throbber
595
`
`STEM CEI.LTRANSPlANTATION FOR RESISTANT I.UPUS. Ann E Traynor,James Schroeder. Robert
`M Rosa, Salim Mujais, Steve Rosen, Suzanne Bowyer, Lawrence jung, Richard Bun Chicago, IL,
`Indianapolis, IN Omaha, NE
`
`Five patients who experienced persistence of aggressive systemic lupus despite cycle(cid:173)
`phosphamide therapy were treated by dose intense immune suppression and autologous hemato(cid:173)
`poietic stem cells. Stem cells were mobilized with cyclophosphamide (2.0 glm2) and granulocyte
`colony stimulating factor (GCSF) 10 ug/kg/day, enriched using CD34 positive selection, ami
`reinfused following immune suppression with cyclophosphamide (200 mg/kg) and anti-thymocyte
`globulin (ATG) 90 mglkg. Results: Median time to an absolute neutrophil count greater than 500/ul
`and non-transfused platelet count greater than 20,OOO/ui in these five transplanted panents were
`day lO and 12 respectively. The first five patients to undergo transplant have now been followed
`for 60-800 days. All are well and without evidence of active lupus. Renal, cardiac, CNS and
`pulmonary functions and all serologic parameters have normalized or markedly improved. No
`patient has received chemotherapy or any immune modulatory agent since transplant other than a
`continuous prednisone taper. Among the four patients who have been followed for over one year,
`the median prednisone dose is 5 mg dally (0-15 mWd). The median SLEOAIscore is I. The first four
`patients have now been followed a median of 18 months (14-27 months) and all are without
`evidence of active lupus. Conclusion: Despite failure of available therapies and serious organ
`dysfunction, each patient is Without active lupus and continues to improve following stem cell
`transplant. Durability of these remissions remains to be determined.
`
`Disclosure: work reported in this abstract was supported by:
`
`598
`
`ACR Minisymposium
`Novel Approaches to Biological Response Modification in
`Rheumatoid Arthritis
`Sunday, November 14,1999,2:15 PM-3:45 PM
`
`rHUlL·lO (TENOVlL) PLUS METJIOTREXATE (MTX) IN ACTIVE RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS (RA): A
`PHASE 1/11 ~TUDY. Michael E Weinblatt, E William St Clair, Fcrdlnand C Brcedveld, Larry W
`Moreland, Edward C Keystone, Sk-y H Lee, l.owell B Robison, Daniel E Furst, Ken J Bulpitt, Eric M
`Veys, Thomas Haverty, Paul Grim, Janice C Wherry
`
`rHUIl-lO (rIL-lO, TENOVIL) is an anti-inflammatory cytokine which inhibits proinflammatory
`cyroklnes and is effective in animal models of arthritis. Trends towards improvement in RA have
`been seen in early clinical studies of rll-IO alone.
`This study evaluated the effects of adding rIL-IO 10 chronic MTXin patients with active RA.The
`study was a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled dose-escalarlng-study of clL-IO (I. 4 or 8
`u: g,tkg qD or 8 or 20 p.g/kg TlW)SC or placebo SC plus MTX (12.'>-25 mg/week PO, SC or 1M) In
`50 pts with active RA treated for 4 weeks along with their stable dose of MTX.
`ACR 20% response criteria was observed in 50% of pts receiving 1i-10 at a dose of 8 1J.g/kg qd,
`50% of patients receiving the 8p.g,tkg llW dose and 63% at 20 p.g/kg TIW dose vs 10% with placebo.
`ACR 50% response criteria was observed in 13% of pIS receiving 11.-10at a dose of 8 Il-g/kg qd, 25%
`of patients receiving the 81l-g/kg TIW dose and 13% at 20 1J.g/kg TIW dose vs 10% With placebo.
`Increases in serum TNF p55 and p75 soluble receptors were seen with rIl-1O therapy.
`tolerated and no antl-Il-In antibodies were found. A dose-dependent
`cll-IO was clinically well
`decrease in platelets and hemoglobin were seen (With the highest doses of rIL-I0, --25% of subjects
`experienced a >40% decrease in platelets or a > 2g/dL decrease in hemoglobin) with rapid full
`recovery following cessation of rU.-IO. 50-70% of subjects treated with 8 or 20 lLg/kg TIW are
`continuing therapy with clL-1Qfor> 12 months in an extension protocol.
`In this study ell-IO therapy was well tolerated and safe and trends towards improvement in RA
`activity were seen. For future studies, the rU.-IO doses that maximize the safety and efficacy profile
`are 8 and 20 p.glkg TIW.
`
`Disclosure: work reported In this abstract was supported by:
`Study was funded by Schering-Plough Research Institute. T. Havcrty, PGrint and JWheny are
`employees of SPRI. Drs. Weinblau, St. Clair, Moreland, Keystone and Furst have served as
`consultants to SPIU
`
`596
`
`599
`
`SUCCESSFUL TREATMENT OF REFRACTORY SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS (SLE) BY
`AUTOLOGOUS STEM CELl. TRANSPLANTATION (ASCI) WITH IN VIVO IMMUNOABlATlON AND
`EX VIVO DEPLETION OF MONONUCLEAR CELLS. Falk Hlepe, Oliver Rosen, Andreas Thiel, Gero
`Masscnkcil, Hartmut Radtke, Thomas Haupt, Erika Gromnica-Ihle, Andreas Radbruch, Renate
`Arnold Berlin, Germany
`
`ASCT is a new experimental approach to treat patients with severe refractory autoimmune
`diseases. Various strategies for
`immunosuppression and processing of
`transplants have been
`proposed. Our hypothesis is that effective in vivo lmmunoablatlcn and ex vivo depletion of
`mononuclear cells including autoimmune cells with subsequent ASCT can lead to long-lasting
`remission in severe autoimmune disease. Until now 3 patients with a refractory SlE (2 female, 1
`male, age between 27 and 48 years) have been treated. These patients failed multiple conventional
`therapeutic strategies and had active life-threatening disease at
`the time of transplant, All SLE
`patients exhibited high disease activity with severe organ involvement especially lupus-nephritis
`and positive anti-dsDNA antibodies. Peripheral stem cells were mobilized with cyclophosphamide
`(2 g/sqm) and G-CSF. The transplant was CD34 positive selected by CliniMacs and contained 2.4 to
`7.3 x lOe6 CD34+lkg b.w. and 1.0 to 1.6 x lOe4 C03lkg b.w. The conditioning regimen included
`200 mg/kg cyclophosphamIde and 90 mg,tkg antithymocytc globulin. The patients received
`antibacterial and antiviral prophylaxis. The efficient depletion ofT cells from the transplant did not
`lead to life-threatening infections during the time of lymphopenia. All :} SLE patients with a
`follow-up time of 5, 9 and 13 months after transplant are in clinical and serological remission.
`Antinuclear antibodies, anti-dsDNA antibodies and other autoantibodies (anti·Ro/SS-A, anIH.a/S5-H.
`anti-cardiolipin) are still negative. The activity index ECLAM decreased from 7 to 2, 6 10 2, and 10
`to 2, respectively. An increase of low complement levels to normal values was observed. Moreover,
`the dosage of steroids could be markedly reduced.
`In conclusion, clinical and serological remission in patients with refractory SlE can be achieved
`by successful immunoablation in vivo combined with highly effective purging of the transplant.
`The duration of the remissions is unknown and needs to be studied.
`
`Disclosure: work reported In this abstract was supported by:
`
`A PILOT STUDY OF ISIS 2302, AN ANTISENSE OLIGODEOXYNllCLEOTlDE, IN PATIENTS WITH
`ACTIVE RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS. Wallcr Maksymowych. Warren Blackburn. Edna Hutchings,
`Lucille Williams, Joseph Tami, Kathleen Wagner, William Shanahan Edmonton, Canada, Blrmlng(cid:173)
`ham, AL, Carlsbad, CA
`
`randomized (3: I;
`Forty-three patients were enrolled in a double-masked,
`ISIS 2302:placebo
`[PBOD, dose-escalation. PBQ.controUed pilot study.
`ISIS 2302 is a 2<J.base phosphorothtoate
`oligodeoxynucleotide (OON)
`thai downregulates human intercellular adhesion molecule I
`(1CAM-I) through an antisense mechanism.
`Patients had to meet criteria for active disease (2:: to swollen joints and other criteria) despite
`adequate NSAID background therapy z approved 2nd line agents z; low dose (SIO mg/djcorttco(cid:173)
`steroids. Patients were administered thirteen 2 hour intravenous infusions over 26 days of ISIS2302
`at doses of 0.5 (10 pIS.), 1.0 (3 pts.) or 2.0 (19 pts.) rug/kg, or normal saline PBO (I I pIS.). and were
`followed for a total of 6 months.
`By Paulus 20% criteria, responses were similar in the ISIS 2302 and PB0-treated patients over the
`first 3 months, but differentiated thereafter, with the greatest response observed in the 0.5 mglkg
`patients. Over Months <Ul, the proportion of patients achieving Paulus 20% responses averaged
`37%. 33%, 18% and 10% for the 0.5, 1.0,2.0 rug/kg and PBO groups, respectively. Transient Paulus
`50% responses, occurring sometime between Days 60-180, were observed in 10%,33%,21%, and
`0% of patients in the 0.5, 1.0,2.0 mg/kg, and PHO groups, respectively. Administration of ISIS 2302
`was well tolerated. The only apparent drug-related adverse effect was an annctpated, transient (24
`hours post dose). and dose-related increase in aPlT (-7 seconds at 2 mglkg), due to inhibition of
`lntrinslc tenase complex activity, a class effect of phosphorothioate DONs.
`Although these results suggest that ISIS 2302 is effective and well
`tolerated in the treatment of
`rheumatoid arthritis, the delayed response suggests that chronic dosing may be more effective. The
`development of second generation antisense chemistries targeting IeAM-I may allow for chronic
`Or-d) dosing.
`
`Dlsdosure: work reported In this abstract was su pported bY'
`Study sponsored by Isis Pharmaceuticals, Carlsbad, CA, 92008
`
`597
`
`600
`
`HIGH·IJOSI'.IMMIiNOABUTIVt: CYCUJI'UtlSI'HAMln,E 1:'11 ~1.1:'. M 1'('I.n. A JooC's. R Bmdsk}·l\;tlllm"rr. MU
`
`HI¢t-tk""C' .mo1tlltn~bl~llvt' C}·t·I"f'hru;f'h~mi...C'(111)1(;:200 mWkIO wilhout seem cell .....s.".l.lr n:&uh~ in oJulOtble...... mpktC' rrmisaiu/U in lhe: rrtiljurity
`of pll .....ith ;apLi)li" ;anemi;a;anoJmher rdlOtt-lUry ~llloimmulIl:' w>Cil.'I(');. Stern rcll
`rescue Is nut n«c).'\;IIY. bCl.";Iu>c c:.Ifly seem "db:.lre re)I~I;aOl It!
`IIDie. IIIJIe: lIc1lvel':'ltrn: .":.IlTlC' lIlN: "f CYloun u-'lCd10 hoot' marrow lr:.to"pl~OI"I.onpll'(l"~r:.tlkm reg1mens. hUI :I\·uld.. Ih... prtlbh:m or1T·lnfusion
`or:tuturnltl~'e Irmph'''1tC'S With M...m-i.·C'IIIT.....'UC,'. WC'h:....e rull<>Wt-d II pts wilh Sl.t :titer 1101(;. Mdhods: II :iLE pili .....rfil c-.OlY 10 oth.:r rcWmelil
`underwent HUIe. Completc" n:-mj~ion II lIdin.:d:t.~ no lIbcax: itlth·jty. on phy~lulOldc or 0<1preoJnbounC" anll"" ImmunuMJpprcMlvt IhC"rapy. Panl;tl
`~l"'m>c Is dclintll ill. mUll lIJIoC"">C ~n.vlly. nn ph)'slllk'ldl' or no prrnnJ"unl:' ~nll nn ImmllnlJ!l'ullpll' ....d\·C'!IO.
`seuow up
`(mlhs)
`
`...
`
`OB
`IlD
`J"
`YH
`U.;.
`PK·T
`(,LoT
`PL·E
`Mo-N
`LT
`BU
`
`Indication
`Skin
`Killnq·
`SkinIP)·Ol.I. (ianj::.)
`Kidnt,·
`Kidney
`eNS. Hl:'n1C."
`Sidn. Kklnc)'
`Kidney
`CNS
`c~s. Pulm 1m.!
`KilJncy
`
`1'tIethUII't"ulo;o. Cl:'lIrtpl
`("~IICo;oPI
`
`«J1cr~t. C)'clo~flOtin
`
`Cc'lIcepl
`cellcePI
`lmur~n
`
`100ur.m.ql",,~n
`
`Ct'tmun
`
`11II1Ir~n
`
`ImufOln. (:O;OIh:cpl. C)'!u:un
`C)1Uun. ("..elkepl
`
`t,~.\
`
`.~.~;
`
`417
`2.81
`7.9.\
`2j6.~
`10).7:1
`1U1;\
`0.'"
`':U7
`.llO
`
`Hc&pon.e
`(:umpICI ... RC"fl\"~~!nn
`Nllnc
`Nulle'
`Sonc
`Complele- Rcmi:\.lliom
`Potni:tlResponsc
`C.llmplclt'R...mlssiun
`NunC"
`C;umpltlrKo;oml,,-,,-Io'n
`Pulm tUN.(;om. Rem.
`N'lIle
`
`Exampk of Rc:rut.I Compldc Rnn-Lulon for CK (" = pn!'.HDlC)
`
`tl/l·II'.m"
`11/191'»1
`1I11l19'J
`4/lW99
`
`Urine proldn (X)
`1."'"
`lfl,H
`1.427
`1l,4'Jj
`
`PtTdnl-.one (rna)
`<.
`
`"IU,
`
`ConclU5lon: 11U1(;Ciln leal.! 1(1,Jur...ble, "(lmplele ro:mi»ioo ur SU; In pl~ who hotve r...i1eo allmher Immunm\lJlprn~i1'("Ihcr~pie•• IncludJnK
`mnl1lhl)'IV l·)·duphn,plumJ<k:. ~"'Urpbwllh rcn~lluI1U" rcr"'t-Iul)' 10 JJInther Ihcr~plc"1'C'''l'''Imlnl. 111CR'hit\·t" hccn nn Cil"l"'ou(lnknllny IU(~IIt·.
`HOlt: offeB 3n 311...m:t1l\·t' 10 u ...m t·tlll\'S(·ut' in refr:II:lory 10 Su: pIs ~I 1/3 Ihe COSI(If Slem cell tr:U\spl;m13Iion.
`
`D....cbure work I"C"'ponniln Ihb atKlrac1 wa~ !>uppont'd by:
`
`RESULTSFROM THE FIRST HUMAN CLINICAl. TRIAL OF GENE TlIERAPY FOR ARTHRITIS. C H
`Evans, P 1>Robbins, S C Ghivlzzani, J H Herndon, M C Wasko, M Tomaino, T A Muzwnlgro, H I
`Georgescu, E Elders, T WhiteSide, S C Watkins, R Kang Pittsburgh, PA
`
`PURPOSE To determine whether it is possible to transfer safely Il-IRa cDNA 10 the joints of
`patients with RA, and to express that DNA Intraarticulurly.
`MEllIODS Nine postmenopausal women were recrulted to the study. Eligibility criteria included
`the need for total joint replacement surgery of the Mep joints 2·5 and surgery on at least one other
`joint. Autologous synovium was recovered at the time of the latter surgery and used as a source of
`synovial fibroblasts. which were then expanded in culture. Cultures were divided in two. One was
`stably transduced with a retrovirus carrying the Il-IRa cDNA and the other remained as an
`untransduced, control cell population.
`Cells were tested for a variety of advcnuuous agents prior to tnjecuon into the Mer joInts
`destined for surgical replacement. In a double blinded fashion, two joints received transduced cells
`and two received control cells. Patients were treated in a dose escalation manner. one week after
`gene transfer, the Mel> joints were surgically removed and the retrieved tissues analyzed for
`evidence of successful gene transfer and gene expression.
`RESULTS All patients completed the protocol unproblematically and no adverse events were
`nOled. All synovia recovered from joints receiving the tnlOsgene showed evidence of gene
`expression by both RT-PCR and by EUSA measurement of IL-IRa in media conditioned by l1Ie
`retrieved tissues_ It
`\Vas also possible to confirm this conclusion by III sf", hybridil.3tion.
`Interestingly, several joints receiving (he control cells also gave positive RT-PCR and protein signals.
`TIle results of rigorous control experiments suggest that these are not false positives.
`CONCLUSIONS It is possible to tiJnsfer genes to human rheumatOid joints and to express them
`intraarticuIarly. The first p:ltient received her genes nearly Ihrce )'ears ago and neither she, nor any
`other participant, has experienced adverse events related to Ihe gene transfer protocol. TIle
`dcteclion of transgene expression in control joints adjacent to Ihose receiving the gene remains an
`It may suggest
`unexplained observation.
`the existence of communication channels lx-tween
`adjacent, severely diseased joints, or the ability of injected cells to migrate interarticularly.
`Supponcd by NIH grdnl RO I AR43623
`
`Disclosure: work reportcd In this abstract was supported by:
`
`5170
`
`MEDAC Exhibit 2005
`ANTARES v. MEDAC
`IPR2014-01091
`Page 00001

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket