`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`Paper 8
`Entered: August 15, 2014
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_______________
`
`
`METRICS, INC., MAYNE PHARMA, and JOHNSON MATTHEY, INC.
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`SENJU PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD., BAUSCH & LOMB, INC., and
`BAUSCH & LOMB PHARMA HOLDINGS CORP.
`Patent Owners.
`_______________
`
`Case IPR2014-01041 (Patent 8,129,431 B2)
`Case IPR2014-01043 (Patent 8,669,290 B2)1
`_______________
`
`Before FRANCISCO C. PRATS, ERICA A. FRANKLIN, and
`GRACE KARAFFA OBERMANN, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`OBERMANN, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of the Proceedings
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 This order addresses issues common to both cases, therefore, we issue a
`single order to be entered in each case. The parties are not authorized to use this
`style heading.
`
`
`
`
`IPR 2014-01041 (Patent 8,129,431 B2)
`IPR 2014-01043 (Patent 8,669,290 B2)
`
`On June 26, 2014, Petitioners filed petitions (Papers 1, 1)2 in these
`
`proceedings. On July 22, 2104, the petitions were accorded a filing date of
`June 26, 2014, and certain defects in the petitions were identified—including
`failure to sequentially number each page of the exhibits; and failure to provide a
`complete exhibit list. Papers 5 at p. 2, 5 at p. 2. Petitioners were provided five
`business days within which to correct those defects. Id. Petitioners filed corrected
`petitions (Papers 6, 6) on July 29, 2014, and notices of accepting those corrected
`petitions (Papers 7, 7) issued on July 31, 2014.
`
`On August 11, 2014, Patent Owner requested a telephone conference with
`the Board to discuss several outstanding procedural errors in the corrected
`petitions. A call was held on August 14, 2014, between Petitioners’ counsel,
`Patent Owners’ counsel, and Administrative Patent Judges Prats, Franklin, and
`Obermann. Based on the information provided during the call, and our review of
`the record, we are persuaded that the corrected petitions are defective and that
`those papers should not have been accepted without further correction. See
`Papers 7, 7 (accepting corrected petitions). During the course of the telephone
`conference, the parties arrived at an agreement regarding resolution of the issues
`presented, which we adopt and summarize, as follows:
`Petitioners are directed to file, no later than Wednesday, August 20, 2014,
`second corrected petitions that comply with the instructions set forth in this order.
`The filing date accorded the petitions—June 26, 2014—is not affected by this
`order. See Papers 5, 5. Patent Owners’ time for filing a preliminary response is
`
`
`
`
`2 Paper numbers refer to IPR 2014-01041 and IPR 2014-01043 in sequence.
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR 2014-01041 (Patent 8,129,431 B2)
`IPR 2014-01043 (Patent 8,669,290 B2)
`
`reset to no later than three months after the date on which Petitioners file second
`corrected petitions.3
`In each proceeding, Petitioner is directed to expunge all exhibits, and refile a
`new set of exhibits, wherein (1) each exhibit has an exhibit label beginning with
`Ex. 1001, and continuing sequentially in the range 1001-1999 as needed; and (2)
`each page of each exhibit is uniquely numbered in sequence. For guidance,
`Petitioner is directed to 37 C.F.R. § 42.63.
`
`In each proceeding, Petitioner is directed to file a second corrected petition
`that is identical in substance to the corrected petition filed on July 29, 2014, except
`that: (1) The Appendix and all references to it shall be deleted from the second
`corrected petition; and (2) the second corrected petition shall refer to the newly-
`filed exhibits by number without any explanation as to how the exhibit replaces an
`expunged exhibit, or any further reference to expunged exhibits.
`All exhibits referred to in a second corrected petition and filed in a
`proceeding pursuant to this order—as well as all exhibits referred to in any
`declaration or other evidence filed in that proceeding—shall be included in the
`Exhibit List of the second filed petition filed in that proceeding.
`The second corrected petitions shall comply with the formatting
`requirements of 37 U.S.C. § 42.6 and the page limits for petitions set forth in
`37 U.S.C. §42.24.
`Failure to comply with this order, within the time prescribed, shall result in
`an order to show cause why the Board should not deny inter partes review in these
`proceedings.
`
`3 The date of the Notice of the Filing Date Accorded to Petition shall be
`changed to reset in PRPS the due date for the filing of the Preliminary Response.
`That change is administrative only and shall not alter the filing date accorded the
`petitions of June 26, 2014.
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`IPR 2014-01041 (Patent 8,129,431 B2)
`IPR 2014-01043 (Patent 8,669,290 B2)
`
`
`
`For the foregoing reasons, it is
`
`ORDERED that Petitioners are directed to file, no later than Wednesday,
`August 20, 2014, second corrected petitions that comply with the instructions set
`forth in this order;
`FURTHER ORDERED that the filing date accorded the petitions—June 26,
`2014—is not affected by this order; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that Patent Owners’ time for filing a preliminary
`response is reset to no later than three months after the date on which Petitioners
`file second corrected petitions.
`
`
`
`PETITIONERS:
`
`Patrick D. McPherson
`Vincent L. Capuano
`DUANE MORRIS LLP
`PDMcPherson@duanemorris.com
`VCapuano@duanemorris.com
`
`PATENT OWNERS:
`
`M. Andrew Holtman
`Jonathan R.K. Stroud
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
`Andy.Holtman@finnegan.com
`Jonathan.Stroud@finnegan.com
`
`
`
`4
`
`