throbber
Filed on behalf of Innovative Display Technologies LLC
`By:
`Justin B. Kimble (jkimble@bcpc-law.com)
`
`Jeffrey R. Bragalone (jbragalone@bcpc-law.com)
`
`Bragalone Conroy P.C.
`
`2200 Ross Ave.
`
`Suite 4500 – West
`
`Dallas, TX 75201
`
`Tel: 214.785.6670
`
`Fax: 214.786.6680
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`LG DISPLAY, LTD.
`Petitioner
`v.
`INNOVATIVE DISPLAY TECHNOLOGIES LLC.
`Patent Owner
`
`Case IPR2014-01096
`U.S. Patent No. 7,537,370
`
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER MANDATORY NOTICES PURSUANT TO
`37 C.F.R. §§ 42.8(a)(2) and 42.8(b)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Mail Stop PATENT BOARD
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent & Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`
`

`

`Case IPR2014-01096
`Patent 7,537,370
`
`Patent Owner Innovative Display Technologies (“IDT”) hereby files its mandatory notices
`
`pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.8(a)(2) and 42.8(b):
`
`A. Section 42.8(b)(1) – Real Party-In-Interest
`
`Patent Owner identifies Acacia Research Group LLC and Acacia Research Corporation
`
`as its real parties-in-interest.
`
`B. Section 42.8(b)(2) – Related Matters
`
`Patent Owner asserts that Petitioner infringes the patent at issue in this inter partes review,
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,537,370 (the “’370 patent”), in the following lawsuit: Delaware Display Group
`
`LLC et al. v. LG Electronics Inc. et al., No. 1:13-cv-02109 (D. Del., filed Dec. 31, 2013). In
`
`addition to that lawsuit, Patent Owner has alleged infringement of the ’370 patent in the following
`
`matters:
`
`1. Innovative Display Technologies LLC v. Acer Inc., et al., No. 2:13-cv-00522 (E.D.
`
`Tex., filed June 28, 2013);
`
`2. Innovative Display Technologies LLC v. Dell Inc., No. 2:13-cv-00523 (E.D. Tex., filed
`
`June 28, 2013);
`
`3. Innovative Display Technologies LLC v. Hewlett-Packard Company, No. 2:13-cv-
`
`00524 (E.D. Tex., filed June 28, 2013);
`
`4. Innovative Display Technologies LLC v. Huawei Investment and Holding Co., Ltd. et
`
`al., No. 2:13-cv-00525 (E.D. Tex., filed June 28, 2013);
`
`5. Innovative Display Technologies LLC v. Blackberry Ltd. et al., No. 2:13-cv-00526
`
`(E.D. Tex., filed June 28, 2013);
`
`6. Innovative Display Technologies LLC v. ZTE Corporation et al., No. 2:13-cv-00527
`
`(E.D. Tex., filed June 28, 2013);
`
` 
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case IPR2014-01096
`Patent 7,537,370
`7. Innovative Display Technologies LLC v. Microsoft Corp., No. 2:13-cv-00783 (E.D.
`
`Tex., filed Oct. 1, 2013);
`
`8. Innovative Display Technologies LLC v. Nokia Corp. et al., No. 2:13-cv-00784 (E.D.
`
`Tex., filed Oct. 1, 2013);
`
`9. Innovative Display Technologies LLC v. Apple Inc., No. 2:14-cv-00030 (E.D. Tex.,
`
`filed Jan. 17, 2014);
`
`10. Innovative Display Technologies LLC v. BMW of North America, LLC et al., No. 2:14-
`
`cv-00106 (E.D. Tex., filed Feb. 21, 2014);
`
`11. Innovative Display Technologies LLC v. Canon U.S.A. Inc. et al., No. 2:14-cv-00142
`
`(E.D. Tex., filed Feb. 26, 2014);
`
`12. Innovative Display Technologies LLC v. MiTAC Digital Corporation et al., No. 2:14-
`
`cv-00144 (E.D. Tex., filed Feb. 26, 2014);
`
`13. Innovative Display Technologies LLC v. Nikon, Inc. et al., No. 2:14-cv-00145 (E.D.
`
`Tex., filed Feb. 27, 2014);
`
`14. Innovative Display Technologies LLC v. TomTom North America Inc. et al., No. 2:14-
`
`cv-00146 (E.D. Tex., filed Feb. 27, 2014);
`
`15. Innovative Display Technologies LLC v. Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. et al., No. 2:14-cv-
`
`00202 (E.D. Tex., filed Mar. 10, 2014);
`
`16. Innovative Display Technologies LLC et al. v. Apple Inc., No. 2:14-cv-00301 (E.D.
`
`Tex., filed Apr. 8, 2014);
`
`17. Innovative Display Technologies LLC v. Google Inc., et al., No. 2:14-cv-00302 (E.D.
`
`Tex., filed Apr. 8, 2014);
`
` 
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case IPR2014-01096
`Patent 7,537,370
`18. Innovative Display Technologies LLC v. Best Buy Co., Inc. et al., No. 2:14-cv-00532
`
`(E.D. Tex., filed Apr. 24, 2014);
`
`19. Innovative Display Technologies LLC et al. v. AT&T Inc. et al., No. 2:14-cv-00720
`
`(E.D. Tex., filed June 25, 2014);
`
`20. Innovative Display Technologies LLC et al. v. Sprint Corporation et al., No. 2:14-cv-
`
`00721 (E.D. Tex., filed June 25, 2014);
`
`21. Delaware Display Group LLC et al. v. Amazon.com Inc., No. 1:13-cv-02106 (D. Del.,
`
`filed Dec. 31, 2013);
`
`22. Delaware Display Group LLC et al. v. HTC Corporation et al., No. 1:13-cv-02107 (D.
`
`Del., filed Dec. 31, 2013);
`
`23. Delaware Display Group LLC et al. v. Lenovo Holding Company Inc. et al., No. 1:13-
`
`cv-02108 (D. Del., filed Dec. 31, 2013);
`
`24. Delaware Display Group LLC et al. v. Pantech Co. Ltd. et al., No. 1:13-cv-02110 (D.
`
`Del., filed Dec. 31, 2013);
`
`25. Delaware Display Group LLC et al. v. Sony Corp. et al., No. 1:13-cv-02111 (D. Del.,
`
`filed Dec. 31, 2013);
`
`26. Delaware Display Group LLC et al. v. VIZIO Inc. et al., No. 1:13-cv-02112 (D. Del.,
`
`filed Dec. 31, 2013);
`
`In addition, there are four other pending requests for inter partes review for patents related
`
`to the ’370 patent. Those IPRs are as follows:
`
`1. IPR2014-01092 (U.S. Patent No. 7,434,974);
`
`2. IPR2014-01094 (U.S. Patent No. 7,404,660);
`
`3. IPR2014-01095 (U.S. Patent No. 8,215,816); and
`
` 
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case IPR2014-01096
`Patent 7,537,370
`4. IPR2014-01097 (U.S. Patent No. 7,300,194).
`
`C. Section 42.8(b)(3) – Lead and Back-Up Counsel
`
`Patent Owner identifies the following lead and back-up counsel:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Lead Counsel:
`
`Justin B. Kimble (Reg. No. 58,591)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(Phone No. 214.785.6673)
`
`Back-Up Counsel:
`
`Jeffrey R. Bragalone (pro hac vice motion to be filed)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(Phone No. 214.785.6671)
`
`Address For Both: Bragalone Conroy P.C.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2200 Ross Ave.
`
`Suite 4500 – West
`
`Dallas, TX 75201
`
`Fax: 214.786.6680
`
`D. Section 42.8(b)(4) – Service Information
`
`(i)
`
`(ii)
`
`(iii)
`
`(iv)
`
`(v)
`
`electronic mailing address:
`
`jkimble@bcpc-law.com
`
`postal mailing address:
`
`Bragalone Conroy P.C.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2200 Ross Ave.
`
`Suite 4500 – West
`
`Dallas, TX 75201
`
`hand-delivery address:
`
`Same as (ii) above
`
`telephone number:
`
`facsimile number:
`
`
`
`
`
`214.785.6673
`
`214.786.6680
`
`Patent Owner consents to service by e-mail at the address identified in Section (i) above.
`
`
`
` 
`
`5
`
`

`

`Case IPR2014-01096
`Patent 7,537,370
`
`
`Dated: July 22, 2014
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` __________________________
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Justin B. Kimble
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Attorney for Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Registration No. 58,591
`
`
`
`
`
`Bragalone Conroy P.C.
`
`
`
`
`
`2200 Ross Ave.
`
`
`
`
`
`Suite 4500 – West
`
`
`
`
`
`Dallas, TX 75201
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that document has been served via electronic mail on July
`
`22, 2014, to Petitioner at following email addresses pursuant to its consent in its Petition at p. 3.
`
`rpluta@mayerbrown.com;
`
`bpaul@mayerbrown.com;
`
`astreff@mayerbrown.com;
`
`alam@mayerbrown.com; and DDGIPR@mayerbrown.com.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` __________________________
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Justin B. Kimble
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Attorney for Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Registration No. 58,591
`
`
`
`
`
`Bragalone Conroy P.C.
`
`
`
`
`
`2200 Ross Ave.
`
`
`
`
`
`Suite 4500 – West
`
`
`
`
`
`Dallas, TX 75201
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` 
`
`6
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket