throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
` Paper No. 17
` Entered: August 22, 2014
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`505 GAMES, INC., ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC., BLIZZARD
`ENTERTAINMENT, INC., CAPCOM U.S.A. INC., THE WALT DISNEY
`CO., DISNEY INTERACTIVE STUDIOS, INC., LUCASARTS,
`ELECTRONIC ARTS INC., BANDAI NAMCO GAMES AMERICA,
`INC., BANDAI NAMCO HOLDINGS USA INC., RIOT GAMES, INC.,
`SONY COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT AMERICA LLC, SQUARE
`ENIX, INC., SQUARE ENIX OF AMERICA HOLDINGS, INC., TAKE-
`TOW INTERACTIVE SOFTWARE, INC., ROCKSTAR GAMES, INC.,
`2KSPORTS, INC., 2K GAMES, INC., and UBISOFT, INC.,
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`BABBAGE HOLDINGS, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2014-00954
`Patent 5,561,811
`____________
`
`Before MEREDITH C. PETRAVICK, KALYAN K. DESHPANDE, and
`MATTHEW R. CLEMENTS, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`CLEMENTS, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of the Proceeding
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`

`

`IPR2014-00954
`Patent 5,561,811
`
`
`A conference call was held on August 21, 2014, between respective
`
`counsel for the parties and Judges Petravick, Deshpande, and Clements. The
`
`following issues were discussed.
`
`Petitioner’s Powers of Attorneys
`
`According to 37 C.F.R. § 42.2, “Petitioner” means “the party filing a
`
`petition requesting that a trial be instituted.” In circumstances not involving
`
`a motion for joinder or consolidation of separate proceedings, for each
`
`“petition” there is but a single party filing the petition, no matter how many
`
`companies are listed as petitioner or petitioners and how many companies
`
`are identified as real parties-in-interest. Thus, before the Board, the separate
`
`companies constitute and stand in the shoes of a single “Petitioner.”
`
`Because the eleven companies constitute, collectively, a single party, they
`
`must speak with a single voice, both in writing and oral representation.
`
`We observed that the Petition, in accordance with our rules, identifies
`
`a single lead counsel, Mr. Eric A. Buresh, and identifies as backup counsel
`
`Mssrs. Patrick D. McPherson, Paul R. Hart, and Phillip D. Mancini. Pet.
`
`51-52. We noted, however, that the powers of attorney were not consistent
`
`with that designation. Specifically, the power of attorney filed by Sony
`
`(Paper 9) does not include Mssrs. Buresh or Hart, and the powers of attorney
`
`filed by the other real parties in interest (Papers 2-8, 10-12) do not include
`
`Mssrs. McPherson or Mancini.
`
`Mr. Paul Hart, counsel for Petitioner, indicated that he spoke on
`
`behalf of not only 505 Games, Activision, Capcom, Disney, Electronic Arts,
`
`Bandai Namco, Riot Games, Square Enix, Take-Two, and Ubisoft,1 but also
`
`
`1 505 Games (U.S.), Inc. (“505 Games”); Activision Blizzard, Inc. and
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2014-00954
`Patent 5,561,811
`
`Sony Computer Entertainment America LLC (“Sony”). He also indicated
`
`that Mr. Mancini had changed employment, and would no longer serve as
`
`back-up counsel.
`
`We instructed Petitioner to file updated powers of attorney consistent
`
`with the designation of lead and backup counsel in the Petition.
`
`Specifically, Sony’s power of attorney must include Mssrs. Buresh and Hart
`
`if Mr. Buresh is to be lead counsel and Mr. Hart is to serve as backup
`
`counsel in this proceeding. Similarly, the powers of attorney for 505 Games,
`
`Activision, Capcom, Disney, Electronic Arts, Bandai Namco, Riot Games,
`
`Square Enix, Take-Two, and Ubisoft must include Mr. McPherson if he is to
`
`serve as backup counsel in this proceeding.
`
`Authorization for Motion to Withdraw
`
`Patent Owner previously engaged Mr. John Kasha and Ms. Kelly
`
`Kasha as lead and backup counsel, respectively, in this proceeding. Paper
`
`14. Subsequently, Patent Owner engaged Mr. David Judson and Mr.
`
`Anthony Garza as lead counsel and back-up counsel, respectively, for this
`
`proceeding (Paper 15), and filed a revised power of attorney appointing
`
`Mssrs. Judson and Garza (Paper 16). Patent Owner requested authorization
`
`
`Blizzard Entertainment, Inc. (collectively, “Activision”); Capcom U.S.A.,
`Inc. (“Capcom”); The Walt Disney Co., Disney Interactive Studios, Inc., and
`LucasArts, a division of Lucasfilm Entertainment Company Ltd. LLC
`(collectively, “Disney”); Electronic Arts Inc. (“Electronic Arts”); BANDAI
`NAMCO Games America, Inc. and BANDAI NAMCO Holdings USA Inc.
`(collectively, “Bandai Namco”); Riot Games, Inc. (“Riot Games”); Square
`Enix, Inc. and Square Enix of America Holdings, Inc. (collectively, “Square
`Enix”); Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc., Rockstar Games, Inc.,
`2KSports, Inc., and 2K Games, Inc. (collectively, “Take-Two”); and
`Ubisoft, Inc. (“Ubisoft”)
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2014-00954
`Patent 5,561,811
`
`to file a motion seeking the withdrawal of Mr. and Ms. Kasha as counsel.
`
`Petitioner had no objection. We authorized the requested motion.
`
`
`
`ORDER
`
`It is hereby
`
`ORDERED that Petitioner file updated powers of attorney consistent
`
`with the designation of lead and backup counsel no later than Friday, August
`
`29, 2014;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Patent Owner is authorized to file the
`
`requested Motion to Withdraw; and
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Patent Owner file a revised Mandatory
`
`Notice omitting Mr. Kasha and Ms. Kasha as back-up counsel.
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`IPR2014-00954
`Patent 5,561,811
`
`PETITIONERS:
`
`Eric A. Buresh
`Paul R. Hart
`ERISE IP, P.A.
`eric.buresh@eriseip.com
`paul.hart@eriseip.com
`
`
`Patrick D. McPherson
`Phillip D. Mancini
`DUANE MORRIS LLP
`PDMcPherson@duanemorris.com
`PDMancini@duanemorris.com
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`David H. Judson
`LAW OFFICE OF DAVID H. JUDSON
`mail@davidjudson.com
`
`
`Anthony M. Garza
`CHARHON CALLAHAN ROBSON & GARZA
`agarza@ccrglaw.com
`
`John Kasha
`john.kasha@kashalaw.com
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket