) – United States District Court for the District of Delaware, 2013
`(Deposition)
`
`Genentech, Inc. and Roche Palo Alto, LLC v. Sandoz, Inc. – United States District Court for the
`Northern District of California, San Francisco, 2013 (Deposition)
`
`Genentech, Inc. and Roche Palo Alto, LLC v. Apotex, Inc. – United States District Court for the
`Northern District of California, San Francisco, 2013 (Deposition)
`
`Grant Street Group, Inc. v. RealAuction.com, LLC – United States District Court for the Western
`District of Pennsylvania, 2013 (Trial)
`
`The Medicines Company v. Mylan, Inc., Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Bioniche Pharma USA,
`LLC, United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, 2013 (Deposition)
`
`Sloan Valve Company v. Zurn Industries, Inc. and Zurn Industries, LLC – United States District
`Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, 2013 (Deposition)
`
`Medicis Pharmaceutical Corporation and Dow Pharmaceutical Sciences, Inc. v. Actavis Mid
`Atlantic, LLC – United States District Court for the District of Delaware, 2013 (Deposition)
`
`Medicis Pharmaceutical Corporation v. Actavis Mid Atlantic, LLC and Actavis, Inc. – Superior
`Court of Arizona, County of Maricopa, 2012 (Deposition)
`
`Shire Development Inc., Shire Pharmaceutical Development Inc., Cosmo Technologies Limited, and
`Giuliani International Limited, v. Cadila Healthcare Limited (d/b/a Zydus Cadila) and Zydus
`Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc. – United States District Court for the District of Delaware, 2012
`(Deposition)
`
`Medicis Pharmaceutical Corporation v. Actavis Mid Atlantic, LLC and Actavis, Inc. – Superior
`Court of Arizona, County of Maricopa, 2012 (Temporary Restraining Order Hearing)
`
`Sciele Pharma, Inc., Andrx Corporation, Andrx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (N/K/A Watson Laboratories,
`Inc.-Florida), Andrx Pharmaceuticals, L.L.C., Andrx Laboratories (NJ), Inc. Andrx EU LTD, and
`Andrx Labs, L.L.C. v. Lupin LTD. And Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. – United States District Court
`District of Delaware, 2011 (Preliminary Injunction Hearing)
`
`
`4
`
`

`
`Ivan T. Hofmann CPA/CFF, CLP
`Cases which Mr. Hofmann has testified at
`deposition or at trial in the past four years.
`
`LIST OF CASES PURSUANT TO 26(a)(2)(B)
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`Merck Eprova AG v. Brookstone Pharmaceuticals, LLC a/k/a Acella Pharmaceuticals, LLC, Harold
`Arthur Deas, and Thomas Jeffrey Bryant – United States District Court Southern District of New
`York, 2011 (Trial)
`
`Grant Street Group, Inc. v. RealAuction.com, LLC – United States District Court Western District of
`Pennsylvania, 2011 (Depositions)
`
`Merck Eprova AG v. Brookstone Pharmaceuticals, LLC a/k/a Acella Pharmaceuticals, LLC, Harold
`Arthur Deas, and Thomas Jeffrey Bryant – United States District Court Southern District of New
`York, 2011 (Deposition)
`
`In the Matter of the Arbitration Between Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. and MiddleBrook
`Pharmaceuticals, Inc. – American Arbitration Association, 2011 (Hearing)
`
`Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GMBH, Aventis Pharma S.A., Abbott GMBH & Co. Kg, and Abbott
`Laboratories v. Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Inc., USA, and Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd. – United
`States District Court for New Jersey, 2011 (Trial)
`
`5

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket