`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`HTC CORPORATION AND HTC AMERICA, INC.
`Petitioner
`v.
`
`E-WATCH, INC. and E—WATCH CORPORATION
`Patent Owner
`
`Case IPR2014-00989
`
`Patent 7,643,168
`
`MANDATORY NOTICE OF PATENT OWNER AND RELATED MATTERS
`
`
`
`This notice is filed in accordance with the requirements of 37 CPR §42.8(a)(2)
`
`1. Real Party in Interest: e-Watch, Inc., a Nevada Corporation having a service address of:
`Robert C. Curfiss
`
`19826 Sundance Drive
`
`Humble, TX 77346
`
`‘ Tel:
`Fax:
`
`832-573-1442
`832-644-6152
`
`email: bob@curfiss.com
`
`2. Lead Counsel: Robert C. Curfiss (Reg. No. 26540)
`Attorney
`19826 Sundance Drive
`
`Humble, TX 77346
`
`Tel:
`Fax:
`
`832-573—1442
`832-6446 152
`
`e-mail: bob@curfiss.com
`
`Back-up Counsel:
`David 0. Simmons (Reg. No. 43,124)
`Registered Patent Agent
`IVC Patent Agency
`- PO. Box 26584
`
`Austin, TX 78755
`
`Tel:
`Fax:
`
`512-345-9767
`512-680-6105
`
`e-mail: dsimmons 1 @sbcglobalnet
`
`
`
`3. Notice of Related Matters:
`h]
`
`1.
`
`t0
`
`e-Watch, Inc. and e-Watch Corporation v. Apple, Inc., Cause No. 13-01061
`filed on December 9, 2013;
`
`e—Watch, Inc. and e—Watch Corporation 1). Blackberry Limited and Blackberry
`Corporation, Cause No. 13-01078; Amended Complaint
`filed on
`December 13, 2013;
`-
`
`Inc. and e-Watch Corporation '0. HTC Corporation and HTC
`e-Watch,
`America, Inc, Cause No. 13-01063; Amended Complaint filed on
`December 13, 2013;
`
`e-Watch, Inc. and e—Watch Corporation v. Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd and
`Huawei Technologies USA,
`Inc, Cause No.
`13-01076 Amended
`Complaint filed on December 13, 2013;
`
`e-Watch, Inc. and e—Watch Corporation v. Kyocera Comn-ntnications, Inc. and
`Kyocera International, Inc, Cause No. 13-01077 filed on December 9,
`2013;
`
`Inc., LG
`Inc. and e—Watclz Conroration 0. LG Electronics,
`e—Watch,
`Electronics USA, Inc. and LG Electronics Mobilecomm U.S.A., Cause No.
`13-01064; Amended Complaint filed on December 13, 2013;
`
`e—Watch, Inc. and e—Watch Corporation ‘0. Nokia Corporation and Nokia, Inc,
`Cause N0. 13-01075; Amended Complaint filed on December 13, 2013;
`
`e-Watch, Inc. and e—Watch Corporation v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and
`Samsung Telecommunications America,
`Inc., Cause No.
`13-01062
`Amended Complaint filed on December 13, 2013;
`
`9.
`
`Inc. and e—Watch Corporation a. Sharp Corporation and Sharp
`e-Watch,
`Electronics Corporation, Cause No. 13-01074; Amended Complaint filed
`on December 13, 2013;
`
`10. e-Watch, Inc. and e—Watch Corporation a. Sony Corporation, Sony Mobile
`Communications AB, and Sony Mobile Communications (USA), Inc, Cause
`No. 13-01073; Amended Complaint filed on December 13, 2013; and
`
`11. e-Watch, Inc. and e-Watch Corporation '0. ZTE Corporation, ZTE (USA),
`Inc. and ZTE Solutions, Inc., Ca use Nu.13-01071;Amended Complaint
`
`filed on December 13, 2013.
`
`
`
`12. IPR2014-00439, Iron Dome LLC Petitioner v. e-Watch, Inc. Patent owner, US Pat. No.
`
`7,365,871
`
`13. IPR2014-00987, HTC Corporation Petitioner v. e-Watch, Inc. Patent owner, U.S.Pat. No.
`
`7,365, 871
`
`
`
`4. Notice of Service Information:
`
`Patent owner consents to electronic service and service by e-mail, in lieu of paper
`
`delivery, at bob@curfiss.com, with copy to dsimmonsl@sbcglobalnet
`
`5. Notice of Service: This Mandatory Notice and Related Matters was served by first class mail
`on:
`
`Bing Ai, Reg. No. 43,312
`Cheng C. (Jack) Ko, Reg. No. 54,227
`Kevin Patariu, Reg. No. 63,210
`Babak Tehranchi, Reg. No. 55,937
`
`Counsel for HTC CORPORATION and
`
`HTC AMERICA, INC.
`
`PERKINS COIE LLP
`
`11988 El Camino Real, Suite 350
`
`San Diego, CA 92130
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Robert C. Curfiss/
`
`Lead Counsel
`
`e-Watch, Inc. Patent owner
`
`19826 Sundance Drive
`
`Humble, TX 77346
`
`e-mail: bob@curfiss.com
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
