`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`HTC CORPORATION and HTC AMERICA, INC.
`Petitioners
`
`v.
`
`E-WATCH, INC. and E-WATCH CORPORATION
`Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CASE: To Be Assigned
`Patent No. 7,643,168 B2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DECLARATION OF KENNETH PARULSKI IN SUPPORT OF PETITION
`FOR INTER PARTES REVIEW OF U.S. PATENT NO. 7,643,168 B2
`
`
`
`HTC Exhibit 1008
`
`

`

`TABLE OF CONTENTS
`
`
`Page
`INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................... 1
`I.
`SUMMARY OF OPINIONS .......................................................................... 3
`II.
`III. QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE .................................................... 4
`A.
`Education and Work Experience .......................................................... 4
`B.
`Compensation ....................................................................................... 8
`C. Documents and Other Materials Relied Upon ..................................... 8
`IV. STATEMENT OF LEGAL PRINCIPLES ..................................................... 8
`A.
`Claim Construction .............................................................................. 8
`B. Anticipation .......................................................................................... 9
`C. Obviousness .......................................................................................... 9
`LEVEL OF ORDINARY SKILL IN THE ART .......................................... 10
`V.
`VI. TECHNOLOGY BACKGROUND OF CLAIMED SUBJECT
`MATTER OF THE 168 PATENT................................................................ 11
`A.
`Evolution of Digital Cameras ............................................................. 11
`B.
`Image Processing in Digital Cameras ................................................ 14
`C.
`Proliferation of Commercially Available Digital Cameras ................ 16
`D.
`Integrated versus Modular Implementations ...................................... 22
`E.
`Image Compression Technologies ..................................................... 25
`F.
`Evolution of Mobile Telephony and Image Transmission................. 27
`VII. OVERVIEW OF THE 168 PATENT ........................................................... 34
`VIII. IDENTIFICATION OF THE PRIOR ART AND SUMMARY OF
`OPINIONS .................................................................................................... 35
`IX. CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ......................................................................... 36
`A.
`“Media being suitable to embody … algorithm” in Claims 1-31 ...... 37
`X. UNPATENTABILITY OF THE 168 PATENT CLAIMS ........................... 38
`A. GROUND 1: CLAIMS 1-6, 8, 10-11, 13-15, 21-29 AND 31
`ARE UNPATENTABLE UNDER 35 U.S.C. § 103(A) AS
`OBVIOUS OVER MORITA IN VIEW OF SARBADHIKARI ....... 38
`
`
`
`
`
`-i-
`
`
`
`HTC Exhibit 1008
`
`

`

`TABLE OF CONTENTS
`(continued)
`
`Page
`
`
`
`B. GROUND 2: CLAIMS 16-18 ARE UNPATENTABLE
`UNDER 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) AS BEING OBVIOUS OVER
`MORITA AND SARBADHIKARI, COMBINED WITH
`LONGGINOU .................................................................................... 62
`C. GROUND 3: CLAIMS 1-6, 8, 10-11, 16-18, 21-22, 24, 26-27
`AND 29 ARE UNPATENTABLE UNDER 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)
`AS OBVIOUS OVER WILSKA IN VIEW OF YAMAGISHI-
`992 ...................................................................................................... 68
`D. GROUND 4: CLAIMS 13-15, 23, 25, 28 AND 31 ARE
`UNPATENTABLE UNDER 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) AS BEING
`OBVIOUS OVER WILSKA AND YAMAGISHI-992,
`COMBINED WITH MCNELLEY .................................................. 103
`ATTACHMENTS A-D
`
`
`
`
`
`-ii-
`
`
`
`HTC Exhibit 1008
`
`

`

`DECLARATION OF KENNETH PARULSKI
`IN SUPPORT OF PETITION FOR INTER PARTES REVIEW
`OF U.S. PATENT NO. 7,643,168 B2
`
`
`I.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`1. My name is Kenneth Parulski. I was the former Chief Scientist in the Digital
`
`Camera and Devices Division of Eastman Kodak Company and I am currently
`
`Chief Scientist and Managing Member of aKAP Innovation, LLC, which I
`
`founded in June 2012. aKAP Innovation, LLC provides innovation and
`
`digital photography related consulting services, and participates in the
`
`development of ISO (“International Organization for Standardization”)
`
`standards for digital photography.
`
`2.
`
`I have been engaged by HTC Corporation and HTC America, Inc. (“HTC”) to
`
`investigate and opine on certain issues relating to U.S. Patent No. 7,643,168
`
`B2 entitled “APPARATUS FOR CAPTURING, CONVERTING AND
`
`TRANSMITTING A VISUAL IMAGE SIGNAL VIA A DIGITAL
`
`TRANSMISSION SYSTEM” (“168 Patent”) in HTC’s Petition for Inter
`
`Partes Review of the 168 Patent (“HTC IPR Petition”) which requests the
`
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) to review and cancel Claims 1-6, 8,
`
`10-11, 13-18, 21-29 and 31 of the 168 Patent, which, based on my
`
`understanding, are all the claims that are currently being asserted in a patent
`
`litigation against HTC.
`
`- 1 -
`
`HTC Exhibit 1008
`
`

`

`DECLARATION OF KENNETH PARULSKI
`IN SUPPORT OF PETITION FOR INTER PARTES REVIEW
`OF U.S. PATENT NO. 7,643,168 B2
`
`3.
`
`I understand that, according to USPTO assignment records of the 168 Patent,
`
`the 168 Patent is owned by E-Watch, Inc. It is also my understanding that E-
`
`Watch Corporation claims to be the exclusive licensee of the 168 Patent. E-
`
`Watch, Inc. and E-Watch Corporation are asserting the 168 Patent in litigation
`
`against HTC and others and are therefore referred to as the “Patent Owner” in
`
`this Declaration.
`
`4.
`
`In this declaration, I will discuss the technology related to the 168 Patent,
`
`including an overview of that technology as it was known prior to, and up to
`
`the January 12, 1998 filing date to which the parent of the 168 Patent claims
`
`priority. This overview of the relevant technology provides some of the bases
`
`for my opinions with respect to the 168 Patent.
`
`5. This declaration is based on the information currently available to me. To the
`
`extent that additional information becomes available, I reserve the right to
`
`continue my investigation and study, which may include a review of
`
`documents and information that may be produced, as well as testimony from
`
`depositions that may not yet be taken.
`
`6.
`
`In forming my opinions, I have relied on information and evidence identified
`
`in this declaration, including the 168 Patent, the prosecution history of the 168
`
`Patent, and prior art references listed as Exhibits to the Petition for Inter
`
`Partes Review of the 168 Patent. I have also relied on my own experience
`
`- 2 -
`
`HTC Exhibit 1008
`
`

`

`DECLARATION OF KENNETH PARULSKI
`IN SUPPORT OF PETITION FOR INTER PARTES REVIEW
`OF U.S. PATENT NO. 7,643,168 B2
`
`
`and expertise in the relevant technologies and systems that were already in use
`
`prior to, and within the timeframe of the earliest priority date of the claimed
`
`subject matter in the 168 Patent— January 12, 1998.
`
`II.
`
`SUMMARY OF OPINIONS
`
`7. The claims of the 168 Patent are directed to technical issues or needs that were
`
`recognized and well understood, and technical solutions that were well
`
`developed to address the technical issues or needs, at the time of filing the 168
`
`Patent – January 12, 1998.
`
`8. For purpose of my analysis in this declaration only and based on the
`
`disclosure and file history of the 168 Patent, I provide my proposed
`
`construction of certain terms in Claims 1-6, 8, 10-11, 13-18, 21-29 and 31 in
`
`detail in a later part of this declaration.
`
`9.
`
`In simple terms, Claims 1-6, 8, 10-11, 13-18, 21-29 and 31 of the 168 Patent
`
`attempt to claim the combination of a handheld wireless telephone and a
`
`digital camera having components and features which were well-known at the
`
`time. It is my opinion that there is nothing novel in the claims of the 168
`
`Patent and Claims 1-6, 8, 10-11, 13-18, 21-29 and 31 of the 168 Patent merely
`
`recite routine and common features that were well known and were published
`
`before the filing of the 168 Patent and are rendered obvious by the prior art
`
`cited in the HTC IPR Petition.
`
`- 3 -
`
`HTC Exhibit 1008
`
`

`

`DECLARATION OF KENNETH PARULSKI
`IN SUPPORT OF PETITION FOR INTER PARTES REVIEW
`OF U.S. PATENT NO. 7,643,168 B2
`
`10. The subsequent sections of this declaration will first provide my qualifications
`
`and experience and then describe details of my analysis and observations of
`
`Claims 1-6, 8, 10-11, 13-18, 21-29 and 31 of the 168 Patent.
`
`III. QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE
`A. Education and Work Experience
`11. I received a Master of Science degree and a Bachelor of Science degree in
`
`Electrical Engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in
`
`1980. I completed my master’s thesis research while working at Motorola
`
`Corporate Research Labs from 1978 through 1980, where I developed a
`
`system for transmitting a series of digital images from a moving vehicle over
`
`an FM radio communications link to a base station. The laboratory where I
`
`worked was managed by Dr. Martin Cooper, who led the Motorola team that
`
`built and demonstrated the world’s first handheld cellular telephone.
`
`12. I joined Kodak Research Labs in 1980, and began developing and
`
`implementing image processing algorithms. Beginning in 1984, I led a
`
`project to develop the world’s first color megapixel digital camera system
`
`prototype. Prints made using this system were exhibited at the Photokina
`
`trade show in 1986, in Kodak’s first public demonstration of its digital
`
`photography technology. Photokina is the world’s largest trade show for the
`
`imaging industry. I also lead teams which developed an image processing
`
`- 4 -
`
`HTC Exhibit 1008
`
`

`

`DECLARATION OF KENNETH PARULSKI
`IN SUPPORT OF PETITION FOR INTER PARTES REVIEW
`OF U.S. PATENT NO. 7,643,168 B2
`
`
`VLSI chipset for digital video cameras, and designed high performance video
`
`cameras for industrial and government applications.
`
`13. From approximately 1986 through 1992, I served as Kodak’s technical
`
`representative to the Advanced Television Research Program at MIT, which
`
`developed “source adaptive” video compression technologies now used in
`
`most HDTV transmission systems. As part of this project, I became a named
`
`inventor on a television decoding patent which was licensed by MIT to many
`
`HDTV manufacturers.
`
`14. Beginning in 1992, I served as architect of Kodak’s first generation of
`
`consumer-oriented digital still cameras, which included the Kodak DC40
`
`camera as well as the Apple QuickTake 100 camera, the first digital camera
`
`marketed by Apple. In my role as digital camera architect at Kodak and
`
`through my participation in various projects I acquired experience in all
`
`aspects of digital camera design, including the selection of hardware and
`
`software components, user interfaces, and image formats.
`
`15. I am a named inventor on more than 200 issued United States patents. Most
`
`of these inventions related to digital cameras and digital photography systems,
`
`and have been broadly licensed by Kodak to more than 40 companies for use
`
`in digital cameras, smartphones, and photo sharing services. Licensing these
`
`- 5 -
`
`HTC Exhibit 1008
`
`

`

`DECLARATION OF KENNETH PARULSKI
`IN SUPPORT OF PETITION FOR INTER PARTES REVIEW
`OF U.S. PATENT NO. 7,643,168 B2
`
`
`patents provided Kodak with earnings of more than $2 Billion dollars from
`
`2005 to 2010.
`
`16. I have authored more than 50 presentations and papers, including invited talks
`
`on digital cameras in the US, Europe and Asia. I authored the “Digital
`
`Photography” chapter in the Consumer Digital Electronics Handbook by
`
`McGraw-Hill 1997, and co-authored the “Color Image Processing for Digital
`
`Cameras” chapter in the Digital Color Imaging Handbook; CRC Press 2003. I
`
`have also developed and taught Kodak internal courses on video technology
`
`and digital cameras.
`
`17. I have served as Chair of the IT10 standards committee for digital
`
`photography since 1994. This group provides the officially recognized United
`
`States input for many international standards used by digital cameras,
`
`including smart phone digital cameras. In addition, from March 2007 through
`
`February 2013, I was chair of ISO technical committee 42 (ISO/TC42), which
`
`is responsible for all international photography standards. In May 2013, I was
`
`elected chair of the US technical advisory group to ISO/TC42. From June 3-
`
`7, 2013, I served as head of the US delegation to the 23rd plenary meeting of
`
`ISO/TC42, held at the National Museum in Copenhagen, Denmark.
`
`18. I currently serve as an expert in ISO Technical Committee 42 (Photography),
`
`and am co-project leader (with Mr. Toru Nagata of Canon) for both ISO
`
`- 6 -
`
`HTC Exhibit 1008
`
`

`

`DECLARATION OF KENNETH PARULSKI
`IN SUPPORT OF PETITION FOR INTER PARTES REVIEW
`OF U.S. PATENT NO. 7,643,168 B2
`
`
`12234-1:2012 Electronic still-picture imaging -- Removable memory -- Part
`
`1: Basic removable-memory model, which standardizes image formats,
`
`including the Exif image format, used in digital cameras and ISO/WD 12234-
`
`3, which is intended to standardize the use of XMP metadata in digital
`
`photography.
`
`19. I am a Fellow of the Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers. In
`
`2001, Kodak received a Technical Emmy Award for contributions I made to
`
`the development of the 24P HDTV production standard, which is used by
`
`Hollywood studios to produce movies and TV programs. In 2002, I received
`
`the Photo-imaging Manufacturing & Distributors Association Technical
`
`Achievement Award for “pioneering work in the development of digital
`
`imaging technology,” becoming the first digital photography expert to be
`
`honored by this photographic association. In 2008, I received the
`
`International Imaging Industries Association (I3A) Achievement Award, for
`
`“significant contributions to the advancement and growth of the imaging
`
`industry.”
`
`20. A copy of my resume is provided as Attachment A at the end of this
`
`Declaration.
`
`- 7 -
`
`HTC Exhibit 1008
`
`

`

`DECLARATION OF KENNETH PARULSKI
`IN SUPPORT OF PETITION FOR INTER PARTES REVIEW
`OF U.S. PATENT NO. 7,643,168 B2
`
`B. Compensation
`21. I am being compensated at the rate of $525 per hour for the services I am
`
`providing in this case. The compensation is not contingent upon my
`
`performance, the outcome of this inter partes review or any other proceeding,
`
`or any issues involved in or related to this inter partes review.
`
`C. Documents and Other Materials Relied Upon
`22. The documents on which I rely for the opinions expressed in this declaration
`
`are documents and materials identified in this declaration, including the 168
`
`Patent, related patents and applications in the same family as the 168 Patent,
`
`the prosecution histories for the 168 Patent and related family members of the
`
`168 Patent, the prior art references and information discussed in this
`
`declaration, and any other references specifically identified in this declaration,
`
`in their entirety, even if only portions of these documents are discussed here in
`
`an exemplary fashion.
`
`IV. STATEMENT OF LEGAL PRINCIPLES
`A. Claim Construction
`23. I understand that, when construing claim terms, a claim subject to inter partes
`
`review receives the “broadest reasonable construction in light of the
`
`specification of the patent in which it appears.” I further understand that the
`
`broadest reasonable construction is the broadest reasonable interpretation
`
`- 8 -
`
`HTC Exhibit 1008
`
`

`

`DECLARATION OF KENNETH PARULSKI
`IN SUPPORT OF PETITION FOR INTER PARTES REVIEW
`OF U.S. PATENT NO. 7,643,168 B2
`
`
`(BRI) of the claim language, and that any term that lacks a definition in the
`
`specification is also given a broad interpretation.
`
`B. Anticipation
`24. I understand that in order for a patent claim to be valid, the claimed invention
`
`must be novel. I further understand that if each and every element of a claim
`
`is disclosed in a single prior art reference, then the claimed invention is
`
`anticipated, and the invention is not patentable according to pre-AIA 35
`
`U.S.C. § 102 effective before March 16, 2013. In order for the invention to be
`
`anticipated, each element of the claimed invention must be described or
`
`embodied, either expressly or inherently, in the single prior art reference. In
`
`order for a reference to inherently disclose a claim limitation, that claim
`
`limitation must necessarily be present in the reference. I also understand that
`
`a prior art reference must be enabling in order to anticipate a patent claim.
`
`C. Obviousness
`25. I understand that obviousness under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. § 103 effective before
`
`March 16, 2013 is a basis for invalidity. Specifically, I understand that where
`
`a prior art reference discloses less than all of the limitations of a given patent
`
`claim, that patent claim is invalid if the differences between the claimed
`
`subject matter and the prior art reference are such that the claimed subject
`
`matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was
`
`- 9 -
`
`HTC Exhibit 1008
`
`

`

`DECLARATION OF KENNETH PARULSKI
`IN SUPPORT OF PETITION FOR INTER PARTES REVIEW
`OF U.S. PATENT NO. 7,643,168 B2
`
`
`made to a person having ordinary skill in the relevant art. Obviousness can be
`
`based on a single prior art reference or a combination of references that either
`
`expressly or inherently disclose all limitations of the claimed invention.
`
`V. LEVEL OF ORDINARY SKILL IN THE ART
`26. I understand that the claims and specification of a patent must be read and
`
`construed through the eyes of a person of ordinary skill in the art at the time of
`
`the priority date of the claims. I also understand that to determine the
`
`appropriate level of a person having ordinary skill in the art, the following
`
`factors may be considered: (a) the types of problems encountered by those
`
`working in the field and prior art solutions thereto; (b) the sophistication of
`
`the technology in question, and the rapidity with which innovations occur in
`
`the field; (c) the educational level of active workers in the field; and (d) the
`
`educational level of the inventor.
`
`27. The relevant technologies to the 168 Patent are those used in digital cameras
`
`and other digital imaging devices which capture, compress, store, and
`
`wirelessly transmit images, and also provide wireless telephony. The 168
`
`Patent describes embodiments which capture a video image using a digital
`
`camera, analog camera, or a camcorder, convert the image to a digital format,
`
`and transmit the image to a remote location using, for example, the Group-III
`
`fax protocol. (See Col. 2, lines 37-45).
`
`- 10 -
`
`HTC Exhibit 1008
`
`

`

`DECLARATION OF KENNETH PARULSKI
`IN SUPPORT OF PETITION FOR INTER PARTES REVIEW
`OF U.S. PATENT NO. 7,643,168 B2
`
`28. Based on the above considerations and factors, it is my opinion that a person
`
`having ordinary skill in the art would have at least a bachelor’s degree in
`
`electrical engineering, computer science, or a related field, and 3-5 years of
`
`experience in designing digital imaging devices. This description is
`
`approximate and additional educational experience in digital imaging could
`
`make up for less work experience and vice versa.
`
`VI. TECHNOLOGY BACKGROUND OF CLAIMED SUBJECT
`MATTER OF THE 168 PATENT
`A. Evolution of Digital Cameras
`29. The first known working prototype digital camera was designed by Mr.
`
`Steven Sasson of Kodak between 1974 and 1976. This work lead to U.S.
`
`Patent No. 4,131,919, titled “Electronic still camera,” and issued to Lloyd and
`
`Sasson. Sasson’s prototype digital camera was publicly revealed for the first
`
`time many decades later, in the digital camera history portion of an invited
`
`paper entitled “The Continuing Evolution of Digital Cameras and Digital
`
`Photography Systems,” which I personally presented in Geneva, Switzerland
`
`at the IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems in May 2000.
`
`30. The Sasson prototype digital camera used the lens and optical viewfinder from
`
`a Kodak XL55 Super 8mm film movie camera. The image sensor was a
`
`Fairchild type 201 CCD array having 100 x 100 pixels. The sensor’s analog
`
`- 11 -
`
`HTC Exhibit 1008
`
`

`

`DECLARATION OF KENNETH PARULSKI
`IN SUPPORT OF PETITION FOR INTER PARTES REVIEW
`OF U.S. PATENT NO. 7,643,168 B2
`
`
`output signal was digitized using a 4-bit A/D converter. The prototype
`
`camera captured and stored black and white still images using a standard
`
`Phillips digital cassette tape. The tape recorded 2275 bits/sec, moving at 5-1/4
`
`inches/sec. It took 23 seconds to capture and store each image, and each tape
`
`could store up to 30 images.
`
`31. Despite this primitive technology, Mr. Sasson recognized that images from
`
`electronic cameras could be sent over conventional communication channels
`
`with little or no modification, and mentioned this possibility in the 1977
`
`Kodak technical report he authored which described the camera and playback
`
`system he had just developed. (See “Driving desired futures – turning design
`
`thinking into real innovation”, Shamiyeh, Birkhauser Verlag GmbH, Basel,
`
`2014, pp. 238-247)
`
`32. On Aug 24, 1981, Sony chairman Akio Morita demonstrated the Sony
`
`MAVICA electronic still camera and described the Sony MAVICA system,
`
`which included a printer and a telephone transmission unit for transmitting
`
`images captured by the MAVICA camera. I personally attended the IEEE
`
`Conference on Consumer Electronics in June 1982, where Sony presented
`
`their first technical papers describing their MAVICA camera and transmission
`
`system. The MAVICA camera stored up to 50 images on an approximately 2”
`
`MAVIPAK floppy disk (See Kihara, et al, “The electronic still camera – a
`
`- 12 -
`
`HTC Exhibit 1008
`
`

`

`DECLARATION OF KENNETH PARULSKI
`IN SUPPORT OF PETITION FOR INTER PARTES REVIEW
`OF U.S. PATENT NO. 7,643,168 B2
`
`
`new concept in photography,” IEEE Trans Consumer Electronics, Vol. CE-28,
`
`No. 3, Aug 1982). A slightly modified version of the “MAVIPAK” was later
`
`standardized as the “still video floppy” (SVF).
`
`33. Canon was the first company to sell electronic still cameras in the US, when
`
`they introduced the Canon RC-701 electronic camera in 1986. The Canon
`
`RC-701 system components included the camera, a player/recorder, a printer,
`
`and a unit for phone transmission of images captured by the camera. Early
`
`prototypes of the camera and phone transmission unit were designed for the
`
`1984 Los Angeles Olympic Games so that images of Olympic events could be
`
`captured with the camera and wirelessly transmitted using the Canon
`
`electronic transmitter connected to an automobile telephone to a Japanese
`
`newspaper, Yomiuri Shimbun. (See http://www.canon.com/camera-
`
`museum/history/canon_story/1976_1986/1976_1986.html)
`
`34. By 1989, many other companies, including Fuji, Konica, Minolta, Nikon,
`
`Olympus, Sony and Panasonic were selling electronic still cameras using the
`
`SVF format. (See Kriss, et al. “Critical technologies for electronic still
`
`imaging systems,” SPIE vol. 1082, pp. 157-184 at p. 159) Systems assembled
`
`from products available at the time included the ability to send images
`
`anywhere in the world, using image transceivers connected to telephone
`
`communication systems. (ibid at p.158)
`
`- 13 -
`
`HTC Exhibit 1008
`
`

`

`DECLARATION OF KENNETH PARULSKI
`IN SUPPORT OF PETITION FOR INTER PARTES REVIEW
`OF U.S. PATENT NO. 7,643,168 B2
`
`35. All digital cameras envisioned, designed or produced prior to the 1998 priority
`
`date of the 168 Patent include essentially the same fundamental components:
`
`an optics section that receives the light from an object, a semiconductor image
`
`sensor, such as a CCD array, that receives the light and produces
`
`corresponding electrical signals, an analog-to-digital converter that converts
`
`the analog signals into digital image data, at least one processing component,
`
`such as a microprocessor or specialized circuitry which controls image capture
`
`operations and performs subsequent digital image processing, and a memory
`
`which stores the digital images. The very same fundamental components that
`
`were known as early as the 1970s appear as claim elements in the 168 Patent.
`
`B.
`Image Processing in Digital Cameras
`36. By the early 1990s, it was widely known that digital camera images could be
`
`processed using custom hardware circuitry or using programmable processors
`
`which execute software algorithms. For example, the first publication
`
`describing an experimental digital camera was made by NHK in 1983 (See
`
`“Fully Digitalized Electronic Still Camera”, Ohnishi, et. al., J. Inst. TV Engnrs
`
`of Japan, Vol. 37, No. 10 (1983) pp. 863-868). In this camera, images were
`
`captured by a color image sensor and stored using a detachable static RAM
`
`memory. An Intel 8086 microprocessor, located in a playback device, was
`
`- 14 -
`
`HTC Exhibit 1008
`
`

`

`DECLARATION OF KENNETH PARULSKI
`IN SUPPORT OF PETITION FOR INTER PARTES REVIEW
`OF U.S. PATENT NO. 7,643,168 B2
`
`
`used to perform image processing, including color separation, white balance,
`
`and gamma correction.
`
`37. Custom digital processing integrated circuits were then developed for use in
`
`digital still and video cameras. (See “A Basic Approach to a Digital Color
`
`Camera System”, O’Keefe, et al., IEEE Trans on Consumer Electronics, Vol.
`
`CE-30, No. 3, Aug. 1984, pp 409-415 and “A High-Performance Digital Color
`
`Video Camera”, Parulski et al., SPIE Vol. 1448 Camera and Input Scanner
`
`Systems, 1991, pp 45-58). These hardwired integrated circuits performed
`
`specific digital image processing functions, in order to rapidly produce full-
`
`color images from a single-chip color image sensor. A microprocessor could
`
`be used to set some of the image processing parameters, in order to perform
`
`functions such as white balancing and flare correction, and adjust the
`
`processing to match the user’s preferences.
`
`38. Digital cameras developed as early as the 1980s included a software
`
`programmable processor which controlled the camera hardware in order to
`
`capture, store, and retrieve images. For example, the world’s first D-SLR
`
`camera, which was called the “Electro-optic” camera and was designed and
`
`constructed by Eastman Kodak Company under a U.S. Government contract
`
`between 1987 and 1988, used software commands executed by an Intel
`
`80C196 16 bit microcontroller to control the camera. (See
`
`- 15 -
`
`HTC Exhibit 1008
`
`

`

`DECLARATION OF KENNETH PARULSKI
`IN SUPPORT OF PETITION FOR INTER PARTES REVIEW
`OF U.S. PATENT NO. 7,643,168 B2
`
`
`http://eocamera.jemcgarvey.com/). The software commands were written in
`
`the PL/M language, and included, for example, commands which opened the
`
`camera shutter and exposed the image sensor to light, controlled a SCSI
`
`magnetic hard disk drive in order to write and read image data, and controlled
`
`the camera status display module. (See
`
`http://eocamera.jemcgarvey.com/pdf/firmware.pdf).
`
`C.
`Proliferation of Commercially Available Digital Cameras
`39. The Fuji DS-1P digital camera, announced in September 1988, was the first
`
`digital still camera to be publicly demonstrated. The camera stored digital
`
`images using a removable card having RAM semiconductor memory ICs.
`
`Rechargeable batteries on the removable card were used to power the RAM,
`
`in order to retain the images. In 1990, Dycam introduced their “Model 1”
`
`portable digital still camera, the first digital camera with a list price of under
`
`$1,000. The Dycam Model 1 stored up to 32 monochrome, QVGA resolution
`
`(376 x 240 pixel) images in internal RAM memory, which was continuously
`
`powered by batteries in order to retain the images. (See “Point and shoot
`
`digital electronic camera introduced”, Electronic Photography News, Sept
`
`1990, p. 7)
`
`40. In 1991, Kodak introduced the Kodak Professional Digital Camera System,
`
`later known as the DCS-100, which consisted of a camera back fitted to a
`
`- 16 -
`
`HTC Exhibit 1008
`
`

`

`DECLARATION OF KENNETH PARULSKI
`IN SUPPORT OF PETITION FOR INTER PARTES REVIEW
`OF U.S. PATENT NO. 7,643,168 B2
`
`
`Nikon F3 camera and a separate digital storage unit (DSU) connected to the
`
`camera back using a digital interconnect cable. The DSU included a magnetic
`
`hard drive which stored the captured images and an LCD display which
`
`displayed a user interface and the images captured by the digital camera. The
`
`DSU also included a set of 12 keys which enabled the camera operator to
`
`select images and perform operations such as image transmission. The DSU
`
`also included a keyboard connector, which enabled the user to enter text, such
`
`as image titles, captions, and keywords, using a separate keyboard. A Telebit
`
`T2500 modem was used to transmit user-selected image files from the digital
`
`storage unit over a telephone line to a remote Macintosh computer. Captured
`
`images were selected for transmission using the display and keys on the DSU.
`
`(See “User’s Manual, Kodak Professional Digital Camera System”, 1991-
`
`1992)
`
`41. The Apple QuickTake 100 was introduced in February 1994. I was the
`
`architect of the Apple QuickTake 100 and 150 cameras, which were designed
`
`by Kodak and marketed by Apple. The QuickTake 100 stored a maximum of
`
`8 VGA (640 x 480 pixels) “high resolution” images or 32 QVGA (320 x 240
`
`pixels) “standard resolution” images in a 1 MB internal Flash EPROM
`
`memory. The digital images were compressed prior to storage in the camera
`
`using a Kodak developed ADPCM (Adaptive Differential Pulse Code
`
`- 17 -
`
`HTC Exhibit 1008
`
`

`

`DECLARATION OF KENNETH PARULSKI
`IN SUPPORT OF PETITION FOR INTER PARTES REVIEW
`OF U.S. PATENT NO. 7,643,168 B2
`
`
`Modulation) software compression algorithm contained in the camera’s
`
`firmware memory. In 1994, I co-authored a paper at the Imaging Science and
`
`Technology (IS&T) Conference that detailed the architecture and components
`
`of this camera. The presentation was subsequently published as “Digital,
`
`Still-Optimized Architecture for Electronic Photography”, IS&T’s 47th
`
`Annual Conference/ICPS 1994, pp. 665-667, which is reproduced in
`
`Attachment B at the end of this Declaration. The digital image compression
`
`algorithm in this camera was executed by a Texas Instruments (TI) digital
`
`signal processor (DSP), controlled by Kodak developed software instructions.
`
`The TI DSP read the image data from a RAM buffer memory, performed
`
`image compression, and stored the compressed image data in the camera’s
`
`Flash EPROM memory.
`
`42. I was also the architect of the Kodak DC40 camera, which was introduced in
`
`April 1995. The DC40 used 4 Mbytes of internal Flash EPROM memory to
`
`store 48 images at 400K pixel resolution, or 99 lower resolution images. It
`
`took approximately 6 seconds in order to capture, compress, and store each
`
`digital image. The camera used an improved Kodak designed RADC (Rate
`
`Adaptive Different Compression) image compression algorithm, which was
`
`executed by a TI DSP within the camera. (See “The digital camera using new
`
`compression and interpolation algorithm”, Shimizu et. al., SPSTJ 70th
`
`- 18 -
`
`HTC Exhibit 1008
`
`

`

`DECLARATION OF KENNETH PARULSKI
`IN SUPPORT OF PETITION FOR INTER PARTES REVIEW
`OF U.S. PATENT NO. 7,643,168 B2
`
`
`Anniversary Symposia on Fine Imaging, pp 69-72, Oct 1995, Tokyo, Japan, in
`
`Japanese)
`
`43. The Olympus VC-1100 camera, introduced in 1994, included image
`
`transmission capabilities. The user could connect an accessory modem to the
`
`VC-1100 and transmit digital photos over cellular and analog phone lines to a
`
`second camera or to a personal computer. The VC-1100 camera included a
`
`zoom lens as well as an LCD viewfinder which was used to compose images
`
`prior to capture. The captured images were stored on removable PCMCIA
`
`cards.
`
`44. The Casio QV-10 digital camera, released in 1995 in Japan included an LCD
`
`panel for composing and reviewing digital still images, rather than an LCD or
`
`CRT electronic viewfinder, or an optical viewfinder. (see
`
`http://world.casio.com/news/2012/0913_qv10/) The Casio QV-10 used 2 MB
`
`of internal Flash memory in order to store a maximum of 96 JPEG
`
`compressed color images with 320 x 240 pixels. A 32-bit RISC
`
`microcontroller was used to perform JPEG compression by executing the
`
`compression algorithm instructions which were stored in a ROM memory.
`
`