throbber
STUDIES ON THE FOLIC ACID VITAMINS
`
`III. The Duration of the Eflects of the Folic Acid
`Antagonists in Man
`
`PAUL T. CoNn1T, M.}D., PI-LB.“
`
`THE FIRST paper of this series described the
`inhibition by aminopterin of the conver-
`sion of folic acid to compounds with citrovo-
`rum factor (CF) activity in man.“ That the
`duration of this inhibition might have pro-
`found therapeutic significance was suggested
`by the work of Goldin et al.3 on the relative
`effectiveness of different dosage schedules of
`amethopterin in the treatment of mouse leu-
`kemia. They found that an interval of 4 days
`between doses produced the best therapeutic
`results when treatment was begun shortly
`after tumor implantation, before dissemina-
`tion occurred, and that
`this interval was re-
`lated to the recovery of the host from the
`effects of the drug.'’- 9
`The development of an analogous dosage
`regimen of amethopterin in man requires the
`determination of the size of the individual
`doses and the interval between consecutive
`
`doses. The second paper of this series pre-
`sented the results of a study of the acute tox-
`icity of amethopterin in man.” It was found
`that intravenous doses as large as 16 mg. per
`kg. produced little toxicity in patients with
`normal renal and bone marrow function.
`
`The duration of the effects of amethopterin
`in man is the subject of this report. Observa-
`tions on 3 other folic acid antagonists are in-
`
`From the National Cancer Institute, of the National
`Institutes of Health, Public Health Service, Bethesda,
`l\-Id.
`The many microbiological assays were skillfully per-
`formed by Dorothea F. Thomasson. The synthetic fo-
`linic acid used as a standard for the microbiological
`assays and the aminopterin were generously provided
`by Dr. H. P. Broquist and Dr. M. Ruegsegger of the
`Lederle Laboratories Division of the American Cyan-
`amid Company, Pearl River, NJ’. The 3'-chloroame-
`thopterin and 3’.5'-dichloroamethopterin were supplied
`by the Research Division of the American Cyanarnid
`Company. The parenteral solutions of amethopterin
`[50 mg. per 1111.), 3'-chloroarnethoptenn (10 mg. per
`ml.), and 3’,5'-dichloroamethopterin (50 mg. per ml.)
`were prepared as the sodium salts In
`the Pharmaceuti-
`cal Development Service of the
`hartnacy, Clinical
`Center, of the National Institutes of Health, under the
`direction of Dr. John A. Scigliano.
`' Present address: Oklahoma Medical Research Foun-
`dation, Oklahoma City. Okla.
`Received for publication April 28, 1959.
`
`229
`
`cluded. The urinary excretion of citmvorum
`factor derived from folic acid was used as an
`
`index of drug effect. From the results ob-
`tained, a dosage regimen of amethopterin for
`the treatment of human cancer is proposed.
`
`MATERIAIS RND METHODS
`
`Patients. Twelve patients with disseminated
`cancer participated in this study. Eight were
`reported previously in regard to the toxic ef-
`fects produced by single doses of amethopterin.’
`None of these patients had obvious renal in-
`sufficiency.
`Procedure. Amethopterin (4-amino-N“L
`methyl pteroylglutamic acid, Methotrexate)
`was given as a rapid intravenous injection
`to all
`the patients
`receiving this drug
`except patient
`I.L., who was given
`it
`orally. Aminopterin (4—amino pteroylglutamic
`acid) was administered as
`an oral dose.
`’-Chloroamethopterin (4-amino-N10-n1ethyl—3L
`chloropteroylglutamic acid) and 3’,5’-dichlo-
`roamethopterin (4-amino-N1“-methyl-3’,5’-dL
`chloropteroylglutamic acid) were given
`intrarnuscularly.
`Repeated test doses of folic acid were given
`before and at intervals of about 4 days after
`the administration of the antagonist. Twenty-
`four—hour urine samples were collected and
`assayed for citrovorum factor activity by the
`method of Sauberlich and Baumann“ as used-
`
`in this laboratory.3 In the illustrations, each
`point represents the urinary excretion of cit-
`rovorum factor during the 24-hour period
`after the subcutaneous administration of 15
`
`mg. of folic acid.
`
`RESULTS
`
`Patient D.W. was given no folic acid an-
`tagonist but was given serial test doses of folic
`acid to determine the variability to be ex-
`pected in the urinary excretion of citrovorum
`factor (Fig. 1). A similar control period for
`patient H.B.
`is presented in Fig. 5. The ob-
`served values ranged from 92 to 116% and
`
`MEDAC Exhibit 2010
`
`ANTARES v. MEDAC
`
`IPR2014-01091
`
`Page 00001
`
`MEDAC Exhibit 2010
`ANTARES v. MEDAC
`IPR2014-01091
`Page 00001
`
`

`
`230
`
`CANCER. March-A pri I 1960
`
`V01» 13
`
`
`
` NO AMETH-
`
`OPTERIN
`
`l
`
`
`lotus,/Kat
`
`
`AMETHOPTERIN
`
`
`
`0
`
`IO
`
`20
`
`DAYS
`
`yo MG/KG.
`AM ETH -
`
`OPTERIN
`
`0
`
`I0
`
`20
`
`DAYS
`
`' gle doses of amethopterin on the urinary excretion of citrovorum factor (CF) derived
`FIG. 1. The effect of
`figures, each point represents the amount
`E citrovorum factor excreted in the 24-
`from Eolic acid. In all
`hour
`iod after the parenteral administration of 15 mg. of folic ac‘
`. In this illustration, and in Figs. 2
`4,
`the v
`'cal arrows indicate the administration of amethopterin. Included are the following patients: D.
`., a
`-il—year—olrl white man with malignant carcinoid: 'R.A., a. 14-31
`-old white boy with fibrosarooma who received
`490 mg. of ameth
`erin; R.B., a 36-year-old white man
`' h
`odgkin's disea who received 690 mg. of ame-
`thopterin; R.S., a
`-
`1'-old white man with seminoma
`0 received 750 mg.
`amethopteri
`' 13.0., a 70-year-
`old white woman w'
`mycosis fungoides who received 470 mg. of amethopterin: L.B., 3 —year-old white
`woman with breast carcinoma who received 1,000 mg. of amethopterin.
`
`Page 00002
`
`Page 00002
`
`

`
`No. 2
`
`STUDIES ON THE Four: ACID VITAMINS. III.
`
`- Candi:
`
`231
`
`AMETHOPTERIN
`
`o I. G M6. / KG.
`
`o
`
`lo
`
`20
`DAYS
`
`so
`
`40
`
`Fin. 2. The elfect of
`repeated doses of amethopterin
`on the urinary excretion of or derived from folic acid
`in patient A.T., a'32-year-old white man with semi-
`notna who received 330 mg. and 325 mg. of ame-
`thopterin. See Fig. 1 for explanation of symbols.
`
`from 82 to 114% of the mean respectively.
`Single Doses of Amethopterin. Patients R.A.,
`R.B., R.S., B.G., and L.B. each received a
`single dose of amethopterin, from 6.5 to 16.
`mg. per kg. (Fig. 1). The initial excretion of
`citrovorum factor derived from folic acid was
`
`5 to 25 pg. per day. After the administration
`of amethopterin, the next dose of folic acid
`produced only 8 to 29% of the pretreatment
`amount. Recovery to initial values or higher
`had occurred by 13 to 24 days in 4 of the 5
`patients. Patient R.S. was not followed for
`longer than 18 days because he received addi-
`tional amethopterin on a different dosage
`regimen at
`that
`time. The higher recovery
`values of citrovorutn factor excretion exhibited
`
`by patients B.G. (159%) and L.B. (195%) sug-
`gest overcompensation during the recovery
`period.
`Multiple Doses of Amethopterin. Patients
`A.T., R.]., and C.M. were all given more than
`1 dose of amethopterin, from 6 to 15 mg. per
`kg. at intervals of 18 to 23 days (Figs. 2 to 4).
`The initial urinary excretion of 19 pg. of
`citrovorutn factor during the control 24 hours
`by patient A.T. was never equalled after
`either of the 2 doses of atnethopterin the pa-
`
`R. J.
`
`tient received (Fig. 2). The highest value of
`6 pg. per day 16 days after the first dose and
`19 days after the second dose was only 32%
`of the initial one. The minimum values of 7
`
`and 6% respectively occurred with the first
`test dose of folic acid given after each dose of
`atnethopterin.
`Patient 11.]. was given atnethopterin in 3
`doses of 6, 8, and 10 mg. per kg. respectively
`(Fig. 3). The initial excretion of citrovorutn
`factor was 6 pg. per day, which was regained
`20 days after the first and 11 days after the
`second dose of atnethopterin. The minima
`that occurred after these doses were 48 and
`
`51% respectively. After the ‘second dose, a
`maximum of 12.8 pg. per day (2l3% of the
`initial value) was obtained on the twenty-
`second day. No consistent change was ob-
`served after the third dose of arnethopterin.
`The initial citrovorum factor excretion by
`patient C.M. of 3 pg. per day was lower than
`that of the other patients (Fig. 4). This value
`was further reduced after the first dose of 10
`
`mg. per kg. of amethopterin to 1.4 pg. per day.
`Recovery to 11.5 pg. per day had occurred by
`16 days, but a prompt reduction to 0.3 pg. per
`day was produced by a second dose of 15 mg.
`per kg. of amethopterin. Recovery to 7.6 pg.
`per day was evident 14 days after amethopterin,
`1 day before the patient died of melanoma.
`Aminopterin. Patient H.B. was given 1 oral
`dose of 0.1 mg. per kg. of aminopterin (Fig. 5).
`Pretreatment values for the urinary excretion
`of citrovorum factor varied from 5 to 7 pg.
`per day. Five days after aruinopterin, it had
`fallen to 2 pg. per day and recovery did not
`occur until 26 days after administration of
`the antagonist.
`Daily Doses of Amethopterin. Patient I.L.
`was given amethopterin as a daily oral dose of
`5 mg. (Fig. 6). Thirteen closes (a total dosage
`of 65 mg. or 1.3 mg. per kg.) of amethopterin
`
`AMETHOPTERIN
`
`3," s, A no MG./KG.
`
`o
`
`to
`
`20
`
`40
`
`so
`DAYS
`
`5,;
`
`.0
`
`-m
`
`FIG. 3. The effect of repeated
`doses of amethopterin on the
`urina
`excretion of CI? derived
`from olic acid in patient R._].,
`a 54-year-old white man with
`bronchogenic carcinoma who re-
`ceived 270 mg., 360 mg.. and
`450 mg. of amethopterin. See
`Fig.
`I
`for explanation of
`the
`symbols.
`
`Page 00003
`
`Page 00003
`
`

`
`232
`
`CANCER. March-April 1960
`
`Vol. 13
`
`AMETHOPTERIN
`to 3. I5
`
`MG./KG.
`
`o
`
`IO
`
`20
`
`so
`
`DAYS
`
`Fla. 4. The effect of repeated doses of amethopterin
`on the urinary excretion of CF derived from folic acid
`in patient C.M.. a 33-year-old white man with mela-
`noma who received 750 mg. and 950 mg. of amethop-
`teriu. See Fig.
`1 for explanation of the symbols.
`
`reduced the urinary excretion of citrovorum
`factor from 16.5 to 3.3 pg. per day. Recovery
`was slow, and pretreatment values had not
`been regained 65 days after the last dose of
`amethopterin.
`re-
`3’-Chloraamethopterin. Patient M.C.
`ceived 0.05 mg. per kg.
`(3 mg.) of 3’-dtloro-
`amethopterin by intramuscular injection once
`daily for 14 doses (a total dosage of 42 mg. or
`0.7 mg. per kg.) (Fig. 7). This treatment re-
`duoed the urinary excretion of citrovorum fac-
`tor from 24.9 to 8.09 pg. per day. Seven days
`after completion of the first series of doses, at
`second series of 0.1 mg. per kg.
`(6 mg.) per
`day was begun and continued for 8 closes (a
`total dosage of 48 mg. or 0.8 mg. per kg.). The
`citrovorum factor excretion after this second
`
`series was 3.35 pg. per day, and it gradually
`returned to essentially pretreatment amounts
`22 days after the last dose of the drug.
`3',5’-Dichioroamethopterin. After recovery
`from 3’-chloroamethopterin was complete, pa-
`tient M.C. was given 2 mg. per kg. (120 mg.)
`per day of 3’,5’-(lichloroamethopterin by in-
`tramuscular injection. Four doses (given on
`days 0, 1, 2, and 4; a total dosage of 480 mg.
`or 8 mg. per kg.) temporarily reduced the uri-
`nary excretion of citrovorum factor from 22.9
`to 8.53 pg. per day. Recovery to nearly control
`levels had occurred I 1 days after the last dose,
`and the drug was resumed 3 days later (on day
`20). Except for the omission of days 25 and 26,
`treatment was continued through day 45 (24
`doses; a total dosage of 2,880 mg. or 48 mg.
`per kg.). Citrovorum factor excretion, which
`was only 1.59 pg- per day 4 days after the last
`
`dose, gradually recovered but had not reached
`pretreatment values 20 days after the drug
`was discontinued.
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`The available evidence indicates that the
`
`primary action of the folic acid antagonists is
`to prevent
`the reduction of
`folic acid to
`tetrahydrofolic acid. Further metabolism of
`the latter gives rise to compounds that sup-
`port
`the growth of Leuconostoc citrouorum
`and hence possess citrovorum factor activ-
`ity.*- “» 13 The observation in man that ami-
`nopterin reduced the urinary excretion of
`citrovorum factor derived from administered
`folic acid3 was consistent with this evidence.
`
`At the time this earlier study was done,-3 some
`of the patients exhibited the inhibitory effects
`of this drug on the excretion of citrovorum
`factor as long as 8 days after cessation of
`aminopterin administration. It was suggested
`at that time that aminopterin might combine
`irreversibly with the enzyme system responsible
`for the utilization of folic acid and that recov-
`
`ery from its inhibitory effects might require re-
`generation of enzyme protein.3
`The present investigation was designed to
`ascertain in man the duration of the inhibi-
`
`tory effects of the folic acid antagonists upon
`the urinary excretion of citrovorum [actor de-
`rived from folic acid. The validity of the use
`of serial
`test doses of folic acid to measure
`
`these changes was demonstrated by the rela-
`
`is H.B.
`
`cF
`
`10
`
`9P [day
`
`5
`
`AMINOPTERIN
`
`0.1 MG./KG.
`
`
`
`0
`
`O
`
`20
`
`DAYS
`Fin. 5. The effect of a single dose of aminopterin on
`the urinary excretion of citrovorum factor (CF) derived
`from folic acid in patient H.B.. a 45-year-old white
`woman with Hodgkin's disease. The patient received
`5.5 mg. of aminopterin (indicated by the vertical ar-
`row). See Fig. 1 for explanation of symbols.
`
`Page 00004
`
`Page 00004
`
`

`
`No. 2
`
`STUDIES ON THE Foue Acn) VITAMINS. III.
`
`- Comiit
`
`233
`
`AME TH OPTERIN
`
`5 MG./DAY
`
`O
`
`20
`
`40
`
`60
`
`80
`
`. DAYS
`
`daily
`Fla. 6. The effect of
`doses of amethopterirt on pa-
`tient LL.,
`3. 65-year-old white
`woman with malignant carci-
`noid. who received 65 mg. of
`amethopterin in 13 days. In this
`illustration and in Figs. 7 and
`8. the boxes indicate the periods
`of drug administration. See Fig.
`l for explanation of the other
`symbols.
`
`the time required for recovery from
`more,
`this inhibition tends to support the concept
`of irreversible combination or alteration of
`
`the enzyme system responsible for the utiliza-
`tion of folic acid.3 Recovery to the pretreat-
`ment state during the period of observation
`did not occur in 4 patients, suggesting that the
`elfects of
`these drugs are not always com-
`pletely reversible.
`The importance of the duration of the ef-
`fects of the folie acid antagonists in the treat-
`ment of mouse leukemia has been demon-
`
`strated by Goldin et al.3 They found that the
`best therapeutic results were obtained in the
`treatment of early lymphoid leukemia Ll2l0
`(i .e., shortly after implantation) when doses of
`amethopterin were given at
`intervals of 4
`days. On the other hand, when treatment was
`delayed until dissemination of the tumor oc-
`curred, daily treatments with atnethopterin
`were superior. They further showed by serial
`measurements of the median lethal dose (LD50)
`of aminopterin7 and of the protection af-
`forded by the administration of folic acid 1
`hour before a lethal dose of aminopterin9
`M.C.
`
`tively constant urinary excretion of citro-
`vorum factor over a period of several weeks by
`patients who had received no prior folic acid
`antagonist.
`The reduction in citrovorum factor excre-
`
`tion that occurred in every case after the ad-
`ministration of single doses of amethopterin
`was prompt and prolonged. The time re-
`quired for recovery to pretreatment values
`varied from a minimum of about 2 weeks to
`
`nearly 4 weeks and appeared to be roughly
`proportional to the size of the dose. A second
`dose of the antagonist given 21/2 to 3 weeks
`after the first dose usually caused similar
`changes. A single dose of aminopterin caused
`alterations identical with those produced by
`arnethopterin but at a dose some 60 times
`smaller.
`
`The administration of amethopterin by a
`more conventional dosage regimen, consisting
`of consecutive daily doses, also greatly de-
`pressed the urinary excretion of citrovorum
`factor derived from folie acid. The recovery
`from this treatment was somewhat slower than
`
`in that
`that observed after the single doses,
`pretreatment values of citrovorum factor ex-
`cretion had not been regained 2 months after
`cessation of amethopterin administration. The
`total amount of drug administered was 1.3
`mg. per kg, which in its elfects appeared to
`be at least equal to, and possibly more toxic
`than, the largest single dose employed of 16 mg.
`per kg. The other folic acid antagonists stud-
`ied, 3’-chloroamethopterin and 3’,5’-dichloro-
`amethopterin, were administered in consecu-
`tive daily doses and produced elfects similar
`to arnethopterin but at dilferent dosages.
`Thus, inhibition of the urinary excretion of
`citrovorum factor derived from administered
`
`folic acid in man appears to be a general
`property of the folie acid antagonists. Further-
`
`
`
`o
`
`20
`
`40
`
`so
`
`m<\\\\V
`3'-catoaome TH 091: am
`3 as H atom
`
`so
`
`OF
`
`“it
`‘"1’
`
`2°
`
`no
`
`0
`
`DRY 5
`
`Fin. 7. The effect of daily doses of 3'-clIloroan'Iel.hop-
`terin on patient M.C., a 45-year-old white woman with
`renal carcinoma, who received the drug under the fol-
`lowing regimen: 42 mg. in 14 days and 48 mg. in 8
`days. See Figs. 1 and 6 for explanation of the symbols.
`
`Page 00005
`
`Page 00005
`
`

`
`234
`
`CANCER March-April 1960
`
`Vol. 13
`
`cs
`
`30
`
`20
`
`M,
`day
`
`0
`
`.
`effect of daily
`Pic. 8. The
`doses of 3',5'-dichloroametl1op-
`terin on the same patient as in
`Fig. 7, who received the drug
`under
`the following regimen:
`4-80 mg.
`in -1- doses
`(over
`a
`eriod of 5 days) and 2.830 mg.
`P
`.
`ll’! 24 doses {over a period of 26
`days). See Figs. 1 and 6 for ex-
`planation of the symbols.
`
`M.C.
`
`as sssasxss
`
`\‘
`ll
`3',5"'DlCHLOROAMETHOPTERlN
`
`IZOM 6./DAY
`
`0
`
`20
`
`40
`
`60
`
`the interval of 4 days corresponded
`that
`closely to the recovery of the host from the
`effects of a nonlethal dose of the drug. The
`enhanced therapeutic effectiveness of this in-
`termittent dosage regimen in early leukemia
`further suggested a temporal dissociation in
`the recovery of the host and of the tumor
`from the effects of amethopterin. By the time
`the next dose of amethopterin was given, 4
`days later,
`the host had recovered from the
`eliects of the first dose but the tumor had not
`
`and therefore was more severely damaged
`than the host. Another way of stating this re-
`sult is that proper spacing of doses (4 days in
`the mouse) minimizes the toxicity for the host
`so that larger doses can be given.
`Ideally,
`the selection of a dosage regimen
`of amethopterin for use in man, which corre-
`sponds to the one used in the mouse, should be
`based upon a comparison of the recovery of
`both the host and the tumor from the elfects
`
`of the drug. The data presented show that for
`the host the size of the individual dose is di-
`
`DAYS
`
`and the preceding one,” a dosage regimen of
`amethopterin consisting of doses of approxi-
`mately fi mg. per kg. every 2 weeks is proposed
`for the treatment of patients with cancer. Pa-
`tients with bone marrow and renal insufficiency
`of even mild degree probably should not receive
`doses of this magnitude. In order to test the
`therapeutic elfectiveness of this regimen,
`it
`should be tried in diseases that are known to
`
`respond to the folic acid antagonists, specifi-
`cally
`acute
`leukemialfi
`and choriocarci-
`norna.1" Trials in patients with other tumors
`would be interesting because little response
`has been obtained by treatment with daily
`dosage regimens of
`the folic acid antago-
`nist5.1, 12, 14
`
`CoNcLusIoNs
`
`l. The inhibitory effect of amethopterin on
`the urinary excretion of citrovorum factor de-
`rived from folic acid in man persists for sev-
`eral weeks after exposure to the drug.
`2. This inhibitory effect appeals to be a
`general property of the folic acid antagonists,
`being exhibited also by aminopterin, 3’-chlo-
`roamethopterin, and 3’,5’dichloroamethopte-
`rm.
`
`rectly related to the duration of its elfects. Re-
`covery in 2 weeks did not usually occur after
`doses larger than 6 mg. per lcg., while smaller
`doses produced iew toxic effects? In the ab-
`sence of comparable information about hu-
`man tumors, further modification of the dos-
`age regimen becomes arbitrary. It is suggested
`that the dosage regimen consist of individual
`4. Based on these observations, an inter-
`doses of amethopterin of approximately 6 mg.
`mittent dosage regimen of amethopterin for
`per kg. repeated at intervals of about 2 weeks.
`Based on the data presented in this paper
`the treatment of human cancer is proposed.
`REFERENCES
`
`3. The duration of the effects is roughly
`proportional to the size of the dose adminis-
`tered.
`
`I. Buncni-:mu., ]. H.; Ksnnorsxv, D. A.; K1Ncst.Ev-
`PILLERS, E. M.; Sotmum, C. M.; Mums, W. P. L.:
`Estzm-:n, G. C.; Clutvnt, L. F.;
`l'J.mt:EoN, H. W., and
`
`Ruoans, C. P.: Effects of folic acid antagonists and 2.
`6-diaminopurine on neoplastic disease; with a
`‘:11
`reference to acute leukemia. Cancer 4-: 549-569,
`I 51.
`
`Page00006
`
`Page 00006
`
`

`
`No. 2
`
`STUDIES ON THE Fouc Acm VITAMINS. III.
`
`- Candi!
`
`235
`
`2. Comm, P. T.: Studies on folic acid vitamins; II,
`acute toxicity of amethopterin in man. Cancer l3: 222-
`228, 1950.
`3. Connrr. P. 'I‘., and (3303. D.: Studies on Eolic acid
`vitamins;
`I, observations on metabolism of folic acid
`in man and on effect of arninopterin. Cancer I1: 525-
`536, 1958.
`4. Docrolz, V. M.: In vitro studies on conversion of
`folic acid to citrovorum factor. J. Biol. Chem. 222:
`959-968, 1956.
`5. FARBER, 5.: Dmmonn, L. K.; Mmczn, R. D.: SYL-
`vrsree, I1.
`I-‘., _]a., and Wotrr, J. A.: Tempcmu-y re-
`missions in acute leukemia in children produced by
`Eolic
`acid antagonist.
`-Laminoptcroyl-glutamic acid
`(aigiflnoptefin). New England J’. Med. 238: 793-793.
`1
`.
`6. Furnnumm, S., and SILVERMAN, M.: "Inactivation"
`of folic acid by liver. J’. Biol. Chem. 221: 31-40, I957.
`7. Gotnm, A.: Employment of methods of inhibition
`analysis in normal and tumor—bearing mammalian or-
`ganism. Advances Cancer Res. 4: 113-143, 1956.
`8. GoLoIN, A.; Vennlrn, ]. M.: HUMPHREYS, S. R.,
`and MANTEL, N.: Modification of treatment schedules
`in management of advanced mouse leukemia with
`
`arnethopterin. ]. Nat. Cancer Inst. I7: 203-212. 1956.
`9. GRI-IENSPAN, E. M.: GOLIJIN, A., and SCHOENB.-tcfl.
`E. 11.: Studies on mechanism of action of chemothera-
`peutic agents in cancer;
`ll, requirements for preven-
`tion of aminopterin toxicity by folic acid in mice.
`Cancer‘ 3: 856-863, 1950.
`10. L], M. C.: Hliltrc. 11.. and SPENCER, D. B.: Effect
`of methotrexate therapy upon choriocarcinoma and
`chorioadenoma. Proc. Soc. Exper. Biol. er Med. 93:
`36l-366, I956.
`ll. SAUIIERLICH, H. I-2., and Bnummn. C. 2\.: Factor
`required for growth of Leuconosioc citrovorum. J. Biol.
`Chem. 176:
`I65-I73, 1948.
`12. Scnoenmtcn, E. 11.: Cotsxv, j., and CREENSPAN.
`E. M.: Observations on eifects of Eolic acid antagonists,
`amino terin and amethopterin,
`in patients with ad-
`vance
`neoplasms. Cancer 5: 1201-1220, 1952.
`13. SEVEKMAN, M.: EBAUGI-I, F. G., ]R., and GARDINER,
`‘R. (1.: Nature of labile citrovorum [actor in human
`urine. J. Biol. Chem. 223: 259-270, 1956.
`I4. WRIGHT, J. C.; Plucor. A.: WRIGHT, B. P.]; Wam-
`1-mum, 8.. and WRIGHT. I... T.: Evaluation 0 tolic acid
`antagonists in adults with neoplastic diseases: study of
`93 patients with incurable neoplasms. J. Nat. M. A. 43:
`2ll-2-10, 1135!.
`
`Page 00007
`
`Page 00007

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket