throbber
EXHIBIT D.02
`U.S. Patent No. 6,853,142
`
`
`References cited herein:
` U.S. Pat. No. 6,853,142 (“’142 Patent”)
`
` D.V. Mozgrin, et al, High-Current Low-Pressure Quasi-Stationary Discharge in a
`Magnetic Field: Experimental Research, Plasma Physics Reports, Vol. 21, No. 5, 1995
`(“Mozgrin”)
`
` A. A. Kudryavtsev, et al, Ionization relaxation in a plasma produced by a pulsed inert-gas
`discharge, Sov. Phys. Tech. Phys. 28(1), January 1983 (“Kudryavtsev”)
`
` D.V. Mozgrin, High-Current Low-Pressure Quasi-Stationary Discharge in a Magnetic
`Field: Experimental Research, Thesis at Moscow Engineering Physics Institute, 1994
`(“Mozgrin Thesis”)
`
` Dennis M. Manos & Daniel L. Flamm, Plasma Etching: An Introduction, Academic Press
`1989 (“Manos”)
`
` Milton Ohring, The Material Science of Thin Films, Academic Press, 1992 (“Ohring”)
`
` Yu. P. Raizer, Gas Discharge Physics, Springer, 1991 (“Raizer”)
`
`
`
`‘142 Claims 24 and 32
`
`Mozgrin in view of Kudryavtsev and Mozgrin Thesis
`
`[21pre.] An apparatus for generating a
`strongly-ionized plasma, the apparatus
`comprising:
`
`The combination of Mozgrin and Kudryavstev discloses an
`apparatus for generating a strongly-ionized plasma.
`
`‘142 Patent at claim 18 (“wherein the peak plasma density
`of the strongly-ionized plasma is greater than about
`1012 cm˗3”)
`
`Mozgrin at Fig 1
`
`Mozgrin at 400, right col, ¶ 4 (“To study the high-current
`forms of the discharge, we used two types of devices: a
`planar magnetron and a ystem with specifically shaped
`hollow electrodes.”)
`
`Mozgrin at 401, right col, ¶2 (“For pre-ionization … the
`initial plasma density in the 109 – 1011 cm-3 range.”)
`
`Mozgrin at 409, left col, ¶ 4 (“The implementation of the
`high-current magnetron discharge (regime 2) in sputtering
`… plasma density (exceeding 2x1013 cm-3).”)
`
`Mozgrin at 409, left col, ¶5 (“The high-current diffuse
`discharge (regime 3) is useful for producing large-volume
`
`ActiveUS 122601007v.1
`
`- 1 -
`
`GILLETTE 1220
`
`

`
`
`
`EXHIBIT D.02
`U.S. Patent No. 6,853,142
`
`‘142 Claims 24 and 32
`
`Mozgrin in view of Kudryavtsev and Mozgrin Thesis
`
`[21a.] an anode;
`
`uniform dense plasmas ni  1.5x1015cm-3…”).
`The combination of Mozgrin and Kudryavstev discloses an
`anode.
`
`‘142 Patent at 2:21-22 (“FIG. 1 illustrates a cross-sectional
`view of a known plasma generating apparatus 100…”)
`
`’142 Patent at 2:45-46 (“An anode 130 is positioned in the
`vacuum chamber 104 proximate to the cathode 114.”)
`
`Mozgrin at Fig. 1
`
`Mozgrin at 401, Fig. 1 caption (“Fig. 1… (1) Cathode; (2)
`anode; …”)
`
`[21b.] a cathode that is positioned adjacent
`to the anode and forming a gap there
`between;
`
`The combination of Mozgrin and Kudryavstev discloses a
`cathode that is positioned adjacent to the anode and
`forming a gap there between.
`
`[21c.] an ionization source that generates a
`weakly-ionized plasma proximate to the
`cathode, the weakly-ionized plasma
`reducing the probability of developing an
`electrical breakdown condition between
`the anode and the cathode; and
`
`‘142 Patent at 2:21-22 (“FIG. 1 illustrates a cross-sectional
`view of a known plasma generating apparatus 100…”)
`
`’142 Patent at 2:45-46 (“An anode 130 is positioned in the
`vacuum chamber 104 proximate to the cathode 114.”)
`
`Mozgrin at Fig. 1
`
`Mozgrin at 401, Fig. 1 caption (“Fig. 1… (1) Cathode; (2)
`anode; …”)
`
`The combination of Mozgrin and Kudryavstev discloses an
`ionization source that generates a weakly-ionized plasma
`proximate to the cathode, the weakly-ionized plasma
`reducing the probability of developing an electrical
`breakdown condition between the anode and the cathode.
`
`‘142 Patent at 5:18-19 (“The weakly-ionized plasma is also
`referred to as a pre-ionized plasma.”)
`
`‘142 Patent at claim 17 (“wherein the peak plasma density
`of the weakly-ionized plasma is less than about 1012 cm˗3”)
`
`Mozgrin at Figs. 1, 2, 3, 6, 7
`
`Mozgrin at 401, left col, ¶ 1 (“The [plasma] discharge had
`
`ActiveUS 122601007v.1
`
`- 2 -
`
`

`
`
`
`EXHIBIT D.02
`U.S. Patent No. 6,853,142
`
`‘142 Claims 24 and 32
`
`Mozgrin in view of Kudryavtsev and Mozgrin Thesis
`
`an annular shape and was adjacent to the cathode.”)
`
`Mozgrin at 401, left col, ¶ 4 (“[A]pplying a square voltage
`pulse to the discharge gap which was filled up with either
`neutral or pre-ionized gas.”)
`
`Mozgrin at 402, right col, ¶2 (“Figure 3 shows typical
`voltage and current oscillograms.… Part I in the voltage
`oscillogram represents the voltage of the stationary
`discharge (pre-ionization stage).”)
`
`Mozgrin at 401, right col, ¶2 (“[f]or pre-ionization, we used
`a stationary magnetron discharge; … provided the initial
`plasma density in the 109 – 1011 cm˗3 range.”)
`
`Mozgrin at 400, right col, ¶ 3 (“We investigated the
`discharge regimes in various gas mixtures at 10-3 – 10
`torr…”)
`
`Mozgrin at 402, ¶ spanning left and right cols (“We studied
`the high-current discharge in wide ranges of discharge
`current…and operating pressure…using various gases (Ar,
`N2, SF6, and H2) or their mixtures of various
`composition…”)
`
`Mozgrin at 406, right col, ¶3 (“pre-ionization was not
`necessary; however, in this case, the probability of
`discharge transferring to arc mode increased.”)
`
`Mozgrin at 400, left col, ¶ 3 (“Some experiments on
`magnetron systems of various geometry showed that
`discharge regimes which do not transit to arcs can be
`obtained even at high currents.”)
`
`Background:
`
`Manos at 231 (“We shall … [include] information on
`unipolar arcs. These are a problem…”)
`
`Manos at 237 (“When such an arc occurs, the metal object
`is melted at the arc spot. The metal is explosively
`released…. How does one prevent such an arc? There are
`several methods…”)
`
`[21d.] a power supply that produces an
`
`The combination of Mozgrin and Kudryavstev discloses a
`
`ActiveUS 122601007v.1
`
`- 3 -
`
`

`
`
`
`EXHIBIT D.02
`U.S. Patent No. 6,853,142
`
`‘142 Claims 24 and 32
`
`Mozgrin in view of Kudryavtsev and Mozgrin Thesis
`
`electric field across the gap, the electric
`field generating excited atoms in the
`weakly-ionized plasma and generating
`secondary electrons from the cathode, the
`secondary electrons ionizing the excited
`atoms, thereby creating the strongly-
`ionized plasma.
`
`power supply that produces an electric field across the gap,
`the electric field generating excited atoms in the weakly-
`ionized plasma and generating secondary electrons from
`the cathode, the secondary electrons ionizing the excited
`atoms, thereby creating the strongly-ionized plasma.
`
`‘142 Patent at 1:41-43 (“Magnetron sputtering systems use
`magnetic fields that are shaped to trap and to concentrate
`secondary electrons, which are produced by ion
`bombardment of the target surface.”)
`
`‘142 Patent at 1:37-40 (“The plasma is replenished by
`electron-ion pairs formed by the collision of neutral
`molecules with secondary electrons generated at the target
`surface.”)
`
`Mozgrin at Figs. 1, 2, 3
`
`Mozgrin at 402, right col, ¶ 2 (“Part 1 in the voltage
`oscillogram represents the voltage of the stationary
`discharge (pre-ionization stage).”)
`
`Mozgrin at 401, right col, ¶ 1 (“Thus, the supply unit was
`made providing square voltage and current pulses with
`[rise] times (leading edge) of 5 – 60 µs…”)
`
`Mozgrin at 401, ¶ spanning left and right cols (“[d]esigning
`the [pulsed supply] unit, we took into account the
`dependences which had been obtained in [Kudryavtsev] of
`ionization relaxation on pre-ionization parameters,
`pressure, and pulse voltage amplitude.”)
`
`Mozgrin 403, right col, ¶4 (“Regime 2 was characterized
`by intense cathode sputtering due to both high energy and
`density of ion flow.”)
`
`Kudryavtsev at Figs. 1, 6
`
`Kudryavtsev at 34, right col, ¶ 4 (“[s]ince the effects
`studied in this work are characteristic of ionization
`whenever a field is suddenly applied to a weakly ionized
`gas, they must be allowed for when studying emission
`mechanisms in pulsed gas lasers, gas breakdown, laser
`sparks, etc.”)
`
`
`ActiveUS 122601007v.1
`
`- 4 -
`
`

`
`
`
`EXHIBIT D.02
`U.S. Patent No. 6,853,142
`
`‘142 Claims 24 and 32
`
`Mozgrin in view of Kudryavtsev and Mozgrin Thesis
`
`Kudryavtsev at 31, right col, ¶ 6 (“For nearly stationary n2
`[excited atom density] values … there is an explosive
`increase in ne [plasma density]. The subsequent increase in
`ne then reaches its maximum value, equal to the rate of
`excitation [equation omitted], which is several orders of
`magnitude greater than the ionization rate during the initial
`stage.”)
`
`Kudryavtsev at 31, right col, ¶ 7 (“The behavior of the
`increase in ne with time thus enables us to arbitrarily divide
`the ionization process into two stages, which we will call
`the slow and fast growth stages. Fig. 1 illustrates the
`relationships between the main electron currents in terms of
`the atomic energy levels during the slow and fast stages.”)
`
`Kudryavtsev at Abstract (“in a pulsed inert-gas discharge
`plasma at moderate pressures… [i]t is shown that the
`electron density increases explosively in time due to
`accumulation of atoms in the lowest excited states.”)
`
`Kudryavtsev at Equation 1
`
`Kudryavtsev at 30, right col, last ¶ (“n2, and ne are the
`atomic densities in the … first excited states and the
`electron density, respectively … 2e [is] the rate
`coefficient[]….”)
`
`See evidence recited in [1pre] of claim 1.
`
`It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill to
`combine Mozgrin with Kudryavtsev. Mozgrin itself cites
`Kudryavtsev. Moreover, Mozgrin explicitly notes that it
`was designed in accordance with Kudryavtsev. Mozgrin at
`401, ¶ spanning left and right columns (“Designing the
`[pulsed supply] unit, we took into account the dependences
`which had been obtained in [Kudryavtsev].”). Further,
`Kudryavtsev states, “[s]ince the effects studied in this work
`are characteristic of ionization whenever a field is suddenly
`applied to a weakly ionized gas, they must be allowed for
`when studying emission mechanisms in pulsed gas lasers,
`gas breakdown, laser sparks, etc.” Kudryavtsev at 34, right
`col, ¶ 4. Because Mozgrin applies voltage pulses that
`“suddenly generate an electric field,” one of ordinary skill
`reading Mozgrin would have been motivated to consider
`
`ActiveUS 122601007v.1
`
`- 5 -
`
`

`
`
`
`EXHIBIT D.02
`U.S. Patent No. 6,853,142
`
`‘142 Claims 24 and 32
`
`Mozgrin in view of Kudryavtsev and Mozgrin Thesis
`
`24. The apparatus of claim 21 wherein the
`electric field comprises a quasi-static
`electric field.
`
`Kudryavtsev to further appreciate the effects of applying
`Mozgrin’s pulse.
`
`If one of ordinary skill, applying Mozgrin’s power levels
`did not experience Kudryavtsev’s “explosive increase” in
`plasma density, it would have been obvious to adjust the
`operating parameters, e.g., increase the pulse length and/or
`pressure, so as to trigger Kudryavtsev’s fast stage of
`ionization. One of ordinary skill would have been
`motivated to use Kudryavtsev’s fast stage of ionization in
`Mozgrin so as to increase plasma density and thereby
`increase the sputtering rate. Further, use of Kudryavtsev’s
`fast stage in Mozgrin would have been a combination of
`old elements that yielded predictable results of increasing
`plasma density and multi-step ionization.
`
`Background:
`Ohring at 104 (“Microscopically, positive gas ions in the
`discharge strike the cathode plate and eject neutral target
`atoms…. In addition, other particles (secondary electrons,
`desorbed gases, and negative ions) … are emitted from the
`target.”)
`The combination of Mozgrin, Kudryavtsev, and the
`Mozgrin Thesis discloses the electric field comprises a
`quasi-static electric field.
`
`See evidence cited in claim 21.
`
`‘142 Patent, 7:16-19 (“In another embodiment, the electric
`field 236 is a quasi –static electric field. By quasi-static
`electric field we mean an electric field that has a
`characteristic time of electric field variation that is much
`greater than the collision time for electrons with neutral gas
`particles.”)
`
`Mozgrin at pp. 407-8, Tables 1 and 2 (“0.1 Torr”)
`
`For 0.1 Torr, a pressure in Mozgrin’s disclosed range, the
`collision frequency is 0.53 x 109 s-1 (i.e., (5.3 x 109 s-1
`Torr-1)x(0.1 Torr) = 0.53 x 109 s-1). Therefore, Mozgrin’s
`collision time was therefore approximately 1.88
`nanoseconds ( 1/0.53x109 s).
`
`Mozgrin, at 402, Fig. 3 caption, (“Fig. 3. Oscillograms of
`
`ActiveUS 122601007v.1
`
`- 6 -
`
`

`
`
`
`EXHIBIT D.02
`U.S. Patent No. 6,853,142
`
`‘142 Claims 24 and 32
`
`Mozgrin in view of Kudryavtsev and Mozgrin Thesis
`
`…(50 µs per div., …”)
`
`Mozgrin Thesis at Fig. 3.2
`
`
`It would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill to
`combine Mozgrin and Kudryavtsev with the Mozgrin
`Thesis. Both Mozgrin and Mozgrin Thesis are written by
`the same author, address similar subject matter, and
`describe the same research. The Mozgrin Thesis merely
`provides additional detail for the material already disclosed
`in Mozgrin. Thus, a person of ordinary skill would have
`combined the Mozgrin Thesis with Mozgrin to add
`additional details not present in Mozgrin.
`
`Further, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill
`to combine Mozgrin with Kudryavtsev at least because
`Mozgrin itself cites Kudryavtsev and Mozgrin explicitly
`notes that it was designed in accordance with Kudryavtsev.
`Mozgrin at 401, ¶ spanning left and right columns
`“[d]esigning the [pulsed supply] unit, we took into account
`the dependences which had been obtained in
`[Kudryavtsev].” The Mozgrin Thesis also cites
`Kudryavtsev as paper [69]. Mozgrin Thesis at 118.
`
`ActiveUS 122601007v.1
`
`Background:
`
`- 7 -
`
`

`
`
`
`EXHIBIT D.02
`U.S. Patent No. 6,853,142
`
`‘142 Claims 24 and 32
`
`Mozgrin in view of Kudryavtsev and Mozgrin Thesis
`
`[31pre]. A method for generating a
`strongly-ionized plasma, the method
`comprising:
`
`Raizer at 11, §2.1.4, (“The collision frequency m is
`proportional to…pressure p.”).
`
`Raizer at Table 2.1 (“m/p = 5.3 x 109 s-1 Torr-1.”)
`
`The combination of Mozgrin and Kudryavstev discloses a
`method for generating a strongly-ionized plasma.
`
`See evidence cited in limitation [21pre] of claim 21.
`
`
`
`[31a] ionizing a feed gas to generate a
`weakly-ionized plasma proximate to a
`cathode, the weakly-ionized plasma
`reducing the probability of developing an
`electrical breakdown condition proximate
`to the cathode;
`
`The combination of Mozgrin and Kudryavstev discloses
`ionizing a feed gas to generate a weakly-ionized plasma
`proximate to a cathode, the weakly-ionized plasma
`reducing the probability of developing an electrical
`breakdown condition proximate to the cathode.
`
`See evidence cited in limitation [21c] of claim 21.
`
`[31b] and applying an electric field across
`the weakly-ionized plasma in order to
`excite atoms in the weakly-ionized plasma
`and to generate secondary electrons from
`the cathode, the secondary electrons
`ionizing the excited atoms, thereby
`creating the strongly-ionized plasma.
`
`The combination of Mozgrin and Kudryavstev discloses
`applying an electric field across the weakly-ionized plasma
`in order to excite atoms in the weakly-ionized plasma and
`to generate secondary electrons from the cathode, the
`secondary electrons ionizing the excited atoms, thereby
`creating the strongly-ionized plasma.
`
`See evidence cited in limitation [21d] of claim 21.
`
`32. The method of claim 31 wherein the
`applying the electric field comprises
`applying a quasi-static electric field.
`
`The combination of Mozgrin, Kudryavtsev, and the
`Mozgrin Thesis discloses the applying the electric field
`comprises applying a quasi-static electric field.
`
`See evidence cited in claim 31.
`
`See evidence cited in claim 24.
`
`
`
`ActiveUS 122601007v.1
`
`- 8 -

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket