`____________________________________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________________________________________
`
`
`
`GLOBALFOUNDRIES U.S., INC., GLOBALFOUNDRIES DRESDEN
`MODULE ONE LLC & CO. KG, GLOBALFOUNDRIES DRESDEN
`MODULE TWO LLC & CO. KG, and
`THE GILLETTE COMPANY,
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`ZOND, LLC,
`Patent Owner
`____________________________________________
`
`Case IPR2014-010881
`U.S. PATENT NO. 6,806,652
`____________________________________________
`
`
`
`PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`Claims 1-17
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 Case IPR2014-01000 has been joined with the instant proceeding.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Request For Oral Argument
`IPR2014-01088 (U.S. 6,806,652)
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a), Petitioner respectfully requests oral
`
`argument on the issues set forth below at a place and time set by the Board. Oral
`
`argument is presently scheduled for August 13, 2015. Scheduling Order at 4
`
`(Paper No. 18). To allow for a complete review of the issues presented in this
`
`proceeding, Petitioner requests the ability to use a computer, projector, and screen
`
`to display possible demonstratives and exhibits. Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70,
`
`Petitioner specifies the following issues to be argued:
`
`I. Whether challenged claims 1-14, 16, and 17 are unpatentable under 35
`
`U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious in view of Mozgrin, Kudryavtsev, Fahey,
`
`and Iwamura.
`
`II. Whether challenged claim 5 is unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)
`
`as obvious in view of Mozgrin, Kudryavtsev, Fahey, Vratny, and
`
`Iwamura.
`
`III. Whether challenged claims 8-10 are unpatentable under 35 U.S.C.
`
`§ 103(a) as obvious in view of Mozgrin, Kudryavtsev, Fahey,
`
`Lantsman, and Iwamura.
`
`IV. Whether challenged claim 15 is unpatentable under 35 U.S.C.
`
`§ 103(a) as obvious in view of Mozgrin, Kudryavtsev, Fahey, Wang,
`
`and Iwamura.
`
`V. Reply to any arguments raised in Patent Owner’s Response.
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Request For Oral Argument
`IPR2014-01088 (U.S. 6,806,652)
`
`VI. Respond to any issues specified by Patent Owner in its request for oral
`
`
`
`argument.
`
`VII. Respond to Patent Owner’s Presentation on all matters.
`
`
`Dated: July 10, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`/s/David M. Tennant
`David M. Tennant
`Lead Counsel for Petitioner
`GlobalFoundries
`Registration No. 48,362
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Request For Oral Argument
`IPR2014-01088 (U.S. 6,806,652)
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e), this is to certify that I caused to be served a
`
`true and correct copy of the foregoing “PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL
`
`ARGUMENT” as detailed below:
`
`
`
`
`
`Date of service July 10, 2015
`
`Manner of service Email: tarek.fahmi@ascendalaw.com;
`gonsalves@gonsalveslawfirm.com; kurt@rauschenbach.com
`
`Documents served PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`Persons Served Tarek Fahmi
`333 W. San Carlos Street, Suite 200
`San Jose, CA 95110
`
`Dr. Gregory J. Gonsalves
`2216 Beacon Lane
`Falls Church, Virginia 22043
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Anna Goodall
`Anna Goodall
`White & Case LLP
`3000 El Camino Real
`Five Palo Alto Square, 9th Floor
`Palo Alto, CA 94306
`Tel: (650) 213-0367
`Email: agoodall@whitecase.com
`
`
`3