Filed on behalf of Innovative Display Technologies LLC.
`By:
`Justin B. Kimble (jkimble@bcpc-law.com)
`
`Jeffrey R. Bragalone (jbragalone@bcpc-law.com)
`Bragalone Conroy P.C.
`2200 Ross Ave.
`Suite 4500 – West
`Dallas, TX 75201
`Tel: 214.785.6670
`Fax: 214.786.6680
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`LG DISPLAY CO., LTD.
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`INNOVATIVE DISPLAY TECHNOLOGIES LLC
`Patent Owner
`
`
`Case IPR2014-01097
`U.S. Patent No. 7,300,194
`
`
`
`
`PRO HAC VICE MOTION TO ADMIT ATTORNEY T. WILLIAM
`KENNEDY PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c)
`
`
`
`
`Mail Stop PATENT BOARD
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent & Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`
`
`By:
`Justin B. Kimble (jkimble@bcpc-law.com)
`
`Jeffrey R. Bragalone (jbragalone@bcpc-law.com)
`Bragalone Conroy P.C.
`2200 Ross Ave.
`Suite 4500 – West
`Dallas, TX 75201
`Tel: 214.785.6670
`Fax: 214.786.6680
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`LG DISPLAY CO., LTD.
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`INNOVATIVE DISPLAY TECHNOLOGIES LLC
`Patent Owner
`
`
`Case IPR2014-01097
`U.S. Patent No. 7,300,194
`
`
`
`
`PRO HAC VICE MOTION TO ADMIT ATTORNEY T. WILLIAM
`KENNEDY PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c)
`
`
`
`
`Mail Stop PATENT BOARD
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent & Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`
`
`
`Case IPR2014-01097
`Patent 7,300,194
`
`
`
`Patent Owner Innovative Display Technologies LLC (“IDT”) hereby files this
`
`motion pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c) for T. William Kennedy to appear pro hac
`
`vice on its behalf before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board in IPR2014-01097. This
`
`motion follows the guidelines set forth in IPR2013-00639, Paper 7, entered October
`
`15, 2013.
`
`I.
`
`Statement of Facts.
`
`IDT has already designated a registered practitioner, Justin B. Kimble (reg.
`
`no. 58,591) as lead counsel, and IDT intends to designate T. William Kennedy as
`
`one of its back-up counsel in the event this motion is granted. The following
`
`statement of facts shows that there is good cause for the Board to recognize T.
`
`William Kennedy pro hac vice during this proceeding.
`
`Mr. Kennedy is a patent litigator with over eight years’ experience, including
`
`significant experience in the area of patent validity. In the many patent litigations in
`
`which he has been counsel, he was worked extensively on issues relating to 35
`
`U.S.C. §§ 102, 103, and 112 challenges to patent validity including things such as
`
`working closely with experts on validity and invalidity reports, preparing invalidity
`
`arguments for trial, developing invalidity and validity arguments, and reviewing and
`
`analyzing numerous prosecution histories and prior art references. Mr. Kennedy has
`
`also spent significant time learning the procedure of inter partes review.
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case IPR2014-01097
`Patent 7,300,194
`
`Mr. Kennedy currently represents the Patent Owner in its assertion of the
`
`patent at issue in this proceeding and its related patents in numerous cases pending
`
`in the District of Delaware and the Eastern District of Texas. See, e.g., Innovative
`
`Display Technologies LLC v. Sprint Corporation et al., No. 2:13-cv-00721 (E.D.
`
`Tex., filed June 25, 2014); see also Delaware Display Group LLC et al. v. Sony Corp
`
`et al., No. 1:13-cv-02111 (D. Del., filed Dec. 31, 2013). As counsel in those actions,
`
`Mr. Kennedy has become very familiar the subject matter at issue in this proceeding,
`
`i.e., light emitting panel assemblies. Moreover, during the course of those lawsuits,
`
`Mr. Kennedy has analyzed the prior art involved in this petition as it relates to the
`
`patent-at-issue as well as its related patents, all of which concern light emitting panel
`
`assemblies. Furthermore, in those lawsuits Mr. Kennedy has developed infringement
`
`allegations that assert the patent-at-issue in this petition against various light
`
`emitting panel assemblies, including those found in smart phones, tablets, laptop
`
`computers, and televisions to name a few. In his role as counsel in those litigations,
`
`Mr. Kennedy has spent significant time learning the technology involved in light
`
`emitting panel assemblies such as those found in the patent-at-issue in this
`
`proceeding.
`
`As of this date, there are currently 38 total pending IPRs covering the patent-
`
`at-issue and its related patents. Mr. Kennedy has familiarized himself which each of
`
`those pending petitions. Given the sheer number of pending IPRs related to this
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case IPR2014-01097
`Patent 7,300,194
`
`patent family and Mr. Kennedy’s already extensive knowledge of the patents, prior
`
`art, and IPRs, Patent Owner asks the PTAB to grant this motion to afford Patent
`
`Owner the benefit of having an additional attorney authorized on this matter.
`
`II. Mr. Kennedy has Submitted Herewith a Declaration1 Attesting the
`
`Following Facts.
`
`1. Mr. Kennedy is a member in good standing of the Texas State Bar.
`
`2. Mr. Kennedy has never been subject to any suspensions or disbarments
`
`from practice before any court or administrative body.
`
`3.
`
`None of Mr. Kennedy’s applications for admission to practice before
`
`any court or administrative body has ever been denied.
`
`4. Mr. Kennedy has never been sanctioned nor had contempt citations
`
`imposed by any court or administrative body.
`
`5. Mr. Kennedy has read and will comply with the Office Patent Trial
`
`Practice Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials set forth in
`
`part 42 of 37 C.F.R.
`
`6. Mr. Kennedy will be subject to the USPTO Rules of Professional
`
`Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et. seq. and disciplinary
`
`jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a).
`
`
`1 See Declaration of T. William Kennedy, attached hereto as Exhibit 2007.
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`Case IPR2014-01097
`Patent 7,300,194
`
`7.
`
`During the past three years, Mr. Kennedy has applied to appear pro hac
`
`vice before the PTAB in one other proceeding (IPR2014-01096), the
`
`motion for which was filed concurrently with this motion. Mr.
`
`Kennedy intends to file pro hac vice motions for the remainder of the
`
`IPRs asserted in this patent family.
`
`8. Mr. Kennedy has familiarity with the subject matter at issue in the
`
`proceeding as set forth in Section I above.
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`Case IPR2014-01097
`Patent 7,300,194
`
`Dated: April 10, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Justin B. Kimble
`Attorney for Patent Owner
`Registration No. 58,591
`Bragalone Conroy P.C.
`2200 Ross Ave.
`Suite 4500 – West
`Dallas, TX 75201
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that this document has been served via
`
`electronic mail on April 10, 2015, to Petitioner at the email addresses
`
`rpluta@mayerbrown.com, bpaul@mayerbrown.com, astreff@mayerbrown.com,
`
`alam@mayerbrown.com,
`
`jbeaber@mayerbrown.com,
`
`and
`
`DDGIPR@mayerbrown.com, pursuant to Petitioner’s consent in its revised
`
`mandatory notice.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`_____________________________
`
`Justin B. Kimble
`Attorney for Patent Owner
`Registration No. 58,591
`Bragalone Conroy P.C.
`2200 Ross Ave.
`Suite 4500 – West
`Dallas, TX 75201
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`6
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
