`
`_______________________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`_______________________________
`
`LG DISPLAY CO., LTD.,
`
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`INNOVATIVE DISPLAY TECHNOLOGIES LLC,
`
`Patent Owner.
`__________________________________
`
`Case IPR2014-01097
`
`Patent 7,300,194
`
`__________________________________
`
`PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a), Petitioner respectfully requests oral
`
`argument. The oral argument is presently scheduled for September 21, 2015.
`
`Paper 10. The issues to be addressed include the following:
`
`1. Unpatentability of claims 1, 4-6, and 28 of U.S. Patent. No. 7,300,194 under
`
`35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over Pristash;
`
`2. Unpatentability of claims 1, 16, 22, 23, 27, and 31 of U.S. Patent. No.
`
`7,300,194 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being anticipated by Funamoto;
`
`3. Unpatentability of claims 4-6 of U.S. Patent. No. 7,300,194 under 35 U.S.C.
`
`§ 103 as obvious over Funamoto;
`
`4. Unpatentability of claim 28 of U.S. Patent. No. 7,300,194 under 35 U.S.C. §
`
`102(b) as being anticipated by Kobayashi;
`
`5. Unpatentability of claims 1, 4-6, and 28 of U.S. Patent. No. 7,300,194 under
`
`35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being anticipated by Nishio;
`
`6. Any procedural and evidentiary issues raised by the parties;
`
`7. Any additional issue the parties raise or propose to raise at or before the oral
`
`argument; and
`
`8. Any additional issues on which the Board seeks information or clarification.
`
`
`
`Petitioner requests that they be permitted to argue first. Office Patent Trial
`
`Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. 45,756, 48,768 (Aug. 14, 2012). Petitioner requests
`
`
`
`forty-five minutes for their argument with the opportunity to reserve time for a
`
`rebuttal.
`
`
`
`Petitioner further requests the use of audio-visual equipment to assist its
`
`arguments and to display is demonstrative exhibits, including a computer-
`
`connectable projector, an ELMO, and a screen.
`
`
`
`Petitioner requests the services of a court reporter to transcribe the
`
`proceeding.
`
`Dated: August 14, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`By:
`/Robert G Pluta Reg No 50970/
`Robert G. Pluta
`Registration No. 50,970
`Amanda K. Streff
`Registration No. 65,224
`MAYER BROWN LLP
`71 S. Wacker Drive
`Chicago, IL 60606
`Telephone: 312-701-8641
`Facsimile: 312-701-7711
`rpluta@mayerbrown.com
`astreff@mayerbrown.com
`
`Jamie B. Beaber
`Baldine B. Paul
`Registration No. 54,369
`Anita Y. Lam
`Registration No. 67,394
`MAYER BROWN LLP
`1999 K Street, N.W.
`Washington, DC 20006
`
`
`
`Telephone: 202-263-3000
`Facsimile: 202-263-3300
`bpaul@mayerbrown.com
`alam@mayerbrown.com
`
`Counsel for LG Display Co. Ltd.
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`The undersigned hereby certifies that on this 14th day of August, 2015, a
`
`
`
`copy of PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT was served in its
`
`entirety via electronic mail, pursuant to Patent Owner’s consent in its Mandatory
`
`Notices Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.8(a)(2) and 42.8(b): jkimble@bcpc-law.com
`
`and jbragalone@bcpc-law.com.
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: August 14, 2015 By:
`
`
`
`
` Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Robert G Pluta Reg No 50970/
`Robert G. Pluta
`Registration No. 50,970
`MAYER BROWN LLP
`71 S. Wacker Drive
`Chicago, IL 60606
`Telephone: 312-701-8641
`Facsimile: 312-701-7711
`
`Counsel for LG Display Co., Ltd.