throbber
••
`
`Field of the Iuventioo
`
`Fortified Mulch
`
`The invention relates to a composition and method for making mulch fortified
`
`with fertilizers via an agglomeration/granulation process.
`
`Background of the Invention
`
`Mulches are commonly applied over grass seed beds. Mulches help to increase
`
`seed germination and decrease soil erosion allowing seeds to become firmly established
`
`in the seeded area. Mulches typically consist of straw, wood shavings, or paper. In the
`
`prior art mulches are mixed with water and agitated in a holding tank, and then sprayed
`
`onto a seed bed. Some mulches are woven into blankets that are designed to be laid
`
`down over seed beds. Some mulches are chemically bonded natural fiber spray-applied
`
`mulches. These mulches use a vegetable gum binder such as guar gum to bind together
`
`natural fibers.
`
`Most mulches are loose configurations of unbonded fibers that easily wash away.
`
`Paper-based mulches tend to bond into a paper mache-like mat that inhibits oxygen and
`
`sunlight transfer, and the ability of seedlings to emerge through the mulch, affecting
`
`vegetation establishment. Chemically-bonded mulch forms an almost impenetrable layer
`
`over the seed bed that is poor at passing oxygen and water through to the seed bed.
`
`U.S. Patent 5,942,029 discloses a mechanically-bonded, water-absorbent fiber
`
`mulch including natural and crimped synthetic fibers that are intimately mixed to fonn a
`
`mechanically-bonded fiber mulch.
`
`U.S. Patent 5,916,027 discloses mulch flakes made from finely divided paper
`
`and/or wood, and a surfactant. The flakes contain fertilizer.
`
`SCOTTS EXHIBIT 1013
`
`

`

`Summary of the Invention
`
`The present invention relates to a process for creating fortified mulch through an
`
`agglomeration/granulation process. A moist paper fiber based product is impregnated
`
`with NPK (nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium) fortifiers in a mixer. The paper product is
`
`combined with the NPK fortifiers either before, or after entry into a mixer. The mixer
`
`performs work that results in an agglomerated (or granulated) product that is a
`
`homogeneous blend of the paper product and NPK fortifiers. This product is then dried
`
`to a desired level of moisture and screened as necessary. A binding agent can be added at
`
`the mixer to enhance the agglomeration/granulation process. If a binding agent is added
`
`the paper fiber based product need not be moist. To increase the percent of on-sized
`
`product, a size reduction operation can be performed on the paper fiber product prior to
`
`entry into the mixer.
`
`These and other features and advantages of the preferred embodiment of the
`
`present invention will become apparent from the detailed description of the preferred
`
`embodiments.
`
`Detailed Description of the Invention
`
`The present invention relates to a process for creating fortified mulch through an
`
`agglomeration/granulation process. A paper fiber based product, which can be moist, is
`
`impregnated with NPK fortifiers in a mixer. The mixer is preferably a pin mixer but can
`
`also be a pan pelletizer, paddle mixer, drum granulator or other type of mixer. The pin
`
`mixer is preferably a double helix pin arrangement. The paper fiber based product is
`
`preferably comprised of a by product of a paper making process. Sewage sludge can be
`
`used to create the fortified mulch rather than paper fibers.
`
`2
`
`

`

`Below is an example of how a fortified mulch product can be made using a pin
`
`•
`
`mixer.
`
`Example
`
`Pin Mixer
`
`In a pin mixer, agglomeration occurs, when radially extended pins mounted on a
`
`high velocity central rotor shaft, in a stationary cylindrical shell impart agitation forces on
`
`the material and sprayed liquid binder. This causes a tumbling, turbulent movement
`
`resulting in densification.
`
`Pin arrangement
`
`Several different types of pin mixers were tested to determine the best pin
`
`arrangement for creating a fortified mulch. The double helix pin arrangement resulted in
`
`a round, more uniform pellet. The internal casing length and diameter were 23 inches
`
`and 6 inches, respectively. The dimensions of the shaft and pins included 2-inch
`
`diameter shaft and two-inch length pins. The tip speed was not calculated. It was
`
`concluded that varying the speed (RPM) effected the pellet size. Increasing the speed
`
`caused a decrease in particle size. Also, the higher the speed (RPM) the fewer number of
`
`large chunks came through. It is important to note that initial ginding of wet paper
`
`sludge drastically reduced chunks discharging the pin mixer. It was found that the pin
`
`mixer when set at 650 RPM resulted in a product that consisted largely of end-size ( -6,
`
`+ 16) product. Although horsepower draws were not conducted, it was apparent that this
`
`material did not require a motor that was larger than FEECO pin mixer specifications.
`
`This material created a shell, but its amperage did not increase. Mulch through the pin
`
`mixer readily agglomerated and the discharged product was uniform in size and shape.
`
`3
`
`

`

`Retention Time
`
`The FEECO unit was inclined to analyze any improvement of product caused by
`
`an increased retention time. No increase in retention time was noticed. A test was
`
`conducted to determine the retention time of the. A scoop full of wet paper was spray-
`
`painted and fed into the feed hopper. Material began to discharge at 2 seconds and ended
`
`at 23 seconds. The majority of the material took 8 seconds. Small particles had short
`
`retention time while larger particles took longer.
`
`Pin Mixer; Material Feed Rates
`
`Ground wet paper sludge
`
`Wet paper was added at 33lbslhr the product was not uniform and round, so the
`
`feed was decreased to 200Jbs/h.r. A uniform product was achieved at this rate. It was
`
`preferable to use a rate of 200lbslhr, however, a rate between 200 and 3001bs.lhr is also
`
`acceptable. The wet paper sludge bridged in the screw feeder. The 3" feeder was the
`
`most consistent.
`
`Water
`
`An added 36-lbs./hr water was metered into the pin mixer. The percent moisture
`
`in the paper was 52.3% water. A total of 140.6lbs./hr of moisture is introduced when
`
`200lbs.lhr of wet sludge is metered into the pin mixer.
`
`NPK
`
`The NPK fortifiers were added to the pin at a rate of28 lbs.lhr. A vibratory
`
`feeder was required to feed such a low rate. The fertilizer had to be screened prior to
`
`addition into the feed hopper.
`
`4
`
`

`

`Coating Drum
`
`Wet Mulch Pellets
`
`The wet mulch pellets were hand fed into a rotary drum. The drum had no
`
`apparent problem with varied low or high feed rates. The rotatry dryer placed
`
`limiatations onto the coating drum feed rate. The majority (>90%) of agglomeration is
`
`done in the pin mixer. Since the material sent into the coating drum was in the form of a
`
`pellet, the material readily rolled. The retention time of the mulch was approximately 1-2
`
`minutes shorter than for an encapsulated seed (4-5 minutes).
`
`Dryer
`
`The pin mixer was not the only component limiting the feed rate, for the rota try
`
`dryer was not able to sufficiently dry the NPK fortified paper pellets. The increase in
`
`moisutre also forced the reduction in the feed rates.
`
`The inlet and outlet air temperatures were 1100 degrees Fahrenheit and 180F,
`
`respectively. The sample at these settings had a material outlet temperature ranging from
`
`150 to 175 degrees Fahrenheit and moisture content of2.5%.
`
`Sieve analysis
`
`A sieve analysis was conducted with the use of a screen. The end-size portion
`
`was between 6 and 16 mesh. A three-hour continuous run was produced, dried, and
`
`screened. The results concluded a total of300 lbs. of material; 206lbs. on-size (68.7%),
`
`53 lbs. under-size (17.7%), and 41 lbs. over-size (13. 7%).
`
`While the invention has been particularly shown and described with reference to
`
`the preferred embodiment of the present invention, it will be understood by those skilled
`
`5
`
`

`

`•
`
`in the art that the foregoing and other changes in form may be made therein without
`
`departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
`
`6
`
`

`

`•
`
`~/An agglomeration/granulation method for creating a
`I
`
`adding paper fibers to a pin mixer;
`
`rtified mulch comprising;
`
`adding NPK fortifiers and a binding agent befi re or at said mixer;
`
`drying contents of said mixer.
`
`The method of claim 1 wherein the pin
`
`ixer is replaced with a pan pelletizer.
`
`The method of claim 1 whereiz;the
`
`·xer is replaced with a paddle mixer.
`
`The method of claim I wherei th pi
`
`ixer is replaced with a drum granulator.
`
`The method of claim 1 wher
`
`s ·
`
`in mixer has a double helix pin
`
`arrangement.
`
`The method of claim 1/erein said paper fibers are comprised of a by-product of
`
`a paper making process.
`
`The method of clai 1 wherein said paper fibers are replaced with sewage sludge.
`
`An agglomerate granulated mulch product that is comprised ofNPK fortifiers
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`5.
`
`6.
`
`7. r
`
`7
`
`

`

`·•
`
`Abstract
`
`The invention relates· to a composition and method for making mulch fortified
`
`with fertilizers via an agglomeration/granulation process.
`
`8
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket