throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
`www.uspto.goV
`
`APPLICATION NO.
`
`F ING DATE
`
`FIRST NAMED INVENTOR
`
`ATTORNEY DOCKET NO.
`
`CONF {MATION NO.
`
`13/687,242
`
`11/28/2012
`
`Shirou SAWA
`
`2012_5420
`
`1577
`
`WENDEROTH,LIND&PONACK,L.L.P.
`103015th Street, N.W.,
`Suite
`East
`
`SOROUSH, LAYLA
`PAPER \1Ul\/IBER
`
`ART UNIT
`1627
`
`02/1 1/2014
`
`ELECTRONIC
`
`Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
`
`The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication.
`
`Notice of the Office communication was sent electronically on aboVe—indicated "Notification Date" to the
`following e—mail address(es):
`ddalecki @Wender0th.c0m
`e0a@ Wender0th.c0m
`
`PTOL_90A (RW04/07)
`
`Metrics EX1015, Page 1
`
`Metrics EX1015, Page 1
`
`

`
`Of
`
`Application No.
`
`13/687,242
`Examiner
`
`App|icant(s)
`
`SAWA ET AL.
`Art Unit
`
`LAYLA SOROUSH
`
`1627
`
`-- The MAILING DA TE of this communication appears on the cover sheet with the correspondence address--
`All claims being allowable, PROSECUTION ON THE MERITS IS (OR REMAINS) CLOSED in this application.
`If not included
`herewith (or previously mailed), a Notice of Allowance (PTOL—85) or other appropriate communication will be mailed in due course. THIS
`NOTICE OF ALLOWABILITY IS NOT A GRANT OF PATENT RIGHTS. This application is subject to withdrawal from issue at the initiative
`of the Office or upon petition by the applicant. See 37 CFR 1.313 and MPEP 1308.
`
`1. IX This communication is responsive to the amendments made on 10/22/13.
`
`2. I:I An election was made by the applicant in response to a restriction requirement set forth during the interview on
`requirement and election have been incorporated into this action.
`
`; the restriction
`
`3. IX The allowed cIaim(s) is/are 19-48.
`
`4. IX Acknowledgment is made of a claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119( )—(d) or (f).
`a) X All
`b) I:I Some*
`c) I:I None
`of the:
`
`1. I:I Certified copies of the priority documents have been received.
`
`2. E Certified copies of the priority documents have been received in Application No. 10/525 006.
`
`3. I:I Copies of the certified copies of the priority documents have been received in this national stage application from the
`
`International Bureau (PCT Rule 17.2( )).
`
`* Certified copies not received:
`
`Applicant has THREE MONTHS FROM THE “MAILING DATE” of this communication to file a reply complying with the requirements
`noted below. Failure to timely comply will result in ABANDONMENT of this application.
`THIS THREE-MONTH PERIOD IS NOT EXTENDABLE.
`
`5. |:I A SUBSTITUTE OATH OR DECLARATION must be submitted. Note the attached EXAMINER’S AMENDMENT or NOTICE OF
`INFORMAL PATENT APPLICATION (PTO—152) which gives reason(s) why the oath or declaration is deficient.
`
`6. I:I CORRECTED DRAWINGS (as “replacement sheets”) must be submitted.
`
`(a) I] including changes required by the Notice of Draftsperson’s Patent Drawing Review ( PTO—948) attached
`
`1) I:| hereto or 2) I] to Paper No./Mail Date
`
`(b) I] including changes required by the attached Examiner’s Amendment / Comment or in the Office action of
`Paper No./Mail Date
`Identifying indicia such as the application number (see 37 CFR 1.84(c)) should be written on the drawings in the front (not the back) of
`each sheet. Replacement sheet(s) should be labeled as such in the header according to 37 CFR 1.121(d).
`
`7. El DEPOSIT OF and/or INFORMATION about the deposit of BIOLOGICAL MATERIAL must be submitted. Note the
`attached Examiner’s comment regarding REQUIREMENT FOR THE DEPOSIT OF BIOLOGICAL MATERIAL.
`
`Attachment(s)
`1. El Notice of References Cited (PTO—892)
`
`2. El Notice of Draftperson‘s Patent Drawing Review (PTO—948)
`
`3. IX Information Disclosure Statements (PTO/SB/08),
`Paper No./Mail Date 1/15/141/17114
`4. I:I Examiner’s Comment Regarding Requirement for Deposit
`of Biological Material
`
`5. I:I Notice of Informal Patent Application
`
`6. I:I Interview Summary (PTO—413),
`Paper No./Mail Date
`.
`7. IX Examiner’s Amendment/Comment
`
`8. E Examiner’s Statement of Reasons for Allowance
`
`9. I:| Other
`
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`
`PTOL-37 (Rev. 03-11)
`
`Notice of Allowability
`
`Part of Paper No./Mail Date 20140206
`
`Metrics EX1015, Page 2
`
`Metrics EX1015, Page 2
`
`

`
`Application/Control Number: 13/687,242
`
`Page 2
`
`Art Unit: 1627
`
`The present application is being examined under the pre-AIA first to invent
`
`provisions.
`
`Acknowledgement of Receipt
`
`Applicant's response filed on 10/22/2013 to the Office Action mailed on
`
`08/01/2013 is acknowledged.
`
`Claim Status
`
`Claims 19-48 are pending.
`
`Claims 19-48 are allowed.
`
`Withdrawn Rejections
`
`The rejection of claims 44-48 under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA),
`
`second paragraph is withdrawn in view of the amendments made to the claims.
`
`The rejection of claims 19, 21-24, 26, 28-30, 32, 34-36, 38, 40-42, and 44-48
`
`under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Gamache, et al. (WO 01/15677 A2;
`
`03/2001) is withdrawn in view of the amendments made to the claims.
`
`The rejection of claims 20, 27, 33, and 39 under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being
`
`unpatentable over Gamache, et al. (WO 01/15677 A2; 03/2001), as applied to claims
`
`19, 21-24, 26, 28-30, 32, 34-36, 38, 40-42, and 44-48 and further in view of Desai, et al.
`
`(5558876) is withdrawn in view of the amendments made to the claims.
`
`The rejection of claims 25, 31, 37, and 43 under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being
`
`unpatentable over Gamache, et al. (WO 01/15677 A2; 03/2001), as applied to claims
`
`19, 21-24, 26, 28-30, 32, 34-36, 38, 40-42, and 44-48 and further in view of Ogawa, et
`
`Metrics EX1015, Page 3
`
`Metrics EX1015, Page 3
`
`

`
`Application/Control Number: 13/687,242
`
`Page 3
`
`Art Unit: 1627
`
`al. (US 4910225 A) and De Bruiju et al. (US 6162393 A) is withdrawn in view of the
`
`amendments made to the claims.
`
`The Double Patenting rejections over U.S. Patent No. 7829544, U.S. Patent No.
`
`8129431, copending Application No. 13353653 is withdrawn in view of the TD’s filed on
`
`11/2/13.
`
`The Double Patenting rejections over copending Application No. 11755662 is
`
`withdrawn in view of the abandonment of the case.
`
`EXAM|NER’S AMENDMENT
`
`An examiner’s amendment to the record appears below. Should the changes
`
`and/or additions be unacceptable to applicant, an amendment may be filed as provided
`
`by 37 CFR 1.312. To ensure consideration of such an amendment, it MUST be
`
`submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee.
`
`Authorization for this examiner’s amendment was given in a telephone interview
`
`with Warren M. Cheek on 1/8/14.
`
`The application has been amended as follows:
`
`In claim 26 line 5 after hydrate; insert “the first component is the sole
`
`pharmaceutical active ingredient contained in the preparation;”
`
`In claim 27 lines 2-3 after salt delete —, and wherein the first component is the
`
`sole pharmaceutical active ingredient contained in the preparation -- .
`
`Metrics EX1015, Page 4
`
`Metrics EX1015, Page 4
`
`

`
`Application/Control Number: 13/687,242
`
`Page 4
`
`Art Unit: 1627
`
`Reasons for Allowance
`
`The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance:
`
`The composition as claimed are found to be patentable over the prior art
`
`because the prior art does not teach or fairly suggest a stable aqueous liquid
`
`preparation comprising: (a) a first component; and (b) a second component; wherein the
`
`first component is 2-amino-3-(4- bromobenzoyl)phenylacetic acid or a
`
`pharmacologically acceptable salt thereof or a hydrate thereof, wherein the hydrate is at
`
`least one selected from a 1/2 hydrate, 1 hydrate, and 3/2 hydrate; the first component is
`
`the sole pharmaceutical active ingredient contained in the preparation; the second
`
`component is tyloxapol and is present in said liquid preparation in an amount sufficient
`
`to stabilize said first component; and wherein said stable liquid preparation is formulated
`
`for ophthalmic administration.
`
`The closest prior arts of record, namely Chen et al. (US 6383471), teach a
`
`pharmaceutical composition including a hydrophobic therapeutic agent having at least
`
`one ionizable functional group, and a carrier. The carrier includes an ionizing agent
`
`capable of ionizing the functional group, a surfactant, and optionally solubilizers,
`
`triglycerides, and neutralizing agents (abstract). The reference teaches a hydrophobic
`
`therapeutic agent to include bromfenac (2-amino-3-(4-bromobenzoyl)phenalyacetic
`
`acid)(see claim 4). The hydrophobic therapeutic agent is used in less than about 1% by
`
`weight, and typically less than about 0.1% or 0.01% by weight (see col 4 lines 58-60)
`
`(renders obvious the limitation of claims 8 and 24). The reference further teaches
`
`surfactants inclusive of polyethylene glycol fatty acid esters and additionally teaches
`
`Metrics EX1015, Page 5
`
`Metrics EX1015, Page 5
`
`

`
`Application/Control Number: 13/687,242
`
`Page 5
`
`Art Unit: 1627
`
`polyethylene glycol fatty acid monoesters such as peg-15 stearate, etc (see claims 21 —
`
`22 24 and 27). The surfactants are selected from the group consisting of alcohols;
`
`polyoxyethylene alkylethers; fatty acids; glycerol fatty acid esters; acetylated glycerol
`
`fatty acid esters; lower alcohol fatty acids esters; polyethylene glycol fatty acids esters;
`
`polyethylene glycol glycerol fatty acid esters; polypropylene glycol fatty acid esters;
`
`polyoxyethylene glycerides; lactic acid derivatives of mono/diglycerides; propylene
`
`glycol diglycerides; sorbitan fatty acid esters; polyoxyethylene sorbitan fatty acid esters;
`
`polyoxyethylene-polyoxypropylene block copolymers; transesterified vegetable oils;
`
`sterols; sterol derivatives; sugar esters; sugar ethers; sucroglycerides; polyoxyethylene
`
`vegetable oils; and polyoxyethylene hydrogenated vegetable oils. The pharmaceutical
`
`compositions of the present invention can be provided in the form of a solution
`
`preconcentrate; i.e., a composition as described above, and intended to be dispersed
`
`with water, either prior to administration, in the form of a drink, or dispersed in vivo (col
`
`34 lines 63-68) (reads on an aqueous liquid preparation). The reference also teaches
`
`preservatives (see claim 64). Although formulations specifically suited to oral
`
`administration are presently preferred, the compositions of the present invention can
`
`also be formulated for topical, transdermal, ocular, pulmonary, vaginal, rectal,
`
`transmucosal or parenteral administration (col 35 lines 9-20). Chen et al. further
`
`teaches components that can be incorporated into the composition include inorganic
`
`acids inclusive of boric acid (col 46, line 6), solubilizer such as polyvinylpyrrolidone
`
`(claim 49), exemplifications of carriers comprising Edetate Disodium (col 4 table 20
`
`formulations 65 and 66), and ionizing agents that deprotonate the acidic functional
`
`Metrics EX1015, Page 6
`
`Metrics EX1015, Page 6
`
`

`
`Application/Control Number: 13/687,242
`
`Page 6
`
`Art Unit: 1627
`
`groups of the therapeutic agent are pharmaceutically acceptable organic or inorganic
`
`bases, inclusive of sodium hydroxide (col 11 lines 12-13) (reads on the limitations of
`
`claim 22).
`
`However, Applicant presents excellent effects are clearly demonstrated by
`
`Experiments 1 to 3 of the present specification. Experiment 1 -- Stability of sodium 2-
`
`amino-3-(4-bromobenzoyl)phenyl acetate was evaluated. Namely, two eye drops of
`
`sodium 2—amino-3-(4-bromobenzoyl) phenylacetate comprising the components as
`
`shown in Table 1 were prepared, filled respectively into a polypropylene container and
`
`subjected to a stability test at 60°C for 4 weeks. As is apparent from Table 1, the
`
`stability test was carried out under the conditions of pH 7.0 at 60 °C for 4 weeks. Table 1
`
`clearly shows that sodium 2-amino-3- (4-bromobenzoyl)phenylacetate in polyoxyl 40
`
`stearate-containing preparation was more stable than that in polysorbate 80- containing
`
`preparation. As is apparent from Table 2, the remaining rate of sodium 2—amino-3-(4-
`
`bromobenzoyl)phenylacetate in the compositions A-07 and A—08 containing 0.02 w/v °/o
`
`and 0.05 w/v °/o of polyoxyl 40 stearate is not less than 90 °/o after storage at 60 °C for 4
`
`weeks. Table 2 clearly shows that the compositions containing 0.02 w/v °/o and 0.05 w/v
`
`°/o of polyoxyl 40 stearate have sufficient stability for eye drops. The arguments are
`
`persuasive.
`
`The composition as claimed are found to be patentable over the prior art
`
`because the prior art does not teach or fairly suggest a stable aqueous liquid
`
`preparation comprising: (a) a first component; and (b) a second component; wherein the
`
`first component is 2-amino-3-(4- bromobenzoyl)phenylacetic acid or a
`
`Metrics EX1015, Page 7
`
`Metrics EX1015, Page 7
`
`

`
`Application/Control Number: 13/687,242
`
`Page 7
`
`Art Unit: 1627
`
`pharmacologically acceptable salt thereof or a hydrate thereof, wherein the hydrate is at
`
`least one selected from a 1/2 hydrate, 1 hydrate, and 3/2 hydrate; the first component is
`
`the sole pharmaceutical active ingredient contained in the preparation; the second
`
`component is tyloxapol and is present in said liquid preparation in an amount sufficient
`
`to stabilize said first component; and wherein said stable liquid preparation is formulated
`
`for ophthalmic administration.
`
`Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later
`
`than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably
`
`accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on
`
`Statement of Reasons for Allowance.”
`
`Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the
`
`examiner should be directed to LAYLA SOROUSH whose telephone number is
`
`(571)272-5008. The examiner can normally be reached on 8:30a.m.-5:00p.m..
`
`If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s
`
`supervisor, Sreenivasan Padmanabhan can be reached on (571)272-0629. The fax
`
`phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is
`
`571-273-8300.
`
`Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the
`
`Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for
`
`published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR.
`
`Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only.
`
`For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should
`
`Metrics EX1015, Page 8
`
`Metrics EX1015, Page 8
`
`

`
`Application/Control Number: 13/687,242
`
`Page 8
`
`Art Unit: 1627
`
`you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic
`
`Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a
`
`USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information
`
`system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000.
`
`/Layla Soroush/
`
`Examiner, Art Unit 1627
`
`Metrics EX1015, Page 9
`
`Metrics EX1015, Page 9

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket