throbber
IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`In re Patent of: Darbee
`
`Universal Remote Control, Inc.
`
`Patent No.: 5,255,313
`
`Filed: Apr. 9, 1993
`
`Issued: Oct. 19, 1993
`
`v.
`
`Universal Electronics, Inc.
`
`Case No. IPR2014-01106
`
`Assignee: Universal Electronics Inc.
`
`Trial Paralegal: Cathy Underwood
`
`Title: UNIVERSAL REMOTE
`CONTROL SYSTEM
`
`Mail Stop PATENT BOARD
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`Certificate of Filing: I hereby certify that this correspondence is being electronically filed with the USPTO
`on this 16th day of July, 2015
`
`By: /Jeannie Ngai/
`Jeannie Ngai
`
`{01783693.1}
`
`

`
`Pursuant to the Board’s Scheduling Order of January 6, 2015 (Paper 10 at 5),
`
`Petitioner requests oral argument be held on August 19, 2015. See 37 C.F.R. §
`
`42.70(a). The Scheduling Order identifies August 19, 2015 as the date for the oral
`
`argument, if requested. Id.
`
`Petitioner requests the ability to use audio visual equipment to display
`
`demonstrative exhibits, including the use of a projector and screen for a
`
`PowerPoint presentation.
`
`Petitioner requests a consolidated hearing for IPRs 2014-01102, -01103, -
`
`01104, and -01106 due to common issues. Petitioner requests sixty minutes of
`
`time for its presentation and an additional twenty minutes of time for rebuttal.
`
`Petitioner specifies the following issues to be argued:
`
`1) Whether Claims 1, 2, and 20 are unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)
`
`based on Ciarcia and Hastreiter.
`
`2) Whether Patent Owner’s expert testimony from Alex Cook is unreliable.
`
`3) Whether Alex Cook’s testimony should be excluded on the grounds
`
`specified in Petitioner’s objections and later motions to exclude, if any.
`
`4) The proper claim construction for the “code data” term.
`
`5) Petitioner’s response to any arguments specified by Patent Owner in a
`
`request for oral argument.
`
`6) Petitioner’s response to Patent Owner’s oral argument on all matters.
`- 1 -
`{01783693.1}
`
`

`
`Date: July 16, 2015
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/ Douglas A. Miro /
`Reg. No. 31,643
`OSTROLENK FABER LLP
`1180 Avenue of the Americas
`7th Floor
`New York, NY 10036
`(212) 382-0700
`Counsel for Petitioner
`
`{01783693.1}
`
`- 2 -
`
`

`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that on the below date, I caused the
`
`foregoing to be served upon the following counsel of record via electronic mail
`
`(with counsel’s agreement):
`
`Eric J. Maiers, Reg. No. 59,614
`James J. Lukas, Reg. No. 59,114
`Matthew J. Levinstein, Pro Hac Vice
`Rob R. Harmer, Reg. No. 68,048
`GREENBURG TRAURIG, P.C.
`77 West Wacker Drive
`Suite 3100
`Chicago, IL 60101
`Maierse@gtlaw.com
`lukasj@gtlaw.com
`levinsteinm@gtlaw.com
`harmer@gtlaw.com
`chiipmail@gtlaw.com
`
`DATED: July 16, 2015
`
`/ Jeannie Ngai /
`Ostrolenk Faber LLP
`1180 Ave. of the Americas
`7th Floor
`New York, NY 10036
`
`{01783693.1}

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket