throbber

`
`.I
`
`'I
`
`|
`
`|
`
`THIN—FILM
`DEPOSITION
`PRINCIPLES & PRACTICE
`
`.
`
`.
`
`_
`
`GII-'—ETTE 1011
`
`GILLETTE 1011
`
`

`

`
`
`Thin-Film
`
`Deposition
`
`Principles and Practice
`
`Donald L. Smith
`
`Boston, Massachusetts Burr Ridge, Illinois
`Dubuque, Iowa Madison, Wisconsin New York, New York
`San Francisco, California St. Louis, Missouri
`
`
`
`

`

`Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
`
`Smith, Donald L. (Donald Leonard), date.
`Thin-film deposition: principles and practice / Donald L.
`Smith.
`cm.
`p.
`Includes index.
`ISBN 0-07-058502-4
`1. Thin films.
`2. Vapor-plating.
`I. Includes index.
`II. Title
`TA418.9.T45$65
`1995
`621.3815'2—dc20
`
`3. Thin film devices.
`
`94-47002
`CIP
`
`Copyright © 1995 by McGraw-Hill, Inc. All rights reserved. Printed in
`the United States of America. Except as permitted under the United
`States Copyright Act of 1976, no part of this publication may be repro-
`duced or distributed in any form or by any means, or stored in a data
`base or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of the
`publisher.
`
`111213141516 IBT/IBT 198765432
`
`ISBN-13: 978-0-07-058502-7
`
`ISBN-10: 0-07—058502—4
`
`The sponsoring editor for this book was Stephen S. Chapman and the
`production supervisor was Suzanne W. B. Rapcavage. It was set in New
`Century Schoolbook by J. K. Eckert & Company, Inc.
`
`INTERNATIONAL EDITION
`
`Copyright © 1995. Exclusive rights by McGraw—Hill, Inc. for manufac-
`ture and export. This book cannot be re-exported from the country to
`which it is consigned by McGraw-Hill. The International Edition is not
`available in North America.‘
`
`When ordering this title, use ISBN 0-07-113913-3.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Cover photo: A thin film ofthe high-temperature superconductor YBaQCu307 is being deposited from
`a pulsed-laser vaporization source onto a ~750°C MgO substrate shown glowing orange at the top of
`the picture. Pulses from a UV (248 nm) KrF excimer laser enter the vacuum chamber from the fight
`and impinge at 45° upon a sintered pellet onBa20u307 situated near the bottom where the white
`glow originates. Energy from the pulses electronically excites and partially ionizes both the vaporiz-
`
`ing material and the 4 Pa ofOz ambient gas, resulting in a spectacular plume ofglowing plasma. The
`
`pulsed-laser deposition process is discussed in Sec. 8.4. This photo of Douglas Chrisey’s apparatus
`was taken by M.A. Savell at the U.S. Naval Research Laboratories, Washington, D.C., and appeared
`
`on the cover of the MRS Bulletin, February 1992. (Used by permission of MRS and NRL.)
`
`
`
`
` Information contained in this work has been obtained by McGraw-Hill, Inc., from sources
`
`believed to be reliable. However, neither McGraw-Hill nor its authors guarantee the accu-
`
`racy or completeness of any information published herein and neither McGraw-Hill nor
`
`its authors shall be responsible for any errors, omissions, or damages arising out of use of
`
`this information. This work is published with the understanding that McGraw-Hill and
`its authors are supplying information but are not attempting to render engineering or
`
`other professional services. If such services are required, the assistance of an appropriate
`professional should be sought.
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Chapter
`
`ration.” In Handbook of Thin Film Rehnology,
`York: McGraw—Hill.
`
`rmodynamics, the Kinetic Theory of Gases, and
`lmbridge, Mass: Addison-Wesley.
`
`Vacuum Technology
`
`Most of the film deposition processes to be discussed in this book oper-
`ate under some degree of vacuum. Only atmospheric-pressure CVD
`does not, but the same vacuum techniques of contamination reduction
`and process control still apply to it. Vacuum technology is a large topic
`which is well treated in textbooks such as those in the recommended
`readings list at the end of this chapter. Our purposes here are more
`specific: first, to become oriented to the general topic and, second, to
`examine certain aspects of vacuum technology that are particularly
`relevant to film deposition and deserve special emphasis. As we know,
`“Nature abhors a vacuum,” so good equipment and techniques are
`needed to create one.
`
`Figure 3.1 is a schematic diagram of a typical vacuum system for
`thin-film deposition. The purpose and functioning of the components
`Shown will be elaborated upon in the subheadings below. Sometimes
`not all of these components will be required for a particular process.
`AS shown, the substrate is introduced through a “load-lock” chamber
`to allow the main process chamber to remain under vacuum, because
`this reduces contamination and shortens substrate turnaround time.
`The roughing pump evacuates the load-lock chamber from atmo- .
`Spheric pressure after the substrate has been loaded into it and before
`the Valve is opened into the process chamber. Once the substrate is in
`the process chamber, it is heated and controlled at the film deposition
`teKnperature. Process gases and vapors are metered into the chamber
`lhI‘OUgh mass flow-controlled supply lines, which are discussed more
`In Sec. 7.1.2. Process pressure is measured by a vacuum gauge that
`can be coupled to a motor-driven throttle valve in the pump throat for
`Pressure control. Sometimes, pressure is controlled instead by cou-
`* 35
`
`

`

`
`
`
`36
`Vacuum Technology
`
`
`
`
`process gas supply
`
`load-lock
`chamber
`
`pressure
`
`
`
`control
`throttle
`
`
`loop
`valve toxic
`
` N2 purge vapor
`
`
`
`
`
` ‘
`adsorbent
`
`high
`canister
`roughing
`
`vacuum
`Pump
`PumP
`
`
`
`roughing/backing
`
`pump
`. purge
`N2ballast
`
`
`Figure 3.1 Typical vacuum-system components for thin-film deposition.
`
`
`pling the vacuum gauge to the gas-supply metering valve, but that
`
`technique does not allow independent control of gas flow rate and
`
`pressure. Finally, process and impurity gases are evacuated through a
`
`high-vacuum pump followed by a “backing” pump which often serves
`to rough out the process chamber from atmosphere as well. For pro-
`
`
`ne stage of pumping is needed. The
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`type pumps do. Trapping pumps of the cryogenic
`variety are not recommended when pumping flammable vaporS,
`
`

`

`mam—MuseEvEh
`23“553358Bad
`$6»mom$532733%
`
`meaEEau£3,
`
`
`ummnmwcomma—aim323°86
`cmcan«I3m
`331.23503%
`3.55.8.““com$22836
`
`mam8:53
`n.330uni: “3:3th:0
`*3»oz
`ESoz
`3?oz
`
`moawtgomfinoESEE3203.pdWEE.
`T.TII
`385*
`
`
`
`26E 7
`
`mmnewtofisam
`
`1......
`
`
`
`was.6quwaEunhemafia“
`
`.3m2
`
`25me".25.555
`
`Sm._a_m.
`¢5:m:
`____________
`
`:53
`
`
`
`
`
`naggingo:3.5€33.883mam—nonv3.33“:bfiufionmymfi
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Somecompass—wantmanna?maid“.nouwfififlcoono296Son:955muEmdou095$.
`
`53852»
`
`2%:
`5.522:
`
`_.......T|||'
`
`T.T|llv
`
`
`
`ES:32:2:
`
`
`
`5523..£383.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`34
`
`
`
`
`$25..33:8:0
`
`$53qu
`
`
`
`moxmt$3350
`
`.8359mo
`
`
`
`.3633“.>54
`
`«Eii8m
`
`
`.IL
`T
`
`
`IF
`
`
`
`mngomfimaflmsou
`
`
`
`he.“:oEEoO
`
`$50
`
`maflwE—EOO
`
`omuaEwEoum
`
`when?»95mamam
`
`r
`
`._IE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ESE313.30
`7.1....
`
`ESEha
`
`wEmZ
`
`
`
`woman»0.533.»
`
`
`
` «Ewan
`
`3%
`
`.32
`
`
`
`
`
` I.
`
`$33338%
`
`33835.35
`
`"5?stno
`
`
`
` 1mug315032
`
`magneto
`
`ofiomnlvm
`
`53880an
`75.2...
`
`quameoqugq
`
`
`

`

`
`
`38
`Vacuum Technology
`
`
`because usually air is pumped too. When the saturated pump is
`
`warmed up to regenerate it, the released gas can form an explosive
`mixture. Sputter-ion pumps are trapping pumps that do not release
`chemically active trapped gases, but they can periodically release
`bursts of inert gases during operation. Unlike the cryogenic trapping
`pumps, they cannot be regenerated when saturated but must have
`their internal parts replaced.
`The next consideration is that the pump operate well at the desired
`process pressure. Notice in the table that the recommended pressure
`limits for process operation are much narrower than the ultimate
`pressure limits. The ultimate upper limit is the maximum pressure at
`which the pump can be started, whereas the process upper limit is the
`maximum pressure at which it will operate well on a continuous basis.
`Excessive operating pressure causes overheating or stalling, as well as
`rapid saturation in the case of trapping pumps. If the maximum start-
`ing pressure is less than 1 atm or if a turbomolecular or molecular
`drag pump is being used, the system must first be roughed out with
`another pump. The lower pressure limit of process operation is the
`pressure below which pumping speed drops off, except in the case of
`the oil—sealed rotary pump, which is widely used for both roughing and
`backing. There, the problem at < 10 Pa is contamination from pump
`oil back-diffusing (backstreaming) into the process chamber, as will be
`discussed in Sec. 3.4.1. The other two choices for roughing and backing
`avoid the oil problem but have other drawbacks. The dry rotary pumps
`are larger, noisier, and more expensive. The cryosorption pumps
`require frequent refills with liquid nitrogen and frequent regeneration
`due to saturation with pumped gas.
`Another consideration is the cost factor. Approximate purchase costs
`per unit of pumping speed for medium-sized pumps are listed in Table
`3.1. There is a large difference among pumps, but in many cases the
`higher cost is justified by improved performance. Moreover, there are
`other cost factors involved, such as maintenance, service life, and
`whether a backing or roughing pump is required. The pumps used for
`backing or roughing are the dry and oil—sealed rotary pumps and the
`cryosorption pump. These all have relatively high cost per unit of
`pumping speed in Us. However, they require a much smaller speed
`than the high-vacuum pump on a given chamber, because of their
`higher operating pressure [see Eq. (3.3) below].
`The molecular-drag pump is the most recent addition to the selec—
`tion of available pumps. Sometimes, it is integrated with a turbomo-
`lecular pump in a single unit, thus increasing the upper operating
`pressure of the latter. By itself, it still has a wide operating pressure
`range that spans the transition-flow regime. This range encompasses
`
`all of the glow-discharge plasma deposition processes as well as some
`
`

`

`
`
`. When the saturated pump is
`eased gas can form an explosive
`oping pumps that do not release
`.It they can periodically release
`ln. Unlike the cryogenic trapping
`when saturated but must have
`
`pump operate well at the desired
`2 that the recommended pressure
`ich narrower than the ultimate
`limit is the maximum pressure at
`reas the process upper limit is the
`perate well on a continuous basis.
`overheating or stalling, as well as
`;ng pumps. If the maximum start-
`if a turbomolecular or molecular
`
`11 must first be roughed out with
`limit of process operation is the
`2d drops off, except in the case of
`widely used for both roughing and
`) Pa is contamination from pump
`Lto the process chamber, as will be
`3 choices for roughing and backing
`drawbacks. The dry rotary pumps
`ensive. The cryosorption pumps
`itrogen and frequent regeneration
`
`actor. Approximate purchase costs
`Lm-sized pumps are listed in Table
`lng pumps, but in many cases the
`performance. Moreover, there are
`is maintenance, service life, and
`.p is required. The pumps used for
`d oil-sealed rotary pumps and the
`a relatively high cost per unit of
`ey require a much smaller speed
`given chamber, because of their
`3.3) below].
`most recent addition to the selec-
`
`;, it is integrated with a turbomo-
`is increasing the upper operating
`:till has a wide operating pressure
`v regime. This range encompasses
`position processes as well as some
`
`3.1
`
`PUmp Selection and Exhaust Handling
`
`39
`
`CW3 processes, so this pump is particularly useful for thin-film work.
`Moreover, its principle of operation is a classic illustration of gas
`kinetic behavior. As illustrated in Fig. 3.2, the pump incorporates a
`channel between the stationary surface of a “stator” and the surface of
`a “rotor,” which is moving to the right at a supersonic velocity ur. In
`construction, one of the two surfaces is a spiral channel, and the other
`is a cylinder surrounding it and almost touching the channel rim. In
`the molecular-flow regime, molecules bounce from surface to surface
`without encountering collisions along the way. They approach the
`rotor surface with mean thermal velocity c and bounce off of it having
`the sum of two velocities, namely: c , which is randomly directed; and
`ur, which is directed to the right. Thus, molecules are pumped to the
`right. This behavior is a consequence of the strong interaction
`between gas molecules and surfaces, which causes them to become
`trapped temporarily and thus lose memory of the direction from which
`they approached. (Helium may be an exception, at least on very
`smooth surfaces.)
`The molecular-drag pump can also operate at the lower end of the
`fluid-flow regime. There, a velocity profile from u, to zero develops
`across the channel as shown in Fig. 3.2b. In the absence of pressure
`gradients, this profile would be linear in accordance with a force bal-
`ance using Eq. (2.28) and as discussed in fluid-mechanics texts. How-
`ever, the pumping action causes pressure to decrease from right to
`left, which causes some back flow in that direction and somewhat “col-
`lapses” the velocity profile, as shown. Now, the mass pumping rate is
`proportional to molecular concentration, 11, and thus to pressure, p,
`
`11:111.
`
`rotor
`
`channel , stator
`(b) fluid flow
`
`(a) molecular flow
`
`Figure 3.2 Molecular-drag pump operation in the two flow regimes.
`
`

`

`
`
`3.2 Problem Gases
`
` 4O
`Vacuum Technology
`
`
`
` whereas it will be seen in Sec. 3.3 that the mass flow rate induced by a
`p drop in the fluid regime is proportional to p2. This means that as p is
`raised, back flow eventually becomes much larger than pumping rate,
`
`
`and this sets an upper limit to pump operating p.
`
`
`
`Some gases present special pumping problems. H2 and He have high
`molecular speeds because of their low mass [Eq. (2.3)]. This limits
`their compression in molecular-drag, turbomolecular, or oil-diffusion
`
`pumps, all of which use supersonic velocity of the pumping medium to
`
`push molecules along. Reactive, condensable or toxic gases require
`
`special handling whatever pump is used, and we will discuss these
`three categories in turn below.
`
`Reactive gases cause several problems. Acidic ones such as the
`chlorinated gases can decompose hydrocarbon pump oil and corrode
`
`metal pump parts. Oxidizing ones such as 02 can explode the pump—oil
`
`vapor in the exhaust. Flammable ones such as methane can explode
`
`when mixed with air in the exhaust. Decomposition and explosion of
`the oil are avoided by using perfluorinated pump oils. These are
`
`organic molecules that have all of their H replaced by F, which makes
`
`them chemically inert due to the high strength of the C-F bond. Even
`
`with these, acidic gases dissolved in the oil can corrode the pump, and
`flammable gases can explode in the exhaust system. These two prob-
`lems are avoided by N2 purging at the pump ballast port and at the
`pump exhaust casing, respectively, as shown in Fig. 3.1. Sufficient and
`reliable N2 purging can also prevent decomposition and explosion of
`hydrocarbon pump oil as an alternative to using the very expensive
`perfluorinated oil.
`N2 purging at the ballast port not only sweeps dissolved corrosives
`out of the pump oil, but also prevents vapor condensation. Conden-
`sates emulsify the oil and thus destroy its sealing and lubricating
`properties. The ballast port addresses this problem by injecting N2
`into the vapor as it is being compressed, which lowers the partial pres-
`sure of the vapor. If the dilution is sufficient, the vapor’s partial pres-
`sure drops below its saturation vapor pressure, at which point no
`condensation can occur. In addition, the equilibrium concentration of
`corrosive gas dissolved in the oil drops roughly in proportion to the
`drop in its partial pressure over the oil. One example of a condensable
`and corrosive vapor situation is the ’I‘iCl4 + H20 mixture sometimes
`used in the CVD of TiOg. The saturation vapor pressures of these tWO
`reactants at room T are about 1400 and 3000 Pa, respectively. To pre-
`
`vent their condensation upon compression of the process stream to 1
`atm (105 Pa), a minimum dilution of 105/1400 = 70/1 is necessary. If
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`41
`Gas Throughput
`3.3
`
`
`
`the dilution provided in the process-gas supply and in the pump fore-
`
`line is less than 70/1, the difference must be made up at the ballast
`
`port.
`_
`.
`.
`
`When tox1c gases are involved, spemal procedures are necessary to
`
`protect personnel and the environment. For example, arsine (AsH3),
`
`which is used in CVD of the important semiconductor GaAs, is one of
`
`the most toxic gases known. Oil removed from pumps for disposal or
`
`recycling should be assumed to contain some amount of any toxic
`
`gases Which have been pumped, and it must be handled and labeled
`
`accordingly. The dissolved concentration can be reduced, though not
`
`necessarily to negligible levels, by a long purge with N2 before the oil
`
`is removed. Regardless of whether any pumps are employed, the pro-
`
`cess exhaust stream must be tightly sealed and must be treated to
`
`reduce the concentration of toxics to negligible levels before release to
`
`the environment. Treatment methods include adsorption (usually'on
`
`activated charcoal) as shown in Fig. 3.1, washing in a scrubber, and
`
`decomposition by burning or by catalysis. Different methods are
`
`appropriate for each vapor. The chemical manufacturer and local gov-
`
`ernment authorities need to be consulted prior to selection of process
`
`equipment. In all cases, continuous environmental-monitoring Sensors
`
`are advised at the gas supply, at the process chamber, and down~
`
`stream of the exhaust treatment equipment.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The required sizes of the pump and its connecting line to the process
`chamber are determined by the gas load imposed by the film deposi-
`tion process. The essential features of this situation are illustrated in
`Fig. 3.3. The mass flow of gas must satisfy the continuity equation,
`which is an expression of the law of mass (and also energy) conserva—
`tion. This equation is fundamental to all flow and film-deposition pro-
`
`3.3 Gas Throughput
`
`vacuum
`gauge
`
`process
`
`
`chamber
`
`foreline conductance C1
`process
`gas
`
`supp}
`flow (ii
`
`‘
`‘
`p0
`pump
`a
`out assing
`throttle
`conductance C0
`103 Qi
`orifice
`conductance 02
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`mm
`u!v
`
`SS
`
`30
`re
`
`1e
`
`1e
`iil
`le
`of
`re
`as
`an
`
`id
`
`1e
`
`1d
`of
`ve
`
`)le
`.es
`N0
`re-
`
`Figure 3.3 Geometry for gas throughput calculations.
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`Vacuum Technology
`42
`
`
`
`
`
`cesses, and it will come up again and again throughout the book. It
`has the general form
`
`input + generation = output + accumulation
`
`(3.1)
`
`
`
`That is, whatever mass or energy is introduced into a given space
`must either come out again or build up there. Here, the space is the
`process chamber’s gas phase. The generation term typically arises
`with chemical reactions (mass) or heat production (energy), and it is
`zero here. We will first consider operation at a constant process-cham~
`ber pressure, p2, so the accumulation term is also zero. There are two
`input terms: the mass flow rate of process gas supplied, Q8, and “outa
`gassing" from the chamber walls, Qi (neglecting unwanted leaks,
`which should have been plugged). Outgassing is evolution of gaseous
`contaminants from chamber materials, and its minimization will be
`discussed in Sec. 3.4.2. The supply flow, Q5, is ofien expressed in sccm,
`which is proportional to mc/s by the ideal-gas law, Eq. (2.10).
`The output term in Eq. (3.1) is the flow of gas toward and through
`the pump(s). In Fig. 3.3, there are three elements in this flow path,
`each of which has a certain “conductance,” C (liters/s, = US), for the
`gas. There is a throttle restriction (C2), a pumping line restriction
`(Cl), and the pump itself (Co). The throttle is needed only when p2 is
`larger than the maximum operating p of the pump (see Table 3.1), as
`in the case of low-p CVD or glow-discharge processes run using a tur-
`bomolecular pump. The mass flow or “throughput,” Q, past these ele-
`ments is usually expressed in (Falls) or (torr-l/s), which is also
`proportional to mc/s by the ideal-gas law. For the two flow restrictions,
`01 and 02, C is defined by
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`where the conductance Co is known as the pumping “speed” (l/s). Usu‘
`ally, Co varies little with p0 over the pump’s operating range, meaning
`
`that pump throughput is proportional to its inlet pressure, p0. Setting
`
`all of these Q values equal in accordance with Eq. (3.1), and taking the
`
`case where Q, << QS (it had better be!), we have
`
`(3'4)
`
`Qs + Qi = Qs = C2(P2 ~ 131) = C1<P1 - P0) = Copo
`
`Q = CAP
`
`(3.2)
`
`where Ap is the pressure difference across the element and is the driv-
`ing force for the gas flow. For the vacuum pump, throughput is given
`by
`
`Q0 = Copo
`
`(3.3)
`
`

`

`
`
`3.3
`
`
`Gas Throughput
`43
`
`t. It
`
`3.1)
`
`mm
`
`the
`ises
`it is
`am-
`
`two
`Jut—
`
`iks,
`:ous
`
`l be
`cm,
`
`ugh
`1th,
`the
`;ion
`
`2 is
`, as
`:ur»
`
`ele-
`llSO
`DDS,
`
`3.2)
`
`l'lV"
`Ien
`
`:.4)
`
`For a given Q5, the three p values will adjust themselves to satisfy
`these equalities. Then, control of the process pressure, p2, is accom-
`plished by throttling down 02 as shown in Fig. 3.1.
`Conductances depend on geometry and flow regime. The simplest
`case is an orifice in molecular flow, meaning that the molecular
`mean free path is larger than the orifice diameter (Kn > 1). In this
`case, the flux through the orifice in each direction (downstream and
`upstream) is equal to the impingement flux at the plane of the orifice
`as given by Eq. (2.18). It is an important property of molecular flow
`that these two fluxes are independent of one another. This is because
`of the fact that the molecules cross paths Without colliding. (We will
`see in Sec. 3.4.1 how this causes oil backstreaming.) The orifice
`throughput is the difference between the downstream and upstream
`fluxes through the orifice times its area, A; thus
`
`Q2 = (Jiz‘Ji1)A = [
`
`N
`
`
`afilmprpo = 02(P2-p1)
`
`(3.5)
`
`The term in square brackets is the orifice conductance per unit area,
`CA. For air at room temperature, conversion from SI units to liters
`and cm gives CA = 11.6 l/s~cm2, a very useful quantity to remember,
`since any restriction in the vacuum plumbing can be modeled approxi-
`mately as an orifice. The conductance of an orifice in fluid flow is
`much more complicated to analyze, but it is also much higher. There-
`fore, it usually is not the throughput-limiting element in Fig. 3.3
`unless it is made so deliberately, as in the case of the throttle valve.
`Appendix E gives the conductance of a fluid-flow orifice in the limit of
`sonic velocity in the orifice (“choked” flow).
`For long tubes in molecular flow, the conductance in Us for air at
`room temperature is
`
`Cm = 12.3o3/L
`
`(3.6)
`
`Where (1) = tube diameter, cm
`L = tube length, cm; L >> 4)
`
`Note that Cm is proportional to (1)3, versus ‘92 for the orifice in Eq. (3.5).
`TWO powers of (1) come from the area factor as in the case of the orifice,
`and the third power comes from the fact that the axial distance tra-
`Versed by a molecule between bounces off the wall is proportional to ‘15-
`FOI‘ gases other than air, Cm scales according to Eq. (2.18). For long
`tUlbes in fluid flow,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`44
`
`Vacuum Technology
`
`
`
`
`0,: 1.41¢4p/L
`(3.7)
`
`where p is the average pressure from end to end, in Pa. Note that C is
`independent of p in molecular flow but proportional to p in fluid flow°
`Thus, in fluid flow, Q is proportional to p2. One power of p comes from
`the concentration of the fluid, and the second comes from the Ap driv-
`ing force for flow. The third and fourth powers of (1) here come from the
`viscous drag force, which is proportional to the radial gradient in axial
`flow velocity [Eq. (2.28)]. This velocity is inversely proportional to tube
`area for a given volumetric flow rate. For gases other than air, Cf
`scales inversely with viscosity. In the transition region (0.01 < Kn < 1),
`both of the above equations will estimate C somewhat low.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`.,helm!“myML...m.‘,,4.
`
`SEE
`
`The minimum size of foreline tube and pump for a given process can
`be calculated from the anticipated gas load, Q8. The tube should be
`sized so that its C is at least as large as that of the pump, since tubes
`are less expensive than pumps. However, depositing films often
`become contaminated by the outgassing load, Q. In such cases, a
`larger pump than the minimum is desirable. For processes operating
`without a throttle, faster pumping (larger CO) reduces the partial p of
`these contaminant gases, pi, in accordance with Eq. (3.3): that is,
`
`pad/00'
`
`(3.8)
`
`For processes operating at some fixed pressure p2 with a throttle,
`faster pumping instead allows the supply gas flow, Q3, of (presumably
`pure) process gas to be higher, which dilutes the flow of outgassing
`contaminant, Qi, and thus reduces its pi by
`
`pi _
`p2
`
`
`
`QE‘Q 2%
`
`(3.9)
`
`This equation assumes that the gases mix well in the chamber and
`that the ideal-gas law holds. Note here that pi also scales with p2,
`whereas in the unthrottled case of Eq. (3.8), p2 does not appear. It does
`appear in the throttled case because it is presumed that Qs is already
`set at the maximum which the pump can handle. Thus, p2 cannot be
`increased by increasing Qs, which would have diluted the contami-
`nant. Instead, p2 can only be increased by closing the throttle to
`reduce 02: which also raises pi. For this reason, film purity is
`improved by reducing process pressure, p2, in cases where the pump
`must be throttled. Alternatively, a pump operable at higher p0 can be
`selected. The molecular-drag pump is attractive here, because it also
`minimizes oil contamination. Equation (3.9) also applies to atmO'
`
`
`
`

`

` 3.4
`
`45
`Contamination Sources
`
`
`
`(3.7)
`
`,hat C is
`iid flow.
`les from
`
`Ap driv-
`'rom the
`in axial
`l to tube
`
`L air, Cf
`Kn < 1),
`
`:ess can
`
`Lould be
`:e tubes
`LS often
`:ases, a
`
`)erating
`tial p of
`is,
`
`(3.8)
`
`;hrottle,
`(umably
`gassing
`
`(3.9)
`
`her and
`
`Vith p2,
`. It does
`
`already
`nnot be
`ontami-
`ottle to
`
`irity is
`e pump
`
`,’can be
`t it also
`) atmo-
`
`Spheric-pressure CVD, where Qs can be increased to reduce pi,
`because there is no pump throughput limitation.
`
`The rate of pumpdown from 1 atm can also be calculated from the
`continuity equation, Eq. (3.1). Here we are considering only evacua-
`tion of the air in the process-chamber volume, V; we are not supplying
`any additional gas. Therefore, the input term is zero. The accumula-
`tion term is the evacuation rate. We also assume that the output term
`is limited by the pump throughput, since (1) the throttle valve will be
`open, and (2) the tube throughput is proportional to p2 and will be rel-
`ativeiy high at the high-p end. Thus, using the notation of Fig. 3.3, we
`have p2 = p0, and Eq. (3.1) becomes
`
`dp
`o = Cop2+vf
`
`(3.10)
`
`where both terms have the units of throughput (Pa-l/s). Rearranging,
`integrating, and applying the initial condition that p2 = p20 at time t =
`0, we have
`
` —t
`p2 = P20€xp(V/CO)
`
`(3.11)
`
`This is a classic exponential-decay situation and is analogous to dis-
`charging a capacitor through a resistor. V/CO is the time constant for
`the process, and for a typical case of a 100 l chamber and a 10 US
`roughing pump, the time constant is 10 s. This means that evacuation
`to 10‘5 Pa would take place in a mere 4 min. In practice, hoWever,
`Eq.. (3.11) is obeyed only down to 10 Pa or so. At lower p, evacuation
`slows down progressively as the added load from outgassing of the
`chamber walls now dominates the situation. Outgassing is one of the
`major contamination sources that we will discuss in the next section.
`
`3.4» Contamination Sources
`
`The sensitivity of a deposition process to contamination varies greatly
`With the materials involved and depends on whether the depositing
`fiifl} incorporates or rejects the contaminants arriving at its surface.
`This. in turn, depends on the chemical. reactivity of the surface with
`the Contaminants. For example, gold is not very reactive and can be
`d'alflosited with high purity in a poor vacuum, whereas aluminum
`reacts with and incorporates almost all arriving contaminants except
`the Inert gases. The degree to which contamination needs to be con-
`trolled must be assessed separately for each material system by analy-
`815 Of the resulting film. Whenever film properties are poorer than
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`46
`
`
`Vacuum Technology
`
`
`
`nants responsible for this result?
`As discussed in Chap. 1, contaminants can be introduced in all four
`
`
`
`steps in the deposition process: source, transport, deposition, and
`
`analysis. The contaminants associated with the source and analysis
`
`steps will be addressed in Chaps. 4 and 10, respectively. Here, we are
`
`proc:
`char:
`
`((1)1114.
`
`process
`chamb‘
`
`a
`F.
`
`l
`
`(b) fluii
`
`Figure 3.4
`phase at
`
`there. .
`cleanin
`process
`stream
`eventu:
`as we v
`
`diffusio
`backstr
`A mo
`of flow :
`
`in Figs.
`face pa1
`face, b1:
`undocu]
`from th
`stream.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`pumps, gas evolution from chamber materials, and dust stirred up
`from surfaces.
`
`3.4.1 Oil backstreaming
`Oil backstreaming into the process chamber can occur whenever oil is
`used as the pump operating fluid or lubricant. The rate at which this
`occurs is much higher than one would predict from the relatively low
`room-temperature vapor pressures (pV) of oils used in vacuum technol-
`ogy This is because pumps usually run hot, and the pv of any material
`rises very steeply (exponentially) with T. For example, a typical rotary
`pump oil has a pv of 10“4 Pa at 25° C but a pv of 10"1 Pa at a pump
`operating temperature of 85° C.
`
`between the process
`chamber and an oil diffusion pump. Despite the flow of gas toward the
`pump, oil molecules bounce freely backward toward the process cham—
`ber without encountering any resistance from the countercurrent gas
`flow, because the gas and oil molecules do not collide with each other
`when Kn > 1. Some but not all of the oil will condense on the room-
`temperature walls of the tube before reaching the chamber. The rem‘
`edy is to place in the tube a baffle which is optically opaque, meaning
`that there is no line-of-sight path for an oil molecule through it with‘
`out encountering at least one surface (two is better). Figure 3.441
`shows the traditional “chevron” baffle or trap, named after the look—
`alike sergeant’s stripes. The trap is cooled with chilled water or, better
`
`yet, liquid nitrogen (LN2), so that the oil condenses on it and stays
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`3.4.1
`
`
`Oil backstreaming
`47
`
`
`ami.
`
`four
`and
`
`lys1s
`a are
`
`nent
`mate
`
`"'-
`process A / / / /
`ber
`/
`, /
`Cham
`//7\/ /
`
`/ /
`
`Oil
`
`'
`
`\\\
`. gas‘O
`
`diffusion
`pump
`
`
`
`
`'ting
`ppli-
`g in
`also
`
`iber,
`:ipal
`will
`the
`
`1 up
`
`)il is
`this
`low
`mol-
`erial
`
`tary
`ump
`
`‘
`
`(a) molecular flow
`
`uncooled creep path W—d '1
`urf
`ace creep
`
`S
`
`A? purge O laminar flow plug flow approximation
`flow Q
`PM #5.“ ,
`/
`I I 5:, ll
`.
` process
`
`chamber
`
`turbopump
`
`
`Ph( Z)
`Z
`
`((3) fluid flow
`
`Figure 3.6% Oil backstreaming behavior in the two flow regimes, showing both gas-
`phase and surface paths
`
`flow
`alec—
`cess
`
`l the
`1am-
`
`. gas
`ther
`)om-
`
`Eemv
`uing
`with-
`3.4a
`ook—
`atter
`
`there. However, the trap will bewarrned up on occasion, either for
`cleaning or due to coolant failure. A valve can be used to block off the
`process chamber on such occasions, but then oil still reaches the down-
`stream face of the valve and is bound to work its way into the chamber
`eventually. Gas purging of the warm trap can stop the backstreaming,
`as we will see below, but this is getting complicated. It is clear why oil
`diffusion pumps are listed in Table 3.1 as having the highest risk of oil
`backstreaming.
`A more insidious backstreaming mechanism which is independent
`9f flow regime is surface diffusion (or “creep,” or migration), as shown
`In Figs. 3.4a and b. It is possible to stop this with a trap having no sur-
`face Pathway through it that does not encounter an LN2-cooled sur-
`facs, but most traps do not have this feature. Another possible but
`Undocumented remedy is to heat the surface so that the oil evaporates
`mm the surface and into the cold trap or, in fluid flow, into the gas
`Stream EVen turbomolecular pumps, which are generally accepted as
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
` 48
`Vacuum Technology
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`being clean due to the very high compression ratio for heavy molecules
`such as oil, would seem to be susceptible to surface creep.
`Turbopumps and molecular drag pumps lose their high compression
`ratio when stalled, such as during a power failure or following bearing
`seizure. Then, rapid backstreaming can occur

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket