`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`Paper 35
`Entered: September 10, 2015
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`LG DISPLAY CO., LTD.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`INNOVATIVE DISPLAY TECHNOLOGIES LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`Case IPR2014-01096
`Patent 7,357,370
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`THOMAS L. GIANNETTI, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
` ORDER
`Decision on Motion
` 37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`
`
`
`
`Patent Owner has filed a motion for pro hac vice admission of T.
`William Kennedy in this proceeding. Paper 26. The motion is supported by
`a declaration of Mr. Kennedy. Exhibit 2006. No opposition has been filed.
`
`
`
`IPR2014-01096
`Patent 7,537,370
`
`
`The Board has reviewed the submissions and determined that the
`requirements of 37 C.F.R. § 42.10 have been met and there is good cause to
`admit Mr. Kennedy pro hac vice.
`
`It is, therefore,
`ORDERED that Patent Owner’s motion for admission of T. William
`Kennedy pro hac vice is granted.
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2014-01096
`Patent 7,537,370
`
`PETITIONER:
`Robert G. Pluta
`Amanda K. Streff
`Baldine B. Paul
`Anita Y. Lam
`MAYER BROWN LLP
`rpluta@mayerbrown.com
`astreff@mayerbrown.com
`bpaul@mayerbrown.com
`alam@mayerbrown.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`Justin B. Kimble
`Jeffrey R. Bragalone
`BRAGALONE CONROY P.C.
`jkimble@bcpc-law.com
`jbragalone@bcpc-law.com
`
`
`3