`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`Paper 10
`Entered: February 4, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`NHK SEATING OF AMERICA, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`LEAR CORPORATION,
`Patent Owner.
`
`Case IPR2014-01026
`Patent 6,665,733 B1
`
`
`Before Lawrence J. Banks, Trial Paralegal.
`
`ERRATA
`
`The Decision Instituting Review (Paper 7) entered December 31,
`2014, includes the following passage at Page 25, which is incorrect:
`FURTHER ORDERED that inter partes review is
`instituted with respect to NHK’s challenge that the combination
`of Wiklund and Humer renders claims 10, 11, 14, 19, and 20
`unpatentable as obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103;
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2014-01026
`Patent 6,665,733 B1
`
`The passage is corrected to read:
`FURTHER ORDERED that inter partes review is
`instituted with respect to NHK’s challenge that the combination
`of Wiklund and Humer renders claims 12, 17, 18, and 21
`unpatentable as obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103;
`
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`William H. Mandir
`John F. Rabena
`SUGHRUE MION PLLC
`wmandir@sughrue.com
`jrabena@sughrue.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`John M. Halan
`Frank A. Angileri
`BROOKS KUSHMAN P.C.
`jhalan@brookskushman.com
`fangileri@brookskushman.com
`
`2
`
`