throbber

`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`HTC CORPORATION; HTC AMERICA, INC.; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
`CO., LTD.; and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`E-WATCH, INC. and E-WATCH CORPORATION
`Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`
`CASE IPR2014-009891
`Patent No. 7,643,168
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PETITIONER’S NOTICE REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`
`
`1 Case IPR2015-00543 has been joined with this proceeding.
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2014-00989
`Patent No. 7,643,168
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70 and the Board’s Scheduling Order dated
`
`December 9, 2014 (Paper 7), Petitioners HTC and Samsung give notice that they
`
`do not seek oral argument. HTC and Samsung submit that the issues currently on
`
`trial in this proceeding have been briefed adequately and oral argument is not
`
`necessary. Earlier today on May 26, 2015, Patent Owner e-Watch filed its request
`
`for oral hearing but did not specify the issues to be argued.
`
`In the event that the Board grants Patent Owner’s request for oral argument
`
`or finds that oral argument would be helpful in deciding any of the issues, HTC
`
`and Samsung request participation in oral argument and request that HTC and
`
`Samsung be given a reasonable amount of time to present their arguments.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
` /Bing Ai/
`Lead Counsel,
`Bing Ai, Reg. No. 43,312
`
`Back-Up Counsel
`Cheng C. (Jack) Ko, Reg. No. 54,227
`Kevin Patariu, Reg. No. 63,210
`Babak Tehranchi, Reg. No. 55,937
`
`PERKINS COIE LLP
`
`Counsel for HTC Corporation and HTC
`America, Inc.
`
`Dated: May 26, 2015
`
`
`
`
` /Steven L. Park/
`Lead Counsel,
`Steven L. Park, Reg. No. 47,842
`
`Back-Up Counsel
`Naveen Modi, Reg. No. 46,224
`Elizabeth L. Brann, Reg. No. 63,987
`
`
`PAUL HASTINGS LLP
`
`Counsel for Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
`and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
`
`Dated: May 26, 2015
`
`1
`
`

`

`IPR2014-00989
`Patent No. 7,643,168
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a true copy of the foregoing
`
`Petitioner’s Notice Regarding Oral Argument was served this 26th day of May
`
`2015 by electronic mail upon the following:
`
`Robert C. Curfiss
`19826 Sundance Drive
`Humble, Texas 77346-1402
`bob@curfiss.com
`
`David O. Simmons
`IVC Patent Agency
`P.O. Box 26584
`Austin, Texas 77755
`Dsimmons1@sbcglobal.net
`
`Respectfully submitted,
` /Bing Ai/
`Lead Counsel,
`Bing Ai, Reg. No. 43,312
`
`Back-Up Counsel
`Cheng C. (Jack) Ko, Reg. No. 54,227
`Kevin Patariu, Reg. No. 63,210
`Babak Tehranchi, Reg. No. 55,937
`
`PERKINS COIE LLP
`
`Counsel for HTC Corporation and HTC
`America, Inc.
`
`Dated: May 26, 2015
`
`
`
`
` /Steven L. Park/
`Lead Counsel,
`Steven L. Park, Reg. No. 47,842
`
`Back-Up Counsel
`Naveen Modi, Reg. No. 46,224
`Elizabeth L. Brann, Reg. No. 63,987
`
`
`PAUL HASTINGS LLP
`
`Counsel for Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
`and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
`
`Dated: May 26, 2015
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket