Case 8:13-cv-00984-AG-JPR Document 76 Filed 02/24/14 Page 1 of 16 Page ID #:438
`
`PETER H. KANG (SBN 158101)
`pkang@sidley.com
`SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
`1001 Page Mill Road, Bldg. 1
`Palo Alto, CA 94304
`Telephone: (650) 565-7000
`Facsimile: (650) 565-7100
`ADDITIONAL COUNSEL LISTED
`ON SIGNATURE PAGE
`Attorneys for Defendant,
`Ohsung Electronics USA, Inc.
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`SOUTHERN DIVISION
`NO. SACV 13-00984 AG (JPRx)
`Assigned to: Hon. Andrew J. Guilford
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`DEFENDANT OHSUNG
`ELECTRONICS, USA, INC.’S
`ANSWER TO SECOND AMENDED
`COMPLAINT
`DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`
`))))))))))))))
`
`))))))))))))
`
`UNIVERSAL ELECTRONICS INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`vs.
`UNIVERSAL REMOTE CONTROL,
`INC., OHSUNG ELECTRONICS CO.,
`LTD., AND OHSUNG ELECTRONICS
`USA, INC.,
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`UNIVERSAL REMOTE CONTROL,
`INC.,
`Counterclaimant,
`
`
`vs.
`
`UNIVERSAL ELECTRONICS, INC.,
`
`Counter-Defendant.
`
`Universal Electronics Exhibit 2022, Page 1
`Universal Remote Control v. Universal Electronics, Trial No. IPR2014-01106
`
`

`

`Case 8:13-cv-00984-AG-JPR Document 76 Filed 02/24/14 Page 2 of 16 Page ID #:439
`
`Defendant Ohsung Electronics U.S.A., Inc. (“Ohsung USA”), by the
`undersigned attorneys, hereby responds to the Second Amended Complaint
`(“Complaint”) in the above civil action with the following Answer and Affirmative
`Defenses:
`
`NATURE OF CASE
`1.(cid:3)
`In answer to paragraph 1 of the Complaint, Ohsung USA admits that the
`Complaint purports to state claims for patent infringement under the patent laws of the
`United States, Title 35, United States Code. Ohsung USA admits that the Court has
`subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338 (a). Ohsung USA
`specifically denies any wrongdoing or liability and denies the claim of patent
`infringement by the Plaintiff.
`
`PARTIES
`2.(cid:3)
`In answer to paragraph 2 of the Complaint, Ohsung USA is without
`knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations
`of paragraph 2, and therefore denies them.
`3.(cid:3)
`In answer to paragraph 3 of the Complaint, Ohsung USA admits that the
`’077 patent is entitled “Remotely Upgradable Universal Remote Control” and bears an
`issue date of July 13, 1993. Ohsung USA is without knowledge or information
`sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the remainder of the allegations contained
`in paragraph 3, and therefore denies them.
`4.(cid:3)
`In answer to paragraph 4 of the Complaint, Ohsung USA admits that the
`’313 patent is entitled “Universal Remote Control System” and bears an issue date of
`October 19, 1993. Ohsung USA is without knowledge or information sufficient to
`form a belief as to the truth of the remainder of the allegations contained in paragraph
`4, and therefore denies them.
`5.(cid:3)
`In answer to paragraph 5 of the Complaint, Ohsung USA admits that the
`’761 patent is entitled “Remote Control System” and bears an issue date of May 9,
`-2-
`DEFENDANT OHSUNG ELECTRONICS U.S.A.’S ANSWER TO SECOND
`AMENDED COMPLAINT; DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`NO. SACV 13-00984 AG(JPRx)
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Universal Electronics Exhibit 2022, Page 2
`Universal Remote Control v. Universal Electronics, Trial No. IPR2014-01106
`
`

`

`Case 8:13-cv-00984-AG-JPR Document 76 Filed 02/24/14 Page 3 of 16 Page ID #:440
`
`1995. Ohsung USA is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as
`to the truth of the remainder of the allegations contained in paragraph 5, and therefore
`denies them.
`6.(cid:3)
`In answer to paragraph 6 of the Complaint, Ohsung USA admits that the
`’917 patent is entitled “Remote Control” and bears an issue date of September 3,
`1996. Ohsung USA is without knowledge or information as to the truth of the
`remainder of the allegations contained in paragraph 6, and therefore denies them.
`7.(cid:3)
`In answer to paragraph 7 of the Complaint, Ohsung USA admits that the
`’059 patent is entitled “Computer Programmable Remote Control” and bears an issue
`date of April 4, 2006, and indicates on its face sheet it is a reissue of U.S. Patent No.
`6,211,870, which bears an issue date of April 3, 2001. Ohsung USA is without
`knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the remainder of
`the allegations contained in paragraph 7, and therefore denies them.
`8.(cid:3)
`In answer to paragraph 8 of the Complaint, Ohsung USA admits that the
`’779 patent is entitled “Method and Apparatus for an Intuitive Universal Remote
`Control System” and bears an issue date of June 18, 2002. Ohsung USA is without
`knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the remainder of
`the allegations contained in paragraph 8, and therefore denies them.
`9.(cid:3)
`In answer to paragraph 9 of the Complaint, Ohsung USA admits that the
`’468 patent is entitled “System and Method for Monitoring Remote Control
`Transmissions” and bears an issue date of October 24, 2006. Ohsung USA is without
`knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the remainder of
`the allegations contained in paragraph 9, and therefore denies them.
`10.(cid:3)
`In answer to paragraph 10 of the Complaint, Ohsung USA admits that the
`’642 patent is entitled “Relaying Key Code Signals Through A Remote Control
`Device” and bears an issue date of September 15, 2009. Ohsung USA is without
`
`-3-
`DEFENDANT OHSUNG ELECTRONICS U.S.A.’S ANSWER TO SECOND
`AMENDED COMPLAINT; DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`NO. SACV 13-00984 AG(JPRx)
`
`Universal Electronics Exhibit 2022, Page 3
`Universal Remote Control v. Universal Electronics, Trial No. IPR2014-01106
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 8:13-cv-00984-AG-JPR Document 76 Filed 02/24/14 Page 4 of 16 Page ID #:441
`
`knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the remainder of
`the allegations contained in paragraph 10, and therefore denies them.
`11.(cid:3)
`In answer to paragraph 11 of the Complaint, Ohsung USA admits that the
`’930 patent is entitled “System and Method for Displaying a User Interface for a
`Remote Control Application” and bears an issue date of November 9, 2010. Ohsung
`USA is without sufficient knowledge or information as to the truth of the remainder of
`the allegations contained in paragraph 11, and therefore denies them.
`12.(cid:3)
`In answer to paragraph 12 of the Complaint, Ohsung USA admits that the
`’207 patent is entitled “System and Method for Activity Based Configuration of an
`Entertainment System” and bears an issue date of August 14, 2012. Ohsung USA is
`without sufficient knowledge or information as to the truth of the remainder of the
`allegations contained in paragraph 12, and therefore denies them.
`13.(cid:3)
`In answer to paragraph 13 of the Complaint, Ohsung USA is without
`sufficient knowledge or information as to the truth of the allegations concerning other
`Defendants named in the Complaint, and therefore denies them.
`14.(cid:3)
`In answer to paragraph 14 of the Complaint, Ohsung USA admits that
`Ohsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (“Ohsung Korea”) is a South Korean entity having its
`principal place of business at #181, Gongdan-Dong, Gumi-City, Gyeongsangbuk-do,
`South Korea 730-030.
`15.(cid:3)
`In answer to paragraph 15 of the Complaint, Ohsung USA admits that it
`is a California corporation with a Business Entity record in the California Secretary of
`State database that lists an entity address of P.O. Box 3171, El Centro, California
`92244 and an agent address of 238 Jakrabbit Dr., El Centro, California 92243.
`Ohsung USA admits that it has an office in Calexico, California. Ohsung USA avers
`that El Centro and Calexico are in Imperial County, California, which is in the federal
`judicial district of the Southern District of California. Ohsung USA avers that it is a
`
`-4-
`DEFENDANT OHSUNG ELECTRONICS U.S.A.’S ANSWER TO SECOND
`AMENDED COMPLAINT; DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`NO. SACV 13-00984 AG(JPRx)
`
`Universal Electronics Exhibit 2022, Page 4
`Universal Remote Control v. Universal Electronics, Trial No. IPR2014-01106
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 8:13-cv-00984-AG-JPR Document 76 Filed 02/24/14 Page 5 of 16 Page ID #:442
`
`subsidiary of Ohsung Korea, a Korean corporation. Ohsung USA denies the
`remaining allegations set forth in paragraph 15 of the Complaint.
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`16.(cid:3)
`In answer to paragraph 16 of the Complaint, Ohsung USA admits that it
`sells remote control devices. Ohsung USA is without sufficient knowledge or
`information as to the truth of the remaining allegations contained in paragraph 16, and
`therefore denies them.
`17.(cid:3)
`In answer to paragraph 17 of the Complaint, Ohsung USA admits that it
`supplies remote control devices to Defendant Universal Remote Control, Inc.
`(“URC”). Ohsung USA is without sufficient information or knowledge as to the truth
`of the remaining allegations contained in paragraph 17, and therefore denies them.
`18.(cid:3)
`In answer to paragraph 18 of the Complaint, Ohsung USA admits that
`Ohsung Korea designs, manufactures, and supplies remote control devices which are
`ultimately transferred to URC. Ohsung USA is without sufficient knowledge or
`information as to the truth of the remaining allegations contained in paragraph 18, and
`therefore denies them.
`19.(cid:3)
`In answer to paragraph 19 of the Complaint, Ohsung USA is without
`sufficient knowledge or information as to the truth of the allegations contained in
`paragraph 19, and therefore denies them.
`20.(cid:3)
`In answer to paragraph 20 of the Complaint, Ohsung USA admits that
`Ohsung Korea designs, manufactures, and supplies remote control devices which are
`ultimately transferred to URC. Ohsung USA is without sufficient knowledge or
`information as to the truth of the remaining allegations contained in paragraph 20, and
`therefore denies them.
`21.(cid:3)
`In answer to paragraph 21 of the Complaint, Ohsung USA admits that
`Ohsung USA is a subsidiary of Ohsung Korea. Ohsung USA admits that Ohsung
`USA, Ohsung Korea, and URC have communicated in the normal course of business.
`-5-
`DEFENDANT OHSUNG ELECTRONICS U.S.A.’S ANSWER TO SECOND
`AMENDED COMPLAINT; DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`NO. SACV 13-00984 AG(JPRx)
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Universal Electronics Exhibit 2022, Page 5
`Universal Remote Control v. Universal Electronics, Trial No. IPR2014-01106
`
`

`

`Case 8:13-cv-00984-AG-JPR Document 76 Filed 02/24/14 Page 6 of 16 Page ID #:443
`
`Ohsung USA is without sufficient knowledge or information as to the truth of the
`remaining allegations contained in paragraph 21, and therefore denies them.
`22.(cid:3)
`In answer to paragraph 22 of the Complaint, Ohsung USA is without
`sufficient knowledge or information as to the truth of the allegations contained in
`paragraph 22, and therefore denies them.
`23.(cid:3)
`In answer to paragraph 23 of the Complaint, Ohsung USA denies the
`allegations therein.
`24.(cid:3)
`In answer to paragraph 24 of the Complaint, Ohsung USA admits that it
`has one employee who works at 500 Mamaroneck Avenue, Harrison, New York
`10528. Ohsung USA Admits that it has not made monetary rental payments for this
`one employee’s use of the facilities at this address. Ohsung USA denies the
`remaining allegations contained in paragraph 24 of the Complaint.
`25.(cid:3)
`In answer to paragraph 25 of the Complaint, Ohsung USA admits that it
`maintains an office in Calexico, California, in Imperial County, which is in the federal
`judicial district of the Southern District of California. Ohsung USA denies the
`remaining allegations contained in paragraph 25 of the Complaint.
`26.(cid:3)
`In answer to paragraph 26 of the Complaint, Ohsung USA admits that it
`maintains an office in Calexico, California, in Imperial County, which is in the federal
`judicial district of the Southern District of California. Ohsung USA denies the
`remaining allegations contained in paragraph 26 of the Complaint.
`27.(cid:3)
`In answer to paragraph 27 of the Complaint, Ohsung USA admits UEI
`alleges that venue is proper in the Central District of California under 28 U.S.C. §§
`1391 and 1400(b), but avers that this judicial district is not the most appropriate venue
`for this lawsuit.
`ANSWERS TO CLAIMS FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`The Complaint asserts infringement by referring to various features allegedly
`present in Ohsung USA’s products. The Complaint does not define these features. The
`-6-
`DEFENDANT OHSUNG ELECTRONICS U.S.A.’S ANSWER TO SECOND
`AMENDED COMPLAINT; DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`NO. SACV 13-00984 AG(JPRx)
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Universal Electronics Exhibit 2022, Page 6
`Universal Remote Control v. Universal Electronics, Trial No. IPR2014-01106
`
`

`

`Case 8:13-cv-00984-AG-JPR Document 76 Filed 02/24/14 Page 7 of 16 Page ID #:444
`
`Complaint asserts legal conclusions based on features that have not been defined in
`the Complaint. Since the features referred to in the Complaint are not defined, the
`following answers to the Counts are based on any potential meaning that could be
`ascribed to each feature recited in the Complaint.
`ANSWERS TO COUNT I
`28.(cid:3) Ohsung USA re-alleges and incorporates by reference as if fully set forth
`herein its responses to paragraphs 1–27 above.
`29.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 29.
`30.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 30.
`31.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 31.
`32.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 32.
`33.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 33.
`34.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 34.
`35.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 35.
`36.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 36.
`37.(cid:3) Ohsung USA is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a
`belief as to the truth of the allegations of paragraph 37, and therefore denies them.
`38.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 38.
`39.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 39.
`ANSWERS TO COUNT II
`40.(cid:3) Ohsung USA re-alleges and incorporates by reference as if fully set forth
`herein its responses to paragraphs 1–27 above.
`41.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 41.
`42.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 42.
`43.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 43.
`44.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 44.
`45.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 45.
`-7-
`DEFENDANT OHSUNG ELECTRONICS U.S.A.’S ANSWER TO SECOND
`AMENDED COMPLAINT; DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`NO. SACV 13-00984 AG(JPRx)
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Universal Electronics Exhibit 2022, Page 7
`Universal Remote Control v. Universal Electronics, Trial No. IPR2014-01106
`
`

`

`Case 8:13-cv-00984-AG-JPR Document 76 Filed 02/24/14 Page 8 of 16 Page ID #:445
`
`46.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 46.
`47.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 47.
`48.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 48.
`49.(cid:3) Ohsung USA is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a
`belief as to the truth of the allegations of paragraph 49, and therefore denies them.
`50.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 50.
`51.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 51.
`ANSWERS TO COUNT III
`52.(cid:3) Ohsung USA re-alleges and incorporates by reference as if fully set forth
`herein its responses to paragraphs 1–27 above.
`53.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 53.
`54.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 54.
`55.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 55.
`56.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 56.
`57.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 57.
`58.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 58.
`59.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 59.
`60.(cid:3) Ohsung USA is without knowledge or sufficient information to form a
`belief as to the truth of the allegations of paragraph 60, and therefore denies them.
`61.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 61.
`62.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 62.
`ANSWERS TO COUNT IV
`63.(cid:3) Ohsung USA re-alleges and incorporates by reference as if fully set forth
`herein its responses to paragraphs 1–27 above.
`64.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 64.
`65.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 65.
`66.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 66.
`-8-
`DEFENDANT OHSUNG ELECTRONICS U.S.A.’S ANSWER TO SECOND
`AMENDED COMPLAINT; DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`NO. SACV 13-00984 AG(JPRx)
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Universal Electronics Exhibit 2022, Page 8
`Universal Remote Control v. Universal Electronics, Trial No. IPR2014-01106
`
`

`

`Case 8:13-cv-00984-AG-JPR Document 76 Filed 02/24/14 Page 9 of 16 Page ID #:446
`
`67.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 67.
`68.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 68.
`69.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 69.
`70.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 70.
`71.(cid:3) Ohsung USA is without knowledge or sufficient information to form a
`belief as to the truth of the allegations of paragraph 71, and therefore denies them.
`72.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 72.
`73.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 73.
`74.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 74.
`ANSWERS TO COUNT V
`75.(cid:3) Ohsung USA re-alleges and incorporates by reference as if fully set forth
`herein its responses to paragraphs 1–27 above.
`76.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 76.
`77.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 77.
`78.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 78.
`79.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 79.
`80.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 80.
`81.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 81.
`82.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 82.
`83.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 83.
`84.(cid:3) Ohsung USA is without knowledge or sufficient information to form a
`belief as to the truth of the allegations of paragraph 84, and therefore denies them.
`85.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 85.
`86.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 86.
`87.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 87.
`ANSWERS TO COUNT VI
`
`-9-
`DEFENDANT OHSUNG ELECTRONICS U.S.A.’S ANSWER TO SECOND
`AMENDED COMPLAINT; DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`NO. SACV 13-00984 AG(JPRx)
`
`Universal Electronics Exhibit 2022, Page 9
`Universal Remote Control v. Universal Electronics, Trial No. IPR2014-01106
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 8:13-cv-00984-AG-JPR Document 76 Filed 02/24/14 Page 10 of 16 Page ID #:447
`
`88.(cid:3) Ohsung USA re-alleges and incorporates by reference as if fully set forth
`herein its responses to paragraphs 1–27 above.
`89.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 89.
`90.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 90.
`91.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 91.
`92.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 92.
`93.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 93.
`94.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 94.
`95.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 95.
`96.(cid:3) Ohsung USA is without knowledge or sufficient information to form a
`belief as to the truth of the allegations of paragraph 96, and therefore denies them.
`97.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 97.
`98.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 98.
`ANSWERS TO COUNT VII
`99.(cid:3) Ohsung USA re-alleges and incorporates by reference as if fully set forth
`herein its responses to paragraphs 1–27 above.
`100.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 100.
`101.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 101.
`102.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 102.
`103.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 103.
`104.(cid:3) Ohsung USA is without knowledge or sufficient information to form a
`belief as to the truth of the allegations of paragraph 104, and therefore denies them.
`105.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 105.
`106.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 106.
`ANSWERS TO COUNT VIII
`107.(cid:3) Ohsung USA re-alleges and incorporates by reference as if fully set forth
`herein its responses to paragraphs 1–27 above.
`-10-
`DEFENDANT OHSUNG ELECTRONICS U.S.A.’S ANSWER TO SECOND
`AMENDED COMPLAINT; DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`NO. SACV 13-00984 AG(JPRx)
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Universal Electronics Exhibit 2022, Page 10
`Universal Remote Control v. Universal Electronics, Trial No. IPR2014-01106
`
`

`

`Case 8:13-cv-00984-AG-JPR Document 76 Filed 02/24/14 Page 11 of 16 Page ID #:448
`
`108.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 108.
`109.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 109.
`110.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 110.
`111.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 111.
`112.(cid:3) Ohsung USA is without knowledge or sufficient information to form a
`belief as to the truth of the allegations of paragraph 112, and therefore denies them.
`113.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 113.
`114.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 114.
`ANSWERS TO COUNT IX
`115.(cid:3) Ohsung USA re-alleges and incorporates by reference as if fully set forth
`herein its responses to paragraphs 1–27 above.
`116.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 116.
`117.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 117.
`118.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 118.
`119.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 119.
`120.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 120.
`121.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 121.
`122.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 122.
`123.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 123.
`124.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 124.
`125.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 125.
`126.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 126.
`127.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 127.
`128.(cid:3) Ohsung USA is without knowledge or sufficient information to form a
`belief as to the truth of the allegations of paragraph 128, and therefore denies them.
`129.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 129.
`130.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 130.
`-11-
`DEFENDANT OHSUNG ELECTRONICS U.S.A.’S ANSWER TO SECOND
`AMENDED COMPLAINT; DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`NO. SACV 13-00984 AG(JPRx)
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Universal Electronics Exhibit 2022, Page 11
`Universal Remote Control v. Universal Electronics, Trial No. IPR2014-01106
`
`

`

`Case 8:13-cv-00984-AG-JPR Document 76 Filed 02/24/14 Page 12 of 16 Page ID #:449
`
`ANSWERS TO COUNT X
`131.(cid:3) Ohsung USA re-alleges and incorporates by reference as if fully set forth
`herein its responses to paragraphs 1–27 above.
`132.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 132.
`133.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 133.
`134.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 134.
`135.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 135.
`136.(cid:3) Ohsung USA is without knowledge or sufficient information to form a
`belief as to the truth of the allegations of paragraph 136, and therefore denies them.
`137.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 137.
`138.(cid:3) Ohsung USA denies the allegations of paragraph 138.
`PLAINTIFF’S PRAYER FOR RELIEF
`Ohsung USA denies that Plaintiff is entitled to any relief requested in the
`Complaint, including any relief requested in the Prayer for Relief and its
`subparagraphs a through e.
`
`AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
`Ohsung USA asserts the below affirmative defenses in further response to the
`Complaint, including each of Plaintiff's Claims for Patent Infringement (Counts I–X).
`FIRST AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`(Failure to State a Claim)
`Plaintiff’s Complaint fails to state any claim upon which relief can be granted.
`SECOND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`(Non-Infringement)
`Plaintiff bears the burden of proving infringement, and Ohsung USA has not
`infringed, either directly, indirectly, contributorily, or by inducement, either literally
`or under the doctrine of equivalents, any valid and enforceable claim of the patents-in-
`suit.
`
`-12-
`DEFENDANT OHSUNG ELECTRONICS U.S.A.’S ANSWER TO SECOND
`AMENDED COMPLAINT; DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`NO. SACV 13-00984 AG(JPRx)
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Universal Electronics Exhibit 2022, Page 12
`Universal Remote Control v. Universal Electronics, Trial No. IPR2014-01106
`
`

`

`Case 8:13-cv-00984-AG-JPR Document 76 Filed 02/24/14 Page 13 of 16 Page ID #:450
`
`THIRD AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`(Invalidity)
`Each of the asserted claims of the patents-in-suit are invalid and/or
`unenforceable for failure to meet one or more of the conditions of patentability under
`the patent laws of the United States, including but not limited to 35 U.S.C. §§ 101,
`102, 103 and/or 112, and/or obviousness-type double patenting.
`FOURTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`(Estoppel, Laches, and/or Waiver)
`Upon information and belief, Plaintiff’s claims are barred or otherwise limited
`under the doctrines of estoppel, laches, and/or waiver.
`FIFTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`(Time Limitations based on 35 U.S.C. § 286)
`Upon information and belief, Plaintiff is limited in its right to seek damages due
`to time limitations under 35 U.S.C. § 286.
`SIXTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`(Failure to Comply with 35 U.S.C. § 287)
`Upon information and belief, Plaintiff is limited in its right to seek damages due
`to its failure to provide Ohsung USA with either actual notice of infringement or
`alleged infringement, or constructive notice of any of the asserted patents-in-suit.
`SEVENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`(Implied or Express License)
`Upon information and belief, Plaintiff is precluded from obtaining its requested
`relief on the basis of implied or express license to one or more of the patents-in-suit.
` EIGHTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`(No Willful Infringement)
`To the extent Ohsung USA is found to have infringed any of the valid and
`enforceable claims of the patents-in-suit, that infringement was not willful.
`-13-
`DEFENDANT OHSUNG ELECTRONICS U.S.A.’S ANSWER TO SECOND
`AMENDED COMPLAINT; DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`NO. SACV 13-00984 AG(JPRx)
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Universal Electronics Exhibit 2022, Page 13
`Universal Remote Control v. Universal Electronics, Trial No. IPR2014-01106
`
`

`

`Case 8:13-cv-00984-AG-JPR Document 76 Filed 02/24/14 Page 14 of 16 Page ID #:451
`
`NINTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`(Patent Misuse)
`Upon information and belief, the patents-in-suit are unenforceable as a result of
`patent misuse.
`RESERVATION OF ADDITIONAL AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
`Ohsung USA has not yet commenced discovery in this action, and Ohsung USA
`continues to investigate the allegations set forth in the Complaint. Ohsung USA
`specifically gives notice that it intends to rely upon other defenses as may become
`available by law or as discovery proceeds in this case, and hereby reserves the right to
`assert such additional defenses.
`PRAYER FOR RELIEF
`WHEREFORE, Ohsung USA respectfully requests:
`1.(cid:3)
`That the Complaint be dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice;
`2.(cid:3)
`That Plaintiff take nothing by way of its Complaint;
`3.(cid:3)
`That this case be found to be an exceptional case in Ohsung USA’s favor
`pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 285;
`4.(cid:3)
`That Ohsung USA be awarded its reasonable costs in this action,
`including attorneys’ fees and prejudgment and postjudgment interest; and
`5.(cid:3)
`Such other relief as the Court may deem just and proper.
`
`Dated: February 24, 2014
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
`
`By: /s/ Peter Kang
`Peter H. Kang
`pkang@sidley.com
`SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
`1001 Page Mill Road, Bldg. 1
`Palo Alto, CA 94304
`Telephone: (650) 565-7000
`-14-
`DEFENDANT OHSUNG ELECTRONICS U.S.A.’S ANSWER TO SECOND
`AMENDED COMPLAINT; DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`NO. SACV 13-00984 AG(JPRx)
`
`Universal Electronics Exhibit 2022, Page 14
`Universal Remote Control v. Universal Electronics, Trial No. IPR2014-01106
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 8:13-cv-00984-AG-JPR Document 76 Filed 02/24/14 Page 15 of 16 Page ID #:452
`
`Facsimile: (650) 565-7100
`Teague Donahey
`tdonahey@sidley.com
`Samuel R. Miller
`srmiller@sidley.com
`SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
`555 California, Suite 2000
`San Francisco, CA 94104
`Telephone: (415) 772-1200
`Facsimile: (415) 772-7400
`Theodore W. Chandler
`tchandler@sidley.com
`SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
`555 West Fifth Street
`Los Angeles, CA 90013
`Telephone: (213) 896-6000
`Facsimile: (213) 896-6600
`Attorneys for Defendant Ohsung
`Electronics USA, Inc.
`
`-15-
`DEFENDANT OHSUNG ELECTRONICS U.S.A.’S ANSWER TO SECOND
`AMENDED COMPLAINT; DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`NO. SACV 13-00984 AG(JPRx)
`
`Universal Electronics Exhibit 2022, Page 15
`Universal Remote Control v. Universal Electronics, Trial No. IPR2014-01106
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 8:13-cv-00984-AG-JPR Document 76 Filed 02/24/14 Page 16 of 16 Page ID #:453
`
`DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`In accordance with Rule 38 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local
`
`Rule 38, Ohsung USA respectfully demands a trial by jury on all issues and claims so
`triable.
`
`Dated: February 24, 2014
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
`
`By: /s/ Peter Kang
`Peter H. Kang
`pkang@sidley.com
`SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
`1001 Page Mill Road, Bldg. 1
`Palo Alto, CA 94304
`Telephone: (650) 565-7000
`Facsimile: (650) 565-7100
`Teague Donahey
`tdonahey@sidley.com
`Samuel R. Miller
`srmiller@sidley.com
`SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
`555 California, Suite 2000
`San Francisco, CA 94104
`Telephone: (415) 772-1200
`Facsimile: (415) 772-7400
`Theodore W. Chandler
`tchandler@sidley.com
`SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
`555 West Fifth Street
`Los Angeles, CA 90013
`Telephone: (213) 896-6000
`Facsimile: (213) 896-6600
`Attorneys for Defendant Ohsung
`Electronics USA, Inc.
`
`-16-
`DEFENDANT OHSUNG ELECTRONICS U.S.A.’S ANSWER TO SECOND
`AMENDED COMPLAINT; DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`NO. SACV 13-00984 AG(JPRx)
`
`Universal Electronics Exhibit 2022, Page 16
`Universal Remote Control v. Universal Electronics, Trial No. IPR2014-01106
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`