throbber
Topical Nonsteroidal
`
`Antiinflammatory Drugs for
`
`Ophthalmic Use
`
`T Allan J. Flach, M.D.
`
`Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) formulated as oph-
`thalmic eye drops are commercially available throughout the world [1, 2].
`They have been used widely in the management of postoperative ocular
`inflammation and for the prevention and treatment of cystoid macular
`edema (CME) after cataract surgery. In addition, they have proved useful
`for the prevention of intraoperative miosis during cataract surgery, for
`the relief of symptoms of seasonal allergic conjunctivitis, and for the reduc-
`tion of ocular discomfort following refractive surgery. This chapter sum-
`marizes the current status of topically applied NSAIDS and their potential
`therapeutic benefit for ophthalmic disorders.
`
`I Chemical Classification
`
`NSAIDs consist of a chemically heterogeneous group of compounds
`that can be grouped into six major classes: salicylates, fenamates, indoles,
`phenylalkanoic acids, phenylacetic acids, and pyrazolones. Classification of
`these drugs as NSAIDs underscores that their chemical structures lack a
`steroid nucleus that is biosynthetically derived from cholesterol. In this
`chapter, the indoles, the phenylacetic acids, and the phenylalkanoic acids
`will be emphasized because they are commercially available as topical oph-
`thalmic preparations. The salicylates, fenamates, and pyrazolone deriva-
`tives are either too toxic or too unstable in solution for commercial formu-
`lation.
`
`Indomethacin is an indole derivative that was formulated initially as a
`sesame seed oil solution. However, this preparation proved to be locally
`irritating and unsuitable for widespread clinical use. Topical indomethacin
`is commercially available outside of the United States as a 1% aqueous
`suspension (Indocid Ophthalmic Suspension, Merck Sharp 8: Dohme). A
`0.1% indomethacin ophthalmic solution has recently been formulated, but
`77
`
`Metrics EX1017
`
`

`
`78 • Flach
`
`it is not yet commercially available [3]. The phenylalkanoic acids are water(cid:173)
`soluble and are formulated as ophthalmic solutions. Flurbiprofen 0.03%
`(Ocufen Ophthalmic Solution, Allergan) and suprofen 1% (Profenal Oph(cid:173)
`thalmic Solution, Alcon) are approved by the Food and Drug Administra(cid:173)
`tion (FDA) for intraoperative use to inhibit miosis during cataract surgery.
`Ketorolac tromethamine 0.5% (Acular Ophthalmic Solution, Allergan) is
`approved in the United States for the treatment of seasonal allergic con(cid:173)
`junctivitis. Diclofenac 1% (Voltaren, Ciba Vision Ophthalmics) is a phenyl(cid:173)
`acetic acid derivative that is approved by the FDA for use to minimize
`postoperative inflammation after cataract surgery.
`
`• Pharmacokinetics
`
`Pharmacokinetics is defined most easily as the action of one's body on
`an administered drug. NSAIDs are well absorbed after oral administration,
`with peak serum levels achieved in 1 to 3 hours. These agents are metabo(cid:173)
`lized by the liver and excreted in the urine and the bile. All these drugs
`are 90 to 99% protein-bound and, therefore, are easily recovered from
`ocular tissues. Ocular instillation of topical NSAIDs provides ocular tissue
`and aqueous humor levels adequate to inhibit prostaglandin (PG) synthesis.
`In fact, these NSAIDs appear to penetrate the eye better after topical
`iiPPlication than after oral administration. This observation, coupled with
`a greater potential for undesirable systemic side effects with oral adminis(cid:173)
`tration, makes it unreasonable for ophthalmologists to prescribe systemic
`NSAIDs to achieve most ocular therapeutic effects. However, topically ap(cid:173)
`plied NSAIDs can gain access to the systemic circulation via mucosal ab(cid:173)
`sorption. Therefore, even local administration of NSAIDs can be accompa(cid:173)
`nied by systemic toxicity if nasolacrimal occlusion and eyelid closure are
`not employed following eye drop instillation.
`
`• Pharmacodynamics
`
`Pharmacodynamics is the action of a drug on one's body. Aspirin and
`other NSAIDs decrease the synthesis of PGs within human tissues by inhib(cid:173)
`iting cyclooxygenase. This enzyme facilitates the formation of endoperox(cid:173)
`ides from arachidonic acid within the cascade of reactions that ultimately
`generate PGs within the human body. The resultant endogenous PGs can
`produce many ocular pharmacological effects including miosis, increased
`permeability of the blood-ocular barriers, conjunctival hyperemia, and
`changes in intraocular pressure. In addition, PGs are known to possess
`chemokinetic activity, can serve as mediators of humoral and cellular
`phases of inflammatory responses and are associated with the pain re(cid:173)
`sponse and allergic reactions.
`
`

`
`Ophthalmic NSAIDS I 79
`
`Although NSAIDs do not inhibit lipoxygenase and, therefore, have
`no ability to inhibit directly the generation of ‘endogenous leukotrienes,
`diclofenac appears capable of reducing the level of leukotriene formation
`in vitro by indirect means [4]. There is evidence that NSAIDs have a free
`radical scavenger activity that may be beneficial during inflammation.
`Therefore, inhibition of cyclooxygenase activity clearly is not the only po-
`tential mechanism of activity for this group of drugs [1].
`
`I NSAIDs and Cataract Surgery
`
`Maintenance of intraoperative Mydriasis
`
`Clinical studies reporting NSAID efficacy describe a small pharmaco-
`logical effect on the intraoperative change in pupil size. Flurbiprofen
`0.03% and suprofen 1% were first approved by the FDA for use as intraop-
`erative inhibitors of miosis. Topical NSAIDs appear to share this therapeu-
`tic benefit [5]. This pharmacological activity is of potential clinical benefit
`because decreasing pupil size is a well-recognized risk factor for vitreous
`loss and zonular breaks during extracapsular cataract extractions with im-
`plantation of an intraocular lens [1]. The FDA’s summary bases of approval
`for flurbiprofen and suprofen suggest that the pharmacological effect of
`these NSAIDs on pupil size varies from one surgical practice to another,
`as previously discussed [2]. This fact implies that endogenous factors other
`than PG-induced miosis and surgical technique are playing important, and
`as yet undefined, roles in the etiology of surgically induced miosis.
`In summary, there is evidence that topically applied NSAIDs have a
`statistically significant inhibitory effect on intraoperative miosis. However,
`it is not clear that this effect is clinically significant for all surgeries. Ade-
`quate intraoperative mydriasis frequently is achieved and maintained by
`using good surgical technique, a combination of preoperative parasympa-
`tholytic and sympathomimetic eye drops, and the use of a sympathomi-
`metic in the intraocular irrigation solution during irrigation and aspiration
`of cortical remnants. Therefore, it probably is unreasonable to suggest the
`routine use of preoperative NSAIDs for inhibiting intraoperative miosis
`during cataract surgery for all ophthalmic practices.
`
`Reduction of Postoperative Inflammation
`
`topical
`Many well—designed clinical studies provide evidence that
`NSAIDs are potentially useful in the management of inflammation after
`cataract surgery [1, 2]. During the 1970s, double-masked, randomized clin-
`ical studies evaluated the effect of topically applied indomethacin on the
`inflammatory response in the early postoperative period following ocular
`surgeries. Initially, the effects appeared variable. However, the results
`were more consistent once studies were designed to evaluate the effective-
`
`

`
`80 I Flach
`
`ness of indomethacin given prior to and immediately after the surgical
`procedures. Unfortunately, many studies include concurrent administra-
`tion of corticosteroids. Therefore, it is difficult to conclude whether the
`observed effects on postoperative inflammation are related to NSAID
`treatment or a synergistic effect of indomethacin and corticosteroids. It
`also is possible that the concurrent steroid treatment masks indomethacin’s
`tendency to cause ocular irritation.
`Several double-masked, randomized placebo- and active-controlled
`studies including patients undergoing cataract surgery have reported anti-
`inflammatory effects from topically applied 1% indomethacin, 0.03%
`flurbiprofen, 0.5% ketorolac, and 0.1% diclofenac ophthalmic prepara-
`tions [1, 2]. These investigations report a measurable antiinflammatory
`effect from topical NSAID treatments as compared to placebo after intra-
`capsular and extracapsular cataract extractions, with and without implanta-
`tion of an intraocular lens. The correlation between slit-lamp observations
`and anterior ocular fluorophotometry appears reasonably consistent. Stud-
`ies using laser cell—and-flare meter methodology further support this po-
`tential therapeutic benefit [6, 7]. Studies comparing NSAIDs to corticoste-
`roids have demonstrated that the results of these treatments show no
`
`significant difference as judged by slit-lamp examinations for cells, flare,
`and chemosis, but NSAID treatment appears more effective than topical
`steroids in reestablishing the blood-aqueous barrier as quantitatively mea-
`sured with anterior ocular fluorophotometry [1].
`In summary, many clinical studies provide evidence that topically ap-
`plied NSAID ophthalmic preparations are potentially useful in managing
`inflammation after cataract surgery. These preparations are available and
`in use throughout the world for this indication. However, at the time this
`chapter was written, diclofenac 0.1% ophthalmic solution (Voltaren) was
`the only NSAID specifically approved by the FDA for use within the
`United States as a postoperative antiinflammatory agent following cataract
`surgery.
`
`Prevention and Treatment of CME
`
`Thoughtful reviews have summarized potential approaches to the pre-
`vention and treatment of CME after cataract surgery [8, 9]. These reviews
`stress the importance of placebo-controlled, double-masked, randomized
`trials in making decisions about the efficacy of potential treatments for
`CME after cataract surgery because this condition’s natural history includes
`spontaneous resolution. Most reports emphasize the need to evaluate pro-
`phylactic therapy separately from the treatment of chronic CME and the
`importance of differentiating between angiographic CME and clinically
`significant CME (that associated with a reduction in vision).
`Topical NSAIDs are effective in the prophylaxis of angiographic CME.
`However, a statistically significant, sustained effect on visual acuity has not
`
`

`
`Ophthalmic NSA|Ds I 81
`
`been demonstrated [1]. Unfortunately, most of the studies of prophylactic
`NSAID therapy include the concurrent use of corticosteroids. Insofar as
`corticosteroids inhibit the generation of PGs by a different mechanism
`than do NSAIDS it appears possible that a synergistic effect occurs when
`these drugs are used together. A randomized, double-masked clinical trial,
`using Snellen and contrast-sensitivity measurements, compares 0.03%
`flurbiprofen, 1% indomethacin, and placebo regarding their ability to pre-
`vent CME during a 6-month period after cataract surgery [10]. The inci-
`dence of clinical CME as determined by contrast-sensitivity scores is sig-
`nificantly lower for the drug- treated groups. However, these effects were
`not sustained, and this study included concurrent corticosteroids.
`Only one randomized, double-masked study of prophylaxis of CME
`with NSAIDs without concurrent corticosteroid therapy is found in the
`literature [11]. It reports less postoperative angiographic CME in the
`group treated with ketorolac 0.5% compared to the placebo group [11].
`Though there are fewer studies of the treatment of chronic CME, two
`double-masked, placebo-controlled, randomized studies demonstrate that
`ketorolac 0.5% ophthalmic solution, one drop given four times daily for
`up to 3 months, improves vision in some patients with chronic CME (of 6
`or more months’ duration) after cataract surgery [12, 13]. Hence, there is
`evidence that topical NSAID treatment offers benefit to some patients for
`the prevention and treatment of CME following cataract surgery.
`
`I Allergic Conjunctivitis
`
`Topical corticosteroids commonly are used in an attempt to reduce
`the signs and symptoms of allergic conjunctivitis. Unfortunately, their use
`can be accompanied by local toxicity, including secondary open-angle glau-
`coma, cataracts, superinfections with viruses or fungi, and impaired wound
`healing. There is evidence that ketorolac 0.5% ophthalmic solution, admin-
`istered as one drop four times daily, is effective in reducing the ocular
`pruritus that often accompanies seasonal allergic conjunctivitis [14]. There-
`fore, the FDA has approved this preparation (Acular) for use in the United
`States. In addition, some studies suggest that diclofenac is effective in the
`treatment of seasonal allergic conjunctivitis [15], and there are reports of
`potentially useful effects following suprofen treatment of giant papillary
`conjunctivitis and vernal conjunctivitis [16, 17].
`
`I Reduction of Discomfort After
`
`Refractive Surgery
`
`The topical NSAIDS are not approved for use following radial kera-
`totomy or photorefractive keratectomy within the United States. However,
`
`

`
`82 I Flach
`
`there are reports that pain following refractive surgeries is reduced with
`the use of topical ketorolac and diclofenac ophthalmic solutions [l8—20].
`
`I Local and Systemic Toxicity of Topical NSAIDS
`
`The most common adverse reactions after topical instillation of the
`NSAIDs are transient burning, stinging, and hyperemia of the conjunctiva.
`Manufacturers have used various formulation methods to minimize this
`
`potential discomfort. Indomethacin solution in sesame seed oil was aban-
`doned in favor of an aqueous suspension. Suprofen is prepared with 1%
`caffeine because it is less irritating in this form. Ketorolac is formulated
`as the tromethamine salt because the tromethamine moiety enhances the
`aqueous solubility and results in a solution that is less irritating to the eye.
`Despite these improvements, some patients will experience local discom-
`fort after instilling these preparations. In addition, allergies and hypersen-
`sitivity reactions have been reported with all the NSAIDs.
`Systemic administration of NSAIDs can be accompanied by serious
`side effects such as gastrointestinal, central nervous system, hematologic,
`renal, liver, dermatological, and metabolic changes. It appears, though,
`that these effects are largely avoided by topical administration. The pos-
`sibility of systemic absorption exists after topical application, but it is not
`clear whether this represents a clinically significant problem [1]. The litera-
`ture clearly describes less toxicity associated with the topical use of NSAIDs
`than with topically applied corticosteroids, but NSAIDS have been used
`"far less extensively. Furthermore, there are some theoretical objections
`to the inhibition of only the cyclooxygenase pathway for PG generation.
`Although an aggravation of ocular inflammation has not been observed in
`any of the clinical studies of NSAID use thus far reported, it is premature
`to assume that this treatment is completely safe. Therefore, NSAID use
`must be carefully monitored for adverse events, as is good practice with
`any new drug treatment.
`
`
`The efforts recorded in this chapter were supported by a Department of Veterans
`Affairs Merit Review grant, a That Man May See, Inc., grant, and a National Institutes
`of Health—University of California San Francisco, Department of Ophthalmology de-
`partmental core grant.
`
`I References
`
`1. Flach A]. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. In: Tasman W, ed. Duane’s foun-
`dations of clinical ophthalmology. Philadelphia: Lippincott, l994:l—32
`2. Flach A]. Cyclo-oxygenase inhibitors in ophthalmology. Surv Ophthalmol l992;36:
`259-284
`
`

`
`Ophthalmic NSAlDs
`
`I 83
`
`. Trinquand C, Richard C, Arnaud B. Three-arm, double-masked study of two oph-
`thalmic formulations of 0.1% indomethacin and 0.1% diclofenac in controlling in-
`flammation after cataract surgery. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1996;37:S590
`. Ku ED, Lee W, Kothari HV, et al. Effect of diclofenac sodium on the arachidonic
`acid cascade. Am] Med 1986;80:l8—23
`. Roberts CW. A comparison of diclofenac sodium to flurbiprofen for maintaining
`intraoperative mydriasis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1993;35:1967
`. Roberts CW, Brennan KM. A comparison of topical diclofenac with prednisolone
`for postcataract inflammation. Arch Ophthalmol 1995;113:725—727
`. Diestelhorst M, Thull D, Krieglstein GK. The effect of argon laser trabeculoplasty
`on the blood-aqueous barrier and intraocular pressure in human glaucomatous
`eyes treated with diclofenac 0.1%. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1995;233:
`559-562
`
`8
`
`. jampol LM. Pharmacologic therapy of aphakic cystoid macular edema: a review.
`Ophthalmology 1982;89:891—897
`. ]ampol LM. Pharmacologic therapy of aphakic and pseudophakic cystoid macular
`edema: 1985 update. Ophthalmology 1985;92:807—810
`Solomon LD, Flurbiprofen-CME Study Group 1. Efficacy of topical fiurbiprofen
`and indomethacin in preventing pseudophakic cystoid macular edema. ] Cataract
`Refract Surg l995;21:73—81
`Flach A], Stegman RC, Graham ], et al. Prophylaxis of aphakic cystoid macular
`edema without corticosteroids. Ophthalmology 1990;97: 1253-1258
`Flach A], ]ampol LM, Yannuzzi LA, et al. Improvement in visual acuity in chronic
`aphakic and pseudophakic cystoid macular edema after treatment with topical 0.5%
`ketorolac ophthalmic solution. Am ] Ophthalmol 1991;112:51-1-519
`Flach A], Dolan B], Irvine AR. Effectiveness of ketorolac tromethamine 0.5% oph-
`thalmic solution for chronic cystoid macular edema. Am ] Ophthalmol l987;103:
`479-486
`‘/
`Tinkelman DG, Rupp G, Kaufman H, et al. Double-masked, paired-comparison
`clinical study of ketorolac tromethamine 0.5% ophthalmic solution compared with
`placebo eyedrops in the treatment of seasonal allergic conjunctivitis. Surv Ophthal-
`mol l993;38:141—148
`Laibovitz RA, Koester ], Schaich L, et al. Safety and efficacy of diclofenac sodium
`0.1% ophthalmic solution in acute seasonal allergic conjunctivitis. ] Ocul Pharmacol
`1995;11:361—368
`Wood T, Steward R, Bowman R. Suprofen treatment of contact lens associated
`GPC. Ophthalmology 1988;96:822—829
`Buckley DC, Caldwell DR, Reaves TA. Treatment of vernal conjunctivitis with su-
`profen. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1986;27:29
`Arshinoff EA. Use of topical nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs in excimer laser
`photorefractive keratectomy. ] Cataract Refract Surg l994;20:2l6—222
`Eiferman RA, Hoffman RS, Sher NA. Topical diclofenac reduced pain following
`photorefractive keratectomy. Arch Ophthalmol 1993;111:1022
`Szerenyi K, Sorken K, Garbus ]], et al. Decrease in normal human corneal sensitiv-
`ity with topical diclofenac sodium. Am ] Ophthalmol 1994;118:312-315
`
`10.
`
`11.
`
`12.
`
`13.
`
`14.
`
`15.
`
`16.
`
`17.
`
`18.
`
`19.
`
`20.

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket