`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`Paper 10
`Entered: January 13, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`LG DISPLAY CO., LTD.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`INNOVATIVE DISPLAY TECHNOLOGIES LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2014-010921
`Case IPR2014-01094
`Case IPR2014-01095
`Case IPR2014-01096
`Case IPR2014-01097
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`THOMAS L. GIANNETTI, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`
`
`
` ORDER
` Decision on Motion
` 37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`
`
`
`
`1 The parties are not authorized to use this caption.
`
`
`
`IPR2014-01092
`IPR2014-01094
`IPR2014-01095
`IPR2014-01096
`IPR2014-01097
`
`Patent Owner has filed unopposed motions for pro hac vice admission
`
`of Jeffrey R. Bragalone in these proceedings. Each of the motions is
`
`supported by a declaration of Mr. Bragalone. Ex. 2001
`
`The Board has reviewed the submissions and determined that the
`
`requirements of 37 C.F.R. § 42.10 have been met and there is good cause to
`
`admit Mr. Bragalone pro hac vice.
`
`
`
`It is, therefore,
`
`ORDERED that Patent Owner’s motion for admission of Jeffrey R.
`
`Bragalone pro hac vice is granted.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2014-01092
`IPR2014-01094
`IPR2014-01095
`IPR2014-01096
`IPR2014-01097
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Robert G. Pluta
`Amanda K. Streff
`Baldine B. Paul
`Anita Y. Lam
`MAYER BROWN LLP
`rpluta@mayerbrown.com
`astreff@mayerbrown.com
`bpaul@mayerbrown.com
`alam@mayerbrown.com
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Justin B. Kimble
`BRAGALONE CONROY P.C.
`jkimble@bcpc-law.com
`
`
`
`3
`
`