`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`KNEAFSEY & FRIEND LLP
`SEAN M. KNEAFSEY (SBN 180863)
`skneafsey@kneafseyfriend.com
`800 Wilshire Blvd. Ste. 710
`Los Angeles, CA 90017
`Telephone: (213) 892-1200
`Facsimile: (213) 892-1208
`
`
`NIRO, HALLER & NIRO
`RAYMOND P. NIRO (pro hac vice)
`rniro@nshn.com
`CHRISTOPHER J. LEE (pro hac vice)
`clee@nshn.com
`RICHARD B. MEGLEY, JR. (pro hac vice)
`megleyjr@nshn.com
`OLIVER. D. YANG (pro hac vice)
`oyang@nshn.com
`181 West Madison, Suite 4600
`Chicago, IL 60602-4515
`Telephone: (312) 236-0733
`Facsimile: (312) 236-3137
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`UNIVERSAL ELECTRONICS INC.
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SOUTHERN DIVISION
`
`
`
`UNIVERSAL ELECTRONICS INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`v.
`
`PEEL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`Case No. SACV13-01484 AG (JPRx)
`
`JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION
`CHART PURSUANT TO S.P.R.
`3.5.1
`
`Honorable Andrew J. Guilford
`Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Pursuant to the Court’s S.P.R. 3.4, the Parties hereby submit their Joint
`
`Claim Construction Chart of disputed claim constructions, as follows:
`
`
`
`05675.00001/6060541.1
`
`
`
`
`
`Universal Remote Control Exhibit: 1011 Page 000001
`
`
`
`Case 8:13-cv-01484-AG-JPR Document 49 Filed 06/13/14 Page 2 of 14 Page ID #:247
`
`
`I.
`
`S.P.R. 3.4.1 – The Parties' Agreed Constructions
`The parties have agreed to the follow constructions:
`
`Patent / Claim Term
`'101
`mark-up language
`Claim 6
`formatted page tag
`
`Agreed Construction
`an element of a mark-up language
`formatted page including a start tag, at
`least the first and second data fields,
`and an end tag
`a non-moving contact with a surface at
`a location
`
`the mode specifying input
`automatically selects at least one of
`the favorite channels lists
`
`more than one control code to which
`the appliance is adapted to respond
`
`'504
`Claims 1 and
`8
`'930
`Claim 1
`
`’243
`Claims 1 and
`8
`'112
`Claims 1 and
`2
`
`static touch
`
`in response, using the
`input to select at least
`one of the plurality of
`lists of favorite
`channels
`control codes to which
`the appliance is
`adapted to respond
`keycode link
`information
`
`data that defines a relationship,
`distinct from a link between a
`physical/soft key and a function to be
`performed
`The parties have also agreed that they believe any 35 U.S.C. § 112 defenses,
`such as indefiniteness, should be addressed during later phases of the case and not
`during claim construction. Accordingly, they have agreed to refrain from
`substantively arguing any §112 defenses during claim construction, although they
`will briefly apprise Your Honor of those defenses in their claim construction
`briefing. If Your Honor believes that a § 112 defense issue should be addressed
`during claim construction, the parties request the opportunity to submit additional
`briefing and evidence on the issue.
`
`
`
`05675.00001/6060541.1
`
`- 2 -
`
`
`
`Universal Remote Control Exhibit: 1011 Page 000002
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`
`Case 8:13-cv-01484-AG-JPR Document 49 Filed 06/13/14 Page 3 of 14 Page ID #:248
`
`
`II. S.P.R. 3.4.2 – EACH PARTIES' PROPOSED
`
`
`CONSTRUCTIONS
`
`The following chart shows each party's proposed construction of each
`
`disputed term, together with an identification of all intrinsic and extrinsic evidence
`supporting each proposed construction.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`05675.00001/6060541.1
`
`- 3 -
`
`
`
`Universal Remote Control Exhibit: 1011 Page 000003
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`
`Case 8:13-cv-01484-AG-JPR Document 49 Filed 06/13/14 Page 4 of 14 Page ID #:249
`
`
`
`Party
`Proposing
`Peel
`
`Patent
`And
`Claim
`’243
`Claims
`1 and 8
`
`Term
`
`data that functions to
`identify the appliance
`
`
`Plaintiff UEI’s Proposed
`Constructions
`data sufficient to identify the
`appliance
`
`
`11:38-41; 5:39-42, 48-49; 4:1-
`34, 45-46; Abstract; 1:59-60;
`11:38-29, 12:58; 11:33, 55;
`12:40, 42; 12:18
`
`Peel
`
`’101
`Claim
`6
`
`data for use in
`generating an infrared
`code to be transmitted
`
`data stored in the mark-up
`language page including
`information for use in
`generating an infrared code to
`be transmitted
`
`Fig. 5; 2:42-44; 5:22-35;
`11:12-22; 13:30-37 & 57-62;
`UEIPEEL000024-32
`
`05675.00001/6060541.1
`
`-4-
`
`1
`1
`2
`2
`3
`3
`4
`4
`5
`5
`6
`6
`7
`8
`7
`9
`8
`10
`9
`11
`10
`12
`11
`13
`12
`14
`15
`13
`16
`14
`17
`15
`18
`16
`19
`17
`20
`18
`21
`22
`19
`23
`
`
`Defendant PEEL’s
`Proposed Constructions
`data, distinct from a control
`code, sufficient to identify
`the appliance
`
`'243 Patent
`Abstract, Fig. 13-17; 1:49-
`63; 3:21-33; 4:1-5:19; 5:39-
`49; 6:42-49; 6:65-7:12; 7:46-
`58; 11:7-41; 12:40-45;
`13:39-42; 13:61-64; claims 1,
`8, 10, 14, 18
`
`Prosecution History
`September 13, 2004
`Applicant Initiated Interview
`Request at
`UEIPEEL001209-1215
`data stored in the mark-up
`language page including the
`infrared code to be
`transmitted
`
`'101 Patent
`Figs. 10c, 12, 19a, 2:15-18;
`6:17-22;
`11:12-22; 13:21-37; 13:57-
`
`Universal Remote Control Exhibit: 1011 Page 000004
`
`
`
`Case 8:13-cv-01484-AG-JPR Document 49 Filed 06/13/14 Page 5 of 14 Page ID #:250
`
`
`
`Patent
`And
`Claim
`
`Party
`Proposing
`
`Term
`
`Plaintiff UEI’s Proposed
`Constructions
`
`Peel
`
`label
`
`’101
`Claim
`6
`
`displayed text and/or image
`
`Fig. 10g, 12 & 13; 2:58-60;
`2:64-3:4; 19:17-22, 26-32;
`20:5-16; 32:25-27
`
`Peel
`
`’101
`Claim
`6
`
`05675.00001/6060541.1
`
`
`hyperlink which is
`activatable to initiate a
`use of the data in the
`first data field
`
`direct relationship between the
`label in the second data field
`that causes the use of the data
`in the first data field
`
`- 5 -
`
`Defendant PEEL’s
`Proposed Constructions
`62; 14:54-62; 16:18-45;
`16:67-17:10; 17:16-21; 18:8-
`21; 20:3-9; 21:4-12; 22:21-
`28; 22:38-50; claims 1-7, 11,
`14, and 16
`
`Prosecution History
`December 21, 2004 Response
`to Non-Final Rejection at
`UEIPEEL000055-
`0071; February 7, 2005
`Response After Final
`Rejection at
`UEIPEEL000025-0032
`displayed text, distinct from a
`graphic or icon
`
`'101 Patent
`Figs. 12, 13; 13:46-48;
`14:50-55; 16:18-61; 16:67-
`17:10; 17:16-21; 22:12-25;
`claim 6
`direct relationship between
`the label in the second data
`field and the infrared code in
`the first data field
`
`Universal Remote Control Exhibit: 1011 Page 000005
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`
`
`
`Case 8:13-cv-01484-AG-JPR Document 49 Filed 06/13/14 Page 6 of 14 Page ID #:251
`
`
`
`Patent
`And
`Claim
`
`Party
`Proposing
`
`Term
`
`Plaintiff UEI’s Proposed
`Constructions
`
`Fig. 12 & 13; Fig. 10a-c; 2:64-
`3:4; 18:16-21; Abstract
`
`UEI
`
`key code
`
`’642
`Claims
`1, 2, 5,
`22 &
`23
`
`the data that modulates a
`carrier signal
`
`Fig. 5; 4:27-5:5
`
`05675.00001/6060541.1
`
`
`- 6 -
`
`Defendant PEEL’s
`Proposed Constructions
`
`'101 Patent
`Figs. 10c, 12, 13, 19a; 2:15-
`18; 13:46-48; 13:58-62;
`14:50-55;
`16:18-45; 16:67-17:10; 18:8-
`21; 22:12-25; claim 6
`
`Extrinsic Evidence
`Feibel, Werner, The Network
`Press
`Encyclopedia of Networking
`(2000) at 564
`(PEEL00009885-9897);
`Berners-Lee, T. and
`Connolly, D.,
`Hypertext Markup Language
`2.0 (1995) at 7, 36-39
`(PEEL00009799-
`9875)
`a control code corresponding
`to a function of an electronic
`device
`
`'642 Patent
`Abstract; Figs. 1-5, 6A, 6B;
`
`Universal Remote Control Exhibit: 1011 Page 000006
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`
`
`
`Case 8:13-cv-01484-AG-JPR Document 49 Filed 06/13/14 Page 7 of 14 Page ID #:252
`
`
`
`Patent
`And
`Claim
`
`Party
`Proposing
`
`Term
`
`Plaintiff UEI’s Proposed
`Constructions
`
`Peel
`
`keystroke indicator
`signal
`
`’642
`Claims
`1, 2, 5,
`22 &
`
`05675.00001/6060541.1
`
`
`a signal that indicates a
`pressed key from a remote
`control device is received
`
`
`- 7 -
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`
`Defendant PEEL’s
`Proposed Constructions
`2:2-6; 2:22-36; 3:9-12; 3:37-
`38; 4:24-41; 4:58-60; 4:66-
`5:2; 5:66-6:6; 6:14-18; 6:24-
`25; 7:27-33; 7:46-59; 8:1-9;
`8:; Claims 1-6, 8-10, 15, 16,
`19-25
`
`Prosecution History
`August 4, 2006 Response to
`Non-Final Rejection at
`UEIPEEL001724-
`1747; January 1, 2008 Reply
`Brief at
`UEIPEEL001519-1532;
`November 14, 2008 Decision
`of BPAI at
`UEIPEEL001496-1513;
`January 9, 2006 Amendments
`and Remarks after BPAI
`Decision at
`UEIPEEL001484-
`1493
`a signal, distinct from a key
`code, corresponding to an
`input on a remote control
`
`
`Universal Remote Control Exhibit: 1011 Page 000007
`
`
`
`Case 8:13-cv-01484-AG-JPR Document 49 Filed 06/13/14 Page 8 of 14 Page ID #:253
`
`
`
`Patent
`And
`Claim
`23
`
`Party
`Proposing
`
`Term
`
`Plaintiff UEI’s Proposed
`Constructions
`Abstract; 1:66-2:1
`
`’351
`
`UEI
`
`associating/associate
`
`creating an association
`
`05675.00001/6060541.1
`
`
`- 8 -
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`
`Defendant PEEL’s
`Proposed Constructions
`'642 Patent
`Fig. 1, Abstract, 1:62-2:15;
`3:40-55; 3:65-4:23; 6:19-25;
`6:43-50; 6:54-58; 7:66-8:4;
`Claims 1, 2, 5, 7, 10,
`and 20
`
`Prosecution History
`August 4, 2006 Response to
`Non-Final Rejection at
`UEIPEEL001724-
`1747; December 26, 2006
`Response After Final
`Rejection at
`UEIPEEL001681-1707;
`January 1, 2008 Reply Brief
`at UEIPEEL001519-1532;
`November 14, 2008 Decision
`of BPAI at
`UEIPEEL001496-1513;
`January 9, 2006 Amendments
`and Remarks after BPAI
`Decision at
`UEIPEEL001484-
`1493
`Plain and ordinary meaning.
`
`Universal Remote Control Exhibit: 1011 Page 000008
`
`
`
`Case 8:13-cv-01484-AG-JPR Document 49 Filed 06/13/14 Page 9 of 14 Page ID #:254
`
`
`
`Patent
`And
`Claim
`Claims
`1 and
`18
`
`Party
`Proposing
`
`Term
`
`the first one of the
`plurality of user input
`classes with the first
`one of the plurality of
`second/target devices
`
`Plaintiff UEI’s Proposed
`Constructions
`between a user input class and
`second/target device
`
`7:10-26, 43-51; 8:52-67; 9:6-
`23; Fig. 5, Fig. 6AA, 6AB, 6B,
`and 6C
`
`UEI
`
`’351
`Claims
`1 and
`18
`
`identify/identifying
`one of a plurality of
`sets of information
`which is associated
`with the first class
`
`using the user input class to
`locate the appropriate control
`code
`
`7:1-51, 8:38-67, 9:1-23, Fig. 5,
`Fig. 6AA, 6AB, 6B, and 6C
`
`Peel
`
`’309
`Claim
`
`second data
`representative of the
`
`second data representing the
`continuous contact from a first
`
`05675.00001/6060541.1
`
`
`- 9 -
`
`Defendant PEEL’s
`Proposed Constructions
`
`
`Alternatively, creating an
`association between the first
`one of the plurality of user
`input classes with the first
`one of the plurality of
`second/target devices
`
`'351 Patent
`5:9-25; Figs. 6AA and 6C;
`8:52-59; 12:34-36; 7:13-19
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning.
`
`Alternatively,
`identify/identifying one of a
`plurality of collections of
`codes which is associated
`with the first class
`
`'351 Patent
`5:8-25; 7:1-26; 8:44-52; Fig.
`5
`
`data of a type distinct from
`that of the first data,
`
`Universal Remote Control Exhibit: 1011 Page 000009
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Patent
`And
`Claim
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 8:13-cv-01484-AG-JPR Document 49 Filed 06/13/14 Page 10 of 14 Page ID #:255
`
`Party
`Proposing
`
`Term
`
`motion made across
`the touch-sensitive
`surface
`
`Plaintiff UEI’s Proposed
`Constructions
`location to a second location
`on the touch sensitive surface
`
`‘309 Patent: Abstract; Fig. 3;
`3:57-63; 4:18-20; 5:5-12, 27-
`31, 46-51; 7:14-17 & 21-24
`
`Reexam Control No.
`95/001,759: 12/13/13 PTAB
`Board Decision
`(UEIPEEL006594-
`UEIPEEL006605) & Appeal
`Brief (UEIPEEL006679-
`UEIPEEL006723)
`
`Defendant PEEL’s
`Proposed Constructions
`representing the continuous
`contact from a first location
`to a second location on the
`touch-sensitive surface
`
`'309 Patent
`Abstract; Fig. 4; 1:13-15;
`1:67-2:5; 2:9-21; 2:47-56;
`4:11-5:13; 5:23-6:47
`
`'309 Prosecution History
`February 17, 2010
`Amendment and Response at
`4-5
`
`'309 Re-examination
`History
`February 17, 2010
`Amendment and Response at
`2-5; February 1, 2012
`Amendment and Response at
`
`05675.00001/6060541.1
`
`
`- 10 -
`
`Universal Remote Control Exhibit: 1011 Page 000010
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`
`
`
`Case 8:13-cv-01484-AG-JPR Document 49 Filed 06/13/14 Page 11 of 14 Page ID #:256
`
`Party
`Proposing
`
`Term
`
`Plaintiff UEI’s Proposed
`Constructions
`
`
`
`Patent
`And
`Claim
`
`’3091
`Claim
`1
`
`
`
`Defendant PEEL’s
`Proposed Constructions
`21-24; June 13, 2012 Office
`Action Closing
`Prosecution at 148-154; July
`13, 2012 Response to Office
`Action at 27-30;
`January 18, 2013 Appeal
`Brief at 3-4, 7-17; June 5,
`2013 Reply Brief at 4-12;
`December 13, 2013 PTAB
`Decision at 8-10
`
`
`
`1 UEI has also asserted against Peel the following U.S. Patents that are related to the ‘309 Patent: 7,821,504
`(“the ‘504 Patent”), 7,821,505 (“the ‘505 Patent”) and 7,999,794 (“the ‘794 Patent). The ‘309, ‘504, ‘505 and ‘794
`patents have the same inventor, substantially the same specification and there is substantial similarity in the
`language of the asserted claims of the four patents. Because of the similarity in claim language, the same claim
`construction dispute exists for all 4 patents and, thus, the parties have agreed that the claim construction dispute
`identified in the chart for the ‘309 Patent is representative of the dispute with respect to all 4 patents, and can be
`decided based on resolution of the disputed construction for the ‘309 Patent.
`05675.00001/6060541.1
`- 11 -
`
`
`Universal Remote Control Exhibit: 1011 Page 000011
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`
`
`
`Case 8:13-cv-01484-AG-JPR Document 49 Filed 06/13/14 Page 12 of 14 Page ID #:257
`
`
`1
`1
`2
`2
`3
`3
`4
`4
`5
`5
`6
`6
`7
`8
`7
`9
`8
`10
`9
`11
`10
`12
`11
`13
`12
`14
`15
`13
`16
`14
`17
`15
`18
`16
`19
`17
`20
`18
`21
`22
`19
`23
`20
`24
`21
`25
`22
`26
`23
`27
`24
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`III. S.P.R. 3.4.3 – IDENTIFICATION OF MOST SIGNIFICANT
`
`TERMS
`In accordance with S.P.R. 3.4.3, the parties have met and conferred and
`
`identified the 9 terms whose construction will be most significant to the case,
`which are listed above in section II.
`
`IV. S.P.R. 3.4.4 – TIME FOR CLAIM CONSTRUCTION HEARING
`
`The parties request more than 45 minutes total for their respective claim
`construction presentations; specifically, a total of 3 hours split evenly between the
`parties. The reason for this request is that the case has materially expanded
`through the addition of 5 patents. The parties believe the additional time is
`necessary to sufficiently describe the technology and present the disputes to the
`Court in enough detail to allow your Honor to make a reasoned determination.
`
`V. S.P.R. 3.4.5 – LIVE WITNESSES
`The parties do not intend to call live witnesses, fact or expert, at the claim
`construction hearing.
`
`05675.00001/6060541.1
`
`-12-
`
`Universal Remote Control Exhibit: 1011 Page 000012
`
`
`
`Case 8:13-cv-01484-AG-JPR Document 49 Filed 06/13/14 Page 13 of 14 Page ID #:258
`
`
`1
`1
`2
`2
`3
`3
`4
`4
`5
`5
`6
`6
`7
`8
`7
`9
`8
`10
`9
`11
`10
`12
`11
`13
`12
`14
`15
`13
`16
`14
`17
`15
`18
`16
`19
`17
`20
`18
`21
`22
`19
`23
`20
`24
`21
`25
`22
`26
`23
`27
`24
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Richard B. Megley, Jr.
`Niro, Haller & Niro
`
`Raymond P. Niro (pro hac vice)
` rniro@nshn.com
`Christopher J. Lee (pro hac vice)
` clee@nshn.com
`Richard B. Megley, Jr. (pro hac vice)
` megleyjr@nshn.com
`Oliver D. Yang (pro hac vice)
` oyang@nshn.com
`181 West Madison, Suite 4600
`Chicago, IL 60602-4515
`Phone: (312) 236-0733
`Fax: (312) 236-3137
`
`Kneafsey & Friend LLP
`Sean M. Kneafsey(SBN 180863)
` skneafsey@kneafseyfriend.com
`800 Wilshire Blvd. Ste. 710
`Los Angeles, CA 90017
`Telephone: (213) 892-1200
`Facsimile: (213) 892-1208
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`UNIVERSAL ELECTRONICS INC.
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Richard H. Doss (with permission)
`Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan,
`LLP
`
`Joseph M. Paunovich
`joepaunovich@quinnemanuel.com
`Richard H. Doss
`richarddoss@quinnemanuel.com
`865 South Figueroa Street, 10th Floor
`Los Angeles, CA 90017
`Phone: (213) 443-3000
`Fax: (213) 443-3100
`
`Claude M. Stern
`claudestern@quinnemanuel.commailto:
`Charles M. Stiernberg
`charliestiernberg@quinnemanuel.com
`Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan,
`LLP
`555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor
`Redwood Shores, CA 94065-2139
`Phone: (650) 801-5000
`Fax: (650) 801-5100
`
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`PEEL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
`
`05675.00001/6060541.1
`
`-13-
`
`Universal Remote Control Exhibit: 1011 Page 000013
`
`
`
`Case 8:13-cv-01484-AG-JPR Document 49 Filed 06/13/14 Page 14 of 14 Page ID #:259
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`The undersigned hereby certifies that on June 13, 2014 the foregoing
`JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CHART PURSUANT TO S.P.R. 3.5.1
`was filed with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, which will then send
`a notification of such filing to the following counsel of record.
`Claude M. Stern
`(claudestern@quinnemanuel.com)
`Charles M. Stiernberg
`(charliestiernberg@quinnemanuel.com)
`Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP
`555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor
`Redwood Shores, CA 94065-2139
`Phone: (650) 801-5000
`Fax: (650) 801-5100
`
`Joseph M. Paunovich
`(joepaunovich@quinnemanuel.com)
`Richard H. Doss
`(richarddoss@quinnemanuel.com)
`Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP
`865 South Figueroa Street, 10th Floor
`Los Angeles, CA 90017
`Phone: (213) 443-3000
`Fax: (213) 443-3100
`
`Attorneys for Defendant,
`Peel Technologies, Inc.
` certify that all parties in this case are represented by counsel who are CM/ECF
`participants.
`
`
` I
`
`
`/s/ Richard B. Megley, Jr.
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`UNIVERSAL ELECTRONICS INC.
`
`
`
`
`
`05675.00001/6060541.1
`
`Universal Remote Control Exhibit: 1011 Page 000014
`
`1
`1
`2
`2
`3
`3
`4
`4
`5
`5
`6
`6
`7
`8
`7
`9
`8
`10
`9
`11
`10
`12
`11
`13
`12
`14
`15
`13
`16
`14
`17
`15
`18
`16
`19
`17
`20
`18
`21
`22
`19
`23
`20
`24
`21
`25
`22
`26
`23
`27
`24
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`