`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
` Paper 25
`Entered: March 2, 2015
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING COMPANY, LTD.,
`TSMC NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION, FUJITSU
`SEMICONDUCTOR LIMITED, FUJITSU SEMICONDUCTOR
`AMERICA, INC., ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC., RENESAS
`ELECTRONICS CORPORATION, RENESAS ELECTRONICS
`AMERICA, INC., GLOBAL FOUNDRIES U.S., INC.,
`GLOBALFOUNDRIES DRESDEN MODULE ONE LLC & CO. KG,
`GLOBALFOUNDRIES DRESDEN MODULE TWO LLC & CO. KG,
`TOSHIBA AMERICA ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS, INC., TOSHIBA
`AMERICA INC., TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS,
`INC., TOSHIBA CORPORATION, and THE GILLETTE COMPANY
`Petitioners,
`v.
`ZOND, LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`Cases IPR2014-00861 and IPR2014-01088
`Patent 6,806,652 B21
`____________
`
`
`Before JONI Y. CHANG, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`DECISION
`Motions for Pro Hac Vice Admission
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`
`1 This Decision addresses the same issues in the above-identified inter partes
`reviews. Therefore, we issue one Decision to be filed in both cases. The
`parties, however, are not authorized to use this style of filing in subsequent
`papers.
`
`
`
`IPR2014-00861 and IPR2014-01088
`Patent 6,806,652 B2
`
`
`Patent Owner Zond, LLC (“Zond”) filed a Motion for Pro Hac Vice
`Admission of Dr. Maria Granovsky (Paper 222), supported by an Affidavit
`of Dr. Granovsky (Ex. 2001), in each of the above-identified proceedings.
`The Motions are unopposed.
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c), we may recognize counsel pro hac
`vice during a proceeding upon a showing of good cause, subject to the
`condition that lead counsel be a registered practitioner. In authorizing
`motions for pro hac vice, we require the moving party to provide a statement
`of facts showing there is good cause for us to recognize counsel pro hac
`vice, and an affidavit or declaration of the individual seeking to appear in the
`proceedings.
`Upon review of Zond’s Motions and supporting evidence, we
`determine that Zond has demonstrated that Dr. Granovsky has sufficient
`legal and technical qualifications to represent Zond in these proceedings.
`We also recognize that there is a need for Zond to have Dr. Granovsky be
`involved in the proceedings at issue. Accordingly, Zond has established that
`there is good cause for admitting Dr. Granovsky.
`Accordingly, it is
`ORDERED that Zond’s Motions for Pro Hac Vice Admission of
`Dr. Maria Granovsky are granted; Dr. Granovsky is authorized to represent
`Zond as back-up counsel in the above-identified proceedings;
`
`
`2 All citations are to IPR2014-00861 unless otherwise noted.
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2014-00861 and IPR2014-01088
`Patent 6,806,652 B2
`
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Zond is to continue to have a registered
`practitioner represent it as lead counsel for these proceedings;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Dr. Granovsky is to comply with the
`Office Patent Trial Practice Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for
`Trials, as set forth in Part 42 of Title 37, Code of Federal Regulations; and
`they are to be subject to the Office’s disciplinary jurisdiction under 37
`C.F.R. § 11.19(a), and the USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct set forth
`in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et. seq.
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`IPR2014-00861 and IPR2014-01088
`Patent 6,806,652 B2
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`Tarek N. Fahmi
`tarek.fahmi@ascendalaw.com
`
`Gregory J. Gonsalves
`gonsalves@gonsalveslawfirm.com
`
`For PETITIONERS:
`TSMC and Fujitsu:
`David M O’Dell
`david.odell.ipr@haynesboone.com
`David L. McCombs
`david.mccombs.ipr@haynesboone.com
`
`Richard C. Kim
`rckim@duanemorris.com
`
`GlobalFoundries:
`David Tennant
`dtennant@whitecase.com
`Dohm Chankong
`dohm.chankong@whitecase.com
`
`Gillette:
`David L. Cavanaugh
`david.cavanaugh@wilmerhale.com
`Larissa B. Park
`larissa.park@wilmerhale.com
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`IPR2014-00861 and IPR2014-01088
`Patent 6,806,652 B2
`
`AMD:
`David M. Tennant
`dtennant@whitecase.com
`Brian M. Berliner
`bberliner@omm.com
`Ryan K. Yagura
`ryagura@omm.com
`Xin-Yi Zhou
`vzhou@omm.com
`
`
`5
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
