`cylindrical magnetrons
`
`John A. Thornton
`
`Telic Corporation, 1631 Colorado Avenue, Santa Monica, California 90404
`(Received 22 September 1977; accepted 7 December 1977)
`
`Magnetron sputtering sources can be defined as diode devices in which magnetic fields are
`used in concert with the cathode surface to form electron traps which are so configured that
`the EXB electron-drift currents close on themselves. Coaxial cylindrical magnetron sputtering
`sources in which post or hollow cathodes are operated in axial magnetic fields have been
`reported for a number of years. However,
`their performance is limited by end losses. A
`remarkable performance is achieved when the end losses are eliminated by proper shaping of
`the magnetic field or by using suitably placed electron-reflecting surfaces. High currents and
`sputtering rates can be obtained, nearly independent of voltage, even at low pressures. This
`characterizes what has been defined as the magnetron mode of operation. This paper reviews
`the basic principles that underly the operation of do sputtering sources in the magnetron mode
`with particular emphasis on cylindrical magnetrons. The important attributes of these devices
`as sputtering sources are also reviewed.
`
`PACS numbers: 81.15.-—z, 52.75.—d
`
`This paper reviews the basic principles that underlie the
`operation of dc sputtering sources in the magnetron mode.
`The discussion concentrates on the cylindrical magnetrons
`with post cathodes and electrostatic reflecting surfaces [Fig.
`l(e)] because these devices possess a relatively simple geom-
`etry. Following previous nomenclaturel these devices, and
`their inverted counterparts [Fig. 1(f)], will be referred to as
`cylindrical—post and cylindrical-hollow magnetrons, respec-
`tively. However, the discussion also applies to other cylindrical
`magnetrons and generally to planar magnetrons and sputter
`guns
`
`SI units are used except for electron energies and temper-
`atures which are expressed in eV. (1 eV = 11 600 K.)
`
`II. SOME BASIC CONCEPTS FROM PLASMA
`PHYSICS
`
`I.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`Magnetron sputtering sources can be defined as diode devices
`in which magnetic fields are used in concert with the cathode
`surface to form electron traps which are so configured that
`the E X B electron—drift currents can close on themselves}
`
`Cylindrical sputtering sources with post2‘1° or hollow“
`cathodes, coaxial anodes, and axial magnetic fields have been
`reported for a number of years. Their configurations, shown
`in Figs. 1(a) and (b), are of a general magnetron form, but
`their performance is limited by end losses. Remarkable per-
`formance is achieved when the end losses are eliminated by
`proper shaping of the magnetic field, as for example in the
`configurations shown in Figs. l(c) and (d), or by using suitably
`placed electron reflecting surfaces as shown in Figs. l(c) and
`(f). High currents and sputtering rates can be obtained, at
`moderate and near constant voltages, even at low pressures.
`This characterizes what has been defined as the magnetron
`mode of operation. 1 It can also be obtained for plasma rings
`magnetically confined over planar surfaces (planar magne-
`trons)” or over short cylinders or within cylindrical surface
`cavities (sputter guns).13
`Cylindrical magnetron configurations have been used for
`microwave oscillators,14’16 pressure gauges,17‘2° and sputter
`ion pumps.21‘23 The first operation in the magnetron mode
`for sputtering appears to have been achieved by Penning and
`Moubis using the configurations of Figs. 1(e)2“ and (f).25 Very
`active development of cylindrical magnetron sputtering
`technology has occurred over the period from 1969 to the
`present.‘ This work has involved primarily the dc operation
`of apparatus of the basic types shown in Figs. 1(c),2€*28 (d),25>28
`(e),27>28“36 and (f),28»29>31‘33 although rf operation has been
`explored with both the post— and hollow—cathode configura-
`tions.1’23
`
`A glow discharge plasma can be defined as a region of
`relatively low-temperature gas in which a degree of ionization
`is sustained by the presence of energetic electrons. Such
`plasmas are neutral and their state is characterized by (1) the
`degree of ionization oz = Ne/(N, + NA), where Ne is the
`electron density, M = N9 is the ion density, and NA is the gas
`density; and (2) the electron energy distribution, which can
`often be approximated by an electron temperature Te. The
`long-range Coulomb forces between charged particles give
`plasmas a propensity for collective behavior.3738 A condition
`for dominance of Coulomb collisions is that a >> 1.7 X 101603,;
`Te 2, where am is the electron—atom collision cross section.39
`Electrostatic waves can be expected to develop if the plasma
`angular frequency, defined as cop = 56.4 N81/2, is much larger
`than the electron—atom collision frequency. Another impor-
`tant parameter, the Debye length AD = 7430 (Te/Ne)1/2,
`provides a measure of the distance over which significant
`INTEL 1116
`0022-5355/78/1502-O171$01.00
`171
`
`© 1978 American Vacuum Society
`
`171
`
`J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 15(2) March/April 1978
`
`INTEL 1116
`
`
`
`172
`
`sight into the behavior of magnetron plasmas. Only the
`electrons are significantly influenced by magnetic fields of
`the strengths used in magnetron mode sputtering sources. An
`electron in a uniform magnetic field B will drift along the
`field lines with a speed 1)“ that is unaffected by the field, and
`orbit them at a gyro or Larmor radius (rg = 3.37 X 10‘6
`W _Ll/2/B), and with a gyro or cyclotron angular frequency
`(me = 1.76 X 10“ B), where W J_ is the energy associated with
`the electron motion perpendicular to the field [see Fig. 2(a)].
`When there is a component of electric field E J_ perpendicular
`to B, a drift of speed 1);; = E i/ B develops in a direction
`perpendicular to both E L and B and combines with the or-
`biting motion as shown in Fig. 2(b). This is the E X B drift.
`The motion of an electron created at rest in uniform and
`
`perpendicular E and B fields is the cycloid generated by a
`circle of radius rg(vE) moving with velocity 1);; as shown in
`Fig. 2(c), where rg(vE) is the value obtained by setting W L
`= 1/2 meog 2. Electrons are emitted from a magnetron cathode
`with energies that are small compared to that acquired as they
`are accelerated through the cathode dark space (CDS).
`However, their motion is not exactly cycloidal because the
`CDS electric field is not uniform. In general, the distance to
`the turning point dt will exceed the CDS thickness ds, as
`shown in Fig. 2(d). For planar cathodes, (1, equals the rg value
`that is obtained with W i set equal to the CDS voltage drop.43
`For thin sheaths (ds << rg) over cylindrical cathodes of radius
`R0, the turning distance d, varies from rg, when R0 >> d,, to
`21g, when R0 << d, as shown in Fig. 2(e).43
`Curved magnetic fields of the type shown in Figs. 1(c) and
`(d) have a perpendicular gradient VB i and a parallel gradient
`VB”, as shown in Fig. 2(f). Electrons in such a field experience
`a VB J_ X B drift that is proportional to 12 L2. This combines
`with an identically directed drift, due to the centrifugal force
`associated with the speed 0 H, and yields a drift identified as
`up in Fig. 2(f).44 Electrons tend to conserve their magnetic
`moment M4 (M4 = meo i 2/B). Thus conservation of energy
`may cause electrons passing in the direction of VB“ to be re-
`flected by the magnetic field45 before they reach the cathode
`surface.
`
`Important collective behavior includes charged particle
`
`MAGNETIC HELD
`Q UPWARDS
`
`
`
`ELECTRON
`STARTING
`AT REST
`
`"LASMA
`
`[I ECTRUH
`M/\."-NFTI C
`REFLECTION
`
`
`
`
`ti
`
`CATHODF
`
`
`
`MAGMETI C
`FIELD
`
`“EL”
`
`FLFCWON
`REFLECTING
`SURFACE
`
`f
`
`MOTION
`
`ANODE
`
`FIG. 1. The configuration of various cylindrical magnetron sputtering
`sources. (a) and (b) have general magnetron configurations but do not operate
`in the magnetron mode because of end losses. (b), (d), and (f) are often called
`inverted magnetrons and sometimes hollow cathodes. e is referred to here
`as a cylindrical-post magnetron and f as a cylindrical-hollow magnetron.
`
`departures from charge neutrality can occur. Magnetron
`plasmas generally have higher degrees of ionization and are
`much richer in collective behavior than are the plasmas in
`conventional planar diode sputtering sources.
`Despite the importance of collective phenomena an ex-
`amination of single-particle motion37‘42 provides useful in-
`
`FIG. 2. Electron motion in static electric and
`magnetic fields.
`
`I
`"; ‘— '9
`
`V“
`
`V1
`
`El
`
`mA<;NEHC F|El D
`UP\“AR D S
`
`Pl/\§.”~.\A
`
`
`
`J. Vac. Sci. Technol., Vol. 15, No. 2, March/April 1978
`
`172
`
`John A. Thornton: Magnetron sputtering
`
`CATHDDE
`
`CATHODE
`
`MAGNETIC
`HELD
`
`ANODE
`
`“ATHODE
`
`'
`~
`5)‘ B
`ELECTRON _
`monov
`
`ANODE
`
`3
`
`c
`
`.
`_
`EX B
`ELECIRON
`MOTION
`
`MAGNFT r C
`HELD
`
`ANODE
`
`r'x3'
`HECTRON -7.
`Mom».
`
`l
`
`Em’
`ELECTRON
`MOTION
`
`CATHODE
`
`— PLASMA
`RINGS
`
`‘X Ar\ouE
`
`d
`
`FLASH/\
`RIMLS
`
`l/3\Cl\.ETl(
`IFLD
`
`W. mA:;r\EHc
`H“
`
`
`
`FIELD E x E
`
`CATHODE
`
`MAGNETIC
`
`ELECTRON
`REFLECTING
`SURFACE
`
`,3
`
`-
`E -
`ELECTRON
`MOTION
`
`ANODE
`
`e
`
`
`
`40 1/2 V 3/2
`,-= 8.6 x 10-9 (—)
`5
`J
`M
`dsz
`40T
`= 1.48 x 10-16 N,,( M3
`
`)
`
`1/2
`
`173
`
`A/m2,
`
`(4)
`
`where M is the ion molecular weight.
`The plasma state is rich in wave phenomena, particularly
`when a magnetic field is present.37-33-51 Electron electrostatic
`waves can propagate along field lines with frequencies of the
`order of cop, or across field lines with a frequency of the order
`of (w,,2 + we 2)1/2. Ion electrostatic waves can pass in all di-
`rections at a velocity of the order of (kTe/m¢)1/2. Electron
`drifts perpendicular to the magnetic field develop in the
`presence of a perpendicular electric field, as discussed above,
`or a density gradient.37 Such drifts are inherently unstable,
`since any departure from charge neutrality in the form of
`charge bunching and separation (over distances of the order
`of the Debye length) create electric fields which cause sec-
`ond-order E X B drifts that can exacerbate the perturbation.
`These instabilities are often referred to as gradient—drift and
`neutral-drag instabilities.” Thus a charge perturbation as-
`sociated with the azimuthal ]9 Hall current in a cylindrical
`magnetron can cause an E 9 perturbation field which interacts
`with the axial magnetic field Bz, to produce radial electron
`drift waves.53"55 Drifts driven by the two density gradients
`associated with a maximum in the radial electron density
`distribution can interact to cause the diocotron instability.56‘53
`If feedback mechanisms are present, the oscillations associated
`with these instabilities can grow to produce macroscopic
`motions capable of enhancing electron transport across the
`magnetic field.
`Plasma instabilities can also be important in permitting a
`collisionless energy exchange within a plasma. Examples are
`the two-stream instability and Landau damping.37=33 Evi-
`dence of such energy transfer has been seen between primary
`electrons and the negative glow over thermionic cath-
`odes.59""°
`
`Plasma oscillations and instabilities are believed to play an
`important role in the operation of magnetrons, as will be
`discussed in the next section.61‘71
`
`III. THE PLASMA DISCHARGE
`
`Consider a cold-cathode magnetron mode discharge in a
`cylindrical-post magnetron of the type shown in Fig. l(e). The
`discharge cross section in the 1-0 plane (cylindrical coordi-
`nates) is shown in Fig. 3. The uniform axial magnetic field is
`assumed to be of such strength that ds < d, < W and we >> 11,
`where W is the width of the end reflector.
`
`A low-pressure cold-cathode discharge is maintained pri-
`marily by secondary electrons emitted from the cathode by
`ion bombardment. These electrons are accelerated in the CDS
`
`and enter the plasma where, known as primary electrons, they
`must produce sufficient ions to release one further electron
`from the cathode.” This requirement can be expressed by the
`following relationship for the minimum potential to sustain
`such a discharge:73
`
`Vmin = 60/Fieiee
`
`173
`
`John A. Thornton: Magnetron sputtering
`
`PRIMARY ELECTRON
`LOST AT CATHODE
`
`,
`
`PRIMARY ELECTRON
`FIRST ORBIT
`MDMENTLIM
`TRANSFER
`
`I
`
`I
`
`VIRTUAL
`ANDDE
`
`CATHODE DARK SPACE
`
`ION NEUTRALIZATION
`AND REFLECTION
`WITH LARGE ANGLE
`SCATTERING
`
`S PUTTERED
`$2 FLUX
`cg’
`NEGATIVE GLOW
`TV PE REG ION
`
`PRIMARY ELECTRON
`TRAPPED IN CIRCULAR
`ORBIT
`
`\\
`\
`
`‘
`
`
`
`MAGNETIC FIELD
`UPWARDS
`
`‘~/__
`ELECTRON
`CURRENT
`DENSITIES
`
`
`LOW ENERGY
`ELECTRONS
`
`FIG. 3. Schematic representation of electron transport processes in a cold-
`cathode discharge between a cylindrical cathode and a coaxial anode in a
`uniform axial magnetic field [configuration shown in Fig. 1(e)].
`
`current flow and diffusion, sheath formation, and plasma
`oscillations. When an electric field E J_ is applied perpen-
`dicular to a magnetic field of sufficient strength to affect the
`electrons but not the ions, a current density
`
`I; = eNe/-‘eLE_L + €N:Mu.E_I_
`
`(1)
`
`will flow in the direction of E L and an electron Hall cur-
`rent“
`
`JH = we/Ve ]e_L = we/Ve eNe I"eJ. EJ_
`
`will flow in the E X B direction. In Eq. (1) the mobility per-
`pendicular to the magnetic field is given by47
`
`IN. = M/[1 + (we/V)2l>
`
`(3)
`
`where fl. = e/ (mu) is the mobility in the absence of a magnetic
`field or along a field line (/.I”) and 1/ is the collision frequency
`for the species in question (m and e are the appropriate mass
`and charge). The diffusion coefficients can be written as D
`= [.LkT/e (k is Boltzman constant) and therefore obey rela-
`tionships similar to Eq. (3).“7‘48
`Because of their difference in mass, electrons and ions tend
`to pass from a plasma to an adjacent surface at different rates.
`Thus a space charge region or sheath, in which one species is
`largely excluded, forms adjacent to such surfaces/*9 The po-
`tential variation between the surface and the plasma is largely
`confined to this layer. The nature of the sheath depends on
`the current passing across it. Therefore the current density
`at the anode establishes the anode sheath voltage drop and
`thus the plasma potential. For floating surfaces the sheath
`potential drop is the well—known floating potential and is
`negative (relative to plasma potential) except for cases where
`the magnetic field causes the total electron flux to be less than
`the ion flux. The CDS is a positive space charge sheath (neg-
`ative potential drop relative to plasma). The ion current
`density j,- is related to the sheath thickness ds and potential
`drop V, by the Child—Langmuir law37 [first term at right in
`Eq. (4)] and approximately to the plasma electron density and
`temperature by the Bohm relationship37A5° (second term at
`right):
`
`J. Vac. Sci. Technol., Vol. 15, No. 2, MarchlApriI 1978
`
`
`
`174
`
`John A. Thornton: Magnetron sputtering
`
`where I‘, is the number of secondary electrons per incident
`ion which leave the cathode, 60 is the average energy required
`for producing ions (about 30 eV for Ar+ 74), e,~ is the ion col-
`lection efficiency, and 6,3 is the fraction of the full complement
`of ions V/ 6 0 that is made by the average primary electron
`before it is lost from the system. The primary electrons are
`emitted from the cathode with energies of a few eV75 and
`move in cycloidal-like trajectories, as shown at A in Fig. 3.
`There is a strong probability of recapture at the cathode, since
`the path length is much smaller than the mean free path.
`Furthermore the retarding field reduces the returning elec-
`tron energy to a value which is generally too low to produce
`significant secondary electron emission. It is believed that the
`recapture probability is reduced by interactions with plasma
`oscillations. On a random phase basis about one-half will
`undergo an interaction which promotes their return to the
`cathode, while about half will exchange sufficient momentum
`so that they cannot return. I‘; is called the effective secondary
`emission coefficient.7f*78 It is equal to the secondary emission
`coefficient due to ion bombardment 7, times a factor which
`accounts for the probability of recapture. 'y,- is typically 1/10
`for low-energy argon ions incident on metal surfaces. I‘, is
`perhaps close to 1/20 for the cylindrical cathode surface. Sec-
`ondary emission from the end reflectors (unaffected by the
`magnetic field) is of little significance in most geometries
`because of the relatively small end-reflector area in contact
`with the intense plasma.
`Primary electrons which enter the plasma are believed to
`become trapped on cycloidal-like paths which orbit but do
`not reach the cathode, as shown at B in Fig. 3. Collisions in the
`radial electric field beyond the CDS and plasma oscillations
`cause the electrons to migrate to the anode. Such discharges
`exhibit a bright glow which extends a distance of about 2d,
`from the cathode, and a dimmer glow from there to the
`anode. The bright glow is believed to be the main region of
`energy exchange for the primary electrons. Thus, following
`conventional terminology,”-79 the regions can be identified
`as having negative glow and positive column-type charac~
`teristics, respectively. Since the primary electrons can escape
`the magnetic trap only by exchanging energy, 63 ~ 1; and
`since the primary energy exchange is close to the cathode, 61
`~ 1. Thus magnetron discharges are very efficient and operate
`in Ar at voltages near the Vmin of 600 V predicted by Eq. (5)
`for 60 = 30 eV /ion and I‘,- = 1/20 (see Sec. IV). The high oper-
`ating voltages of conventional planar diode sources result from
`low values of ee and e,-.1
`I
`A typical cylindrical magnetron discharge operates at a
`pressure of 0.13 Pa (1 mTorr) with a magnetic field strength
`of 0.02 T (200 G). Thus we = 3.5 X 109 rad/ s. The total elec-
`tron—atom cross section of electrons of a typical energy of 10
`eV in argon is about 2 X 1019 m2,174 and the collision fre-
`quency V is about 107 5'1. Thus coc/ V ~ 300. Accordingly, the
`Hall current density, Eq. (2), is significant and electrons circle
`the cathode many times in passing to the anode. The total Hall
`current is typically an order of magnitude larger than the
`discharge current and constitutes a solenoidal current that can
`cause a reduction of the magnetic field strength in the vicinity
`of the cathode by ~10%.
`Equation (3) predicts ue _]_ ~ 10_5}.Le at o.>c/ :1 ~ 300. If the
`
`J. Vac. Sci. Technol., Vol. 15, No. 2, March/April 1978
`
`174
`
`electron mobility were this low, it would be less than the Ar
`ion mobility, and operation of the discharge in the positive
`space charge mode would be endangered.‘ Similarly, the
`radial current predicted by Eq. (1) (using measured values
`for E i and N3 in the vicinity of the anode) or by electron
`diffusion (using electron density gradients estimated from
`probe measurements) fails to account for the discharge current
`by a factor of more than two orders of magnitude.” The an-
`swer to these dilemmas is believed to be plasma oscillations
`which promote electron migration across magnetic fields
`strong enough to restrain the motion of the primary electrons}
`Oscillations at frequencies in the 50-500 kHz range, with a
`maximum frequency that varies inversely with the square root
`of the working gas atomic mass, have been detected using
`electrostatic probes in cylindrical—post magnetrons operating
`with Ar, 02, and Hes‘) This frequency range is consistent with
`electrostatic ion waves oscillating in the discharge cavity and
`about equal to the ion—ion collision frequency.
`Electrostatic probe measurements of the electron density
`in the discharge region are consistent with Eq. (4) and indicate
`that the degree of ionization is a few percent or less. At low
`pressures the primary electrons in a well-designed trap are
`estimated to travel as much as 100 In before their energy is
`totally exchanged although, as with conventional negative
`glows, the primary electron density is typically only a few
`percent of the density of ions and low-energy electrons. Atom
`flux calculations indicate that an average atom passing
`through the discharge region of a cylindrical—post magnetron
`must have a 1% to 30% chance of being ionized, depending
`on the discharge current} Probabilities of being either excited
`or ionized are about twice as large. This is particularly relevant
`to reactive sputtering.
`The anode in a magnetron should be placed within the
`magnetic field so that it terminates the trap at a point where
`the primary electrons have dissipated their energy} Anode
`placement is aided by the fact that ice“ >> #eJ_. Thus all
`electrons reaching the radius R A in Fig. 3 are swept into the
`anode; i.e., a virtual anode, that does not disrupt the sputtered
`flux, separates the substrates from the plasma and reduces
`plasma substrate heating (ions are electrostatically forced to
`stay in the vicinity of the electrons). An anode of insufficient
`size or with poor placement can cause a significant anode
`voltage drop.
`
`IV. CURRENT—VOLTAGE CHARACTERISTICS
`
`The current—voltage characteristic reveals a great deal
`about the ionization processes in a plasma discharge. Dis-
`charges operating in the magnetron mode obey an I—V rela-
`tionship of the form I 0: V", where n is an index to the per-
`formance of the electron trap and is typically in the range 5
`to 9. The voltage is related to the ionization mechanisms by
`Eq.
`Typical I—V curves for cylindrical—post magnetrons oper-
`ating with various magnetic field strengths and pressures are
`shown in Fig. 4 and compared with a I—V curve for a planar
`diode. If the magnetic field is too weak, the discharge will
`leave the magnetron mode and the voltage will increase
`abruptly, as shown at A.1~24~35 Figure 5 shows the variation in
`
`
`
`175
`
`John A. Thornton: Magnetron sputtering
`
`175
`
`PRESSURE trniorrl
`2
`2
`A
`5 31°
`CYLlNDRlCAL'POST MAGNETRON
`COPPER CATHODE (32 mm diam. X 300 mm |g.|
`I10 mA/crn
`ARGON
`CURRENT DENSITY ' 100 A/rnz
`2}
`
`4
`
`STABLE DISCHARGE
`
`6
`4
`
`‘\
`K.
`Vg/W ~0/.?
`
`DISCHARGE
`EXTINGUISHES
`
`(mTl
`
`
`MAGNETICFIELDSTRENGTH
`
`-1
`
`2
`
`8
`(7
`-'1
`PRESSURE lPal
`
`2
`
`4
`
`6
`
`8
`
`2
`
`10
`
`2
`
`4
`
`e 81
`
`Z 3
`
`2
`
`1
`
`10
`
`2
`
`4
`
`o
`
`8
`
`1
`
`CURRENT neusnv (mix/cm?»
`s 810
`4
`2
`2
`4
`5 210
`CYLINDRICAL-POST mmswrmoms
`COPPER CATHODES
`ARGON
`110 mTorrl
`I 1.33 Pa
`o 0.067 Pa (0.5 mTorrJ
`
`
`
`DISCHARGEVOLTAGE
`
`PLANAR DIODE
`ALUMINUM CATHODE
`ARGON - 6. 67 Pa (50 mTorr)
`
`rq/w ~ 0.9
`5 mT (500),;
`
`F9/W‘0.7
`/6 ITIT (606)
`'
`
`_.o
`
`rg(W ~ 0.2
`°__o,/20 mT rzoocn
`‘
`_,1o mTl100G)
`V20 mT (zoom
`I. QCOCII
`*‘
`30 mT eoocu
`
`l\/olls‘
`
`CURRENT DENSITY Wm?)
`
`FIG. 4. Typical current voltage characteristics for a planar diode sputtering
`source and for cylindrical-post magnetron sputtering sources operating under
`various conditions of pressure and magnetic field strength.
`
`FIG. 6. Conditions of pressure and magnetic field strength for stable oper-
`ation of a representative cylindrical-post magnetron at fixed current (from
`Ref. 1).
`
`voltage with pressure at constant magnetic field strength. A
`similar abrupt voltage increase is seen at B. These voltage
`behaviors are a result of electrons escaping from the trap
`without making sufficient ionization (low ee), because their
`gyro radii are too large compared to the end reflector size W.
`At high magnetic field strengths the discharge will extinguish
`if the pressure is too low, as seen at C in Fig. 5. This is believed
`to be the result of electrons not exchanging sufficient mo-
`mentum with the plasma during their first cycloidal orbit (low
`I‘,-). Note that the low-pressure extinction is surprisingly in-
`dependent of gas species (i.e., collision cross section). This is
`attributed to the role of plasma oscillations in establishing I}.
`Figure 6 summarizes the pressure-magnetic field require-
`ments of a small cylindrical—post magnetron operating at a
`current density of 100 A /m2. Increasing the magnetic field
`strength lowers the allowable operating pressure until the
`length of the first cyloidal orbit becomes too small to permit
`adequate energy exchange. At normal operating pressures
`(>0.07 Pa) low field strengths can be used for larger devices
`(design requirement is that W be a mutliple of rg1»29).
`At a fixed voltage and magnetic field strength the current
`
`-
`
`1°
`
`2
`
`4
`
`5 31°
`
`2
`
`increases with pressure (more collision targets). At a fixed
`voltage and pressure the current increases with magnetic field
`strength (higher q), at least for moderate fields (<20 mT). An
`electrostatic probe placed over the anode of a cylindrical—post
`magnetron operating at 700 V indicated that the primary
`electrons had exchanged essentially all of their energy in the
`discharge, therefore implying that 62 ~ 1.31 Taking I‘, = 1/20
`and 60 = 30 eV/ion, in Eq. (5) yields at ~ 0.9. This ion-col-
`lection efficiency is generally consistent with electrostatic
`probe measurements at positions beyond the virtual anode.
`With proper choice of magnetic field, magnetron mode
`operation with a near common I—V characteristic has been
`achieved for a wide range of apparatus sizes in both cylin-
`drical-post and cylindrical-hollow configurations}
`
`V. PERFORMANCE AS SPUTTERING SOURCE
`
`With sufficiently uniform magnetic fields, the cylindrical
`magnetron configurations shown in Figs. l(e) and 1(f) provide
`uniform sputtering over the cathode surface. This has been
`verified by measuring the cathode erosion profiles after ex-
`tended sputtering}-82 (Reports of nonuniform erosion are
`believed to be due to nonuniform magnetic fields.35) A large
`inventory of coating material can be stored in a cylindrical
`target and used efficiently. Current densities are typically 50
`to 500 A/m2 with erosion rates of 33 nm/s and deposition rates
`of 3.3 nm/s (2000 A /min). However, a copper cylindrical-post
`cathode has been operated with a uniform current density of
`over 2000 A/m2 and an erosion rate of over 333 nm/s (200 000
`A /min).
`At typical operating pressures the sputtered flux passes to
`substrates with little gas scattering. This has been verified by
`observing the post—cathode images that are formed by the
`coatings on substrates placed behind shields with small ap-
`ertures in pin-hole camera configurations.‘ Thus mechanical
`masks can be effectively used to accurately define deposition
`areas. The deposition flux at various points surrounding a post
`cathode can be predicted with considerable accuracy by as-
`suming a uniform cathode current density and a cosine
`emission of sputtered flux with collisionless transport.33
`
`PRESSURE (mTorr)
`1
`1
`8
`o
`4
`2
`2
`4
`5 810
`C‘/LINDRICAL-POST MAGNETRON
`COPPER CATHODE (32 mm diam. X 300 mm |g.l
`0 CURRENT - 3A, ARGON
`A CURRENT - 1A, ARGON
`0 CURRENT -1A, OXYGEN
`10 mTl1[)0Gl
`20 mT (2006) K,‘O
`‘s
`L
`20 mT IZOOGTX‘T
`°~o.
`DISCHARGE
`EXTINGUISHES
`
`(Volts)
`
`
`
`DISCHARGEVOLTAGE
`
`‘ ‘°"°~°-o-o—~gg m (2003)
`
`-1
`
`2
`
`8
`6
`4
`PRESSURE (Pal
`
`FIG. 5. Operating characteristic of a cylindrical-post magnetron sputtering
`source, showing the variation of discharge voltage with pressure at constant
`discharge current and magnetic field strength (from Ref. 1).
`
`J. Vac. Sci. Technol., Vol. 15, No. 2, March/April 1978
`
`
`
`176
`
`
`
`John A. Thornton: Magnetron sputtering
`RADIAL
`POSITION
`X=L/2
`XlR=6
`
`X=L
`
`XlR=l2
`
`RELATIVE /'
`umronmnr
`
`
`
`
`
`FIG. 7. Theoretical coating uniformity profiles at various radii surrounding
`a cylindrical—post magnetron sputtering source with a uniform cathode
`current density. Cosine emission and collisionless transport are assumed.
`Profiles show the influence of end effects. Absolute deposition rate incor-
`porates an X/R dependence not shown. Such profiles have been verified
`experimentally.33
`
`Typical calculated profiles are shown in Fig. 7. A hollow
`cathode with uniform cosine emission has the interesting
`characteristic that the coating flux at all points within the
`cathode that are unaffected by end losses is equal to the
`cathode erosion flux, independent of the working gas pres-
`sure.“ This behavior has been experimentally verified.“ It
`makes hollow cathodes particularly effective for coating
`objects of complex shape. All surfaces having an unobstructed
`view of the cathode receive a uniform coating.
`An important attribute of magnetrons is the reduced sub-
`strate plasma bombardment. No primary electrons reach
`substrates located at radii beyond the virtual anode of 9. cy-
`lindrical post magnetron. Floating potentials are a few volts
`positive with respect to the anode. Ion densities are typically
`50-100 times less than in the discharge. When sputtering
`metals, ion bombardment fluxes are typically only about 1/10
`to 1/5 of the deposition flux, even with a negative substrate bias.
`Therefore, auxiliary discharges are generally required for
`sputter cleaning and bias sputtering.“ In the case of cylin-
`drical-hollow magnetrons the charged particle density on the
`axis is typically 1/3 that adjacent to the target surface. Floating
`potentials are -20 to -50 V relative to the anode. For metals
`the ion diffusion flux to the substrate is typically 1/5-1/3 the
`sputtered atom flux.
`The substrate heating is much reduced in cylindrical-post
`magnetrons by the absence of plasma bombardment. Plastics
`and other heat-sensitive substrates can be effectively coated.3‘5
`The heating flux has been found to be proportional to the
`sputtered flux and to vary from 15 to 25 eV/atom for metals
`such as Ti, Cr, and Cu, to about 50 eV/atom for heavy metals
`such as Mo, Ta, and W, where ion neutralization and reflec-
`tion85‘89 become more significant and where the sputtered
`atom KE is larger.9° Atom reflection is believed to be rela-
`tively important for cylindrical-post magnetrons because of
`the low operating pressure and the fact that ions undergoing
`
`J. Vac. Scl. Technol., Vol. 15, No. 2, March/April 1978
`
`176
`
`reflections of considerably less than 180° pass in the direction
`of the substrates‘ as indicated in Fig. 3.
`
`VI. SUMMARY
`
`An operation defined as the magnetron mode can be
`achieved in diode sputtering sources that are configured so
`that magnetic fields in concert with the cathode surface form
`electron traps of such geometry that the E X B electron-drift
`currents close on themselves. The ionization process is very
`efficient, and high currents and sputtering rates can be
`achieved at relatively low voltages, even at low pressures.
`Plasma collective behavior is believed to play an important
`role in the discharge operation.
`Uniform current densities can be achieved over post or
`hollow cathodes, thereby permitting a large inventory of
`coating material to be stored and efficiently used. Post cath-
`odes can be scaled to large sizes, permitting large areas to be
`uniformly coated. Hollow cathodes are effective for coating
`substrates of complex shape. Substrate plasma bombardment
`is much reduced, particularly with cylindrical-post magne-
`trons.
`
`ACKNOWLEDGMENT
`
`The author gratefully acknowledges many stimulating and
`fruitful discussions with Dr. Alan S. Penfold of Telic Corpo-
`ration concerning plasma physics in general and magnetrons
`in particular.
`
`1]. A. Thornton and A. S. Penfold, in Thin Film Processes, edited by J. L.
`Vossen and W. Kern (Academic, New York, 1978).
`2K. Wasa and S. Hayakawa, Proc. IEEE 55, 2179 (1967).
`3K. Wasa and S. Hayakawa, Microelectron. Reliab. 6, 213 (1967).
`‘K. Wasa and S. Hayakawa, IEEE Trans. PMP-3, 71 (1967).
`5K. Wasa and S. Hayakawa, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 40, 693 (1969).
`“R. F. Tischler, Proc. 14th Ann. Conf. Soc. Vacuum Coaters, Cleveland
`(1971), p. 71.
`7L. Lamont, NASA SP—lll (NASA, Washington, DC, 1972), p. 139.
`3S. Aoshima and T. Asamaki, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. Suppl. 2, Pt. 1, 253
`(1974).
`9F. A. Green and B. N. Chapman, Appl. Phys. Lett. 27, 189 (1975).
`"’F. A. Green and.B. N. Chapman, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 13, 165 (1976).
`“W. D. Gill and E. Kay, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 36, 277 (1965).
`12R. K. Waits, Vac. Sci. Technol. 15, 179 (1978).
`13D. B. Fraser, ]. Vac. Sci. Technol. 15, 178 (1978).
`“I. B. Fisk, H. D. Hagstrum, and P. L. Hartman, Bell. Syst. Tech. J. 25, 167
`(1946).
`in Microwave Magnetrons, edited by G. B. Collins
`15G. B. Collins,
`(McCraw-Hill, New York, 1948), p. 1.
`‘SR. Latham, A. H. King, and L. Rushforth, The Magnetron, (Chapman 6:
`Hall, London, 1952).
`"A. H. Beck and A. D. Brisbane, Vacuum 11, 137 (1952).
`13]. P. Hobson and P. A. Redhead, Can. J. Phys. 36, 271 (1958).
`“P. A. Redhead, Can. J. Phys. 37, 1260 (1959).
`”P. A. Redhead, in Adv. Vac. Sci. Technol., edited by E. Thomas (Pergamon,
`New York, 1960), p. 410.
`“W. Knauer and E. B. Stack, in Trans. 1015}: National Vacuum Symp.
`(Pergamon, New York, 1964), p. 180.
`22D. Andrew, Proc. 4th Inteml. Vacuum Congress, Manchester (Institute
`of Physics, 1968), Pt. 1, p. 325.
`“M. Wutz, Vacuum 19, 1 (1969).
`“F. M. Penning and I. H. A. Moubis, Proc. Ned. Akad. Wet. 43, 41
`(1940).
`25F. M. Penning, Physica 3, 873 (1936).
`
`
`
`177
`
`John A. Thornton: Magnetron sputtering
`
`25U. Heisig, K. Goedicke, and S. Schiller, Proc. 7th Intl. Symp. Electron and
`Ion Beam Science and Technology, Washington, DC, 1976 (Electro-
`chemical Society, Princeton, 1976), p. 129.
`27N. Hosokawa, T. Tsukada, and T. Misumi, ]. Vac. Sci