throbber
THERAPEUTIC SUPPRESSION 0F TISSUE REACTIVITY
`
`I. Comparison of the Effects of Cortisone and Aminopterin
`
`.\l.D.
`By RICHARD Cuuxea,
`ASSISTANT PROFESSOR OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
`NE“! YORK, NEW YORK
`
`(From the Department of Medicine, State University of New York College of Medicine at
`Kings County Hospital. and the Equitable Life Assurance Society of
`the United States)
`
`THE remarkable advances in chemo-
`therapy in recent years have condi-
`tioned medicine of this era to consider
`disease in terms of specific cures,
`just
`as medicine of the era following Pas-
`teur and Koch became conditioned to
`view disease in terms of specific causes.
`The period intervening was one of
`elucidation and therapeutic application
`of specific host immunologic defenses.
`In this age of specific causes, specific
`responses and specific cures, general
`pathology as a conceptual guide in
`clinical medicine, which flourished so
`productively in the last century, has
`become overshadowed and some of its
`generic lessons have become obscured.
`The reaction to injury is, regardless
`of etiology, basically similar
`in its
`local manifestations, which constitute
`inflammation, both morphologicallyu
`and dynamically“, and in the general
`bodily changes largely mediated via
`stimulation of the pituitary-adrenal axis
`to which Selye“ has applied the
`terms alarm reaction and adaptation
`syndrome.
`Although the process of inflamma-
`tion is the first and most
`important
`line of defense of the body, its char-
`acteristics are such that defensive and
`reparative processes may themselves be
`inimical
`to the body’s welfare. Pha-
`gocytosis of organisms which exist
`parasitically in macrophages
`as
`in
`tuberculosis, coccidioidomycosis, psit-
`tacosis and histoplasmosis, abet and aid
`in perpetuating and disseminating the
`pathogen. Reduction in vascularity,
`
`which characterizes inflammatory pro-
`cesses of a more chronic nature, sets up
`a barrier to the penetration of hnmoral
`immune bodies or pharmacological
`agents.
`the deleterious
`is
`More important
`effect of the repair process itself, which
`like Aladdin's djinn, may wreak havoc.
`Mechanical obstruction may
`ensue
`following a lye burn of the esophagus,
`or as in cicatricial pyloric stenosis in
`peptic ulcer. Organ function may be
`impaired as in cirrhosis, uveitis, scar-
`ring of the heart valves in the wake of
`rheumatic fever, derangement of artic-
`ular and periarticular structures
`in
`rheumatoid arthritis, pulmonary fibro-
`sis secondary to silica or beryllium, to
`which may be added various granulo-
`matoses,
`to cite only random illustra-
`tions. In such circumstances disease is
`itself the repair process of the body
`stimulated to respond in such manner
`that there ensues distortion of morphol-
`ogy and interference with function.
`The reparative process is most closely
`associated with mesenchymal deriva-
`tives, notably fibroblasts and reticula-
`endothelial cells, but other organs such
`as the skin in which repair is an im-
`portant function may be similarly sub.
`ject to overactivity of the repair process
`as illustrated by keloid formation and
`the excessive desquamation of psoriasis.
`Such disorders are distinguished from
`neoplasia, which similarly may be pro-
`voked by irritative noxious agents caus-
`ing a proliferative reaction, in that they
`are responses of tissues rather than in-
`(169)
`
`Page 1 of 7 ANTARES Exhibit 1025
`
`ANTARES Exhibit 1025
`
`Page 1 of 7
`
`

`

`170
`
`GUBNERZ
`
`THERAPEUTIC SUPPRESSION 0F TISSUE REACUYITY
`
`dividual cellular elements. The distinc-
`tion, however,
`is not absolute, as is
`perhaps best illustrated by the histo-
`pathology of Hodgkin’s disease
`in
`which multiple cellular elements are
`combined in neoplastic formation.
`It appears appropriate to group such
`disorders produced by the repair pro-
`cess as diseases of
`tissue reactivity.
`Such nosological grouping in disregard
`of etiology seems warranted, for the
`musative agents, be they microorgan-
`isms, or nonorganic irritants such as
`silica, share the common property of
`acting as incitant to tissue responses of
`proliferation, which comprise the dis-
`ease entities. It is apparent that ther-
`apy in the large group of disorders
`of tissue reactivity must be directed at
`the host response and that specific
`measures aimed solely at the etiologi-
`cal agent may be inadequate and
`unavailing.
`such a concept'would
`Until recent]
`'ttle practical moment.
`have been of
`Newer knowledge of the functions of
`the adrenal cortex indicate that potent
`agents may be employed to combat the
`lesions of tissue reactivity by m '
`'
`host responses of the vulnerable shock
`tissue.
`
`The adrenal cortex, vital though it
`be in mobilizing body reactions to
`stress is, as stated by Albright‘, “anti-
`anabolic”. The lesions of Cushings
`disease are characterized by marked
`generalized atrophy of tissues, notably
`striated and smooth muscle, bone and
`skin. As indicated by Albright, this is
`due not to excessive breakdown of tis-
`sue but rather to an inhibition of tis-
`sue protein
`thesis b the glycogenic
`steroids of
`e adren . Numerous in-
`vestigations have established the inhib-
`itory
`eifect
`of
`adrenocorticotropic
`hormone (ACTH) and Compound E of
`the adrenal cortex on body growth”~”,
`and in suppressing development of
`mesenchymal tissuesz'3-3". Baker", in a
`comprehensive study, has shown that
`in addition to general
`inhibition of
`
`Page 2 of 7
`
`growth ACTH causes reduction in cel-
`lularity of
`connective
`tissue with
`atrophy of
`collagenous
`fibers
`and
`retardation of wound healing, disap-
`pearance of osteoblasts with cessation
`of proliferation of epiphyseal cells,
`atrophy of marrow,
`lymphoid struc-
`tures and the thymus, and a marked
`atrophy of the entire epithelial tissues
`including the
`epidermis,
`sebaceous
`glands
`and hair. Such suppressive
`effects on tissue proliferation provide
`an adequate explanation for the in—
`creasing number of disorders that are
`being benefited by ACTH and corti-
`sone, all of which have as their com-
`mon denominator excessive tissue re-
`activity.
`Interest in the therapeutic applica-
`tions of ACTH and cortisone has cen-
`tered particularly on the rheumatic
`diseases, largely since it was in these
`conditions that the dramatic ameliora-
`tive effects of these hormones were first
`reported by Hench and his
`co-
`workers”. Rheumafic fever and rheu-
`matoid arthritis are somewhat unique
`in that the mesenchyme is at once the
`offending agent and the victim in the
`disease process. Antibodies to hemoly-
`tic streptococcal
`infection, which are
`generated in the immune body-pro-
`ducing cells of the mesenchyme (retic-
`uloendothelial, plasma, and lymphoid
`cells), are the noxious agents that pro-
`duce the characteristic pathological
`lesions in connective tissue, another
`mesenchymal derivative". It has been
`a logical
`line of investigation to at-
`tempt to prevent the antibody response
`to hemolytic streptococcal infection in
`treating rheumatic fever, and evidence
`has accumulated suggesting that
`the
`beneficial action of massive salicylate
`therapy may be due to suppression of
`the immune responseWL“. The adrenal
`cortical hormone in large doses sup-
`presses
`antibody formation experi-
`mentally”, and it has been su
`ested
`that this may be a mechanism w ereby
`cortisone alleviates rheumatoid arthritis
`
`Page 2 of 7
`
`

`

`GUBNBR:
`
`THERAPEUTIC SUPPRESSION 0F TISSUE REACTIVITY
`
`171
`
`and allied conditions”. In man, how-
`ever, neither ACTH nor cortisone in-
`hibits antibody formation“. Numerous
`studies indicate furthermore that corti-
`sone operates
`by suppressing the
`reactivity of connective tissue itself
`rather
`than by acting at
`the level
`of immune responses. Thus there may
`be mentioned
`suppression
`of
`the
`Schwartzman Phenomenon” and of
`connective tissue responses
`to such
`local irritants as beryllium dust“ and
`formalin periarthritis‘“ where immune
`mechanisms are not involved.
`Although suppression of antibody
`formation may be produced experi-
`mentally by agents such as salicylate,
`adrenal cortical hormone, and amin-
`opterin“, this cannot be readily accom-
`plished in man, and it is probable that
`the depression in blood globulins ob-
`served with cortisone
`and ACTH
`reflects the general inhibition] of protein
`synthesis earlier reported by Albright‘,
`rather than any specific effect on anti-
`body formation. Neither nitrogen mus-
`tard,
`spray radiation, urethane nor
`aminopterin produce any lowering of
`gamma globulin in rheumatic fever
`or rheumatoid arthritis“.
`Aminopterin does, however, despite
`the lack of any indication of effect on
`immune responses. produce ameliora-
`tion of symptoms and decrease in
`articular and periarticular exudative
`changes. In a study carried out in col-
`laboration with Dr. J.
`]. Oleson of
`the Lederle Laboratories it has been
`found that
`in rats pretreated with
`aminopterin there is suppression of
`emdative and proliferative changes
`produced by periarticular injection of
`formalin, similar to the findings re-
`ported by Selye with cortisone“. In
`these experiments male albino rats
`weighing 70 to 85 gm. received 10‘!
`of aminopterin divided into 2 oral
`doses daily. On the second day 0.1 cc.
`1% formaldehyde was injected into the
`right hind paw at the plantar aponeuro-
`sis. This injection was repeated on the
`
`Page 3 of 7
`
`4th day, and on the 5th da an injec-
`tion of 0.1 cc. of 2% formal ehyde was
`given at the plantar aponeurosis of the
`left hind paw. Severe inflammatory
`reaction and marked swelling of the
`hind feet occurred in control animals,
`which was largely although not en-
`tirely suppressed in the animals receiv-
`ing aminopterin. The inhibitory effect
`of aminopterin on formalin arthritis
`occurred in adrenalectomized animals,
`so that the suppression of the inflam-
`matory response was directly due to
`aminopterin and not mediated via
`adrenal
`stimulation. A somewhat
`greater
`suppression of
`inflammatory
`changes was observed in 2 rats given
`cortisone in dosage of 5 mg. divided
`into 4 daily doses. The steroid artisone
`in the same dosage was devoid of any
`effect.
`Indication of the suppressive effect
`of aminopterin on tissue reactivity is
`seen clinically, particularly in psoriasis
`where the therapeutic response is more
`uniform and more dramatic". Histolog-
`ically psoriasis is characterized by a
`great overgrowth of
`the epithelium.
`with downward growth of the interpa-
`pillary processes“. It is of interest that
`improvement in psoriasis ha been ob-
`served on administration of cortisone“.
`In 18 subiects treated with aminop—
`terin in daily dosage of 1 to 2 mg.
`numerous indications of an inhibition
`of tissue reparative and proliferative
`responses have been observed. In 10
`subiects with psoriasis, cessation of
`scaling has occurred regularly within
`3 to 7 days, frequently accompanied by
`slight hemorrhagic crusting at the site
`of the lesions followed by rapid thin~
`ning of the skin in the areas involved.
`Similar changes in skin lesions have
`been observed in a case of lupus ery-
`thematosus and in a subject with chron-
`ic atopic eczematoid dermatitis. In the
`latter the observation was made by the
`patient
`that his associated asthma.
`which for several months had required
`2 injections of 0.3 to 0.6 mg. epin-
`
`Page 3 of 7
`
`

`

`172
`
`Gunman:
`
`THERAPEUTIC SI'I'I'RI'ZSSIOX OI" TISSUE REACTIVITY v
`
`ephrine and 7 to 8 capsules of ephed-
`rine daily,
`improved so markedly
`during the period of aminopterin ad-
`ministration that no therapy other than
`an occasional ephedrine capsule was
`required. Three weeks after discontinu-
`ing aminopterin his dermatitis and
`asthma both recurred and an identical
`response was obtained with a 2nd
`course of aminopterin given in dosage
`of 1.5 mg. daily for 11 days.
`In 4 subjects temporary incomplete
`alopecia
`followed administration of
`aminopterin. Hair
`loss
`is produced
`likewise by ACTH2. Lack of healing
`was a noteworthy finding in 3 subjects
`with superficial ulceration of the scro-
`tum, penis and neck respectively, and
`in 2 patients with pustular infections.
`In these subjects absence of granula-
`tion and epithelialization was conspicu-
`ous and bleeding occurred with any
`rubbing of the wound surface. Impair-
`ment of wound healing has likewise
`been observed with ACTH and corti-
`soneg-mi Further indication of inhibi-
`tion of connective tissue proliferation is
`seen also in the suppressive effect of
`aminopterin on experimental sarcoma
`27'3””. an effect that is also exhibited
`by cortisonefl.
`A uniform finding among patients
`treated with aminopterin was the oc-
`currence of patches of shallow ulcera-
`tion of the buccal mucosa generallv as-
`sociated with abdominal cramps. These
`changes generally developed during
`the 2nd week of aminopterin adminis-
`tration after a total dose of 10 to 20
`mg., although in a few instances as
`much as 40 mg. was given before
`changes in the oral mucosa or cramps
`developed. These findings are due. iust
`as in the skin. to inhibition of prolifer-
`ation of epithelium in the oral cavitv
`and gastrointestinal tract, the mucosal
`thinning favoring the development of
`superficial
`infection and ulceration.
`Similar observations have been made in
`rats and dogs given aminopterin”, and
`also in man, in patients with acute leu-
`
`kemia, in whom temporary remissions
`followed by refractoriness may be ob-
`served‘-“‘-"3, similar to experience with
`ACTH and cortisone”.
`\Veight
`loss
`and muscle wasting, which are pro-
`duced experimentally by aminopterin”.
`and are also seen with experimental
`administration of ACTH“. and in the
`.hyperadrenalcorticism of Cushing's dis-
`ease, were observed in 1 subject given
`40 mg. of aminopterin over a 3 week
`period.
`It is not
`intimated from these an-
`alogous effects of aminopterin and
`cortisone that
`their actions are the
`same. Both are anti-anabolic, but cor-
`tisone is concerned with whole protein
`moieties”; whereas the locus of action
`of the folic acid antagonist aminopterin
`lies more particularly in inhibition of
`the effects of folic acid on the synthe-
`sis of purines, pyrimidines and desoxy-
`ribonucleic acidT-W‘, and the utilization
`of tvrosine. histidine, and other amino
`acids in the regulation of protein syn-
`thesislaJlSJDJB.
`Folic acid is now recognized as
`essential
`in nucleoprotein formation
`and cell growth, acting as a coenzyme
`in enzyme systems concemed with syn-
`thesis of thymine and purines“. The
`effect of aminopterin is to block the
`reduction of folic acid to the formation
`of the citrovomm factor, which is the
`biologically active derivative of folic
`acid5-‘7.
`Observation that the citrovonlm fac-
`tor or thvmidine reverses the inhibiton'
`effect of aminopterin-“7 has provided
`a useful means to control some of the
`toxic effects of aminopterin.
`In the
`present
`study citrovorum factor
`in
`dosage of 40 to 100 million units was
`given intramuscularlv 2 to 3 times
`weekly to 4 subiects receiving aminop—
`terin. An increased tolerance to amin-
`opterin was observed. as compared to
`previous courses of aminopterin ad-
`ministration several months
`earlier.
`There was partial but not complete
`protection from the typical toxic effects
`
`Page 4 of 7
`
`Page 4 of 7
`
`

`

`urnxrzu:
`
`TIIERAI'I-II'TIC SI'I‘I’RESSION 0F TISSUE REACTIVITY
`
`173
`
`of aminopterin, that is, stomatitis and
`abdominal cramps, but
`it was also
`observed that
`the
`amelioration of
`arthritic symptoms and of psoriasis was
`less complete than when aminopterin
`alone had been given. Aureomycin
`given prophylactically in several sub-
`jects in dosage of 1 gm. daily was
`found effective in decreasing stomati-
`tis and gastrointestinal symptoms and
`did not appear to modify sensibly the
`therapeutic effect of aminopterin.
`Although the citrovorum factor and
`aureomycin are helpful
`in alleviating
`the toxic effects of aminopterin the
`margin between the therapeutic and
`toxic (lose of aminopterin is so narrow
`as to preclude its clinical use. The
`observations of an ameliorative effect
`on the exudative phenomena of rheu-
`matoid arthritis reported separatelv in
`greater detail” are of interest princi-
`pallv to indicate that the mechanism
`of action of cortisone is not a specific
`hormonal effect but is due to suppres-
`sion of mesenchvmal reactivity. as is
`also accomplished bv aminopterin. It
`is to be emphasized that the effects of
`aminopterin are not so marked as those
`nrodueed bv cortisone, although the
`action
`is more protracted usuallv
`persisting for some weeks after dis-
`continuing medication. Sustained phar-
`macolmrical effect is a desideratum in
`controlling diseases of tissue reactivity
`and it is possible that other anti-folio
`compounds will be found more suitable
`for clinical employment. or that ami-
`nopterin in smaller dosage may be 11se-
`ful
`as
`a
`supplement
`to cortisone
`administration. The use of such meas-
`ures mav be envisaged as a potent
`therapeutic weapon to suppress the
`unfavorable host
`responses of tissue
`reactivitv, in coniunction with specific
`measures
`aimed at
`the
`etiological
`agent. Thus.
`for
`example, ACTH
`nromptlv
`suppresses
`granulomatous
`formation and ulceration of- laryngeal
`lesions, and svstemic signs of illness, in
`tuberculosis“. The administration of
`
`inhibit unfavorable host
`agents that
`responses in tuberculosis over extended
`periods may prove of considerable
`value as an adjunct to specific chemo-
`therapy with streptomycin and other
`bacteriostatic agents.
`Both cortisone and aminopterin exert
`generalized effects on all
`tissues;
`this
`limits their therapeutic value. A studv
`is currently in progress to establish
`whether
`the striking remissions
`in
`psoriatic lesions observed with oral ad—
`ministration of aminopterin can be
`achieved by topical applications
`so
`that
`the effects of the drug can be
`confined to the tissues involved. If, as
`appears probable, the beneficial effect
`of such measures as cortisone and
`aminopterin in the rheumatic state is
`due to suppression of mesenchymal
`reactivity it would appear desirable to
`find an agent that specifically inhibits
`connective tissue. Such a substance
`has been found in extracts of malt,
`ungerminated grain and oranges, which
`totallv inhibit the growth of fibroblasts
`and other mesenchvrne cells in con-
`centrations permitting the free growth
`of epithelial
`tissues”. Further study
`has revealed this differential growth-
`inbibiting action to he possessed by
`parasorbic acid and coumarin’”. It is
`of interest that coumarin is structurally
`allied to salicylate. It would appear
`worth while to investigate the thera-
`.peutic potentialities of parasorbic acid
`and various of the coumz‘irin series.
`Considerable investigation has been
`done in the screening of therapeutic
`agents in experimental sarcoma. and
`this line of investigation may prove V
`fruitful in finding connective tissue in-
`hibiting agents of value in diseases
`involving mesenchymal tissues such as
`resnond to cortisone.
`Summary.Attention is drawn to the
`similarity1n action of cortisone and the
`folic acid antagonist aminopterin. Al-
`though the locus of their biochemical
`effects does not appear to be the same.
`both are anti-anabolic and inhibit tis-
`
`Page 5 of 7
`
`Page 5 of 7
`
`

`

`171
`
`aunxnn:
`
`THERAI’EUTIC SUPPRESSION 01" TISSUE REACI‘1"1TY
`
`are
`regeneration. Observations
`sue
`reported
`indicating
`the
`inhibitory
`effect of aminopterin 011 various tissue
`elements. Amelioration of psoriasis,
`and of experimental and clinical
`ar—
`thritis, reflects suppression of epithelial
`and mesenchymal derivatives respec-
`tively.
`Clinical disorders in which reparative
`and proliferative host
`responses are
`inimical to the body’s welfare may be
`
`nosologically grouped as diseases of
`tissue reactivity. In such disorders sup-
`pression of
`tissue reactivity, which
`itself constitutes the disease process,
`becomes a therapeutic necessity. The
`therapeutic rationale of agents that
`suppress tissue reactivity such as cor-
`tisone and anti~folic com ounds, and
`of other compounds who may more
`selectively affect mesenchyme,
`is dis-
`cussed.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`Allaright F.: Hanev Lectures, 38,123,1943.
`Baker, B. L.: Symposium on the Adrenal Cortex, Am. Assn. Ad\. Sei., December 28
`
`5E.9mfleweweer Becks, H., Simpson, M. E., Li, C. H., and Evans, H. M.: Endocrinology, 34, 305, 194-1.
`
`Boyhnd, E.: Ann. Rev. Biochem., 18, 217, 19-19.
`Broquist, H. P., Stnkstnd, E. L. B., and Jukes, '1'. H.: J. Biol. Chem., 185, 399, 1950.
`Cobum, A. F.: Bull. John Hopkins Hosp.. 73, 435, 19-13.
`[1. 332. 19-15.
`Comm, 1.: Am. Assn. Adv., Sci., Res. Conf. on Cancer,
`Derick, C. L., Hitchcock, C. H., and Swift, H. F.: J. Clin. Invest., 5, 427. 1928.
`Engel, F. L.: Symposium on the Adrenal Cortex, Am. Assn. Adv. Sci., December 28,
`10. Fischel, E. 13.: Bull. N. Y. Amd. .\1ed., 26, 255, 1950.
`11. Forbus, \V. D.: Cranulomatous Inflammation, Springfield, 111., Charles C Thomas, 1949.
`12. Freyberg, 11. 11.: Bull. N. v. Acad. Med, 26, 206, 1950.
`13. Coven, C. D., Jr. and Gordon, H. H. Science, 109, 332, 19-19.
`14. Gray, A. M. H. In Textbook of the Practice of \ledicine, ed. by F. \V. Price, 3d ed..
`p. 1343, Oxford Uni\. Press, 1929.
`15. Grubbs,R. C. Trossbnch,1., Houghton, B. C., and Hitchcock, F. A.: J. App. Phy.s,2-,
`5327,1949.
`
`l’mc. StalI. Meet.
`
`16. Cubncr, R... Am. Clinica, 14, 13. 19-19.,
`17. Gubner, 11., August, 5., and Cinsberg,‘ :.Am J. Med. Sci.. 220, 176. 1950.
`18. Cubner, B., and August, S. Unpublished obsenations.
`19. Hall, D. A.: Biochem. J. 40, 55, 19-16.
`20. Hench, P. S., Kendall,EE. C., Slocumb, C. H., and Pulley, 11. F.:
`\iavo Clin.,24,181,1949.
`21. Higgins, C. M., \Voods, K. A., and Bennett, W. A.: Cancer Res. 10, 202, 1950.
`22. Hitchings, G. H., Elion, G. B., Faleo, E. A., Russell, P. B., and Vandcr War“, 11.:
`Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 52, 1318, 1950.
`23. Inglc, D. J., Li, C. H., and Evans, H. M.: Endocrinology, 29, 32, 19-16.
`24. Ingle, D. 1.: Symposium on the Adrenal Cortex, Am Assn. Adv. Sci., December 28,
`1949.
`25. Kendall, E. C.: Conference on Metabolic Aspects of Convalescence Including Bone and
`\Vound Healing, Edited by E. C. Reifenstein, Jr. [1. 81, New York Josiah Macy Foundation,
`1945.
`26. 'Kennedy, B. J., Pure, 1. A. P., Pump, K. K., and Standard, R. L: Canad. Med. Assn. 1.,
`62, 4.2.6, 1950
`27. Little,P. A., Sampath, A.,Pagnnelli,V., Locke,E., and Subhnflow,Y.z Trans. N. Y. Acad.
`Sci.,10,91,1948.
`_
`28. Medawar, P. B.: Quart. J. Exp. Phys., 27, 147, 1937.
`29. Mednwnr, P. B., Robinson, G. M., and Robinson, Ra Nature, 151, 195, 19-13.
`30. Menkin, V.: Dynamics of Inflammation, New York, Macmillan, Co., 1940.
`31. Meyer, L. M., Fink, H. Sawitsky, A., Bowen, M., and Ritz, N. D.- Am. 1. Clin. Path.,
`19,119,1949.
`32. Mirick, G. 5.: Am. Soc. Clin. Invest., 42nd Annual Meeting, May 1,1950
`38. Mondollo,fi.,andDeLerne1-, S. 1.: Femalecta,2, 171,1947.
`
`Page 6 of 7
`
`Page 6 of 7
`
`

`

`(iUBNER: THERAPEUTIC SUPPRESSION 01" TISSUE REACTIVITY
`
`175
`
`34. Oleson, J. J.: Trans. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 12, (set. 2 ii) 118, 1950.
`35. Philips, F. S., Thiersch, J. 3., and Ferguson, F. C.: Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 52, 13-19,
`1950.
`36. Pnlsolf, \V. 11., Toply, L. J., and King, C. C.: J. Biol. Chem., 1.76, 1309, 1948.
`37. Rngnn, C., Howes, E. L., Plou, C. M., Meyer, K., and Blunt, J. W.: Proc. Soc. Exp.
`Biol. and .\Ied., 72, 718, 1949.
`38. Sacks, M. 5., Bradford, C. T., and Schoenbnch, E. 8.: Ann. Int. Med, 32, 80, 1050.
`39. Schoenbnch, E. 3., Coldin, A., Goldberg, 3., and Ortega, L. 0.: Cunu-r, 2, 57, 1949.
`:10. Selye, 11.: Brit. Med. J., 1129, 1949.
`41. Idcm.: Textbook of Endocrinology, Acta Endocrinologica Inc., Montreal, 1949.
`42. Seller, L. J., Schwartzmnn, C., Schneierson, S. S., and Cnbrilove, J. L.: Science, 111,
`303, 1950.
`’
`43. Sticlmcy, J. M., Heck, F. J., and \Volltins, C. 11.: Proc. Stall Meet. Mayo Clin., 25, 488,
`1950.
`44. Stokes, J. L.: J. Back., 48, 201, 1944.
`45. Swift, 1!. F.: J. Exp. Med., 36, 735, 1922.
`46. Tompsefl, 11., LeMnish'e, C., Muschenheim, C., and MeDerrnon, W.: Am. Soc. for
`Clin. Invest., 42nd Annual Meeting, May 1, 1950.
`7. Welch, A. D.: Assn. Am. Physicians, 63rd Annual Meeting, Maw 2, 1950.
`48. Williams, J. N., Sunde, M. L., Cravens, W. W., and Elvehjem, C. A.: J. Biol. Chem.
`185. 895, 1950.
`.
`
`Page 7 of 7
`
`Page 7 of 7
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket