throbber
1
`2
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`
`25
`
`Page 1
`
` UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
` BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
` TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR Patent No. 6,805,779
` MANUFACTURING COMPANY, IPR 2014-00828
` LTD., et al., IPR 2014-00829
` IPR 2014-00917
` Petitioners, IPR 2014-01073
` IPR 2014-01076
`
` vs.
`
` ZOND, LLC,
`
` Patent Owner.
`
`-----------------------------------------------------
`
` VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF LARRY D. HARTSOUGH, Ph.D.
` Oakland, California
` Tuesday, April 7, 2015
`
`REPORTED BY:
`TAVIA MANNING, CSR No. 13294, CLR, CCRR, RPR
`JOB NO. 92218
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`IPR2014-01076
`GlobalFoundries 1117
`
`

`
` April 7, 2015
` 9:01 A.M.
`
`Page 2
`
`Deposition of LARRY D. HARTSOUGH, Ph.D.,
`taken on behalf of Petitioners at 1001
`Broadway, Oakland, California,
`before Tavia Manning, Certified Shorthand
`Reporter No. 13294, Certified LiveNote
`Reporter, California Certified Realtime
`Reporter, Registered Professional Reporter.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`1
`2
`
`3 4 5 6
`
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`IPR2014-01076
`GlobalFoundries 1117
`
`

`
`Page 3
`
`APPEARANCES:
`
`FOR THE GLOBALFOUNDRIES PETITIONERS:
` WHITE & CASE
` BY: DAVID TENNANT, ESQ.
` BRETT RISMILLER, ESQ.
` NATHAN ZHANG, ESQ.
` 701 Thirteenth Street, NW
` Washington, DC 20005
`
`
`
`
`
`FOR PETITIONER ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC.:
` O'MELVENY & MYERS
` BY: VINCENT ZHOU, ESQ.
` SCOT RIVES, ESQ.
` 400 South Hope Street
` Los Angeles, CA 90071
`
`
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`1
`
`2 3
`
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`IPR2014-01076
`GlobalFoundries 1117
`
`

`
`APPEARANCES (CONTINUED):
`
`Page 4
`
`FOR PETITIONER TOSHIBA (appearing telephonically):
` BAKER BOTTS
` BY: ROBINSON VU, ESQ.
` One Shell Plaza
` 910 Louisiana Street
` Houston, TX 77002
`
`
`FOR THE PATENT OWNER ZOND, LLC:
` ASCENDA LAW GROUP
` BY: TAREK FAHMI, ESQ.
` 333 West San Carlos Street
` San Jose, CA 95110
`
`
`
`Also present: Marza Tozo, Videographer
` ***
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`1
`
`2 3
`
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`IPR2014-01076
`GlobalFoundries 1117
`
`

`
` OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA;
` TUESDAY, APRIL 7, 2015; 9:01 A.M.
`
`Page 5
`
` THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Good morning.
` This is the beginning of DVD Number 1 of
`the deposition of Dr. Larry Hartsough in the matter
`of GLOBALFOUNDRIES U.S., Inc., et al., versus Zond,
`LLC, in the United States Patent and Trademark
`Office before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board,
`Cases IPR2014-00828, IPR2014-00829, IPR2014-00917,
`IPR2014-01073, and IPR2014-01076.
` We are located at 1001 Broadway, Oakland,
`California, on Tuesday, April 7th, 2015.
` The time is 9:02 a.m.
` My name is Marza Tozo from TSG Reporting,
`Inc., and I am the legal video specialist.
` The court reporter is Tavia Manning in
`association with TSG Reporting.
` Will counsel please introduce yourself?
` MR. TENNANT: Dave Tennant with White &
`Case. I am counsel for GLOBALFOUNDRIES U.S., Inc.,
`GLOBALFOUNDRIES Dresden Module One LLC & Co. Kg,
`GLOBALFOUNDRIES Dresden Module Two LLC & Co. Kg.
` MR. ZHANG: Nathan Zhang, White & Case LLP,
`also for GLOBALFOUNDRIES.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`1
`2
`
`3 4
`
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`IPR2014-01076
`GlobalFoundries 1117
`
`

`
`Page 6
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` MR. RISMILLER: Brett Rismiller, White &
`Case LLP, also for GLOBALFOUNDRIES.
` MR. ZHOU: Xin-Yu Zhou, from the law firm
`of O'Melveny & Myers, for petitioner Advanced Micro
`Devices, Inc., and I am joined here by my colleague
`Scot Rives from the same firm.
` MR. FAHMI: Tarek Fahmi on behalf of Zond.
` MR. TENNANT: And anybody on the phone,
`please introduce yourself?
` MR. VU: This is Robinson Vu with Baker
`Botts representing Toshiba.
` THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Will the court reporter
`please swear in the witness.
`
` LARRY HARTSOUGH,
` having been first duly sworn in by the reporter,
` testified as follows:
`
` EXAMINATION
`BY MR. TENNANT:
` Q. Good morning.
` A. Good morning.
` Q. State your name for the record, please.
` A. Larry Dowd Hartsough.
` Q. And you understand that I'll be asking you
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`IPR2014-01076
`GlobalFoundries 1117
`
`

`
`Page 7
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`questions today?
` A. Yes.
` Q. And you also understand that you have to
`answer truthfully?
` A. Yes.
` Q. And you will answer my questions fully?
` A. Yes.
` Q. You understand that you have to answer the
`questions I ask of you; correct?
` A. Yes.
` Q. And even if an objection is made, you have
`to answer my questions, unless your counsel objects
`on the basis of privilege and instructs you not to
`answer.
` Do you understand that?
` A. Yes, I do.
` Q. If you don't understand my question, please
`let me know.
` A. I will.
` Q. Okay. If you answer, I will assume you
`have understood my question; is that fair?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Is there anything that could impair your
`ability to answer my questions today?
` A. No.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`IPR2014-01076
`GlobalFoundries 1117
`
`

`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Page 8
` Q. Did you do anything to prepare for today's
`deposition?
` A. Yes.
` Q. And what did you do?
` A. I met with Mr. Fahmi, and I also reviewed
`some of the materials.
` Q. And how long did you meet with Mr. Fahmi?
` A. Probably about five to six hours.
` Q. And you also mentioned you reviewed some
`materials; correct?
` A. Yes.
` Q. What materials did you review?
` A. Mainly the '779 patent, my declaration
`related to that patent, the three main prior art
`documents, and Angelbeck and -- the name starts with
`a P.
` Q. Pinsley?
` A. Yeah.
` Q. Did you review any other materials?
` A. If I did, it was only partially or briefly
`referencing something that I wanted to find out. I
`might have looked at Kortshagen's declaration or
`file history or something like that.
` Q. But that wasn't in the preparation leading
`up to today's deposition?
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`IPR2014-01076
`GlobalFoundries 1117
`
`

`
`Page 9
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` A. Pardon?
` Q. Was that in the --
` A. Just brief reference to look at that --
`look at those.
` Q. And what did you look at in those -- in the
`Kortshagen declaration?
` A. I think it was just a quote.
` Q. Do you recall that quote?
` A. No. Oh, I remember. It was -- somehow the
`quote was referencing a quotation that was
`referencing one of the -- one of the documents that
`wasn't cited as -- necessarily as the grounds for
`these, and so I wondered what was happening there,
`why he quoted that. That's all.
` Q. And what did you conclude?
` A. Pardon?
` Q. Did you conclude anything from your review
`of his declaration?
` A. Did I conclude anything?
` Q. Yes.
` A. Well, yes.
` Q. And what was that conclusion?
` A. That Mr. Kortshagen made some inaccurate
`statements.
` Q. What document was he referring to?
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`IPR2014-01076
`GlobalFoundries 1117
`
`

`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Page 10
` A. One of the -- either Angelbeck or -- what's
`that guy's name again?
` Q. Pinsley?
` A. Pinsley. Pinsley. One of those two.
` Q. But you referenced a document that wasn't
`cited necessarily as a ground?
` A. I didn't.
` Q. Kortshagen did?
` A. I was just looking at a quote from
`Kortshagen. That was all.
` Q. And you don't recall the name of that
`document?
` A. It's that Russian paper for flash tube.
` Q. Kudryastev?
` A. That one.
` Q. Okay. Do you recall any other documents
`that you reviewed?
` A. No.
` Q. Did you prepare your -- well -- strike
`that.
` I'm going to hand you what has been
`previously marked as Exhibit 2005. This is the
`patent owner's exhibit.
` Do you recognize this document?
` A. Yes.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`IPR2014-01076
`GlobalFoundries 1117
`
`

`
`Page 11
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` Q. And refer to the cover page, which is, I
`guess, the second page.
` Do you see on the cover page, it lists
`inter partes review case numbers, and it lists the
`five case numbers that are the subject of today's
`deposition?
` Do you see that?
` A. I guess, yes.
` Q. Did you prepare one declaration for all
`five IPR case numbers?
` A. In my preparation, yes. I wasn't told that
`it was submitted for all five or whatever, but yeah.
` Q. But --
` A. I might have prepared one declaration.
` Q. Okay. And did you write this declaration?
` A. I certainly wrote parts of it, background
`materials and some of the technical issues, yeah.
` Q. What parts did you not write?
` A. I had a hand in reviewing and editing the
`opinions. I obviously have to agree with what my
`opinion is, but the original drafts were not written
`by me.
` Q. Can you identify the sections of this
`declaration that you did not write?
` A. Unfortunately, there's not a table of
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`IPR2014-01076
`GlobalFoundries 1117
`
`

`
`Page 12
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`contents, but...
` Q. Or we could identify, whichever is
`easier -- or can you identify the sections that you
`did write?
` A. For the most part, Sections 1 through -- 1
`through 4.
` Q. And just for confirmation on the record,
`you're testifying that you wrote Sections 1 through
`4; is that correct?
` A. I said for the most part, yeah.
` Q. And so therefore you did not write
`Sections 5 and higher; correct?
` MR. FAHMI: Objection; form.
` THE WITNESS: Well, as I said, I reviewed
`all sections and made edits to them so that they are
`in conformance with my opinions about the claims.
`BY MR. TENNANT:
` Q. And does this declaration constitute your
`entire testimony?
` MR. FAHMI: Objection; form.
` THE WITNESS: It may have -- I may be
`testify -- having testimony that might be a little
`different than the declaration today -- as I sit
`here today, depending on the questions that you ask.
` But when you say "entire testimony," you
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`IPR2014-01076
`GlobalFoundries 1117
`
`

`
`Page 13
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`mean my entire position on this patent?
`BY MR. TENNANT:
` Q. Yes.
` A. Is that what you're asking?
` Q. Yes.
` A. Yeah. Yes.
` Q. And can you refer to paragraph three, which
`is page 2.
` Do you see that?
` A. Yeah.
` Q. It says "the list of materials I
`considered."
` Do you see that?
` A. Yes.
` Q. And it lists various sets of materials, and
`it includes-- I'm just going to read from the
`paragraph:
` "The '779 patent, the file history of the
` '773 patent, the petitions for inter partes
` review and the exhibits, and the PTAB's
` institution decisions, the transcript of
` the deposition of the petitioners' expert
` on the '779 patent, and the prior art
` references discussed below."
` Do you see that?
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`IPR2014-01076
`GlobalFoundries 1117
`
`

`
`Page 14
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` A. Yes.
` Q. You refer to the file history of the '773
`patent.
` Why did you review the '773 patent?
` A. Oh, that is just a typo, isn't it?
` Q. What -- how should that read?
` A. The '779, yeah.
` Q. Okay. And were there any other
`materials -- strike that.
` Did you review any material that is not
`listed here in forming your opinions set forth in
`this declaration?
` A. No.
` Q. And also, all of your opinions in response
`to the material listed here is set forth in this
`declaration; correct?
` A. Could you repeat that question, please?
` Q. So you reviewed the positions by the
`petitioners' expert; correct?
` A. Yes.
` Q. And that includes the transcript of the
`deposition of the petitioners' expert on the '779
`patent; correct?
` A. As I recall, yes.
` Q. And did you form opinions in response to
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`IPR2014-01076
`GlobalFoundries 1117
`
`

`
`Page 15
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`the positions that the petitioners' expert took?
` A. I did.
` Q. And were any of -- did you express all of
`those opinions in this declaration?
` A. I may have formed further opinions based on
`my more recent review, but -- so I'm not -- I'm not
`sure that I explicitly stated them in the
`declaration.
` Q. So what further opinions did you form?
` A. Well, as I said, I may not have stated my
`opinion that I felt that Dr. Kortshagen was making
`an inaccurate statement regarding electron trapping
`for the laser patents. I did state my opinion that
`those patents do not trap electrons, but I did
`not -- may have not stated that I disagreed with
`Dr. Kortshagen's statement.
` Q. Were there any other opinions that you
`formed that are not in this declaration?
` A. I don't recall at this time.
` Q. In forming your opinions, did you conduct
`any type of experiments?
` A. No.
` Q. Did you refer to any background material
`that is not listed in paragraph three of your
`declaration?
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`IPR2014-01076
`GlobalFoundries 1117
`
`

`
`Page 16
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` A. No.
` Q. So would you turn to --
` A. There may be some references in here. I
`mean, some -- I may have referred to some of my own
`knowledge, but I don't recall that I referred to any
`background material for making any statements like
`that.
` Q. And when you say you referred to your own
`knowledge, what do you mean by that statement?
` A. Well, I have been in this -- working in
`this industry for 30 -- over 35 years, so I have a
`fair amount of just knowledge about how things work
`and real devices.
` Q. So based on your impression or thoughts?
` A. On my knowledge.
` Q. Right. Did you refer to any document to
`refresh your recollection?
` A. No.
` Q. Did you refer to any patent to refresh your
`declaration -- refresh -- refresh your recollection?
`Excuse me.
` A. Any patents other than --
` Q. Than are listed here.
` A. -- than are listed here?
` No, not that I recall.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`IPR2014-01076
`GlobalFoundries 1117
`
`

`
`Page 17
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` Q. Okay. Turn to paragraph 20, please.
` And that is the beginning of section four,
`"Background Topics"?
` A. Right.
` Q. Section -- subsection A is entitled
`"Magnetron Sputtering History and Operation."
` Do you see that?
` A. Correct.
` Q. Earlier you testified that you wrote this
`section; is that correct?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Okay. What is the basis for the
`description in the section?
` And by the way, let me just clarify it for
`the record. The section that I am referring to is
`paragraphs 20 through 31.
` A. I'm sorry. What do you mean by "what is
`the basis"?
` Q. How did you form the opinions that are
`expressed in this section?
` A. Based on my experience.
` Q. And in writing this section, did you refer
`to any materials?
` A. Well, I give references to some materials
`that illustrate some of the developments. But a
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`IPR2014-01076
`GlobalFoundries 1117
`
`

`
`Page 18
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`lot -- a lot of this is based on materials that I
`have previously provided as background materials
`for -- for magnetron sputtering, either a case or a
`tutorial or whatever.
` Q. And you mentioned your experience. I
`believe your experience is listed paragraph four
`through nine; is that correct?
` A. Partially. Of course, my CV is attached,
`but...
` Q. And that's right. And the last paragraph
`says, "a copy of my CV is attached," which also
`references other material; correct?
` A. Correct.
` Q. And so does this accurately capture all of
`your experience in forming the opinions that are
`expressed in paragraphs 20 through 31?
` MR. FAHMI: Objection; form.
` THE WITNESS: It's -- it's just an
`illustration of my experience. It may not capture
`all of the relevant experience. Well, it doesn't
`capture all of the relevant experience.
`BY MR. TENNANT:
` Q. Is there any relevant experience that you
`did not list on your declaration?
` A. In a 30-year career, it would be hard to
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`IPR2014-01076
`GlobalFoundries 1117
`
`

`
`Page 19
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`list all of the --
` Q. Right.
` A. -- all of the experience.
` Q. But based on what you can recall, all of
`your experience is listed in the declaration that's
`relevant?
` A. I doubt it. I mean, I doubt it -- every
`piece of information would be listed here. This
`gives a broad summary of my experience, and it
`really has to do with the breadth of -- the breadth
`of experience, although it's all pretty much related
`to sputtering, although I do have some other areas
`that I mentioned in paragraph seven.
` And, again, a -- you know, a one-sentence
`summary of those other areas is totally inadequate
`to present the depth of the experience in each of
`those areas.
` Q. And what other areas are you referring to?
` A. Pressure control, wafer cooling, wafer
`handling, cryogenic -- this last sentence in
`paragraph seven.
` Q. Can I refer you back to paragraph 20,
`please.
` And beginning in paragraph 20, you say:
` "Since late 1990s, DC magnetron sputtering
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`IPR2014-01076
`GlobalFoundries 1117
`
`

`
`Page 20
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` has become the preferred method for the
` deposition of thin metal films for many
` applications."
` And it goes on. Do you see that?
` MR. FAHMI: Objection; form.
` THE WITNESS: You said "1990s." It's
`1970s.
`BY MR. TENNANT:
` Q. Thank you.
` A. Yes, I see that.
` Q. And what is your experience with DC
`magnetron sputtering?
` A. Well, it does date back to the mid-1970s,
`when I first went to work for Temescal
`Metallurgical, who were holders of one of the
`seminal patents in magnetron sputtering, and I
`worked in their application lab, both on process and
`on developing equipment.
` Q. Did that equipment have magnets?
` A. I'm sorry. Did --
` Q. Did that equipment use magnets?
` A. Oh, yes.
` Q. And what were the magnets used for?
` A. They were used for forming the magnetic
`field that creates the electron trap in a planar
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`IPR2014-01076
`GlobalFoundries 1117
`
`

`
`Page 21
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`magnetron source.
` Q. And so let me refer you to paragraph 22.
` Do you see the second-to-last sentence on
`this page reads:
` "Since most of the voltage drop from anode
` to cathode occurs in this region, the
` electrons arrive from the discharge region
` with more than enough energy to ionize
` neutral gas atoms there."
` Do you see that sentence?
` A. Yes.
` Q. I'm going to focus on the term "discharge
`region."
` Do you see that in the sentence?
` A. Yeah.
` Q. And what does "discharge region" refer to?
` A. In a planar magnetron device, the discharge
`is relatively localized near the dark space, and
`it's confined, to a great degree, to the region
`where the magnetic field is perpendicular to the
`electric field.
` So in this case, in a standard magnetron,
`the discharge region is relatively localized
`compared to a non-magnetron or planar diode
`discharge.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`IPR2014-01076
`GlobalFoundries 1117
`
`

`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Page 22
` Q. And in this discharge region, is this where
`the plasma is formed?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Okay. And in the sentence that I read
`earlier, it references "neutral gas atoms" at the
`end of the sentence.
` Do you see that?
` A. I'm sorry, what sentence were you looking
`at?
` Q. It's a sentence spanning pages 8 and 9.
` A. Oh.
` Yes.
` Q. So is it correct that neutral gas atoms
`will be present in the discharge region as well?
` A. They will be, yes. They can diffuse to
`that region. Because they're not charged, they're
`not affected by electric or magnetic fields.
` Q. And so -- within the discharge region, you
`have the formation of a plasma; you also have
`neutral -- neutral gas atoms there; correct?
` A. That's correct.
` Q. Is there any other species that would be
`present in the discharge region?
` A. Yes.
` Q. What other species would be present?
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`IPR2014-01076
`GlobalFoundries 1117
`
`

`
`Page 23
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` A. There -- there will be some excited gas
`atoms and some -- perhaps some ionized sputtered
`material atoms.
` Q. And would ions be present as well?
` A. I just said "ionized."
` Q. Okay. Sorry if I missed that.
` What is an ion?
` A. An ion is a particle. It can have ionized
`atoms or ionized molecules that -- in which the
`number of electrons doesn't match the number of
`protons. So they can have a deficit of electrons,
`or they can have a surplus of electrons.
` Q. If an ion has a deficit of electrons, what
`happens to the electrons that were ejected from the
`atom?
` MR. FAHMI: Objection; form.
` THE WITNESS: What do you mean what happens
`to them? They're -- they're --
`BY MR. TENNANT:
` Q. Where do they go?
` A. Well, they go where they will be -- they're
`under the same influence as any other electron in
`that region. And so it would be influenced by
`electric and magnetic fields. They may be trapped,
`or they may eventually lose enough energy to reach
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`IPR2014-01076
`GlobalFoundries 1117
`
`

`
`Page 24
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`a -- an electrode or other surface.
` Q. And how are electrons trapped by the
`magnetic electric field -- or magnetic field?
`Excuse me.
` MR. FAHMI: Objection; form.
` THE WITNESS: That's not necessarily an
`easy question to answer because the trapping
`phenomenon depends on examination of all of those
`influences that I mentioned: the proximity to a
`surface, the electric field and the magnetic field
`configuration, and how those interact.
` But in general, the trapping results in a
`motion of the electron that, in essence, impedes it
`as -- impedes it when it has energy; impedes it from
`moving out of that trapped region.
`BY MR. TENNANT:
` Q. So in the presence of a magnetic field,
`isn't it correct that an electron will rotate or
`spiral around the magnetic field lines?
` A. Again, that's one of the motions that an
`electron will have. That may not trap it in the
`sense that I am talking about, but it will have that
`motion.
` Q. And what sense of trap are you talking
`about, then?
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`IPR2014-01076
`GlobalFoundries 1117
`
`

`
`Page 25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` A. I am talking about -- that if -- when it
`has energy, that its motion keeps it within a region
`that tends to prevent it from going to an electrode
`or other surface.
` Q. And how long would -- strike that.
` Can an electron be trapped forever and
`therefore never contact another surface in the
`presence of a magnetic field?
` A. As I mentioned, the trapping effect depends
`on that electron having some -- some energy and
`response to -- in response to an electric field.
`And as it undergoes collisions, it loses significant
`energy, then that changes.
` But you have to look at the configuration
`that the magnetic and electric fields to determine
`whether the kind of electron trapping that I am
`talking about takes place, and that may --
` Q. If --
` A. -- that may depend on looking at very
`specific -- specific of each situation.
` Q. Assuming that the magnetic field and the
`electric field are perpendicular to one another,
`would that result in trapping an electron?
` MR. FAHMI: Objection; form.
` THE WITNESS: No.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`IPR2014-01076
`GlobalFoundries 1117
`
`

`
`Page 26
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`BY MR. TENNANT:
` Q. Why not?
` A. Because that alone just imparts a -- exerts
`a force on the electron. And whether that force is
`one that results in a motion that traps the
`electron, again, as I said, depends on the specifics
`of each geometry of the electric and magnetic
`fields.
` Q. Sir, earlier you referred to an electron
`resulting in a collision.
` Do you recall that?
` A. It may, depending on...
` Q. What would an electron collide with?
` A. Other -- other -- an electron would
`typically collide with atoms, whether -- no matter
`what state they're in, or molecules.
` Q. So let's consider a neutral gas atom in a
`collision with an electron.
` What happens to the neutral gas atom after
`the collision with the electron?
` MR. FAHMI: Objection; form.
` THE WITNESS: The answer to that depends a
`lot on the energy of that electron. So it can
`impart -- there can be elastic collisions; there can
`be collisions that cause excitation; there can be
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`IPR2014-01076
`GlobalFoundries 1117
`
`

`
`Page 27
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`collisions that cause ionization. So it just
`depends on what the energy is.
`BY MR. TENNANT:
` Q. And so you referred to excitation.
` So it's possible to excite a gas atom with
`the collision with an electron; correct?
` A. That is correct.
` Q. Have you heard of the term -- strike that.
` Do you understand the term "metastable
`atom"?
` A. To the extent that it's been defined here.
` I am not an atomic physicist, so I can
`understand what it's saying, that the energy level
`is one that is more stable than other states,
`because, in some theory, a -- an event that causes
`it to leave that state is not possible. That's --
`that's my extent of my understanding of it. It has
`a longer lifetime than other states -- other excited
`states.
` Q. When you refer to "longer lifetime," what
`do you mean by that?
` A. Well, I have been given to understand that
`it can be on the order of many seconds.
` Q. And what happens at the end of the life of
`a metastable atom?
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`IPR2014-01076
`GlobalFoundries 1117
`
`

`
`Page 28
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` MR. FAHMI: Objection; form.
` THE WITNESS: Well, it -- it could undergo
`a collision before the end of its life that ionizes
`it, or it could return to a -- to a ground state.
`BY MR. TENNANT:
` Q. A metastable atom is an excited atom;
`correct?
` A. It has a higher energy state, yes.
` Q. And because it has a higher energy state,
`it has a longer lifetime relative to excited atoms
`that are not metastable atoms; correct?
` A. That's my understanding, yes.
` Q. And what is the basis of your
`understanding?
` A. As I said, I'm not an atomic -- not a
`physicist, so the basis of my understanding is
`basically what is presented in the materials that I
`read.
` Q. And what specific materials regarding
`metastable atoms did you read?
` A. Well, the '779 patent talks about it
`briefly.
` Q. Any other materials that you reviewed?
` A. I think I might have, you know, gone to
`Wikipedia just to see, okay, is the '779 description
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`IPR2014-01076
`GlobalFoundries 1117
`
`

`
`Page 29
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`correct? But that's about it.
` Q. And in your review of Wikipedia, did you
`find anything that was inconsistent with what you
`reviewed on the '779 patent?
` A. Not that I recall.
` Q. Did you find any different interpretations
`of a metastable atom when you reviewed Wikipedia?
` A. Again, not that I recall.
` Q. Do you agree with the material that you
`reviewed regarding metastable atoms in particular to
`the '779 patent?
` MR. FAHMI: Objection; form.
` THE WITNESS: I will say that I found no
`reason to disagree with it.
`BY MR. TENNANT:
` Q. And in your experience from designing
`sputtering magnetron systems, did you ever encounter
`or analyze the phenomenon of generating metastable
`atoms?
` A. No. Well, in the sense of not doing it
`purposefully. I mean, did I encounter it? I could
`have, but I wouldn't have recognized -- I wouldn't
`have paid attention to that -- that particular
`phenomenon.
` Q. Is it the case that metastable atoms are
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`IPR2014-01076
`GlobalFoundries 1117
`
`

`
`Page 30
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`always generated when you form a plasma?
` A. That, I couldn't answer for sure.
` Q. Do you have an opinion?
` MR. FAHMI: Objection; form.
` THE WITNESS: I would have to study it.
`BY MR. TENNANT:
` Q. So I just handed you a copy of U.S. Patent
`Number 6,805,779 that has been previously marked as
`Exhibit TSMC 1201.
` Do you recognize this document?
` A. Yes.
` Q. This is the '779 patent that is subject of
`the IPRs in this case; correct?
` A. Yes.
` Q. And just for the record, the '779 patent
`has various exhibit numbers, depending on which IPR
`it was submitted in.
` So for this deposition today, I am just
`going to refer to it as the '779 patent; is that
`fair?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Okay. Can you refer to Figure 1, please?
` A. Okay.
` Q. Now at the bottom of Figure 1, do you see
`the word "prior art"?
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`IPR2014-01076
`GlobalFoundries 1117
`
`

`
`Page 31
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` A. Yes.
` Q. Do you understand Figure 1 to illustrate a
`prior art system?
` A. That's what it says, yes.
` Q. And do you agree with that?
` A. It's -- yes. It's a generalized schematic
`of prior art magnetron -- DC magnetron sputtering.
` Q. Okay. Now refer to Figure 2, please.
` A. Did you say Figure 2?
` Q. Yes.
` Now, this illustrates an embodiment of a
`plasma generator disclosed by the '779 patent;
`correct?
` A. That's correct.
` Q. And if you can just look at the brief
`description of the drawing, column 2, line 3, the
`'779 patent states that:
` "Figure 2 illustrates a cross-sectional
` view of an embodiment of a plasma generator
` that generates a plasma with a multi-step
` ionization process according to the present
` invention."
` Do you see that?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Now, refer back to Figure 1, please.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`IPR2014-01076
`GlobalFoundries 1117
`
`

`
`Page 32
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` Do you see how the various components of
`the system are labeled with numbers?
` A. Yes.
` Q. And those numbers are 100 and above?
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket