throbber

`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`____________
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`____________
`
`
`APPLE INC.,
`Petitioner
`
`
`v.
`
`
`MOBILE TELECOMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,
`Patent Owner
`
`
`____________
`
`Case IPR2014-01034
`Patent No. 5,894,506
`____________
`
`JOINT MOTION TO TERMINATE PROCEEDING
`PURSUANT TO 35 U.S.C. § 317
`
`

`

`Case IPR2014-001034
`Patent No. 5,894,506
`
`
`
`
`
`Joint Motion to Terminate Proceeding
`
`
`Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317(a), Apple Inc. (“Apple” or “Petitioner”) and
`
`Mobile Telecommunications Technologies, LLC (“Patent Owner”) (jointly, the
`
`“Parties”) jointly request termination of IPR2014-01034, which is directed to U.S.
`
`Patent No. 5,894,506 (the “’506 Patent”).
`
`On June 27, 2014, Petitioner filed a Petition for Inter Partes Review
`
`(“Petition”) before the United States Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Patent
`
`Owner’s preliminary response was filed on October 24, 2014. On January 22,
`
`2015, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) issued a
`
`Decision to Institute inter partes review of claim 19 of the ’506 Patent. Paper 9.
`
`Patent Owner has not filed a response, and one is not due (by stipulation of
`
`Petitioner and Patent Owner, filed herewith) until August 21, 2015. No final
`
`written decision on the merits of this inter partes review proceeding has been
`
`entered. The Parties have settled their dispute, and have reached agreement to
`
`terminate this inter partes review.
`
`Generally, the Board expects that a proceeding will terminate after the filing
`
`of a settlement agreement. See, e.g., Office Patent Trial Practice Guide, 77
`
`Fed.Reg. 48,756, 48,768 (Aug. 14, 2012). The Board authorized the filing of the
`
`instant Motion in a conference call dated April 21, 2015. IPR2013-00428, Paper
`
`No. 56 provides guidance as to the content of a motion to terminate. There, the
`
`Board indicates that a joint motion, such as this one, should (1) include a brief
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case IPR2014-001034
`Patent No. 5,894,506
`
`explanation as to why termination is appropriate; (2) identify all parties in any
`
`Joint Motion to Terminate Proceeding
`
`
`
`
`
`related litigation involving the patents at issue, and the status of each; and (3)
`
`identify any related proceedings currently before the Office. IPR2013-00428,
`
`Paper No. 56 at 2. This Motion satisfies each of the above requirements.
`
`Indeed, the Parties have entered into a Settlement Agreement, and a true
`
`copy of the same is attached hereto as Exhibit 2006, as required by 35 U.S.C. §
`
`317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(b).1 The Parties desire that the Settlement
`
`Agreement (Exhibit 2006) be maintained as business confidential information
`
`under 37 C.F.R. §42.74(c) and a separate joint request to that effect is being filed
`
`on even date herewith.
`
`1. Reasons Why Termination is Appropriate.
`
`Under 35 U.S.C. § 317(a), “[a]n inter partes review instituted under this
`
`chapter shall be terminated with respect to any petitioner upon the joint request of
`
`the petitioner and the patent owner, unless the Office has decided the merits of the
`
`proceeding before the request for termination is filed.” With respect to Apple,
`
`termination is appropriate because a final written decision has not been reached in
`
`this Review. Indeed, Patent Owner has not yet filed its Response, nor has Apple
`
`
`1 The Settlement Agreement is being filed electronically via the Patent Review
`
`Processing System (PRPS) as “Parties and Board Only.”
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case IPR2014-001034
`Patent No. 5,894,506
`
`filed responsive papers. Termination of this proceeding with respect to Apple is
`
`Joint Motion to Terminate Proceeding
`
`
`
`
`
`further appropriate because, if this Motion is granted, Apple will not be
`
`participating as a party in this proceeding going forward, despite the filing of this
`
`Joint Motion to Terminate prior to a Board decision on the merits of the
`
`proceeding. To this point, the Parties have settled their dispute and executed the
`
`earlier-referenced Settlement Agreement to terminate this proceeding as to Apple,
`
`as well as the Parties’ related district court litigation. The Parties expect that this
`
`district court litigation will be dismissed per the Parties’ Settlement Agreement.
`
`For all these reasons, the Parties respectfully request termination of this
`
`proceeding with respect to Apple.
`
`Moreover, Petitioner, Apple, does not oppose Patent Owner in seeking
`
`termination of this inter partes review proceeding altogether.
`
`Because § 317(a) indicates that the USPTO is not required to terminate an
`
`inter partes review when no petitioner remains in the proceeding, Patent Owner
`
`provides comments as to why termination with respect to Patent Owner is proper
`
`in Patent Owner’s Explanation as to Why Termination Is Appropriate, attached
`
`hereto as Exhibit 2007.
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case IPR2014-001034
`Patent No. 5,894,506
`
`
`
`
`
`Joint Motion to Terminate Proceeding
`
`
`2. All parties in any pending related litigation involving the patents at
`issue, and current status of each such related litigation.
`
`
`
`Petitioner is not involved in any other pending related litigations involving
`
`the ’506 Patent. Other parties involved in litigations related to the ’506 Patent are
`
`identified in the table that follows.
`
`Case Name
`Mobile
`Telecommunications
`Technologies, LLP v.
`BlackBerry
`Corporpation
`Mobile
`Telecommunications
`Technologies, LLP v
`LG Electronics
`MobileComm USA,
`Inc.
`Mobile
`Telecommunications
`Technologies, LLP v
`AT&T, Inc. and
`AT&T Mobility, Inc.
`
`Case No.
`3:12cv946
`
`Court
`NDTX
`Dallas
`
`Defendants
`BlackBerry
`Corp.
`
`Status
`Ongoing; trial
`scheduled for
`November 9,
`2015.
`
`2:13cv947-
`JRG-RSP
`
`EDTX
`Marshall
`
`LG
`Electronics
`MobileComm
`USA, Inc.
`
`Ongoing; trial
`set for
`September 14,
`2015.
`
`2:14cv897-
`JRG-RSP
`
`EDTX
`Marshall
`
`AT&T, Inc.
`and AT&T
`Mobility, Inc.
`
`
`
`Ongoing;
`scheduling
`conference
`held March
`20, 2015.
`
`3. Related proceedings currently before the Office and Status.
`
`Aside from this inter partes review proceeding, the ’506 Patent is also the
`
`subject of the following proceeding(s) currently before the Office:
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case IPR2014-001034
`Patent No. 5,894,506
`
`
`
`
`
`Joint Motion to Terminate Proceeding
`
`
`Related Proceeding Requestor/Petitioner
`IPR2014-01033
`Apple Inc.
`
`
`Status
`Not instituted by the Board
`Per Paper 9 of IPR2014-01033
`
`Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, Petitioner will not further participate
`
`in these proceedings even if the Petition is not terminated pursuant to this joint
`
`motion. Patent Owner reserves its right to participate (including the right to seek
`
`exclusion of some or all the testimony of Petitioner’s declarant), if necessary.
`
`Patent Owner notes, however, that in the absence of Petitioner, it is unclear how
`
`these proceedings could properly proceed.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: April 22, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: April 22, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`/John R. Kasha/
`John R. Kasha (Reg. No. 53,100)
`Lead Counsel for Patent Owner
`KASHA LAW LLC
`14532 Dufief Mill Rd.
`North Potomac, MD 20878
`Tel. 703-867-1886
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/W. Karl Renner/
`W. Karl Renner (Reg. 41,265)
`Lead Counsel for Apple
`Fish & Richardson P.C.
`3200 RBC Plaza
`60 South Sixth Street
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`Tel. 202-783-5070
`
`5
`
`

`

`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`In accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 1.550(f), a copy of Joint Motion to
`
`Terminate Proceeding Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317 and the supporting exhibits
`
`filed by the Mobile Telecommunications Technologies, LLC on April 22, 2015
`
`was duly served via electronic mail upon IPR39521-0003IP2@fr.com - counsel of
`
`record for Apple Inc. (“Petitioner”).
`
`The parties have agreed to electronic service in this matter.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`/John R. Kasha/
`John R. Kasha (Reg. No. 53,100)
`Lead Counsel for Patent Owner
`KASHA LAW LLC
`14532 Dufief Mill Rd.
`North Potomac, MD 20878
`Tel. 703-867-1886
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: April 22, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket