`MOTIONS FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 1.68, I, Jamie B. Beaber, hereby attest to the following:
`1. I am a member in good standing of the District of Columbia Bar (2003) and
`
`the Michigan Bar (2001), as well as the following Federal Courts:
`
`a. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (2003)
`
`b. District of Columbia Court of Appeals (2003)
`
`c. U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (2013)
`
`d. U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia (2013);
`
`2. I have not been suspended or disbarred from practice before any court or
`
`administrative body;
`
`3. I have never had an application for admission to practice before any court or
`
`administrative body denied;
`
`4. I have never had sanctions or contempt citations imposed by any court or
`
`administrative body against me;
`
`5. I have read and will comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide and the
`
`Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials set forth in part 42 of 37 C.F.R.;
`
`6. I will be subject to the USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37
`
`C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et. seq. and disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a);
`
`7. I am currently applying to appear pro hace vice in IPR2014-01092, IPR2014-
`
`01094, IPR2014-01095, IPR2014-01096, IPR2014-01097, IPR2014-01357,
`
`1
`
`LGD_001763
`
`LG Display Ex. 1025
`
`
`
`IPR2014-01359, and IPR2014-01362. I have not applied to appear pro hac vice
`
`before the Board in connection with any other proceedings in the last three
`
`years.
`
`8. I am an experienced litigation attorney and have been involved in numerous
`
`patent infringement cases in the U.S. International Trade Commission and in
`
`federal District Courts across the country. I have experience in various aspects
`
`of patent infringement matters including trials, Markman hearings, and
`
`summary judgment hearings.
`
`9. I am lead counsel for the defendants, which include LG Display Co., Ltd., in a
`
`co-pending litigation (Delaware Display Group LLC and Innovative Display
`
`Technologies LLC v. LG Electronics, Inc., LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc., LG Display Co.,
`
`Ltd., and LG Display America, Inc., Case No. 1:13-cv-02109 (D. Del.)) in which
`
`U.S. Patent Nos. 6,755,547, 7,300,194, 7,384,177, 7,404,660, 7,434,974,
`
`7,537,370, 7,914,196, and 8,215,816 are asserted. I have reviewed and am
`
`familiar with the asserted patents, the prior art references, and invalidity claim
`
`charts in the co-pending litigation. Further, I have been involved and am
`
`familiar with the factual and legal arguments at issue in the co-pending
`
`litigation. Accordingly, I am familiar with the subject matter at issue in the inter
`
`partes reexamination proceedings for the asserted patents.
`
`10. I also entered an appearance as counsel for third parties Dell Inc. in Case No.
`
`2:13-cv-00523 (E.D. Tex.) on September 5, 2014, Hewlett-Packard Company in
`2
`
`LGD_001764
`
`
`
`Case No. 2:13-cv-00524 (E.D. Tex.) on October 8, 2014, and Hyundai Motor
`
`Company, Hyundai Motor America, Hyundai Motor Manufacturing Alabama,
`
`LLC, Kia Motors Corporation, Kia Motors America, Inc., and Kia Motors
`
`Manufacturing Georgia, Inc. in Case No. 2:14-cv-00201 (E.D. Tex.) on July 9,
`
`2014. Each of these cases involve U.S. Patent Nos. 6,755,547, 7,300,194,
`
`7,384,177, 7,404,660, 7,434,974, and 8,215,816. Case Nos. 2:13-cv-00523 and
`
`2:13-cv-00524 additionally involve U.S. Patent No. 7,537,370. Although these
`
`cases do not involve LG Display Co., Ltd., my role in these cases further
`
`underscores my familiarity with the subject matter at issue in the IPR
`
`proceedings listed at Paragraph 7.
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`Jamie B. Beaber
`Mayer Brown LLP
`1999 K Street, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20006
`(202) 263-3153
`
`
`
`
`
`Date:December 3, 2014
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`LGD_001765
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
