throbber
Basic
`Circuit
`Theory
`
`Charles A. Desoer
`and
`Ernest S. Kuh
`
`Department of Electrical Engineering
`and Computer Sciences
`University of California, Berkeley
`
`McGraw-Hill Book Company
`New York St. Louis San Francisco
`London Sydney Toronto
`Mexico Panama
`
`RPX-Farmwald Ex. 1047, p 1
`
`

`

`To the University of California
`on Its Centennial
`
`Basic Circuit Theory
`
`Copyright© 1969 by McGraw-Hill, Inc. All rights reserved.
`Printed in the United States of America. No part of this
`publication may be reproduced, stored in Ir-retrieval system,
`or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic,
`mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without
`the prior written permission of the publisher.
`Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 68-9551
`
`ISBN 07-016575-0
`56789-MAMM-7 6543 2
`
`RPX-Farmwald Ex. 1047, p 2
`
`

`

`Chap. 9 Network Graphs and Tellegen's Theorem 396
`
`Thus, we have shown that given any set of branch voltages subject to KVL
`only and any set of branch currents subject to KCL only, the sum of the
`products v,Jk is zero. This concludes the proof.
`
`Exercise 1 Suppose that starting from the reference node and following a certain path
`to node @, we obtain (by adding appropriate branch voltages) for its
`node potential the value ea. Show that if following another path we were
`to obtain a potential e~ =:/=ea, then the branch voltages of these two paths
`would violate KVL.
`
`Exercise 2 Consider an arbitrary network driven by any number of sources of any
`kind. Let v1(t), v2(t), ... , v,,(t) and }i(t),)2(t), ... ,}b(t) be its branch voltages
`and currents at time t. If ta and tb are arbitrarily selected instants of time,
`what can you say about
`b L Vk(ta)}k(tb)
`
`k = l
`
`- Applications
`
`5.1
`
`Conservation of Energy
`
`for all t
`
`Considering an arbitrary network, we have, with the notations of
`Tellegen's theorem,
`b 2: vk(t)jk(t) = o
`k = l
`Since vk(t)}k(t) is the power delivered at time t by the network to branch k,
`the theorem may be interpreted as follows: at any time t the sum of the
`power delivered to each branch of the network is zero. Suppose the net(cid:173)
`work has several independent sources; separating in the sum the sources
`from the other branches, we conclude that the sum of the power delivered by
`the independent sources to the network is equal to the sum of the power ab(cid:173)
`sorbed by all the other branches of the network. From a philosophical point
`of view, this means that as far as lumped circuits are concerned, KVL and
`KCL imply conservation of energy.
`Let us briefly look into the interpretation of this conservation of energy
`as far as linear time-invariant RLC networks are concerned. The power
`delivered by the sources is the rate at which energy is absorbed by the
`network. The energy is either dissipated in the resistors at the rate
`R!fik2(t) for the kth resistor, or it is stored as magnetic energy in inductors
`[~L,Jk2(t)] or as electric energy in capacitors [~Ckvk2(t)). When ele(cid:173)
`ments are time-varying (as in electric motors and generators or in para(cid:173)
`mAtrir <>mnlifi"""' thP rli"""""inn 1c: mnr.h mnrP. r.nmn1icated and is dis-
`
`RPX-Farmwald Ex. 1047, p 3
`
`

`

`Sec. 5 Applications 397
`
`Remark Tellegen's theorem has some rather astonishing consequences. For ex(cid:173)
`ample, consider two arbitrary lumped networks whose only constraint is
`to have the same graph.
`In each one of these networks, let us choose the
`same reference directions and number the branches in a similar fashion.
`(The networks may be nonlinear and time-varying and include inde(cid:173)
`pendent sources as well as dependent sources.) Let uk,}k be the branch
`voltages and currents of the first network and ~.]k be corresponding
`branch voltages and currents of the second. Since the uk's and 'V"k's satisfy
`the same set of KVL constraints and since the ]k's and the }k's satisfy the
`same set of KCL constraints, Tellegen's theorem guarantees that
`b
`b
`2.: ulfik = 2.: 'V"Jk = o
`k = l
`and
`b
`2.: 'V"lfik = 2.: uJk = o
`k=•
`k = l
`Note that whereas the first two are expressions of the conservation of
`energy, the last two expressions do not have an energy interpretation be(cid:173)
`cause they involve voltages of one network and currents of another.
`
`k = l
`
`b
`
`5.2
`
`Conservation of Complex Power
`
`(5.1)
`
`Consider a linear time-invariant network. For simplicity let it have only
`one sinusoidal source in branch 1, as shown in Fig. 5.1. Suppose that the
`network is in the sinusoidal steady state. For each branch (still using
`associated reference directions), we represent the branch voltage uk by
`the phasor Vi and the branch current }k by the phasor Jk. Clearly,
`Vi, V2, . .. , v;, and Ji.J2, ... , Jb satisfy all the constraints imposed by KVL
`and KCL. However, the conjugates] 1, 12, . .. , Jb also satisfy all the KCL
`constraints; therefore, by Tellegen's theorem
`b L ~Vk]k=O
`k = l
`Since Vi is the source voltage and J 1 is the associated current measured
`with respect to the associated reference direction, ~Vi ] 1 is the complex
`power delivered to branch I by the rest of the network, and hence - ~Vi] 1
`is the complex power delivered by the source to the rest of the network.
`We rewrite Eq. (5.1) as follows:
`b
`-~ViJ1 = 2.: ~Vi]k
`k = 2
`Clearly, the above can be generalized to networks with more than one
`source. Thus. we state the theorem of conseruation of complex power as
`
`RPX-Farmwald Ex. 1047, p 4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket