throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Entered: May 13, 2015
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`FUJITSU SEMICONDUCTOR LIMITED, FUJITSU SEMICONDUCTOR
`AMERICA, INC., ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC., RENESAS
`ELECTRONICS CORPORATION, RENESAS ELECTRONICS
`AMERICA, INC., GLOBAL FOUNDRIES U.S., INC.,
`GLOBALFOUNDRIES DRESDEN MODULE ONE LLC & CO. KG,
`GLOBALFOUNDRIES DRESDEN MODULE TWO LLC & CO. KG,
`TOSHIBA AMERICA ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS, INC., TOSHIBA
`AMERICA INC., TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS,
`INC., TOSHIBA CORPORATION, and
`THE GILLETTE COMPANY,
`Petitioner,
`v.
`ZOND, LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Cases IPR2014-00828; IPR2014-00829; IPR2014-00917;
`IPR2014-01073; IPR2014-010761
`Patent 6,805,779 B2
`____________
`
`Before KEVIN F. TURNER, DEBRA K. STEPHENS, JONI Y. CHANG,
`SUSAN L. C. MITCHELL, and JENNIFER M. MEYER,
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`CHANG, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`ORDER
`Granting Requests for Oral Hearing
`37 C.F.R. § 42.70
`
`
`1 This Order addresses the same issue in the above-identified inter partes
`reviews. Therefore, we exercise our discretion to issue one Order to be
`entered in each case.
`
`

`

`IPR2014-00828; IPR2014-00829; IPR2014-00917;
`IPR2014-01073; IPR2014-01076
`Patent 6,805,779 B2
`
`
`
`The Scheduling Order for these proceedings provided that an oral
`
`
`
`hearing would be conducted if the hearing is requested by the parties and
`
`granted by the Board. Paper 10.2 Petitioner requests oral hearing pursuant
`
`to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70 in each above-identified inter partes review. Paper 45.
`
`The requests are granted.
`
`These proceedings are related, and all proceedings will be conducted
`
`as a single consolidated hearing, such that any representation made by
`
`counsel at the consolidated hearing is applicable to and useable in each
`
`proceeding that has an underlying basis for the representation. Each party
`
`will have two hours of total time to present arguments for all of the
`
`proceedings. Petitioner bears the ultimate burden of proof that Patent
`
`Owner’s claims at issue are unpatentable. Thus, Petitioner will open the
`
`hearing by presenting its case regarding the challenged claims for which we
`
`instituted trial. Petitioner may reserve some of its argument time for
`
`rebuttal. Thereafter, Patent Owner will respond to Petitioner’s presentation.
`
`The hearing will commence at 9:00 AM ET on June 15, 2015, on the
`
`ninth floor of Madison Building East, 600 Dulany Street, Alexandria,
`
`Virginia. The Board will provide a court reporter for the hearing and the
`
`reporter’s transcript will constitute the official record of the hearing and will
`
`be entered in the record of each proceeding. The hearing will be open to the
`
`public for in-person attendance that will be accommodated on a first-come,
`
`first-served basis.
`
`
`2 All citations are to IPR2014-00828, as representative, unless otherwise
`noted.
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2014-00828; IPR2014-00829; IPR2014-00917;
`IPR2014-01073; IPR2014-01076
`Patent 6,805,779 B2
`
`
`
`
`Furthermore, under 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(b), demonstrative exhibits must
`
`be served at least five business days before the hearing date. Barring any
`
`objections to the demonstratives by the opposing party, the parties are
`
`authorized to file any demonstrative exhibits in this proceeding in PRPS
`
`three business days prior to the oral hearing date. The parties also should
`
`note that one or more members of the panel will be attending the hearing
`
`electronically from a remote location and will not be able to view the
`
`projection screen in the hearing room. The parties are reminded that the
`
`presenter must identify clearly and specifically each demonstrative exhibit
`
`(e.g., by slide or screen number) referenced during the hearing to avoid
`
`confusion, and to ensure the clarity and accuracy of the reporter’s transcript.
`
`If there are objections to the demonstratives, the party raising the
`
`objections must communicate those objections via email to
`
`Trials@uspto.gov. Any objection to demonstrative exhibits that is not
`
`presented timely will be considered waived. The objections should identify
`
`with particularity which demonstratives are subject to objection and include
`
`a short (one sentence or less) statement of the reason for each objection.
`
`No argument or further explanation is permitted. The Board will consider
`
`the objections and schedule a conference if deemed necessary. Otherwise,
`
`the Board will reserve ruling on the objections until at or after the oral
`
`argument. The parties are directed to St. Jude Medical, Cardiology Division,
`
`Inc. v. The Board of Regents of the University of Michigan, Case IPR2013-
`
`00041 (PTAB Jan. 27, 2014) (Paper 65), for guidance regarding the
`
`appropriate content of demonstrative exhibits. See also CBS Interactive Inc.
`
`v. Helferich Patent Licensing, LLC, Case IPR2013-00033 (PTAB Oct. 23,
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2014-00828; IPR2014-00829; IPR2014-00917;
`IPR2014-01073; IPR2014-01076
`Patent 6,805,779 B2
`
`
`2013) (Paper 118) (The Board has the discretion to limit the parties’
`
`
`
`demonstratives to pages in the record should there be no easy resolution to
`
`objections over demonstratives.).
`
`The Board expects lead counsel for each party to be present in person
`
`at the oral hearing. However, any counsel of record may present the party’s
`
`argument. If either party expects that its lead counsel will not be attending
`
`the oral argument, the parties should initiate a joint telephone conference
`
`with the Board no later than two business days prior to the oral hearing to
`
`discuss the matter.
`
`Any special requests for audiovisual equipment should be directed to
`
`Trials@uspto.gov. Requests for special equipment will not be honored
`
`unless presented in a separate communication not less than five days before
`
`the hearing, directed to the above email address.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`IPR2014-00828; IPR2014-00829; IPR2014-00917;
`IPR2014-01073; IPR2014-01076
`Patent 6,805,779 B2
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`
`
`
`
`
`Gregory J. Gonsalves
`gonsalves@gonsalveslawfirm.com
`
`Bruce J. Barker
`bbarker@chsblaw.com
`
`Tarek Fahmi
`tarek.fahmi@ascendalaw.com
`
`
`
`For PETITIONERS:
`
`GlobalFoundries:
`
`David Tennant
`dtennant@whitecase.com
`
`Dohm Chankong
`dohm.chankong@whitecase.com
`
`
`Gillette:
`
`Michael A. Diener
`michael.diener@wilmerhale.com
`
`Larissa B. Park
`larissa.park@wilmerhale.com
`
`
`
`Fujitsu:
`
`David L. McCombs
`david.mccombs.ipr@haynesboone.com
`
`David M O’Dell
`david.odell.ipr@haynesboone.com
`
`Richard C. Kim
`rckim@duanemorris.com
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`

`

`IPR2014-00828; IPR2014-00829; IPR2014-00917;
`IPR2014-01073; IPR2014-01076
`Patent 6,805,779 B2
`
`AMD:
`
`
`
`
`
`6
`
`Brian M. Berliner
`bberliner@omm.com
`
`Ryan K. Yagura
`ryagura@omm.com
`
`Xin-Yi Zhou
`vzhou@omm.com
`
`
`Toshiba:
`
`Robinson Vu
`Robinson.vu@bakerbotts.com
`
`
`Renesas:
`
`John J. Feldhaus
`jfeldhaus@foley.com
`
`Pavan Agarwal
`pagarwal@foley.com
`
`Mike Houston
`mhouston@foley.com
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket