throbber
1
`2
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`
`25
`
`Page 1
`
` UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
` BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
` TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR Patent No. 6,853,142
` MANUFACTURING COMPANY, IPR 2014-00818
` LTD., et al., IPR 2014-00819
` IPR 2014-00821
` Petitioners, IPR 2014-00827
` IPR 2014-01098
`
` vs.
`
` ZOND, LLC,INC.,
`
` Patent Owner.
`
`-----------------------------------------------------
`
` VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF LARRY D. HARTSOUGH, Ph.D.
` Berkeley, California
` Thursday, February 26, 2015
`
`REPORTED BY:
`TAVIA MANNING, CSR No. 13294, CLR, CCRR, RPR
`JOB NO. 90527
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`IPR2014-01083
`GlobalFoundries 1423
`
`

`

` February 26, 2015
` 9:00 A.M.
`
`Page 2
`
`Deposition of LARRY D. HARTSOUGH, Ph.D.,
`taken on behalf of Petitioners at 200
`Marina Boulevard, Berkeley, California,
`before Tavia Manning, Certified Shorthand
`Reporter No. 13294, Certified LiveNote
`Reporter, California Certified Realtime
`Reporter, Registered Professional Reporter.
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3 4 5 6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`IPR2014-01083
`GlobalFoundries 1423
`
`

`

`Page 3
`
`APPEARANCES:
`
`FOR TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING COMPANY,
`LIMITED and TSMC NORTH AMERICA:
` DUANE MORRIS
` BY: ANTHONY FITZPATRICK, ESQ.
` 100 High Street
` Boston, MA 02110
`
` -- and --
`
`FOR TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING COMPANY,
`LIMITED and TSMC NORTH AMERICA and FUJITSU:
` HAYNES AND BOONE
` BY: GREGORY HUH, ESQ.
` DAVID McCOMBS, ESQ.
` 2505 North Plano Road
` Richardson, TX 75082
`
`///
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`1
`
`2 3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`IPR2014-01083
`GlobalFoundries 1423
`
`

`

`Page 4
`
`APPEARANCES (CONTINUED):
`
`FOR THE GLOBALFOUNDRIES PETITIONERS:
` WHITE & CASE
` BY: DAVID TENNANT, ESQ.
` BRETT RISMILLER, ESQ.
` 701 Thirteenth Street, N.W.
` Washington, D.C. 20005
`
`FOR THE PATENT OWNER ZOND, LLC:
` RADULESCU
` BY: MICHAEL SADOWITZ, ESQ.
` ETAI LAHAV, ESQ.
` The Empire State Building
` 350 Fifth Avenue
` New York, NY 10118
`
` ///
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`1
`
`2 3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`IPR2014-01083
`GlobalFoundries 1423
`
`

`

`Page 5
`
`APPEARANCES (CONTINUED):
`
`Also present: Sean McGrath, Videographer
`
` ***
`
`1
`
`2 3
`
`4 5
`
`6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`IPR2014-01083
`GlobalFoundries 1423
`
`

`

` BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA;
` THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 26, 2015; 9:00 A.M.
`
`Page 6
`
` THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Good morning.
` This is the beginning of Disk Number 1 of
`the videotaped deposition of Dr. Larry Hartsough in
`the matter Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing
`Company, Ltd., et al., versus Zond, LLC, in the
`United States Patent and Trademark Office before the
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board; cases IPR 2014-00818,
`IPR 2014-00819, IPR 2014-00821, IPR 2014-00827 and
`IPR 2014-01098.
` This deposition is being held at 200 Marina
`Boulevard, Berkeley, California on February 26th,
`2015 at approximately 9:01 a.m.
` My name is Sean McGrath from TSG Reporting,
`and I am the legal video specialist.
` The court reporter is Tavia Manning in
`association with TSG reporting.
` Will counsel please introduce yourselves
`starting with the questioning attorney.
` MR. FITZPATRICK: Anthony Fitzpatrick, from
`Duane Morris, LLP, on behalf of petitioners Taiwan
`Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Limited and
`TSMC North America.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3 4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`IPR2014-01083
`GlobalFoundries 1423
`
`

`

`Page 7
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` MR. HUH: Gregory Huh, from Haynes and
`Boone, on behalf of TSMC and Fujitsu.
` MR. McCOMBS: David McCombs, with Haynes
`and Boone, on behalf of TSMC Fujitsu.
` MR. RISMILLER: Brett Rismiller, with White
`& Case, on behalf of GLOBALFOUNDRIES.
` MR. SADOWITZ: Michael Sadowitz, with
`Radulescu, and here with me is Etai Lahav, also with
`Radulescu, representing patent owner and the
`witness.
` MR. SULLIVAN: This is Michael Sullivan
`from Toshiba.
` THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Will the court reporter
`please swear in the witness, and we can proceed.
`
` LARRY D. HARTSOUGH, Ph.D.,
` having been first duly sworn by the reporter,
` testified as follows:
`
` EXAMINATION
`BY MR. FITZPATRICK:
` Q. Good morning, Doctor.
` A. Good morning.
` Q. Would you please state your full name for
`the record.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`IPR2014-01083
`GlobalFoundries 1423
`
`

`

`Page 8
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` A. Larry Dowd Hartsough.
` Q. Doctor, obviously, you've been through this
`several times in the last couple of weeks, but let's
`just talk briefly about the ground rules.
` You understand that you have taken an oath
`to testify truthfully?
` A. Yes.
` Q. And your answers to my questions will be
`truthful?
` A. Yes.
` Q. They will be complete?
` A. Yes.
` Q. You understand that you are required to
`answer my question even if your attorney objects,
`unless your attorney instructs you not to answer?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Have you ingested anything that could
`impair or impact your ability to testify truthfully
`and completely today?
` A. No.
` Q. If, at any point, you don't fully hear or
`understand any of my questions, will you please let
`me know?
` A. Yes.
` Q. If you answer my question, then I'll assume
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`IPR2014-01083
`GlobalFoundries 1423
`
`

`

`Page 9
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`that you understood it.
` Is that okay?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Since the conclusion of yesterday's
`deposition, have you done anything to prepare for
`this deposition?
` A. Yes.
` Q. What did you do?
` A. I met for several hours with counsel after
`the -- after yesterday's meeting and for
`approximately an hour this morning and spent about
`two hours at home reviewing the patent.
` Q. Did you -- and by "the patent," you're
`referring to United States Patent Number 6,853,142?
` A. The '142 patent, yes.
` Q. So if we talk about it about as the '142
`patent today, you'll understand what I'm referring
`to?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Did you review anything, other than the
`'142 patent itself, in the context of what you've
`reviewed since yesterday?
` A. I did look at Lantsman.
` Q. The Lantsman reference?
` A. Mm-hmm.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`IPR2014-01083
`GlobalFoundries 1423
`
`

`

`Page 10
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` Q. You'll have to say "yes" or "no" for the
`record.
` A. Oh, yes.
` Q. Anything else that you reviewed?
` A. Parts of Wang.
` Q. Do you remember which parts?
` A. Just the -- reviewing the layout, the
`structural parts. But that's what I concentrated
`on.
` Q. Anything else that you reviewed?
` A. Not that I recall specifically from that
`period.
` Q. Other than what you've just described as
`your preparation since yesterday for this
`deposition, together with what you described
`yesterday concerning your preparation for that
`deposition, have you done anything else to prepare
`for this deposition?
` MR. SADOWITZ: Caution the witness not to
`reveal the content of any attorney-client -- or any
`communications with your attorneys.
` If you can answer without revealing the
`content of those communications, you can do so.
` THE WITNESS: Not -- not to prepare -- not
`preparing specifically for this deposition.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`IPR2014-01083
`GlobalFoundries 1423
`
`

`

`Page 11
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`BY MR. FITZPATRICK:
` Q. Okay. Let me hand you what has previously
`been marked as Exhibit 2005 in IPR number -- IPR
`2014-00818, '819, '821, '827, and '1098.
` Please look at that and tell me what it is.
` A. It is my declaration in regard to the '142
`patent.
` Q. And, unfortunately, the document is not
`page numbered until you get to the very last few
`pages, but about eight -- approximately eight pages
`from the end of the document, there's a declaration
`or a signature page.
` Do you see that?
` A. Yes.
` Q. And is that your signature there?
` A. Yes.
` (Mr. Tennant joins the proceedings.)
` Q. And you signed that on or about January 2nd
`of this year?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Does this declaration contain the entirety
`of your testimony with respect to the IPR
`proceedings for the '142 patent?
` A. This represents my opinion on the
`obviousness of the '142 patent.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`IPR2014-01083
`GlobalFoundries 1423
`
`

`

`Page 12
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` What do you mean by "testimony?"
` Q. Well, directing your attention back to the
`signature page of the document, in that -- on that
`signature page, you declared that:
` "All statements made herein on my own
` knowledge are true, and that all statements
` made on information and belief are believed
` to be true, and, further, that these
` statements were made with the knowledge
` that willful false statements and the like
` so made are punishable by fine or
` imprisonment or both under Section 1001 of
` Title 18 of the United States Code."
` Do you see that?
` A. Yes.
` Q. And you read that --
` A. Yeah.
` Q. -- at the time that you signed the
`document?
` A. Yes.
` Q. You understood it?
` A. Yes.
` Q. So you understood that this was a
`declaration to be used in a proceeding before the
`United States Patent and Trademark Office?
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`IPR2014-01083
`GlobalFoundries 1423
`
`

`

`Page 13
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` A. Yes.
` Q. So this declaration is a complete statement
`of all of your opinions with respect to the '142
`patent; is that correct?
` A. It's a statement of the opinions of -- of
`the -- yes.
` Q. Turn to paragraph 3 of the document,
`please.
` This paragraph reads:
` "This list of materials I considered in
` forming the opinions set forth in this
` declaration includes the '142 patent, the
` file history of the '142 patent, the
` petitions for inter partes review and the
` exhibits, the PTAB's Institution decisions,
` the transcript of the petitioner's expert
` on the '142 patent, and the prior art
` references discussed below."
` Do you see that?
` A. Yes.
` Q. In forming your opinions that are set forth
`in this declaration, did you review or consider
`anything else other than the items that are
`enumerated in this paragraph?
` A. I don't recall at the moment.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`IPR2014-01083
`GlobalFoundries 1423
`
`

`

`Page 14
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` Q. Is there anything that would help you to
`recall?
` A. If there are citations in here other than
`that, I would have to look at them and determine
`whether they were considered in forming the opinion
`or whether they were just illustrating the opinion.
` Q. So you're referring now to items cited in
`your declaration; is that right?
` A. I said that would be one thing that would
`remind me if I had considered anything other than
`this.
` I don't recall at the moment.
` Q. If you recall anything during the course of
`the day or while we're going through your
`declaration, would you please let me know?
` A. I'll try.
` Q. Turn, please, to paragraph 55 of the
`declaration -- I'm sorry -- 52 of the declaration.
` In paragraphs 52, 53, and 54, you describe
`what it is that the inventor of the '142 patent
`purportedly invented; isn't that correct?
` A. He describes this invention in his -- in
`his specification, but what he invented in the '142
`patent does go beyond that, as it is -- '142 is a
`plasma generation system.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`IPR2014-01083
`GlobalFoundries 1423
`
`

`

`Page 15
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` Q. Well, I'm not asking you, Doctor, what or
`how the inventor described his invention.
` I am asking you: Isn't it the case that in
`these three paragraphs of your declaration you
`describe what it is that you believe the inventor
`purportedly invented? Right?
` A. This was -- you know, this was copied over
`from my declaration for the -- for I believe the
`'759.
` And as I said, his invention isn't limited
`to that.
` Q. Well, again, Doctor, in paragraph 52 of
`your declaration concerning the -- let me back up.
` This declaration relates to the '142
`patent; correct?
` A. That's correct.
` Q. Turn, please, to paragraph 52 -- to
`paragraph 52 --
` A. Yes.
` Q. -- five-two.
` Paragraph 52 begins:
` "To overcome the deficiencies of the prior
` art, Dr. Chistyakov invented..."
` And then you describe what it is that you
`believe he invented; right?
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`IPR2014-01083
`GlobalFoundries 1423
`
`

`

`Page 16
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` A. I describe an invention, yes.
` Q. These are your words; right?
` A. I understand that.
` Q. These are your words?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Okay. And this is your description of the
`invention; right?
` A. Yes.
` Q. And you say:
` "As illustrated in Figure 2 of the '142
` patent reproduced below."
` Right?
` A. Yes.
` Q. And then in paragraph 53, you continue your
`discussion, and you have a series of quotes citing
`to the specification; right?
` A. May I see the -- may I see the '142 patent,
`please?
` Q. Doctor, I'm going to hand you what has been
`marked as TSMC 1001, which is a copy of the '142
`patent.
` A. (Witness reviewing document.)
` So what was your question?
` Q. My question is: In paragraph 53, you have
`a series of quotes citing to the specification of
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`IPR2014-01083
`GlobalFoundries 1423
`
`

`

`Page 17
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`the '142; right?
` A. May I see the '759 patent?
` Q. Why would you like to see the '759 patent,
`Doctor?
` A. Well, I want to see it.
` Q. Why is that?
` A. Because the quote doesn't match the
`reference location.
` Q. That's because all the quotes come from the
`'759 patent; right, Doctor?
` A. Looks like...
` Q. Let me hand you what was marked -- or what
`was introduced yesterday, in yesterday's deposition.
`It's the '759 patent marked as TSMC 1201 from the
`'759 IPR proceedings.
` A. (Witness reviewing document.)
` Q. The quotes in paragraph 53 are actually all
`from the '759 patent; right, Doctor?
` A. That's correct.
` Q. Not from the '142?
` A. That's correct.
` Q. And, in fact, the Figure 2 in paragraph 52
`that you say is from the '142 patent isn't from the
`'142 patent either; right?
` A. That's correct.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`IPR2014-01083
`GlobalFoundries 1423
`
`

`

`Page 18
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` Q. That's actually from the '759 patent?
` A. Yeah.
` (Witness nods head.)
` Yes.
` Q. And, in fact, these three paragraphs, 52,
`53, and 54, in your declaration concerning the '142
`patent were, as you testified earlier, copied over
`from your declaration concerning the '759 patent;
`right?
` A. Yes. Despite the -- my error on that,
`oversight, and including that, I am here today
`prepared to testify about my opinions on the '142
`patent.
` Q. I understand, and we'll have lots of
`questions about that.
` But other than the change in the reference
`from '759 to '142 in paragraph 52, these three
`paragraphs are identical to the corresponding
`paragraphs in your declaration concerning the '759
`patent; right?
` A. I would have to take a look at that, but...
` Q. Okay. Let me hand you what was marked
`yesterday -- or introduced yesterday as Exhibit 2005
`from the '759 proceedings. It's a copy of your
`declaration concerning those proceedings.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`IPR2014-01083
`GlobalFoundries 1423
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Page 19
` If you would look at paragraphs 55 through
`57.
` MR. LAHAV: Do you have a copy of that for
`us?
` MR. FITZPATRICK: I don't.
` THE WITNESS: Yes. Just to clarify, you
`did say other than -- you know, other than the
`change of reference to the patent number?
`BY MR. FITZPATRICK:
` Q. In paragraph 52 of your '142 declaration,
`at the end of the text, it says "as illustrated in
`para -- in Figure 2 of the '142 patent"; and in the
`'759 declaration, it says "as illustrated in
`Figure 2 of the '759 patent."
` Other than that one difference, these three
`paragraphs are identical in the two declarations;
`right?
` A. Yes.
` Q. You reviewed your declaration before you
`signed it, Doctor?
` A. I did.
` Q. But you didn't notice these misstatements
`in your description of the invention?
` A. I did not. I didn't -- I was concentrating
`on the parts of the declaration that -- on my
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`IPR2014-01083
`GlobalFoundries 1423
`
`

`

`Page 20
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`opinions on -- on the claims.
` Q. Well, you would agree with me, Doctor, that
`your description of the purported invention of the
`'142 patent is significant; right?
` MR. SADOWITZ: Objection; form.
` THE WITNESS: It does include the
`generation of the -- of a strongly-ionized plasma by
`multi-step ionization process, which is, you know --
`definitely relates to the '142 patent.
`BY MR. FITZPATRICK:
` Q. I understand, Doctor. And again, that's
`not my question.
` And I really hope that today we can stay on
`track and you can listen to my questions and answer
`my questions.
` The question is: Wouldn't you agree with
`me that your description in your declaration of what
`it is that is the purported invention of the '142
`patent is a significant portion of your declaration,
`it's an important portion of that declaration;
`right?
` MR. SADOWITZ: Same objection.
` THE WITNESS: Not necessarily. I discuss
`the aspects of it as relate to the claims in many
`other parts of my declaration.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`IPR2014-01083
`GlobalFoundries 1423
`
`

`

`Page 21
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`BY MR. FITZPATRICK:
` Q. So this portion of your declaration is not
`important?
` MR. SADOWITZ: Objection; form.
` THE WITNESS: Well, it's -- as I say, it's
`an oversight on my part that it was included, and it
`in no way affects my opinions that I formed about
`the obviousness of the claims of the '142 patent.
`BY MR. FITZPATRICK:
` Q. You knew when you were preparing and
`signing your declaration that it was going to be
`submitted to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board;
`correct?
` A. Yes.
` Q. And your intention was that the Patent
`Trial and Appeal Board should read and rely upon
`your declaration; right?
` A. My intention was that I -- I overlooked an
`error -- or an oversight in my declaration.
` Q. I understand.
` But again, my question is: Your intention
`was that the Board should read and rely upon your
`declaration; correct?
` A. Yes.
` Q. And in your declaration, you purported to
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`IPR2014-01083
`GlobalFoundries 1423
`
`

`

`Page 22
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`characterize what the purported invention of the
`patent was; right?
` MR. SADOWITZ: Objection; form.
` THE WITNESS: I purported...
`BY MR. FITZPATRICK:
` Q. You included, in paragraphs 52 through 54,
`a summary or a description of your view as to what
`the invention of the '142 patent is; correct?
` MR. SADOWITZ: Objection; form.
` THE WITNESS: It was an oversight on my
`part.
`BY MR. FITZPATRICK:
` Q. I understand.
` Again, my question is: You included in
`these paragraphs a description of your view as to
`what the invention of the '142 patent is; right?
` MR. SADOWITZ: Same objection.
`BY MR. FITZPATRICK:
` Q. Right, Doctor?
` A. But, you know...
` Q. Do you need the question again?
` Would you like me to repeat the question,
`Doctor?
` A. Yes.
` Q. I'll try again.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`IPR2014-01083
`GlobalFoundries 1423
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Page 23
` In these paragraphs, 52 through 54, of your
`declaration, you included a description of your view
`as to what the invention of the '142 patent is;
`correct?
` MR. SADOWITZ: Objection; form.
` THE WITNESS: It says it describes the '142
`patent, and it doesn't. So that was definitely an
`oversight on my part and not intentional.
`BY MR. FITZPATRICK:
` Q. And you would agree with me that your
`description -- your description of the purported
`invention of the '142 patent is an important part of
`your declaration; right?
` MR. SADOWITZ: Objection; form.
` Tony, he's already answered this question
`multiple times. It's getting to the point of
`harassment. He's admitted it's an oversight.
` I think you've reached the end of this line
`of questioning.
` MR. FITZPATRICK: He has not answered the
`question.
` THE WITNESS: As I mentioned, the
`descriptions -- it's not necessary for the
`considerations that I used in forming my opinions
`about the claims of the '142 patent.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`IPR2014-01083
`GlobalFoundries 1423
`
`

`

`Page 24
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`BY MR. FITZPATRICK:
` Q. So it can be disregarded?
` A. In which I did refer specifically to the
`'142 patent, not -- I used the '142 patent and not
`the '759 patent.
` Q. So this section of your declaration can
`just be disregarded?
` MR. SADOWITZ: Objection; form.
` THE WITNESS: It was not important in
`arriving -- in me arriving at my opinions.
`BY MR. FITZPATRICK:
` Q. So, Doctor, since you used the '759 patent
`in summarizing what it is that was purportedly
`invention -- invented in the '142 patent, let me ask
`you: What is it, in your view, that is different
`about the '142 patent than the '759 patent?
` A. There are a number of differences, but the
`main one is that the '142 patent -- let me back up.
` The '759 patent is directed to sputtering
`using a strongly-ionized plasma.
` The -- and the generation of the '142
`patent is directed to generating a strongly-ionized
`plasma that may or may not be used for sputtering,
`but, in fact, it focus -- it's focusing on the
`generation of the strongly-ionized plasma and uses
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`IPR2014-01083
`GlobalFoundries 1423
`
`

`

`Page 25
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`thereof, properties thereof.
` It would take me some time to go through
`both and list all the differences, but the main
`difference is as to what it's directed toward.
` Q. The '759 being directed to sputtering, and
`the '142 being directed to generation of
`strongly-ionized plasma?
` A. The generation, yes.
` Q. The '759 patent discloses generation of
`strongly-ionized plasma; correct?
` A. It does.
` Q. And it discloses uses of such plasma;
`correct?
` A. Yes.
` Q. And it discloses properties of such plasma;
`correct?
` A. Some, yes.
` Q. So what is it that's in the '142 that's not
`in the '759?
` A. There are differences in the specifics of
`the generation, how you generate the
`strongly-ionized plasma between the two methods --
`between the two patents.
` And it would take me some time to try to
`enumerate all of those sitting before you here
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`IPR2014-01083
`GlobalFoundries 1423
`
`

`

`Page 26
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`today.
` Q. In -- any other differences?
` A. I am sure there are, but, I -- you know, I
`can't -- it would take me some time to enumerate
`them here today.
` Q. You can't think of any as you sit here,
`without reviewing the two patents?
` A. That's correct.
` Q. When you say that there are differences in
`how the strongly-ionized plasma is generated,
`differences in the methods between the two patents,
`what do you mean by that?
` MR. SADOWITZ: Objection; form.
` THE WITNESS: Well, one example of a
`difference is: In the '142 patent, Claim 1
`describes the:
` "Supplying power to the weakly-ionized
` plasma through an electrical pulse applied
` across the weakly-ionized plasma, the
` electrical pulse having a magnitude and a
` rise-time that is sufficient to increase
` the density of the weakly-ionized plasma to
` generate a strongly-ionized plasma."
` And -- I take that back. That's not one of
`the differences.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`IPR2014-01083
`GlobalFoundries 1423
`
`

`

`Page 27
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` (Witness reviewing document.)
` One difference is '759 claims a cathode
`assembly that is positioned adjacent to the anode --
`the cathode assembly including a sputter target.
` The '142 just claims a cathode.
`BY MR. FITZPATRICK:
` Q. Is that your complete answer?
` A. Repeat your question, please.
` Q. When you say there are differences in how
`the strongly-ionized plasma is generated between the
`two patents, what do you mean by that?
` A. That wasn't the last question.
` Q. I believe it was.
` A. I thought that you said, "Tell me -- tell
`me about a difference," or "give me an example of a
`difference."
` Q. I will read back to you, Doctor, word for
`word, the question at issue:
` "When you say that there are differences in
` how the strongly-ionized plasma is
` generated, differences in the methods
` between the two patents, what do you mean
` by that?"
` A. And I -- it would take me some time to
`prepare and compare all the differences, and I am
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`IPR2014-01083
`GlobalFoundries 1423
`
`

`

`Page 28
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`not prepared to list them all right now.
` If you went -- you know, I could do that,
`but I did cite an example of a difference.
` Q. And in preparing for your depositions this
`week concerning the '759 and the '142 patents, you
`indicated yesterday that you prepared for about 20
`hours between Sunday, Monday, and Tuesday; is that
`correct?
` A. About.
` Q. And that included review of and discussion
`with counsel about those two patents; is that
`correct?
` A. Yes.
` Q. And then you indicated that you spent time
`last night and this morning, several hours, again
`reviewing the '142 patent and discussing it with
`counsel; correct?
` A. Reviewing the obviousness or lack of
`obviousness grounds between each patent and the
`cited grounds for obviousness, not particularly
`spent in exploring all of the differences between
`the two patents.
` Q. But nonetheless, you spent quite a bit of
`time reviewing and looking at both patents; right?
` A. Spent some time.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`IPR2014-01083
`GlobalFoundries 1423
`
`

`

`Page 29
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` Q. And notwithstanding that preparation, as
`you sit here right now, the only difference that you
`can identify between the invention of the '759
`patent and the invention of the '142 patent is that
`in the '759 patent the cathode assembly includes a
`target, but the '142 patent does not; correct?
` MR. SADOWITZ: Objection; form,
`mischaracterizes.
` THE WITNESS: You know, I wasn't asked to
`prepare a list of all those differences.
` And I can't list all of them for you
`sitting right here, right now.
`BY MR. FITZPATRICK:
` Q. If you could turn to paragraph 12 of your
`declaration, please.
` In paragraph 12, you state your opinion
`regarding the level of ordinary skill in the art at
`the time of the filing of the '142 patent; is that
`correct?
` A. Yes.
` Q. And the application for the '142 patent was
`filed in November of 2002; correct?
` A. Yes.
` Q. So that's the time or the date that you
`used in establishing the level of ordinary skill in
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`IPR2014-01083
`GlobalFoundries 1423
`
`

`

`Page 30
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`the art; is that right?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Anodes were well known by persons of
`ordinary skill in the art as of 2002; correct?
` A. Yes.
` Q. And cathodes were well known by persons of
`ordinary skill in the art at that time?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Using magnets to generate magnetic fields
`was well known in the art at that time; correct?
` A. Yes.
` Q. You'll agree that using magnetic fields to
`trap electrons was well known by persons of skill in
`the art prior to 2002; right?
` MR. SADOWITZ: Objection; form.
` THE WITNESS: Yes.
`BY MR. FITZPATRICK:
` Q. Generating a plasma between an anode and a
`cathode was well known by persons of skill in the
`art before 2002?
` MR. SADOWITZ: Same objection.
` THE WITNESS: Yes.
`BY MR. FITZPATRICK:
` Q. Generating a weakly-ionized plasma was well
`known by persons of the art -- persons of skill in
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`IPR2014-01083
`GlobalFoundries 1423
`
`

`

`Page 31
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`the art before 2002; right?
` MR. SADOWITZ: Objection; form.
` THE WITNESS: Generating a plasma that
`would be in -- that could be characterized as a
`weakly-ionized plasma, depending on the relative
`densities, would be, yes.
`BY MR. FITZPATRICK:
` Q. And by the same token, generating a
`strongly-ionized plasma was well known by persons of
`ordinary skill in the art before 2002; correct?
` MR. SADOWITZ: Same objection.
` THE WITNESS: Yes.
`BY MR. FITZPATRICK:
` Q. Generating excited atoms was well known to
`persons with skill in the art prior to 2002;
`correct?
` MR. SADOWITZ: Object to form.
` THE WITNESS: Yes.
`BY MR. FITZPATRICK:
` Q. Ionizing excited atoms was well known by
`persons of skill in the art before 2002; right?
` MR. SADOWITZ: Same objection.
` THE WITNESS: Generating conditions that
`excited atoms were ionized was known.
`//
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`IPR2014-01083
`GlobalFoundries 1423
`
`

`

`Page 32
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`BY MR. FITZPATRICK:
` Q. Generating secondary electrons was known
`prior to 2002?
` MR. SADOWITZ: Same ob

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket