throbber
EXHIBIT A.12
`U.S. Patent No. 7,147,759
`
`References cited herein:
`
`(cid:120) U.S. Patent No. 7,147,759 (“‘759 Patent”)
`
`(cid:120) U.S. Pat. No. 6,413,382 (“Wang”)
`
`(cid:120) A. A. Kudryavtsev, et al, Ionization relaxation in a plasma produced by a pulsed inert-gas
`discharge, Sov. Phys. Tech. Phys. 28(1), January 1983 (“Kudryavtsev”)
`
`(cid:120) EP 1 113 088 (“Yamaguchi”)
`
`Claim 38
`
`[20pre.] A method
`of generating
`sputtering flux, the
`method comprising:
`
`[20a.] ionizing a
`feed gas to generate
`a weakly-ionized
`plasma proximate to
`a sputtering target;
`
`Wang in view of Kudryavtsev and Yamaguchi
`
`The combination of Wang and Kudryavtsev discloses a method of
`generating sputtering flux.
`
`Wang at Title (“Pulsed sputtering with a small rotating magnetron.”).
`
`The combination of Wang and Kudryavtsev discloses ionizing a feed
`gas to generate a weakly-ionized plasma proximate to a sputtering
`target.
`
`Wang at Fig. 1
`
`Wang at 4:5-6 (“A sputter working gas such as argon is supplied from a
`gas source 32….”).
`
`Wang at 4:20-21 (“… a reactive gas, for example nitrogen is supplied
`to the processing space 22….”).
`
`Wang at 7:17-31 (“The background power level PB is chosen to exceed
`the minimum power necessary to support a plasma... [T]he application
`of the high peak power PP quickly causes the already existing plasma to
`spread and increases the density of the plasma.”)
`
`Wang at 7:19-25 (“Preferably, the peak power PP is at least 10 times the
`background power PB … and most preferably 1000 times to achieve the
`greatest effect of the invention. A background power PB of 1 kW
`[causes] little if any actual sputter deposition.”)
`
`Wang at 4:23-31 (“A small rotatable magnetron 40 is thus creating a
`region 42 of a high-density plasma (HDP)…”)
`
`[20b.] generating a
`magnetic field
`proximate to the
`
`The combination of Wang and Kudryavtsev discloses generating a
`magnetic field proximate to the weakly-ionized plasma, the magnetic
`field substantially trapping electrons in the weakly-ionized plasma
`
`ActiveUS 122346308v.1
`
`1
`
`GILLETTE 1232
`
`

`

`EXHIBIT A.12
`U.S. Patent No. 7,147,759
`
`Claim 38
`
`weakly-ionized
`plasma, the
`magnetic field
`substantially
`trapping electrons in
`the weakly-ionized
`plasma proximate to
`the sputtering target;
`and
`
`Wang in view of Kudryavtsev and Yamaguchi
`
`proximate to the sputtering target.
`
`‘759 Patent at 3:10-12 (“FIG. 1 shows a cross-sectional view of a
`known magnetron sputtering apparatus 100…” that has a magnet 126.”)
`
`‘759 Patent at 4:4-10 [describing the prior art Fig. 1] (“The electrons,
`which cause ionization, are generally confined by the magnetic fields
`produced by the magnet 126. The magnetic confinement is strongest in
`a confinement region 142….”)
`
`Wang at Fig. 1.
`
`Wang at 4:23-27 (“A small rotatable magnetron 40 is disposed in the
`back of the target 14 to create a magnetic field near the face of the
`target 14 which traps electrons from the plasma to increase the electron
`density.”)
`The combination of Wang and Kudryavtsev discloses applying a
`voltage pulse to the weakly-ionized plasma, an amplitude and a rise
`time of the voltage pulse being chosen to increase an excitation rate of
`ground state atoms that are present in the weakly-ionized plasma to
`create a multi-step ionization process that generates a strongly-ionized
`plasma, which comprises ions that sputter target material, from the
`weakly-ionized plasma, the multi-step ionization process comprising
`exciting the ground state atoms to generate excited atoms, and then
`ionizing the excited atoms within the weakly-ionized plasma without
`forming an arc discharge.
`
`‘759 Patent at Fig. 5
`Wang at Figs. 6, 7.
`
`Wang at 7:61-62 (“The pulsed DC power supply 80 produces a train of
`negative voltage pulses.”).
`
`[20c.] applying a
`voltage pulse to the
`weakly-ionized
`plasma, an
`amplitude and a rise
`time of the voltage
`pulse being chosen
`to increase an
`excitation rate of
`ground state atoms
`that are present in
`the weakly-ionized
`plasma to create a
`multi-step ionization
`process that
`generates a strongly-
`ionized plasma,
`which comprises
`ions that sputter
`target material, from
`the weakly-ionized
`plasma, the multi-
`step ionization
`process comprising
`exciting the ground
`state atoms to
`generate excited
`
`ActiveUS 122346308v.1
`
`2
`
`

`

`Claim 38
`
`atoms, and then
`ionizing the excited
`atoms within the
`weakly-ionized
`plasma without
`forming an arc
`discharge.
`
`EXHIBIT A.12
`U.S. Patent No. 7,147,759
`
`Wang in view of Kudryavtsev and Yamaguchi
`
`Wang at 5:23-27 (“[The pulse’s] exact shape depends on the design of
`the pulsed DC power supply 80, and significant rise times and fall
`times are expected.”).
`
`Wang at 4:29-31 (“increases the sputtering rate...”).
`
`Wang at 7:19-25 (“Preferably, the peak power level PP is at least 10
`times the background power level PB, … most preferably 1000 times to
`achieve the greatest effects of the invention. A background power PB
`of 1 kW will typically be sufficient…”)
`
`Wang at 7:31-39 (“The SIP reactor is advantageous for a low-power,
`low-pressure background period since the small rotating SIP magnetron
`can maintain a plasma at a lower power and lower pressure than can a
`larger stationary magnetron. However, it is possible to combine highly
`ionized sputtering during the pulses With significant neutral sputtering
`during the back ground period.”).
`
`Wang at 7:3-6 (“Plasma ignition, particularly in plasma sputter
`reactors, has a tendency to generate particles during the initial arcing,
`which may dislodge large particles from the target or chamber.”)
`
`Wang at 7:47-49 (“The initial plasma ignition needs be performed only
`once and at much lower power levels so that particulates produced by
`arcing are much reduced.”).
`
`Wang at 7:13-28 (“Accordingly, it is advantageous to use a target
`power waveform illustrated in FIG. 6… As a result, once the plasma
`has been ignited at the beginning of sputtering prior to the illustrated
`waveform…”).
`
`Kudryavtsev at 34, right col, ¶ 4 (“Since the effects studied in this work
`are characteristic of ionization whenever a field is suddenly applied to a
`weakly ionized gas, they must be allowed for when studying emission
`mechanisms in pulsed gas lasers, gas breakdown, laser sparks, etc.”)
`
`Kudryavtsev at Fig. 1
`
`ActiveUS 122346308v.1
`
`3
`
`

`

`EXHIBIT A.12
`U.S. Patent No. 7,147,759
`
`Claim 38
`
`Wang in view of Kudryavtsev and Yamaguchi
`
`Kudryavtsev at Fig. 6
`
`Kudryavtsev at 31, right col, ¶ 7 (“The behavior of the increase in ne
`with time thus enables us to arbitrarily divide the ionization process
`into two stages, which we will call the slow and fast growth stages.
`Fig. 1 illustrates the relationships between the main electron currents in
`terms of the atomic energy levels during the slow and fast stages.”).
`
`Kudryavtsev at 31, right col, ¶ 6 (“For nearly stationary n2 [excited
`atom density] values … there is an explosive increase in ne [plasma
`density]. The subsequent increase in ne then reaches its maximum
`value, equal to the rate of excitation [equation omitted], which is
`several orders of magnitude greater than the ionization rate during the
`initial stage.”)
`
`Kudryavtsev at Abstract (“[I]n a pulsed inert-gas discharge plasma at
`moderate pressures… [i]t is shown that the electron density increases
`explosively in time due to accumulation of atoms in the lowest excited
`
`ActiveUS 122346308v.1
`
`4
`
`

`

`EXHIBIT A.12
`U.S. Patent No. 7,147,759
`
`Claim 38
`
`Wang in view of Kudryavtsev and Yamaguchi
`
`states.”)
`
`If one of ordinary skill, applying Wang’s power levels did not
`experience Kudryavtsev’s “explosive increase” in plasma density, it
`would have been obvious to adjust the operating parameters, e.g.,
`increase the pulse length and/or pressure, so as to trigger Kudryavtsev’s
`fast stage of ionization. One of ordinary skill would have been
`motivated to use Kudryavtsev’s fast stage of ionization in Wang so as
`to increase plasma density and thereby increase the sputtering rate.
`Further, use of Kudryavtsev’s fast stage in Wang would have been a
`combination of old elements that yielded predictable results of
`increasing plasma density and multi-step ionization.
`
`Kudryavtsev states, “[s]ince the effects studied in this work are
`characteristic of ionization whenever a field is suddenly applied to a
`weakly ionized gas, they must be allowed for when studying emission
`mechanisms in pulsed gas lasers, gas breakdown, laser sparks, etc.”
`Kudryavtsev at 34, right col, ¶ 4 (Ex. 1004). Because Wang applies
`voltage pulses that “suddenly generate an electric field,” one of
`ordinary skill reading Wang would have been motivated to consider
`Kudryavtsev and to use Kudryavtsev’s fast stage in Wang.
`
`The combination of Wang with Kudryavtsev and Yamaguchi discloses
`ionizing the feed gas comprises exposing the feed gas to an electrode
`that is adapted to emit electrons.
`
`See evidence cited in claim 20.
`
`Wang at 1:6-8 (“…the invention relates to sputtering apparatus and a
`method capable of producing a high fraction of ionized sputter
`particles.”).
`
`Wang at 1:25-29 (“…the positively charged sputtered ions can be
`accelerated towards a negatively charged wafer and reach deep into
`high aspect-ratio holes.”).
`
`Yamaguchi at ¶ [0027] (“introducing … a sputtering discharge gas,
`such as a rare gas…at the center of an ionizing space.”)
`
`Yamaguchi at ¶ [0027] (emphasis added) (“The ionizing mechanism 6,
`which is of a hot cathode type using Penning ionization, ionizes
`sputtering ions by hitting thermoelectrons, emitted from a hot electrode
`against ... sputtering discharge gas particles…”)
`
`38. The method of
`claim 20 wherein
`the ionizing the feed
`gas comprises
`exposing the feed
`gas to an electrode
`that is adapted to
`emit electrons.
`
`ActiveUS 122346308v.1
`
`5
`
`

`

`EXHIBIT A.12
`U.S. Patent No. 7,147,759
`
`Claim 38
`
`Wang in view of Kudryavtsev and Yamaguchi
`
`Yamaguchi at ¶¶ [0012]-[0013]. (“It is an object of the present
`invention … to form a film at a high bottom coverage ratio…”; “It is
`another object of the present invention to provide a film forming
`method…and apparatus which can prevent substrate temperature from
`increasing.”)
`
`Yamaguchi at ¶ [0012] (“It is an object of the present invention…to
`form a film at a high bottom coverage ratio even on a substrate with
`deep grooves on its surface.”).
`
`Yamaguchi at ¶ [0015] (“These objects are attained by…ionizing
`sputtering particles…”).
`
`It would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill to combine the
`heated electrodes of Yamaguchi in the sputtering device of Wang.
`Both Wang and Yamaguchi relate to sputtering devices where
`ionization of the sputtered target material is carried out to achieve
`improved deposition in deep holes or grooves. Wang at 1:6-8 (“…the
`invention relates to sputtering apparatus and a method capable of
`producing a high fraction of ionized sputter particles.”); Wang at 1:25-
`29 (“…the positively charged sputtered ions can be accelerated towards
`a negatively charged wafer and reach deep into high aspect-ratio
`holes.”); Yamaguchi at ¶ [0012] (“It is an object of the present
`invention…to form a film at a high bottom coverage ratio even on a
`substrate with deep grooves on its surface.”); Yamaguchi at ¶ [0015]
`(“These objects are attained by…ionizing sputtering particles…”). A
`combination of Yamaguchi’s heated electrodes that emit electrons in
`the sputtering device described by Wang would be a combination of
`known elements in which each element performed as expected.
`
`ActiveUS 122346308v.1
`
`6
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket