throbber
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING COMPANY, LTD.
`Petitioner
`
`V.
`
`DSS TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, INC.
`
`Patent Owner
`
`Patent 5,652,084
`
`IPR2014-01030
`
`AFFIDAVIT OF MR. -SCOTT CUNNING IN SUPPORT OF
`
`MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION
`
`I, Scotl: Cunning, being duly sworn and upon oath, hereby attest to the
`
`following:
`
`1.
`
`I am a member in good standing of the Virginia. State Bar (#68071) and
`
`DC. Bar (#492939), as well as the following Federal Courts:
`
`21) U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia;
`
`13) U.S. District Court for the Western District of Virginia;
`
`:2) U.S. Court ofAppeals for the 4"" Circuit.
`
`2.
`
`I have not been suspended or disbarred from practice before any court or
`
`administrative body.
`
`TSMC-1013 / lPR2014-01030
`TSMC v. DSS
`
`Page 1 of 3
`
`TSMC-1013 / IPR2014-01030
`TSMC v. DSS
`Page 1 of 3
`
`

`
`Exhibit TSMC-1013 — Affidavit of Scott Cunning
`ll’R20l4-00094
`
`.
`
`I have never had an application for admission to practice before any court
`
`or administrative body denied.
`
`. No sanction or contempt citation has been imposed against me by any
`
`court or administrative body.
`
`_UI
`
`I have read and will comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide
`
`and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials set forth in part 42 o I‘ the
`
`Code of Federal Regulations.
`
`I will be subject to the USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in
`
`37 C..F.R. §§ l l.l0l er seq. and disciplinaryjurisdiction under 37 C.F.R.
`
`§ H.I9(a).
`
`I have not. applied to appear Pro [Inc Vice before the Office in any other
`
`proceeding in the last three years.
`
`.
`
`I am an experienced litigation attorney, with experience in many
`
`litigations involving patent infringement in District Courts across the
`
`country, including experience with fact and expert document and
`
`deposition discovery, claim construction, .Markman hearings, motion
`
`practice, trials and hearings.
`
`.I am counsel for Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd.
`
`(“TSMC”), Petitioner and the defendant in a related on-going litigation in
`
`which U.S. Patent No. 5,637,084 is and was asserted by the Patent
`
`TSMC-1013
`
`Page 2 of 3
`
`TSMC-1013
`Page 2 of 3
`
`

`
`Exhibit TS.\/IC-1013 — Affidavit of Scott Cunning
`IPR201-4—00094
`
`Owner.
`
`I am familiar with the subject matter at issue in this proceeding
`
`as a result of my representation of TSMC in the related litigation,
`
`including the alleged prior art that Petitioner presents in this procctcding,
`
`as well as issues of claim construction.
`
`
` Sc01;'i"'C until
`
`State of
`
` G.MMMQ
`Hamnv PUBUC DISTRICT or: COLUMBIA
`County of M!C0l'nmlsslon E‘-fn-‘res January 31. 3318
`
`Sworn to and subscribed before me on this
`
`‘}‘L\__ day of it-—PlJv'i.i (.1 1-’ ii
`
`, 2014.
`
`a‘““”.|IItlt¢;-;:"-
`PU.‘ ix
`5.
`..:....,4;,,
`Q‘ ‘\
`- Q '.
`sxr.'v;-,'é‘~
`_ f a'5’(-3‘
`fig: _1_-31,2313
`
`*
`
`*9’ .''-uoIn"
`
`5“.
`
`_
`
`1;’?
`s/‘.4
`7
`J.
`‘K//’
`I
`.
`. "
`:2/;:z.rz,{..~:»M
`
`F)’ PL1bllC
`"
`
`TSMC-1013
`
`Page 3 of 3
`
`TSMC-1013
`Page 3 of 3

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket