throbber
Transcript of CONFERENCE CALL
`
`Date: January 21, 2015
`
`Case: ANTARES PHARMA, INC., ET AL v. SPEZIALPRAPARATE MBH.
`
`Planet Depos, LLC
`Phone: 888-433-3767
`Fax: 888-503-3767
`Email: transcripts@planetdepos.com
`Internet: www.planetdepos.com
`
`Court Reporting | Videography | Videoconferencing | Interpretation | Transcription
`
`Antares Exhibit 1033
`Antares v. medac
`IPR2014-01091
`
`Page 1 of 29
`
`

`
` UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
` BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`1
`
`---------------------------------x
`
`ANTARES PHARMA, INC., LEO PHARMA :
`
`A/S AND LEO PHARMA INC., :
`
` Petitioner, : Case IPR2014-01091
`
` v. : Patent 8,664,231 B2
`
`MEDAC GESELLSCHAFT FUER :
`
`KLINISCHE SPEZIALPRAPARATE MBH., :
`
` Patent Owner. :
`
`---------------------------------x
`
` Conference Call before
`
` THE HONORABLE ERICA A. FRANKLIN, TONI R. SCHEINER,
`
` and JACQUELINE WRIGHT BONILLA
`
` Wednesday, January 21, 2015
`
` 11:00 a.m.
`
`Job No.: 73436
`
`Pages: 1 - 21
`
`Reported by: Bonnie Panek
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`Page 2 of 29
`
`

`
`CONFERENCE CALL
`CONDUCTED ON WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 21, 2015
`
`2
`
` A P P E A R A N C E S
`
` ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER:
`
` SANYA SUKDUANG, ESQUIRE
`
` THOMAS H. JENKINS, ESQUIRE
`
` LILLIAN M. ROBINSON, ESQUIRE
`
` FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
`
` GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
`
` 901 New York Avenue, NW
`
` Washington, D.C. 20001
`
` (202) 408-4000
`
`
`
` ON BEHALF OF RESPONDENT:
`
` JAMES F. HALEY, JR. ESQUIRE
`
` CHING-LEE FUKUDA, ESQUIRE
`
` STEVEN MOSSEY, ESQUIRE
`
` ROPES & GRAY, LLP
`
` 1211 Avenue of the Americas
`
` New York, New York 10036
`
` (212) 596-9000
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`Page 3 of 29
`
`

`
`CONFERENCE CALL
`CONDUCTED ON WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 21, 2015
`
`3
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
` C O N T E N T S
`
` PAGE
`
`PRELIMINARY DISCUSSIONS ON CASE: 5
`
`DISCUSSIONS ON SCHEDULING ORDER:
`
` By Mr. Sukduang 7
`
` By Mr. Haley 7
`
` By Mr. Sukduang 8
`
` By Judge Franklin 9
`
`DISCUSSIONS ON DOCUMENT PRODUCTION:
`
` By Mr. Haley 9
`
` By Mr. Sukduang 11
`
` By Mr. Haley 12
`
` By Judge Franklin 14
`
` By Mr. Haley 15
`
` By Mr. Sukduang 15
`
` By Mr. Haley 16
`
` By Mr. Sukduang 17
`
` By Judge Franklin 17
`
`CONFIRMATION OF DATES BY JUDGE FRANKLIN: 18
`
` E X H I B I T S
`
` (None)
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`Page 4 of 29
`
`

`
`CONFERENCE CALL
`CONDUCTED ON WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 21, 2015
`
`4
`
` P R O C E E D I N G S
`
` JUDGE FRANKLIN: Good morning. This is
`
`Judge Franklin. I'm on the line with Judges Scheiner
`
`and Bonilla.
`
` MR. SUKDUANG: Good morning, Your Honor.
`
`This is Sanya Sukduang, Tom Jenkins and Lilly Robinson
`
`for petitioners, and we also have on the line a court
`
`reporter.
`
` MR. HALEY: Good morning, Your Honor. This
`
`is Jim Haley, and with the other line is Ching-Lee
`
`Fukuda and Steve Mossey from Ropes & Gray for Medac,
`
`the patent owner.
`
` JUDGE FRANKLIN: Okay. Welcome to you all,
`
`and it's fine that you have a court reporter. We just
`
`want to request that the parties file with the board as
`
`an exhibit a copy of the transcript prepared by the
`
`court reporter.
`
` MR. SUKDUANG: We will, Your Honor.
`
` JUDGE FRANKLIN: Great. And the board, the
`
`panel will also prepare a summary of the call and
`
`provide that, make that available on purpose. All
`
`right. Let's get started.
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`Page 5 of 29
`
`

`
`CONFERENCE CALL
`CONDUCTED ON WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 21, 2015
`
`5
`
` The purpose of this call is to discuss
`
`proposed changes to the scheduling order and any
`
`motions that the parties intend to file as well as any
`
`other preliminary matters, but first I'd like to ask
`
`whether there have been any attempts at settlement.
`
` MR. SUKDUANG: Your Honor, the parties are
`
`involved in a corresponding litigation involving this
`
`particular patent, and I believe the parties during the
`
`course of that litigation have discussed settlement but
`
`at this time have not reached any resolution on that
`
`issue.
`
` JUDGE FRANKLIN: Okay. Thank you. And Mr.
`
`Haley, do you have any comment?
`
` MR. HALEY: Just one comment, Your Honor.
`
`There actually is a second litigation pending as well
`
`in Delaware on some of Antares own patents, and
`
`certainly it is correct the parties have discussed
`
`settling all of these matters, but it is correct that
`
`we have not yet reached a position where both sides
`
`agree to settle.
`
` JUDGE FRANKLIN: Okay. And for both pending
`
`matters or for all pending matters, related matters
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`Page 6 of 29
`
`

`
`CONFERENCE CALL
`CONDUCTED ON WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 21, 2015
`
`6
`
`what's the status of those if they're different than
`
`what was indicated in your previous filings?
`
` MR. SUKDUANG: Sure. Your Honor, with
`
`respect to the one that is most directly related to
`
`this IPR involving the 231 patent the litigation is in
`
`the fact discovery stage. Claim construction motions
`
`have been filed, responses are due in the middle of
`
`February.
`
` Medac, the patent owner, has filed a motion
`
`for a preliminary injunction. That is currently being
`
`briefed, and Antares or the petitioners will be filing
`
`in that litigation again mid February a motion to stay.
`
`The district court judge has set a March 6th date to
`
`hear all pending motions, and we would expect
`
`resolution shortly after that on the preliminary
`
`injunction claim construction and motion to stay.
`
` JUDGE FRANKLIN: Okay.
`
` MR. HALEY: In the Delaware action Antares
`
`brought its own motion for preliminary injunction.
`
`Judge Robinson denied that motion. It was appealed at
`
`the federal circuit who affirmed Judge Robinson, and
`
`Antares has asked for reconsideration, or
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`Page 7 of 29
`
`

`
`CONFERENCE CALL
`CONDUCTED ON WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 21, 2015
`
`7
`
`reconsideration En Banc, and the federal circuit has
`
`not yet ruled on that request.
`
` JUDGE FRANKLIN: Okay. Thank you both. Now
`
`let's turn to the scheduling order. It appears that
`
`neither party has filed a notice indicating that they
`
`anticipate filing motions not already authorized by the
`
`board. Is that correct, Mr. Sukduang?
`
` MR. SUKDUANG: That's correct, neither party
`
`filed the required notice two days before the
`
`conference with respect to changing the schedule or
`
`additional motions.
`
` JUDGE FRANKLIN: And are there any motions
`
`at this point that either party would like to discuss
`
`with the panel?
`
` MR. SUKDUANG: From the petitioner's
`
`perspective, Your Honor, we don't have any motions that
`
`we are contemplating or any changes to the schedule we
`
`would like to propose.
`
` MR. HALEY: From the patent owner's side,
`
`Your Honor, I guess two things. One is we sent an
`
`E-mail yesterday to the petitioners suggesting that we
`
`move the schedule later in time by one week because the
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`Page 8 of 29
`
`

`
`CONFERENCE CALL
`CONDUCTED ON WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 21, 2015
`
`8
`
`due date one is only one week after the claim
`
`construction preliminary injunction hearing which was
`
`mentioned is going to take place on March 6th in New
`
`Jersey.
`
` And we thought that two weeks would be
`
`better after that hearing in order to put in our patent
`
`owner's response, and that would move every -- all the
`
`dates in the schedule by one week if that's possible.
`
` MR. SUKDUANG: Your Honor, may I address
`
`that?
`
` JUDGE FRANKLIN: Yes.
`
` MR. SUKDUANG: Again, we don't believe that
`
`a one-week movement of the schedule is necessary. The
`
`preliminary injunction is really Medac's prompting, and
`
`we believe that in response to the PI motion the
`
`evidence that they'd be presenting to the court there
`
`would be nearly duplicative of the evidence that they
`
`present in their response due in March because the
`
`issue of validity is one that needs to be raised in
`
`response to the preliminary injunction motion, and to
`
`be honest with Your Honor, the IPR plays a significant
`
`role in that.
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`Page 9 of 29
`
`

`
`CONFERENCE CALL
`CONDUCTED ON WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 21, 2015
`
`9
`
` JUDGE FRANKLIN: Well, we would like to
`
`remind the parties that you are allowed to stipulate to
`
`modifications of due dates one through five, and we
`
`encourage that the parties -- we encourage the parties
`
`to come to some resolution where one party has made a
`
`request to make modifications to that due date barring
`
`some type of prejudice or burden.
`
` We're not going to rule on this now, but
`
`what we'd like you to do is to continue your
`
`conversation and come to some agreement about modifying
`
`any of due dates one through five. If, Mr. Haley, you
`
`are not able to come to some agreement that you find
`
`useful, you are open to calling or E-mailing the board
`
`and requesting a conference call.
`
` MR. SUKDUANG: We'll reach out -- thank you,
`
`Your Honor. We'll reach out and discuss the scheduling
`
`issue with counsel for patent owners.
`
` MR. HALEY: And I see no reason why we can't
`
`come to some cooperative conclusion to it. Your Honor,
`
`the second thing that we would like to raise, and I
`
`don't think it's going to require a motion but I want
`
`to put it on the table.
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`Page 10 of 29
`
`

`
`CONFERENCE CALL
`CONDUCTED ON WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 21, 2015
`
`10
`
` We sent an E-mail yesterday again to
`
`petitioner's counsel raising the question of the
`
`production of some specific documents that are called
`
`into question in their petition and I think were
`
`addressed in your institution decision, and the first
`
`of those is the Grint patent which is their exhibit --
`
` MR. SUKDUANG: 1003, I believe.
`
` MR. HALEY: 1003, exactly. The Grint patent
`
`in example one talks about a clinical trial combining
`
`Methotrexate and IL-10, and it talks about the
`
`Methotrexate dose being either 12 and a half up to 25
`
`mgs, but does not give the concentration at which that
`
`dose was administered.
`
` We understand from an abstract which we
`
`found which is our Exhibit 2005 that Dr. Weinblatt,
`
`petitioner's expert, was involved in that clinical
`
`trial, and so we've asked the petitioners to produce
`
`any report or other document referring to the protocols
`
`in that trial, in particular to the concentration of
`
`the Methotrexate used in the subcutaneous injection in
`
`that trial.
`
` JUDGE FRANKLIN: Okay. Mr. Sukduang.
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`Page 11 of 29
`
`

`
`CONFERENCE CALL
`CONDUCTED ON WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 21, 2015
`
`11
`
` MR. SUKDUANG: Yes, Your Honor. First we
`
`think in an IPR proceedings any discovery requires a
`
`motion for additional discovery, so with respect to
`
`that we believe that they would have to file a motion
`
`if the board grants permission.
`
` On the issue of the protocols that they're
`
`seeking, they have an obligation under the Garman
`
`factor to show beyond speculation that something useful
`
`will be uncovered in the discovery that they're
`
`seeking.
`
` Here the protocol is not being relied on as
`
`an anticipatory or a reference relying on for
`
`obviousness. It's the Grint patent itself and its
`
`disclosure of the concentrations that are presently
`
`claimed.
`
` Moreover, as Mr. Haley indicated they have
`
`the abstract which has the protocol, and if there's a
`
`corresponding paper that goes with that they will have
`
`that as well. That would include the protocol. Thus,
`
`this information would seem to be publicly available to
`
`them.
`
` Additionally, we don't think this
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`Page 12 of 29
`
`

`
`CONFERENCE CALL
`CONDUCTED ON WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 21, 2015
`
`12
`
`information is useful again because we're relying on
`
`the Grint patent itself, not on the protocols that were
`
`disclosed in example one of the Grint patent, so that
`
`-- we request that this request be denied, or at the
`
`very least they're required to file a motion seeking
`
`additional discovery on this point.
`
` MR. HALEY: Just a quick response, Your
`
`Honor. The abstract which we've cited as example 2005
`
`does not give the concentration of Methotrexate that
`
`was used, and its much like example one in Grint which
`
`only talks about the dose of Methotrexate, not the
`
`concentration.
`
` In addition, I will represent that we have
`
`done all of the extensive searching that we can
`
`imagine, including on the FDA website and through all
`
`of the pub med places that we could think of to find a
`
`fuller report of the clinical trial. We've not been
`
`able to find that, and so it is not available to us.
`
` Secondly, in terms of its use, as you know
`
`in the institution decision we raised the argument that
`
`while Grint has a large range of possible
`
`concentrations he also has a large range of possible
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`Page 13 of 29
`
`

`
`CONFERENCE CALL
`CONDUCTED ON WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 21, 2015
`
`13
`
`diseases, and our argument was that only the very
`
`bottom of the range was ever used to treat RA.
`
` And at least in the institution decision you
`
`said at this point we would have to support that with
`
`more than attorney argument, and one of the ways to
`
`support that, and therefore why this is useful is what
`
`their expert actually used in this clinical trial when
`
`treating RA with Methotrexate, what concentration.
`
` MR. SUKDUANG: Your Honor -- I'm sorry, Mr.
`
`Haley. I didn't mean to interrupt you.
`
` MR. HALEY: No problem. We believe that
`
`concentration will be below 25 mgs per mill, which
`
`would be incredibly useful when we say well, even the
`
`petitioner's expert was using the prior art, not our
`
`invention.
`
` JUDGE FRANKLIN: Okay. I just wanted to
`
`clarify, you mentioned, Mr. Haley, that you submitted
`
`this request in an E-mail yesterday?
`
` MR. HALEY: Yes.
`
` JUDGE FRANKLIN: Have the parties, other
`
`than during this conference call, spoken about the
`
`request?
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`Page 14 of 29
`
`

`
`CONFERENCE CALL
`CONDUCTED ON WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 21, 2015
`
`14
`
` MR. HALEY: No, Your Honor.
`
` MR. SUKDUANG: No, Your Honor.
`
` JUDGE FRANKLIN: Okay. Because again the
`
`panel is going to ask that the parties meet and confer
`
`on this issue, and Mr. Haley, as far as you're able to
`
`be very specific about which documents you are
`
`requesting and Mr. Sukduang, if you're aware of the
`
`document whether or not you're willing to provide it.
`
`Be specific as to what the document is which contains
`
`the information requested.
`
` And if you say that it's your position that
`
`the document is publicly available indicate where it's
`
`available and how Mr. Haley might retrieve it. If the
`
`parties, after meeting and conferring, are not able to
`
`come to some agreement then Mr. Haley, we do invite you
`
`to request a conference call seeking authorization to
`
`file a motion.
`
` And again in that motion we'll ask you to be
`
`very specific on the document requested, and Mr.
`
`Sukduang, if you choose to challenge that motion you
`
`then may do so.
`
` MR. SUKDUANG: Thank you, Your Honor.
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`Page 15 of 29
`
`

`
`CONFERENCE CALL
`CONDUCTED ON WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 21, 2015
`
`15
`
` MR. HALEY: Your Honor, just to complete the
`
`other subjects that we've raised in the E-mail
`
`yesterday to petitioner's counsel, there are two other
`
`documents or reports that we've requested.
`
` In the Weinblatt declaration, that is the
`
`petitioner's declarant, which is Exhibit 1012 on
`
`paragraph 33, the declarant Dr. Weinblatt said, quote,
`
`I have been treating patients with RA using a
`
`subcutaneous injection of Methotrexate since at least
`
`1995, end quote, and we asked for the documents
`
`indicating what concentrations Dr. Weinblatt has used
`
`to treat RA subcutaneously since 1995.
`
` MR. SUKDUANG: Your Honor, again on that
`
`point the parties haven't discussed this issue, but I'd
`
`like to point out that that's 20 years of patient data
`
`that they're seeking. Dr. Weinblatt is a world
`
`renowned expert in treating Rheumatoid Arthritis. This
`
`is probably thousands upon thousands of patients and
`
`there are also HIPAA laws, privacy laws associated with
`
`this type of information.
`
` We think it would be, one, not useful
`
`because we're not relying on Dr. Weinblatt's prior
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`Page 16 of 29
`
`

`
`CONFERENCE CALL
`CONDUCTED ON WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 21, 2015
`
`16
`
`experience with Methotrexate to treat RA as prior art.
`
`He just noted that in terms of what his experience is.
`
`And two, it would be incredibly burdensome to try to
`
`track this information down, and three, their request
`
`is not very specific. They're just looking for every
`
`concentration he has ever used over the 20 plus years
`
`of his experience treating RA with Methotrexate.
`
` MR. HALEY: We will certainly take a
`
`representation that he's never used anything above 25
`
`mgs per mill.
`
` MR. SUKDUANG: They would have to seek a
`
`motion for that.
`
` MR. HALEY: And in a similar vein, Your
`
`Honor, the second of petitioner's experts, Dr.
`
`Gammond's (phonetic) expert report is Exhibit 1013. In
`
`paragraph 36 of that report Dr. Gammond says, and I
`
`quote, I have compounded or manipulated Methotrexate in
`
`various concentrations for use in various diseases
`
`including cancer, RA and psoriasis since before 2006,
`
`end quote.
`
` And again, we've asked for documents
`
`indicating what concentrations Dr. Gammond manipulated
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`Page 17 of 29
`
`

`
`CONFERENCE CALL
`CONDUCTED ON WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 21, 2015
`
`17
`
`and compounded Methotrexate to produce for subcutaneous
`
`injection in RA patients.
`
` MR. SUKDUANG: And again, Your Honor, with
`
`respect to that we're looking at decades of work. The
`
`request isn't specific, and I think that it would be
`
`highly burdensome to try to gather this information
`
`given the schedule that we need to follow even with an
`
`adjustment by one week of the due dates.
`
` Moreover, we don't think this is useful as
`
`we're not relying on Mr. Gammond's prior experience as
`
`prior art to the 231 patent.
`
` JUDGE FRANKLIN: Okay. So having heard both
`
`sides, I am -- as you meet and confer I want to draw
`
`out a couple of points for you to consider as you meet
`
`and confer, and that is Mr. Haley in particular to
`
`consider the scope and relevance of the documents as
`
`well as the specific documents that you're requesting,
`
`and Mr. Sukduang to consider Mr. Haley's interest in
`
`those documents in trying to facilitate the information
`
`that he's seeking, which it sounds like it's the
`
`concentration used by not only the experts but also
`
`what's included in the Grint patent.
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`Page 18 of 29
`
`

`
`CONFERENCE CALL
`CONDUCTED ON WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 21, 2015
`
`18
`
` These, I have to say what I've heard so far,
`
`do sound like questions for depositions, so keep that
`
`in mind, too, as you meet and confer. I understand the
`
`issue is about documentation, but it also just sounds
`
`like an attempt to gain information that was not
`
`included in the declaration or that's not specified in
`
`Exhibit 1003.
`
` MR. HALEY: That's correct, Your Honor, and
`
`certainly we understand that we can ask those questions
`
`at deposition. We're just concerned that the witness
`
`will either say they don't know, they would have to go
`
`back and check the records, and given the schedule we
`
`thought we'd get this up front and if there's documents
`
`we will then have them and we can show them to the
`
`witness.
`
` JUDGE FRANKLIN: Okay. So the instruction
`
`there is for the parties to meet and confer, consider
`
`the points raised, and if there's no resolution to seek
`
`a conference with the panel.
`
` MR. HALEY: Thank you, Your Honor.
`
` MR. SUKDUANG: Thank you, Your Honor.
`
` JUDGE FRANKLIN: At this point I want to
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`Page 19 of 29
`
`

`
`CONFERENCE CALL
`CONDUCTED ON WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 21, 2015
`
`19
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`also confirm with each of the parties that they will
`
`make themselves available on the scheduled date for
`
`oral argument if that oral argument is requested, and
`
`that date is August 17th, 2015.
`
` MR. HALEY: For patent owner we confirm
`
`that, Your Honor.
`
` JUDGE FRANKLIN: That's Mr. Haley?
`
` MR. HALEY: Yes.
`
` JUDGE FRANKLIN: Okay.
`
` MR. SUKDUANG: And we confirm that, too,
`
`Your Honor.
`
` JUDGE FRANKLIN: And I have a question. At
`
`the beginning of the conference during the roll call
`
`there was mention of a Lilly Robinson.
`
` MR. SUKDUANG: That's correct, Your Honor.
`
` JUDGE FRANKLIN: And is she -- who is she?
`
`Can you just --
`
` MR. SUKDUANG: She's an attorney at
`
`Finnegan, Henderson who has been working on these
`
`issues.
`
` JUDGE FRANKLIN: Okay. All right. And as
`
`we're talking about documents I do want to note to the
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`Page 20 of 29
`
`

`
`CONFERENCE CALL
`CONDUCTED ON WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 21, 2015
`
`20
`
`parties that a protective order does not exist in these
`
`proceedings until one is filed and approved by the
`
`board. If a protective order is sought we do encourage
`
`the parties to use a default protective order in the
`
`trial practice guide.
`
` Petitioner, is there anything else you wish
`
`to discuss during this initial conference call?
`
` MR. SUKDUANG: Not at this time, Your Honor.
`
` JUDGE FRANKLIN: And patent owner, do you
`
`have any additional concerns?
`
` MR. HALEY: No, Your Honor. Thank you very
`
`much.
`
` JUDGE FRANKLIN: In that case this call is
`
`adjourned.
`
` MR. SUKDUANG: Thank you, Your Honor.
`
` MR. HALEY: Thank you. Have a good day.
`
` (Off the record at 11:21 a.m.)
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`Page 21 of 29
`
`

`
`CONFERENCE CALL
`CONDUCTED ON WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 21, 2015
`
`21
`
` CERTIFICATE OF SHORTHAND REPORTER - NOTARY PUBLIC
`
` I, Bonnie K. Panek, a Notary Public in and
`
`for The State of Texas, the officer before whom the
`
`foregoing proceedings were taken, do hereby certify
`
`that the foregoing transcript is a true and correct
`
`record of the proceedings; that said proceedings were
`
`taken by me stenographically and thereafter reduced to
`
`typewriting under my supervision; and that I am neither
`
`counsel for, related to, nor employed by any of the
`
`parties to this case and have no interest, financial or
`
`otherwise, in its outcome.
`
` IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my
`
`hand and affixed my notarial seal this 30th day of
`
`January, 2015.
`
`My commission expires: January 22, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR
`
`THE STATE OF TEXAS
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`Page 22 of 29
`
`

`
`22
`
`10:12,19 12:9,12
`13:8,12 16:6
`17:21
`concentrations
`11:14 12:22
`15:11 16:18,22
`concerned
`18:10
`concerns
`20:10
`conclusion
`9:19
`confer
`14:4 17:13,15
`18:3,17
`conference
`1:13 7:10 9:14
`13:21 14:16
`18:19 19:13
`20:7
`conferring
`14:14
`confirm
`19:1,5,10
`CONFIRMATI...
`3:19
`consider
`17:14,16,18 18:17
`construction
`6:6,16 8:2
`contains
`14:9
`contemplating
`7:17
`continue
`9:9
`conversation
`9:10
`cooperative
`9:19
`copy
`4:16
`correct
`5:17,18 7:7,8
`18:8 19:15 21:5
`corresponding
`5:7 11:18
`
`
`CONFERENCE CALLCONFERENCE CALL
`
`CONDUCTED ON WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 21, 2015CONDUCTED ON WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 21, 2015
`
`1:6 3:3 20:13
`21:10
`certainly
`5:17 16:8 18:9
`CERTIFICATE
`21:1
`certify
`21:4
`challenge
`14:20
`changes
`5:2 7:17
`changing
`7:10
`check
`18:12
`Ching-Lee
`2:14 4:10
`choose
`14:20
`circuit
`6:21 7:1
`cited
`12:8
`claim
`6:6,16 8:1
`claimed
`11:15
`clarify
`13:17
`clinical
`10:9,16 12:17
`13:7
`combining
`10:9
`come
`9:5,10,12,19
`14:15
`comment
`5:13,14
`commission
`21:15
`complete
`15:1
`compounded
`16:17 17:1
`concentration
`
`barring
`9:6
`beginning
`19:13
`BEHALF
`2:2,12
`believe
`5:8 8:12,15 10:7
`11:4 13:11
`better
`8:6
`beyond
`11:8
`board
`1:2 4:15,19 7:7
`9:13 11:5 20:3
`Bonilla
`1:15 4:4
`Bonnie
`1:22 21:2
`bottom
`13:2
`briefed
`6:11
`brought
`6:19
`burden
`9:7
`burdensome
`16:3 17:6
`B2
`1:7
`
`C
`
`C 2
`
`:1 3:1 4:1
`call
`1:13 4:20 5:1
`9:14 13:21
`14:16 19:13
`20:7,13
`called
`10:3
`calling
`9:13
`cancer
`16:19
`case
`
`6:20
`appears
`7:4
`approved
`20:2
`argument
`12:20 13:1,5 19:3
`19:3
`art
`13:14 16:1 17:11
`Arthritis
`15:17
`asked
`6:22 10:17 15:10
`16:21
`associated
`15:19
`attempt
`18:5
`attempts
`5:5
`attorney
`13:5 19:18
`August
`19:4
`authorization
`14:16
`authorized
`7:6
`available
`4:21 11:20 12:18
`14:12,13 19:2
`Avenue
`2:8,17
`aware
`14:7
`a.m
`1:17 20:17
`A/S
`1:5
`
`B
`
`B 3
`
`:21
`back
`18:12
`Banc
`7:1
`
`A
`
`able
`9:12 12:18 14:5
`14:14
`abstract
`10:14 11:17 12:8
`action
`6:18
`addition
`12:13
`additional
`7:11 11:3 12:6
`20:10
`Additionally
`11:22
`address
`8:9
`addressed
`10:5
`adjourned
`20:14
`adjustment
`17:8
`administered
`10:13
`affirmed
`6:21
`affixed
`21:13
`agree
`5:20
`agreement
`9:10,12 14:15
`allowed
`9:2
`Americas
`2:17
`Antares
`1:4 5:16 6:11,18
`6:22
`anticipate
`7:6
`anticipatory
`11:12
`APPEAL
`1:2
`appealed
`
`
`PLANET DEPOSPLANET DEPOS
`
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`Page 23 of 29
`
`

`
`CONFERENCE CALL
`CONDUCTED ON WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 21, 2015
`
`23
`
`13:16,20 14:3
`17:12 18:16,22
`19:7,9,12,16,21
`20:9,13
`front
`18:13
`FUER
`1:8
`Fukuda
`2:14 4:11
`fuller
`12:17
`
`G
`
`G 4
`
`:1
`gain
`18:5
`Gammond
`16:16,22
`Gammond's
`16:15 17:10
`Garman
`11:7
`GARRETT
`2:7
`gather
`17:6
`GESELLSCH...
`1:8
`give
`10:12 12:9
`given
`17:7 18:12
`go
`18:11
`goes
`11:18
`going
`8:3 9:8,21 14:4
`good
`4:2,5,9 20:16
`grants
`11:5
`Gray
`2:16 4:11
`Great
`4:19
`
`17:19
`fact
`6:6
`factor
`11:8
`far
`14:5 18:1
`FARABOW
`2:6
`FDA
`12:15
`February
`6:8,12
`federal
`6:21 7:1
`file
`4:15 5:3 11:4
`12:5 14:17
`filed
`6:7,9 7:5,9 20:2
`filing
`6:11 7:6
`filings
`6:2
`financial
`21:10
`find
`9:12 12:16,18
`fine
`4:14
`Finnegan
`2:6 19:19
`first
`5:4 10:5 11:1
`five
`9:3,11
`follow
`17:7
`foregoing
`21:4,5
`found
`10:15
`Franklin
`1:14 3:8,13,18,19
`4:2,3,13,19 5:12
`5:21 6:17 7:3,12
`8:11 9:1 10:22
`
`E 2
`
`:1,1 3:1,21 4:1,1
`either
`7:13 10:11 18:11
`employed
`21:9
`En
`7:1
`encourage
`9:4,4 20:3
`ERICA
`1:14
`ESQUIRE
`2:3,4,5,13,14,15
`evidence
`8:16,17
`exactly
`10:8
`example
`10:9 12:3,8,10
`exhibit
`4:16 10:6,15 15:6
`16:15 18:7
`exist
`20:1
`expect
`6:14
`experience
`16:1,2,7 17:10
`expert
`10:16 13:7,14
`15:17 16:15
`experts
`16:14 17:21
`expires
`21:15
`extensive
`12:14
`E-mail
`7:21 10:1 13:18
`15:2
`E-mailing
`9:13
`
`F
`
`F 2
`
`:13
`facilitate
`
`directly
`6:4
`disclosed
`12:3
`disclosure
`11:14
`discovery
`6:6 11:2,3,9 12:6
`discuss
`5:1 7:13 9:16
`20:7
`discussed
`5:9,17 15:14
`DISCUSSIONS
`3:3,4,9
`diseases
`13:1 16:18
`district
`6:13
`document
`3:9 10:18 14:8,9
`14:12,19
`documentation
`18:4
`documents
`10:3 14:6 15:4,10
`16:21 17:16,17
`17:19 18:13
`19:22
`dose
`10:11,13 12:11
`Dr
`10:15 15:7,11,16
`15:22 16:14,16
`16:22
`draw
`17:13
`due
`6:7 8:1,18 9:3,6
`9:11 17:8
`DUNNER
`2:7
`duplicative
`8:17
`D.C
`2:9
`
`E
`
`counsel
`9:17 10:2 15:3
`21:9
`couple
`17:14
`course
`5:9
`court
`4:7,14,17 6:13
`8:16
`currently
`6:10
`
`D
`
`D 4
`
`:1
`data
`15:15
`date
`6:13 8:1 9:6 19:2
`19:4
`dates
`3:19 8:8 9:3,11
`17:8
`day
`20:16 21:13
`days
`7:9
`decades
`17:4
`decision
`10:5 12:20 13:3
`declarant
`15:6,7
`declaration
`15:5 18:6
`default
`20:4
`Delaware
`5:16 6:18
`denied
`6:20 12:4
`deposition
`18:10
`depositions
`18:2
`different
`6:1
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`Page 24 of 29
`
`

`
`CONFERENCE CALL
`CONDUCTED ON WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 21, 2015
`
`24
`
`13:10
`med
`12:16
`Medac
`1:8 4:11 6:9
`Medac's
`8:14
`meet
`14:4 17:13,14
`18:3,17
`meeting
`14:14
`mention
`19:14
`mentioned
`8:3 13:17
`Methotrexate
`10:10,11,20 12:9
`12:11 13:8 15:9
`16:1,7,17 17:1
`mgs
`10:12 13:12
`16:10
`mid
`6:12
`middle
`6:7
`mill
`13:12 16:10
`mind
`18:3
`modifications
`9:3,6
`modifying
`9:10
`morning
`4:2,5,9
`Mossey
`2:15 4:11
`motion
`6:9,12,16,19,20
`8:15,20 9:21
`11:3,4 12:5
`14:17,18,20
`16:12
`motions
`5:3 6:6,14 7:6,11
`
`20:9,13
`Judges
`4:3
`
`K
`
`K 2
`
`1:2
`keep
`18:2
`KLINISCHE
`1:9
`know
`12:19 18:11
`
`L
`
`large
`12:21,22
`laws
`15:19,19
`LEO
`1:4,5
`let's
`4:22 7:4
`LILLIAN
`2:5
`Lilly
`4:6 19:14
`line
`4:3,7,10
`litigation
`5:7,9,15 6:5,12
`LLP
`2:7,16
`looking
`16:5 17:4
`
`M
`
`M 2
`
`:5
`manipulated
`16:17,22
`March
`6:13 8:3,18
`matters
`5:4,18,22,22,22
`MBH
`1:9
`mean
`
`17:18 21:10
`interrupt
`13:10
`invention
`13:15
`invite
`14:15
`involved
`5:7 10:16
`involving
`5:7 6:5
`IPR
`6:5 8:21 11:2
`IPR2014-01091
`1:6
`issue
`5:11 8:19 9:17
`11:6 14:5 15:14
`18:4
`issues
`19:20
`
`J
`JACQUELINE
`1:15
`JAMES
`2:13
`January
`1:16 21:14,15
`Jenkins
`2:4 4:6
`Jersey
`8:4
`Jim
`4:10
`Job
`1:20
`JR
`2:13
`judge
`3:8,13,18,19 4:2,3
`4:13,19 5:12,21
`6:13,17,20,21
`7:3,12 8:11 9:1
`10:22 13:16,20
`14:3 17:12
`18:16,22 19:7,9
`19:12,16,21
`
`6:3 7:16,20 8:9
`8:21 9:16,19
`11:1 12:8 13:9
`14:1,2,22 15:1
`15:13 16:14
`17:3 18:8,20,21
`19:6,11,15 20:8
`20:11,15
`HONORABLE
`1:14
`
`I
`
`IL-10
`10:10
`imagine
`12:15
`include
`11:19
`included
`17:22 18:6
`including
`12:15 16:19
`incredibly
`13:13 16:3
`indicate
`14:12
`indicated
`6:2 11:16
`indicating
`7:5 15:11 16:22
`information
`11:20 12:1 14:10
`15:20 16:4 17:6
`17:19 18:5
`initial
`20:7
`injection
`10:20 15:9 17:2
`injunction
`6:10,16,19 8:2,14
`8:20
`institution
`10:5 12:20 13:3
`instruction
`18:16
`intend
`5:3
`interest
`
`Grint
`10:6,8 11:13 12:2
`12:3,10,21
`17:22
`guess
`7:20
`guide
`20:5
`
`H
`
`H 2
`
`:4 3:21
`Haley
`2:13 3:6,10,12,14
`3:16 4:9,10 5:13
`5:14 6:18 7:19
`9:11,18 10:8
`11:16 12:7
`13:10,11,17,19
`14:1,5,13,15
`15:1 16:8,13
`17:15 18:8,20
`19:5,7,8 20:11
`20:16
`Haley's
`17:18
`half
`10:11
`hand
`21:13
`hear
`6:14
`heard
`17:12 18:1
`hearing
`8:2,6
`Henderson
`2:6 19:19
`hereunto
`21:12
`highly
`17:6
`HIPAA
`15:19
`honest
`8:21
`Honor
`4:5,9,18 5:6,14
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`Page 25 of 29
`
`

`
`CONFERENCE CALL
`CONDUCTED ON WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 21, 2015
`
`25
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket