throbber
1
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
`ORLANDO DIVISION
`
`Docket No. 3:11-CV-719
`
` . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` .
`
`08:33:24
`08:35:33
`08:35:33
`08:35:33
`08:35:33
`
`08:35:33
`08:35:33
`08:35:33
`
` 1
`
` 2
`
` 3
`
` 4
`
` 5
`
`08:35:33
`
` 6
`
`08:35:33
`
` 7
`
`08:35:33
`08:35:33
`08:35:33
`08:35:33
`08:35:33
`08:35:33
`08:35:33
`08:35:33
`08:35:33
`08:35:33
`08:35:33
`08:35:33
`08:35:33
`
` 8
`
` 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
` PARKERVISION, INC. :
` :
`Orlando, Florida
` Plaintiff :
`October 10, 2013
` :
`9:01 a.m.
` v. :
` :
`QUALCOMM, INCORPORATED :
` :
` Defendant :
`. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
`
`
`
`
`TRANSCRIPT OF JURY TRIAL
`DAY FOUR
`BEFORE THE HONORABLE ROY B. DALTON
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`08:35:33
`
`15
`
`08:35:33
`
`16
`
`
`
`
`
`08:35:33
`08:35:33
`08:35:33
`08:35:33
`08:35:33
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`RPX-Farmwald Ex. 1015, p 1
`
`

`

` 2
`
`08:35:33
`
` 1
`
`APPEARANCES:
`
`08:35:33
`
` 2
`
`
`
`08:35:33
`
` 3
`
`For the Plaintiff: Douglas A. Cawley
`
`08:35:33
`
` 4
`
`08:35:33
`
` 5
`
`08:35:33
`
` 6
`
`08:35:33
`
` 7
`
`08:35:33
`
` 8
`
`08:35:33
`
` 9
`
`08:35:33
`
`10
`
`
`
`
`
` Joshua W. Budwin
`
` Leah Buratti
`
` Kevin Kneupper
`
` Stephen D. Busey
`
` Kevin Burgess
`
`
`
`08:35:33
`
`11
`
`For the Defendant: Stephen C. Neal
`
`08:35:33
`
`12
`
`08:35:33
`
`13
`
` Timothy S. Teter
`
` John DeVault
`
`08:35:33
`
`14
`
`
`
`08:35:33
`
`15
`
`08:35:33
`
`16
`
`08:35:33
`
`17
`
`08:35:33
`
`18
`
`08:35:33
`
`19
`
`08:35:33
`
`20
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`08:35:33
`
`21
`
`Court Reporter:
`
`Amie R. First, RPR, CRR
`
`08:35:33
`
`22
`
`AmieFirst.CourtReporter@gmail.com
`
`08:35:33
`
`23
`
`
`
`08:35:33
`
`24
`
`Proceedings recorded by mechanical stenography.
`
`08:35:33
`
`25
`
`Transcript produced by Computer-Aided Transcription.
`
`RPX-Farmwald Ex. 1015, p 2
`
`

`

` 3
`
`08:38:47
`
` 1
`
`P R O C E E D I N G S
`
`09:01:54
`
` 2
`
`THE COURT: Good morning, everyone. We're back on
`
`09:01:55
`
` 3
`
`the record in ParkerVision versus Qualcomm, Case Number
`
`09:01:58
`
` 4
`
`3:11-CV-719.
`
`09:02:02
`
` 5
`
`Counsel, ready to proceed?
`
`09:02:06
`
` 6
`
`MR. BUDWIN: Yes, Your Honor.
`
`09:02:06
`
` 7
`
`MR. NEAL: We are, Your Honor. We have a few
`
`09:02:08
`
` 8
`
`unobjected to exhibits that I would like to move in. I can
`
`09:02:11
`
` 9
`
`do it now or whenever else the Court would prefer.
`
`09:02:14
`
`10
`
`THE COURT: Now is fine.
`
`09:02:15
`
`11
`
`MR. NEAL: All right. We will move in
`
`09:02:17
`
`12
`
`unobjected-to -- these are all DXs -- 85, 90, 113, 357,
`
`09:02:24
`
`13
`
`428, 466, 713, 1106, 1109, 1112, 1276, and 1701,
`
`09:02:36
`
`14
`
`Your Honor.
`
`09:02:37
`
`15
`
`THE COURT: All right. Thank you, Mr. Neal.
`
`09:02:45
`
`16
`
`(Defendant's Exhibit 85, 90, 113, 357, 428,
`
`09:02:45
`
`17
`
` 466, 713, 1106, 1109, 1112, 1276, and 1701
`
`18
`
` were received in evidence.)
`
`09:02:38
`
`19
`
`MR. NEAL: Thank you.
`
`09:02:40
`
`20
`
`THE COURT: Dr. Prucnal, how is your voice this
`
`09:02:42
`
`21
`
`morning?
`
`09:02:43
`
`22
`
`THE WITNESS: It's on the mend. Thank you.
`
`09:02:45
`
`23
`
`THE COURT: Bring our jury back, please,
`
`09:02:48
`
`24
`
`Mr. Fiorenza.
`
`09:02:53
`
`25
`
`(Jury entered the courtroom at 9:03 a.m.)
`
`RPX-Farmwald Ex. 1015, p 3
`
`

`

` 4
`
`09:03:14
`
` 1
`
`THE COURT: Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. I
`
`09:03:15
`
` 2
`
`hope you all had a pleasant evening. Were all of you able
`
`09:03:18
`
` 3
`
`to follow my instructions not to discuss the case amongst
`
`09:03:21
`
` 4
`
`yourselves or with anyone else?
`
`09:03:23
`
` 5
`
`JURY: Yes.
`
`09:03:23
`
` 6
`
`THE COURT: Were you all able to avoid any media
`
`09:03:25
`
` 7
`
`exposure in connection with the case?
`
`09:03:27
`
` 8
`
`JURY: Yes.
`
`09:03:27
`
` 9
`
`THE COURT: All right. Are you ready to proceed,
`
`09:03:30
`
`10
`
`Mr. Budwin?
`
`09:03:31
`
`11
`
`MR. BUDWIN: Yes, Your Honor.
`
`09:03:32
`
`12
`
`THE COURT: All right. You may inquire.
`
`09:03:35
`
`13
`
`CONTINUED DIRECT EXAMINATION
`
`09:03:35
`
`14
`
`BY MR. BUDWIN:
`
`09:03:36
`
`15
`
`09:03:38
`
`16
`
`09:03:38
`
`17
`
`09:03:40
`
`18
`
`09:03:41
`
`19
`
`Q
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Good morning, Dr. Prucnal.
`
`Good morning.
`
`How is your voice today?
`
`I think it's a little better.
`
`Maybe just move that mic a little closer to you.
`
`09:03:43
`
`20
`
`Hopefully you and I can do a little better with that today.
`
`09:03:43
`
`21
`
`09:03:45
`
`22
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Okay.
`
`Dr. Prucnal, yesterday I may have put the cart before
`
`09:03:48
`
`23
`
`the horse, and I'd like to summarize a little bit, if
`
`09:03:51
`
`24
`
`that's okay with you.
`
`09:03:52
`
`25
`
`A
`
`Okay.
`
`RPX-Farmwald Ex. 1015, p 4
`
`

`

` 5
`
`09:03:53
`
` 1
`
`MR. BUDWIN: Can we get slide 104, please,
`
`09:03:55
`
` 2
`
`Mr. Moreno? And I think we checked that last element
`
`09:03:58
`
` 3
`
`yesterday before we left. Thanks.
`
`09:04:00
`
` 4
`
`BY MR. BUDWIN:
`
`09:04:01
`
` 5
`
`09:04:06
`
` 6
`
`09:04:12
`
` 7
`
`09:04:14
`
` 8
`
`09:04:15
`
` 9
`
`09:04:21
`
`10
`
`09:04:22
`
`11
`
`09:04:23
`
`12
`
`09:04:25
`
`13
`
`09:04:28
`
`14
`
`09:04:29
`
`15
`
`09:04:30
`
`16
`
`09:04:32
`
`17
`
`Q
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Now, Dr. Prucnal, what is a patent claim?
`
`A patent claim defines the boundaries of the patent.
`
`And are the claims important?
`
`Sorry. Go ahead.
`
`Are the claims important?
`
`The claims are very important, yes.
`
`And why is that?
`
`Because the claims define what the patent is.
`
`Now, is what we see here a patent claim?
`
`Yes.
`
`Which patent is this a claim from?
`
`This is the '518.
`
`Now, are there other patents and other claims that
`
`09:04:34
`
`18
`
`you'll show us in your analysis?
`
`09:04:36
`
`19
`
`09:04:36
`
`20
`
`09:04:40
`
`21
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`A
`
`Yes.
`
`What is the claim construction?
`
`The claim construction is the Court's definition of
`
`09:04:45
`
`22
`
`certain terms within the claims.
`
`09:04:48
`
`23
`
`09:04:51
`
`24
`
`09:04:52
`
`25
`
`Q
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Is the claim construction important?
`
`Yes, it's important.
`
`And why is that?
`
`RPX-Farmwald Ex. 1015, p 5
`
`

`

` 6
`
`09:04:54
`
` 1
`
`A
`
`Because it's important to understand what the claim
`
`09:04:56
`
` 2
`
`terms mean.
`
`09:04:57
`
` 3
`
`Q
`
`And have you followed the claim constructions in your
`
`09:04:59
`
` 4
`
`analysis?
`
`09:05:01
`
` 5
`
`09:05:01
`
` 6
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Yes.
`
`Now, Dr. Prucnal, why have you put checks next to each
`
`09:05:06
`
` 7
`
`element of claim 82 of '518 patent?
`
`09:05:09
`
` 8
`
`A
`
`In the analysis that we went through yesterday, we --
`
`09:05:13
`
` 9
`
`I went through each of these claim elements and found the
`
`09:05:16
`
`10
`
`elements in the accused product and checked it off when I
`
`09:05:21
`
`11
`
`did.
`
`09:05:21
`
`12
`
`Q
`
`And what do the checks next to each claim element
`
`09:05:25
`
`13
`
`prove with respect to claim 82 in the '518 patent and the
`
`09:05:30
`
`14
`
`accused products in this case?
`
`09:05:30
`
`15
`
`09:05:34
`
`16
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`That this claim is infringed by the accused products.
`
`What do the schematics that you showed us yesterday
`
`09:05:40
`
`17
`
`represent?
`
`09:05:40
`
`18
`
`A
`
`These schematics represent the circuits that are
`
`09:05:43
`
`19
`
`within the accused products.
`
`09:05:45
`
`20
`
`Q
`
`And I may not have been clear about this, but whose
`
`09:05:49
`
`21
`
`schematics are they?
`
`09:05:50
`
`22
`
`09:05:52
`
`23
`
`09:05:54
`
`24
`
`09:05:54
`
`25
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Those are schematics from Qualcomm.
`
`Are they confidential?
`
`Yes.
`
`Now, when we were looking at the schematics yesterday,
`
`RPX-Farmwald Ex. 1015, p 6
`
`

`

` 7
`
`09:05:57
`
` 1
`
`we saw that they were printed on this yellow paper. Do you
`
`09:06:00
`
` 2
`
`understand why they were printed on this yellow paper?
`
`09:06:03
`
` 3
`
`09:06:08
`
` 4
`
`09:06:09
`
` 5
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`A
`
`Yes.
`
`Why is that?
`
`They're confidential documents. It's to distinguish
`
`09:06:12
`
` 6
`
`them from other documents. And, in addition, at the bottom
`
`09:06:15
`
` 7
`
`of each page, there is a statement of confidentiality.
`
`09:06:19
`
` 8
`
`Q
`
`And, Dr. Prucnal, do you have an understanding as to
`
`09:06:21
`
` 9
`
`why we had to look at the schematics on the ELMO instead of
`
`09:06:26
`
`10
`
`on the screen?
`
`09:06:29
`
`11
`
`A
`
`Yes. These are not in electronic form for us. These
`
`09:06:33
`
`12
`
`are hard, paper copies.
`
`09:06:35
`
`13
`
`Q
`
`To your understanding, were we allowed to make
`
`09:06:38
`
`14
`
`electronic copies of the schematics?
`
`09:06:41
`
`15
`
`09:06:43
`
`16
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`I understand that we were not.
`
`Now, what do the design documents that you showed us
`
`09:06:46
`
`17
`
`yesterday represent?
`
`09:06:49
`
`18
`
`A
`
`Those are also confidential documents from Qualcomm
`
`09:06:53
`
`19
`
`describing the chips.
`
`09:06:55
`
`20
`
`Q
`
`Now, to your knowledge, was Mr. Sorrells permitted to
`
`09:06:58
`
`21
`
`see either the schematics or the design documents before he
`
`09:07:03
`
`22
`
`showed them in court yesterday?
`
`09:07:05
`
`23
`
`09:07:06
`
`24
`
`09:07:08
`
`25
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`A
`
`Not to my knowledge.
`
`Now, why did you get access to them?
`
`Because I've entered into a confidentiality agreement.
`
`RPX-Farmwald Ex. 1015, p 7
`
`

`

` 8
`
`09:07:11
`
` 1
`
`Q
`
`Was it important in your analysis of Qualcomm's
`
`09:07:14
`
` 2
`
`infringement to review both the schematics and the design
`
`09:07:17
`
` 3
`
`documents?
`
`09:07:19
`
` 4
`
`09:07:19
`
` 5
`
`09:07:22
`
` 6
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`A
`
`Yes.
`
`Why is that?
`
`This provides the information that I need to find the
`
`09:07:26
`
` 7
`
`elements of the claim in the accused products.
`
`09:07:30
`
` 8
`
`Q
`
`And would you have been comfortable asserting
`
`09:07:33
`
` 9
`
`infringement merely by looking at high level block diagrams
`
`09:07:36
`
`10
`
`of the accused products?
`
`09:07:37
`
`11
`
`09:07:38
`
`12
`
`09:07:41
`
`13
`
`09:07:46
`
`14
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`No.
`
`Why not?
`
`High-level documents could lack the necessary detail.
`
`Now, in addition to claim 82 in the '518 patent, do
`
`09:07:51
`
`15
`
`the accused products infringe the other asserted claims?
`
`09:07:54
`
`16
`
`A
`
`Yes.
`
`09:07:55
`
`17
`
`MR. BUDWIN: Can I see slide 106 please,
`
`09:07:58
`
`18
`
`Mr. Moreno?
`
`09:07:59
`
`19
`
`BY MR. BUDWIN:
`
`09:07:59
`
`20
`
`09:08:01
`
`21
`
`09:08:06
`
`22
`
`09:08:10
`
`23
`
`09:08:14
`
`24
`
`09:08:17
`
`25
`
`Q
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`A
`
`What is this showing us, Dr. Prucnal?
`
`This shows the -- the asserted patents and claims.
`
`And which claim did you show us already, Dr. Prucnal?
`
`That was 82, claim 82 of the '518.
`
`And so can we put a check next to that one as well?
`
`Yes.
`
`RPX-Farmwald Ex. 1015, p 8
`
`

`

` 9
`
`09:08:21
`
` 1
`
`Q
`
`Now, Dr. Prucnal, are there some similarities between
`
`09:08:24
`
` 2
`
`some of the other asserted claims and claim 82 of the '518
`
`09:08:27
`
` 3
`
`patent?
`
`09:08:28
`
` 4
`
`09:08:28
`
` 5
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Yes.
`
`And do those similarities enable you to provide an
`
`09:08:31
`
` 6
`
`analysis maybe a little bit more quickly than what we
`
`09:08:34
`
` 7
`
`walked through for the one claim yesterday?
`
`09:08:36
`
` 8
`
`09:08:36
`
` 9
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Yes.
`
`And have you prepared a demonstrative graphic to help
`
`09:08:40
`
`10
`
`explain that?
`
`09:08:41
`
`11
`
`A
`
`Yes.
`
`09:08:41
`
`12
`
`MR. BUDWIN: Can I see slide 107, please,
`
`09:08:44
`
`13
`
`Mr. Moreno?
`
`09:08:45
`
`14
`
`BY MR. BUDWIN:
`
`09:08:46
`
`15
`
`09:08:48
`
`16
`
`Q
`
`A
`
`Dr. Prucnal, what are you showing us here?
`
`On the left-hand side is claim 82, which was just
`
`09:08:52
`
`17
`
`discussed. And on the right-hand side is claim 90.
`
`09:08:57
`
`18
`
`Q
`
`So let me stop you there. So the left-hand side, is
`
`09:08:59
`
`19
`
`this the claim that you already showed us?
`
`09:09:02
`
`20
`
`09:09:02
`
`21
`
`09:09:05
`
`22
`
`09:09:06
`
`23
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Yes.
`
`And is the right-hand side a new claim?
`
`Yes.
`
`And then I see some color coding. What does the color
`
`09:09:09
`
`24
`
`coding represent?
`
`09:09:10
`
`25
`
`A
`
`The color coding indicates the analogy between
`
`RPX-Farmwald Ex. 1015, p 9
`
`

`

` 10
`
`09:09:15
`
` 1
`
`elements of claim 82 and the same or similar elements of
`
`09:09:20
`
` 2
`
`claim 90.
`
`09:09:21
`
` 3
`
`Q
`
`And so by proving all of the elements of claim 82 of
`
`09:09:24
`
` 4
`
`the '518 patent, as you did yesterday, have you already
`
`09:09:28
`
` 5
`
`proven some of the elements of claim 90 of the '518 patent?
`
`09:09:32
`
` 6
`
`09:09:33
`
` 7
`
`09:09:33
`
` 8
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`A
`
`Yes.
`
`Which elements?
`
`The ones that are shown in the -- that are colored on
`
`09:09:36
`
` 9
`
`the right-hand side.
`
`09:09:37
`
`10
`
`Q
`
`And for the benefit of the record, it's the first four
`
`09:09:40
`
`11
`
`elements of claim 90 of the '518 patent?
`
`09:09:43
`
`12
`
`A
`
`Yes.
`
`09:09:44
`
`13
`
`MR. BUDWIN: And so if I could see slide 108,
`
`09:09:46
`
`14
`
`please, Mr. Moreno.
`
`09:09:48
`
`15
`
`BY MR. BUDWIN:
`
`09:09:48
`
`16
`
`09:09:51
`
`17
`
`09:09:54
`
`18
`
`Q
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`What is this, Dr. Prucnal?
`
`This is claim 90 with its elements shown.
`
`Now, in light of the color coding on the prior side,
`
`09:09:57
`
`19
`
`can we go ahead and check the first four elements here?
`
`09:10:00
`
`20
`
`A
`
`Yes.
`
`09:10:00
`
`21
`
`MR. BUDWIN: And can we do that, please,
`
`09:10:02
`
`22
`
`Mr. Moreno?
`
`09:10:04
`
`23
`
`I guess maybe we don't have that ability.
`
`09:10:08
`
`24
`
`BY MR. BUDWIN:
`
`09:10:09
`
`25
`
`Q
`
`So the first four elements you've already shown us?
`
`RPX-Farmwald Ex. 1015, p 10
`
`

`

` 11
`
`09:10:12
`
` 1
`
`09:10:13
`
` 2
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Yes.
`
`And that's the same evidence that you've shown us and
`
`09:10:16
`
` 3
`
`explained to us yesterday?
`
`09:10:17
`
` 4
`
`09:10:17
`
` 5
`
`09:10:19
`
` 6
`
`09:10:20
`
` 7
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Yes.
`
`And what do you have to show us now?
`
`The final elements of the claim.
`
`And what's the final element of the claim?
`
`09:10:23
`
` 8
`
`MR. BUDWIN: Oh, I should have asked you, in
`
`09:10:24
`
` 9
`
`advance, to slide 109, Mr. Moreno. Sorry. And put the
`
`09:10:29
`
`10
`
`checks in. There we go.
`
`09:10:32
`
`11
`
`BY MR. BUDWIN:
`
`09:10:32
`
`12
`
`Q
`
`And so what do you have left to show us, just the last
`
`09:10:35
`
`13
`
`element?
`
`09:10:36
`
`14
`
`A
`
`Yes.
`
`09:10:36
`
`15
`
`MR. BUDWIN: Can I see slide 110, please,
`
`09:10:38
`
`16
`
`Mr. Moreno?
`
`09:10:39
`
`17
`
`BY MR. BUDWIN:
`
`09:10:40
`
`18
`
`Q
`
`Dr. Prucnal, this claim recites a means for impedance
`
`09:10:44
`
`19
`
`matching at least one of said first signal and said second
`
`09:10:47
`
`20
`
`signal?
`
`09:10:47
`
`21
`
`09:10:48
`
`22
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`09:10:51
`
`23
`
`term?
`
`09:10:52
`
`24
`
`09:10:52
`
`25
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Yes.
`
`And are there claim constructions applicable to this
`
`There are.
`
`And which claim constructions?
`
`RPX-Farmwald Ex. 1015, p 11
`
`

`

` 12
`
`09:10:54
`
` 1
`
`A
`
`Impedance matching and means for impedance matching at
`
`09:10:58
`
` 2
`
`least one of said first signal and said second signal.
`
`09:11:01
`
` 3
`
`Q
`
`And has the Court provided us with the definition of
`
`09:11:03
`
` 4
`
`means for impedance-matching term?
`
`09:11:05
`
` 5
`
`09:11:06
`
` 6
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Yes.
`
`It says, has the function of impedance matching the
`
`09:11:09
`
` 7
`
`first or second signal such that the desired power is
`
`09:11:12
`
` 8
`
`transferred and the structure is an arrangement of
`
`09:11:17
`
` 9
`
`circuitry to transfer the desired power.
`
`09:11:19
`
`10
`
`A
`
`Yes.
`
`09:11:20
`
`11
`
`MR. BUDWIN: Can we advance to slide 111, please,
`
`09:11:23
`
`12
`
`Mr. Moreno?
`
`09:11:23
`
`13
`
`BY MR. BUDWIN:
`
`09:11:25
`
`14
`
`Q
`
`Now, Dr. Prucnal, what evidence do you have that the
`
`09:11:29
`
`15
`
`accused products have a means for impedance matching at
`
`09:11:32
`
`16
`
`least one of said first signal and said second signal?
`
`09:11:36
`
`17
`
`A
`
`That would be contained in the circuit diagrams in the
`
`09:11:39
`
`18
`
`technical documents.
`
`09:11:20
`
`19
`
`MR. BUDWIN: Well, let's -- if I could have the
`
`09:11:42
`
`20
`
`ELMO briefly, please, I'd like to go back to some of the
`
`09:11:46
`
`21
`
`circuit diagrams.
`
`09:11:41
`
`22
`
`BY MR. BUDWIN:
`
`09:11:20
`
`23
`
`Q
`
`So this is PX-847.
`
`09:11:57
`
`24
`
`And in particular -- in particular, schematic page
`
`09:12:02
`
`25
`
`1999.
`
`RPX-Farmwald Ex. 1015, p 12
`
`

`

` 13
`
`09:12:07
`
` 1
`
`Now, Dr. Prucnal, this is one of the pages you showed
`
`09:12:09
`
` 2
`
`us yesterday. What do we see here as related to the means
`
`09:12:13
`
` 3
`
`for impedance matching in the claim limitation?
`
`09:12:19
`
` 4
`
`A
`
`Well, we see the capacitors at the output, for
`
`09:12:23
`
` 5
`
`example.
`
`09:12:29
`
` 6
`
`Q
`
`And you're talking about these capacitors here that
`
`09:12:33
`
` 7
`
`you described to us yesterday?
`
`09:12:35
`
` 8
`
`09:12:36
`
` 9
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Yes.
`
`Now, Dr. Prucnal, if we look to schematic page 2003
`
`09:12:40
`
`10
`
`from the same exhibit, do we see additional evidence
`
`09:12:46
`
`11
`
`related to the means for impedance-matching term?
`
`09:12:49
`
`12
`
`09:12:51
`
`13
`
`09:12:53
`
`14
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`A
`
`Yes.
`
`What do we see?
`
`We see the transimpedance amplifiers which have the
`
`09:13:00
`
`15
`
`feedback circuit that I described yesterday.
`
`09:13:04
`
`16
`
`09:13:08
`
`17
`
`09:13:08
`
`18
`
`Q
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`So that's TIA I and TIA Q?
`
`Yes.
`
`And are those separate transimpedance amplifiers for
`
`09:13:11
`
`19
`
`each in phase in --
`
`09:13:11
`
`20
`
`09:13:12
`
`21
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Yes.
`
`Now, you mentioned feedback. What was the feedback,
`
`09:13:14
`
`22
`
`just to refresh your memory?
`
`09:13:15
`
`23
`
`A
`
`That's the path from the output of the amplifier back
`
`09:13:20
`
`24
`
`to the input of the amplifier.
`
`09:13:22
`
`25
`
`Q
`
`And what does that feedback path mean with respect to
`
`RPX-Farmwald Ex. 1015, p 13
`
`

`

` 14
`
`09:13:26
`
` 1
`
`the impedance?
`
`09:13:27
`
` 2
`
`A
`
`Well, this is a transimpedance amplifier. And the
`
`09:13:30
`
` 3
`
`feedback path provides low impedance at the input of the
`
`09:13:35
`
` 4
`
`TIA.
`
`09:13:36
`
` 5
`
`Q
`
`Now, remind us, what's the significance of low
`
`09:13:39
`
` 6
`
`impedance?
`
`09:13:42
`
` 7
`
`A
`
`The significance of low impedance is this is a path
`
`09:13:43
`
` 8
`
`through which current can flow.
`
`09:13:45
`
` 9
`
`MR. BUDWIN: And, Mr. Moreno, can we see JX-62 at
`
`09:13:49
`
`10
`
`page 17, please?
`
`09:13:50
`
`11
`
`BY MR. BUDWIN:
`
`09:13:50
`
`12
`
`Q
`
`This is one of the documents that you showed us
`
`09:13:52
`
`13
`
`yesterday.
`
`09:13:53
`
`14
`
`BY MR. BUDWIN:
`
`09:13:54
`
`15
`
`Q
`
`Now, Dr. Prucnal, remind us what we're seeing here.
`
`09:13:56
`
`16
`
`And can we make sure to get the first line here?
`
`09:14:05
`
`17
`
`09:14:08
`
`18
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`This is a high-level diagram of the receiver circuit.
`
`Is this the high-level diagram of the same circuit you
`
`09:14:11
`
`19
`
`were showing us in the schematics?
`
`09:14:13
`
`20
`
`09:14:14
`
`21
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Yes.
`
`Now, what's the -- where is the transimpedance
`
`09:14:20
`
`22
`
`amplifier in this figure?
`
`09:14:22
`
`23
`
`A
`
`The transimpedance amplifier is located inside the box
`
`09:14:26
`
`24
`
`that says signal pull.
`
`09:14:31
`
`25
`
`Q
`
`Here and here?
`
`RPX-Farmwald Ex. 1015, p 14
`
`

`

` 15
`
`09:14:33
`
` 1
`
`09:14:33
`
` 2
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Yes.
`
`Can you determine by looking at this page what the
`
`09:14:35
`
` 3
`
`significance of the low impedance is?
`
`09:14:37
`
` 4
`
`09:14:38
`
` 5
`
`09:14:39
`
` 6
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`A
`
`Yes.
`
`Can you explain that, please?
`
`Well, the low impedance and the transimpedance input
`
`09:14:45
`
` 7
`
`to the transimpedance amplifier enables the flow of current
`
`09:14:50
`
` 8
`
`out of the transmit filter, which is the capacitor, and
`
`09:14:56
`
` 9
`
`into the next stage.
`
`09:14:58
`
`10
`
`09:15:00
`
`11
`
`Q
`
`A
`
`And how do you know that?
`
`That's indicated by -- that's indicated by the flow of
`
`09:15:05
`
`12
`
`current right here we have from the mixer output to the
`
`09:15:08
`
`13
`
`transmit filter output. And the transmit filter output is
`
`09:15:11
`
`14
`
`going into the baseband filter or TIA.
`
`09:15:18
`
`15
`
`Q
`
`Now, by looking at the schematic pages you just showed
`
`09:15:21
`
`16
`
`us, and by looking at this design document, can you
`
`09:15:23
`
`17
`
`conclude whether the means for impedance matching at least
`
`09:15:27
`
`18
`
`one of said first signal and said second signal limitation
`
`09:15:30
`
`19
`
`of claim 90, the '518 patent, is met?
`
`09:15:34
`
`20
`
`09:15:34
`
`21
`
`09:15:36
`
`22
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`A
`
`Yes.
`
`And what did you determine?
`
`That it is met.
`
`09:15:37
`
`23
`
`MR. BUDWIN: Can I see slide 114, please,
`
`09:15:40
`
`24
`
`Mr. Moreno?
`
`09:15:41
`
`25
`
`BY MR. BUDWIN:
`
`RPX-Farmwald Ex. 1015, p 15
`
`

`

` 16
`
`09:15:42
`
` 1
`
`09:15:44
`
` 2
`
`Q
`
`A
`
`So can I check that box, Dr. Prucnal?
`
`Yes.
`
`09:15:44
`
` 3
`
`MR. BUDWIN: And can I have slide 115, Mr. Moreno?
`
`09:15:46
`
` 4
`
`BY MR. BUDWIN:
`
`09:15:47
`
` 5
`
`09:15:50
`
` 6
`
`Q
`
`A
`
`And can we go ahead and check claim 90?
`
`Yes.
`
`09:15:50
`
` 7
`
`MR. BUDWIN: So I'd like to move on now to claim
`
`09:15:52
`
` 8
`
`91 of the '518 patent, and in particular slide 116.
`
`09:15:59
`
` 9
`
`BY MR. BUDWIN:
`
`09:16:00
`
`10
`
`Q
`
`Now, Dr. Prucnal, the first limitation I see here is
`
`09:16:02
`
`11
`
`the apparatus of claim 90.
`
`09:16:05
`
`12
`
`09:16:05
`
`13
`
`09:16:07
`
`14
`
`09:16:09
`
`15
`
`09:16:10
`
`16
`
`09:16:13
`
`17
`
`09:16:15
`
`18
`
`09:16:19
`
`19
`
`09:16:22
`
`20
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`A
`
`Yes.
`
`Is this a particular type of a claim?
`
`Yes, it is.
`
`What kind of a claim is this?
`
`This is called a dependent claim.
`
`And what does it mean to be a dependent claim?
`
`This claim depends upon everything in claim 90.
`
`And have you already shown us claim 90, Dr. Prucnal?
`
`Yes.
`
`09:16:22
`
`21
`
`MR. BUDWIN: So, Mr. Moreno, if we could advance
`
`09:16:24
`
`22
`
`to slide 117.
`
`09:16:26
`
`23
`
`BY MR. BUDWIN:
`
`09:16:28
`
`24
`
`Q
`
`Does that mean we can go ahead and check the first
`
`09:16:30
`
`25
`
`element because you've already shown us claim 90?
`
`RPX-Farmwald Ex. 1015, p 16
`
`

`

` 17
`
`09:16:33
`
` 1
`
`09:16:34
`
` 2
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Yes.
`
`Now, this claim adds the requirement wherein the
`
`09:16:37
`
` 3
`
`aperture periods are substantially greater than zero such
`
`09:16:40
`
` 4
`
`that energy transferred is to such an extent that accurate
`
`09:16:44
`
` 5
`
`voltage reproduction of the first signal is prevented?
`
`09:16:47
`
` 6
`
`A
`
`Yes.
`
`09:16:49
`
` 7
`
`MR. BUDWIN: And if we could advance to slide 118,
`
`09:16:51
`
` 8
`
`please, Mr. Moreno.
`
`09:16:53
`
` 9
`
`BY MR. BUDWIN:
`
`09:16:53
`
`10
`
`Q
`
`Are there any claim constructions applicable to this
`
`09:16:56
`
`11
`
`claim element from claim 91?
`
`09:16:58
`
`12
`
`09:16:58
`
`13
`
`09:17:02
`
`14
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`A
`
`No.
`
`Can you remind us what the aperture periods are?
`
`The aperture period is the period during which the
`
`09:17:06
`
`15
`
`switch is closed so that energy is transferred from the
`
`09:17:09
`
`16
`
`carrier signal to the baseband.
`
`09:17:11
`
`17
`
`Q
`
`Now, Dr. Prucnal, what's your understanding about the
`
`09:17:14
`
`18
`
`last part of this limitation where it says energy is
`
`09:17:17
`
`19
`
`transferred to such an extent that accurate voltage
`
`09:17:21
`
`20
`
`reproduction of the first signal is prevented?
`
`09:17:26
`
`21
`
`A
`
`Well, my understanding is that because the switch is
`
`09:17:28
`
`22
`
`closed for a long time, it is allowing the carrier signal
`
`09:17:33
`
`23
`
`to flow in for a long time, and causing it to be smeared
`
`09:17:37
`
`24
`
`out and stored in the capacitor.
`
`09:17:40
`
`25
`
`Q
`
`Can you explain maybe a little bit more what you mean
`
`RPX-Farmwald Ex. 1015, p 17
`
`

`

` 18
`
`09:17:43
`
` 1
`
`with respect to some of the prior art or prior circuits
`
`09:17:46
`
` 2
`
`that we discussed previously?
`
`09:17:52
`
` 3
`
`A
`
`Well, I showed an example yesterday of prior art,
`
`09:17:56
`
` 4
`
`which was a voltage sampler, and the invention, which is an
`
`09:18:01
`
` 5
`
`energy transfer sampler.
`
`09:18:05
`
` 6
`
`And in the voltage sampler, there were very quick and
`
`09:18:08
`
` 7
`
`accurate samples taken of the input signal. The switch
`
`09:18:14
`
` 8
`
`closed and opened very quickly. And during that time, a
`
`09:18:17
`
` 9
`
`very small piece of the input signal was taken so that it
`
`09:18:19
`
`10
`
`was an accurate sample.
`
`09:18:22
`
`11
`
`Whereas, during the -- with the energy sampler, the
`
`09:18:25
`
`12
`
`switch was closed for a long time. That allowed more
`
`09:18:28
`
`13
`
`transfer of energy but smeared out the signal that was
`
`09:18:31
`
`14
`
`being transferred.
`
`09:18:32
`
`15
`
`09:18:36
`
`16
`
`09:18:36
`
`17
`
`Q
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Dr. Prucnal, the word here is aperture periods?
`
`Yes.
`
`Can we analogize the aperture here to an aperture in
`
`09:18:41
`
`18
`
`something people might be familiar with, like a camera?
`
`09:18:44
`
`19
`
`09:18:44
`
`20
`
`09:18:50
`
`21
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`A
`
`Yes.
`
`Can you explain what you mean?
`
`Well, a camera has a shutter, which is like a switch
`
`09:18:54
`
`22
`
`letting light go into it. And the time during which the
`
`09:18:56
`
`23
`
`switch is open in that case is called the aperture. That
`
`09:18:59
`
`24
`
`allows the images to flow in, the energy from the light to
`
`09:19:03
`
`25
`
`flow in.
`
`RPX-Farmwald Ex. 1015, p 18
`
`

`

` 19
`
`09:19:03
`
` 1
`
`Q
`
`And you mentioned in your answer something about
`
`09:19:05
`
` 2
`
`smearing. Using your camera analogy, can you explain a
`
`09:19:08
`
` 3
`
`little bit more about what you mean by that?
`
`09:19:11
`
` 4
`
`A
`
`Sure. With a camera, for example, if you're operating
`
`09:19:16
`
` 5
`
`at low light levels, you can open up the aperture and cause
`
`09:19:21
`
` 6
`
`the shutter to be open for a long period of time. That
`
`09:19:25
`
` 7
`
`lets more light in.
`
`09:19:27
`
` 8
`
`But if you were taking a picture of a fast-moving
`
`09:19:32
`
` 9
`
`image, say, for example, a picture of a hummingbird with
`
`09:19:36
`
`10
`
`the wings flapping very quickly, if the aperture -- if the
`
`09:19:41
`
`11
`
`shutter is open, if the aperture period is long, then one
`
`09:19:44
`
`12
`
`wouldn't resolve that quick motion. It would just get
`
`09:19:47
`
`13
`
`smeared out, even though one could take that photograph at
`
`09:19:50
`
`14
`
`low light levels.
`
`09:19:52
`
`15
`
`Q
`
`And, Dr. Prucnal, does the patent provide a discussion
`
`09:19:55
`
`16
`
`of this claim limitation?
`
`09:19:58
`
`17
`
`A
`
`Yes.
`
`09:19:59
`
`18
`
`MR. BUDWIN: Can I see PX-2? And maybe we should
`
`09:20:03
`
`19
`
`go first to the front page of PX-2 so it's clear what we're
`
`09:20:08
`
`20
`
`talking about.
`
`09:20:09
`
`21
`
`BY MR. BUDWIN:
`
`09:20:09
`
`22
`
`09:20:11
`
`23
`
`Q
`
`A
`
`Is this the '518 patent?
`
`Yes.
`
`09:20:12
`
`24
`
`MR. BUDWIN: And can we go to column 66 at lines
`
`09:20:16
`
`25
`
`38 to 46, please, Mr. Moreno? It's 38 to 46, column 66.
`
`RPX-Farmwald Ex. 1015, p 19
`
`

`

` 20
`
`09:20:37
`
` 1
`
`BY MR. BUDWIN:
`
`09:20:38
`
` 2
`
`Q
`
`I'll read the first part of this, Dr. Prucnal, and
`
`09:20:39
`
` 3
`
`maybe you can read the second part.
`
`09:20:39
`
` 4
`
`It says, in the energy transfer environment --
`
`09:20:41
`
` 5
`
`THE COURT: Read a little more slowly.
`
`09:20:43
`
` 6
`
`BY MR. BUDWIN:
`
`09:20:45
`
` 7
`
`Q
`
`In the energy transfer environment, the storage module
`
`09:20:48
`
` 8
`
`illustrated in figure 82 as the storage capacitance
`
`09:20:51
`
` 9
`
`preferably has the capacity to handle power being
`
`09:20:54
`
`10
`
`transferred and to allow it to accept a non-negligible
`
`09:20:56
`
`11
`
`amount of power during a non-negligible aperture period.
`
`09:21:00
`
`12
`
`Do you see that?
`
`09:21:01
`
`13
`
`09:21:02
`
`14
`
`09:21:03
`
`15
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`A
`
`Yes.
`
`And what's that describing?
`
`That's indicating that the storage capacitance has to
`
`09:21:05
`
`16
`
`be sufficiently large to handle the charge being
`
`09:21:09
`
`17
`
`transferred in it over a period of time that's
`
`09:21:13
`
`18
`
`non-negligible.
`
`09:21:15
`
`19
`
`Q
`
`And then the second part reads, this allows the
`
`09:21:18
`
`20
`
`storage capacitance to store energy transferred from the
`
`09:21:22
`
`21
`
`input EM signal.
`
`09:21:25
`
`22
`
`What's an EM signal?
`
`09:21:27
`
`23
`
`09:21:28
`
`24
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`That's electromagnetic signal.
`
`Without substantial concern for accurately reproducing
`
`09:21:31
`
`25
`
`the original unaffected voltage level of the input EM
`
`RPX-Farmwald Ex. 1015, p 20
`
`

`

` 21
`
`09:21:36
`
` 1
`
`signal?
`
`09:21:36
`
` 2
`
`09:21:37
`
` 3
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Yes.
`
`Is this a description of what you just explained to us
`
`09:21:39
`
` 4
`
`with respect to the camera and the aperture periods?
`
`09:21:43
`
` 5
`
`09:21:43
`
` 6
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Yes.
`
`Now, Dr. Prucnal --
`
`09:21:46
`
` 7
`
`MR. BUDWIN: And, Mr. Moreno, if we could switch
`
`09:21:47
`
` 8
`
`back to the slide deck and advance back to slide 120.
`
`09:21:52
`
` 9
`
`BY MR. BUDWIN:
`
`09:21:52
`
`10
`
`Q
`
`Do you have evidence that the accused products have
`
`09:21:55
`
`11
`
`aperture periods that are substantially greater than zero
`
`09:22:00
`
`12
`
`such that accurate voltage reproduction is prevented?
`
`09:22:05
`
`13
`
`09:22:07
`
`14
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Yes.
`
`Dr. Prucnal, have you already shown us some of the
`
`09:22:09
`
`15
`
`schematic pages with the capacitors?
`
`09:22:11
`
`16
`
`09:22:11
`
`17
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Yes.
`
`And was that the PX-847 at 1999?
`
`09:22:17
`
`18
`
`You can consult your deck up there if you need to.
`
`09:22:20
`
`19
`
`A
`
`Yes.
`
`09:22:23
`
`20
`
`MR. BUDWIN: And now, Mr. Moreno, if we can go
`
`09:22:25
`
`21
`
`back to JX-62.
`
`09:22:31
`
`22
`
`BY MR. BUDWIN:
`
`09:22:31
`
`23
`
`Q
`
`And, in particular, let's just look first at page 17.
`
`09:22:34
`
`24
`
`It's the same diagram we've been talking about.
`
`09:22:37
`
`25
`
`A
`
`Yes.
`
`RPX-Farmwald Ex. 1015, p 21
`
`

`

` 22
`
`09:22:40
`
` 1
`
`Q
`
`Can you conclude by looking at this diagram as to
`
`09:22:43
`
` 2
`
`whether this claim limitation is satisfied, in part?
`
`09:22:48
`
` 3
`
`09:22:49
`
` 4
`
`09:22:51
`
` 5
`
`09:22:56
`
` 6
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Yes, in part.
`
`Okay. Why?
`
`Because this shows energy transfer into the capacitor.
`
`And do you also need to know some additional
`
`09:22:58
`
` 7
`
`information?
`
`09:22:59
`
` 8
`
`A
`
`Yes.
`
`09:23:00
`
` 9
`
`MR. BUDWIN: And can we go to page 26 of the same
`
`09:23:02
`
`10
`
`document, Mr. Moreno?
`
`09:23:04
`
`11
`
`BY MR. BUDWIN:
`
`09:23:06
`
`12
`
`Q
`
`And I believe you described this figure and the
`
`09:23:08
`
`13
`
`diagram next to it to us yesterday. But can you just
`
`09:23:12
`
`14
`
`refresh our memory briefly?
`
`09:23:15
`
`15
`
`A
`
`This shows the arrangement of the transistor switches
`
`09:23:18
`
`16
`
`inside of the mixer. And the switches are controlled to
`
`09:23:23
`
`17
`
`close during aperture periods which are defined by the
`
`09:23:27
`
`18
`
`local oscillator waveform at the upper right.
`
`09:23:30
`
`19
`
`Q
`
`Now, what on this page shows the aperture periods are
`
`09:23:33
`
`20
`
`substantially greater than zero?
`
`09:23:36
`
`21
`
`A
`
`The shape of a local oscillator waveform, as well as
`
`09:23:39
`
`22
`
`the 25 DC that describes their shape.
`
`09:23:43
`
`23
`
`Q
`
`And by looking at the prior page that you showed with
`
`09:23:47
`
`24
`
`the current transfer, can you determine as to whether
`
`09:23:49
`
`25
`
`energy is transferred to such an extent that voltage
`
`RPX-Farmwald Ex. 1015, p 22
`
`

`

` 23
`
`09:23:52
`
` 1
`
`reproduction is prevented?
`
`09:23:56
`
` 2
`
`A
`
`Of the original signal, yes.
`
`09:24:00
`
` 3
`
`MR. BUDWIN: Can we see slide 124 please,
`
`09:24:04
`
` 4
`
`Mr. Moreno?
`
`09:24:05
`
` 5
`
`BY MR. BUDWIN:
`
`09:24:06
`
` 6
`
`Q
`
`Dr. Prucnal, have you proven that the additional
`
`09:24:07
`
` 7
`
`requirement of claim 91 is satisfied?
`
`09:24:10
`
` 8
`
`09:24:10
`
` 9
`
`09:24:12
`
`10
`
`09:24:14
`
`11
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Yes.
`
`Can we check this box?
`
`Yes.
`
`And if we can move on to slide 125, now we've shown
`
`09:24:18
`
`12
`
`claim 91.
`
`09:24:24
`
`13
`
`And I'd like to move on to claim 27 of the '518
`
`09:24:28
`
`14
`
`patent, which should be slide 126.
`
`09:24:32
`
`15
`
`09:24:33
`
`16
`
`09:24:35
`
`17
`
`09:24:36
`
`18
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`09:24:39
`
`19
`
`yet?
`
`09:24:46
`
`20
`
`09:24:47
`
`21
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Okay.
`
`And it starts, the method according to claim one?
`
`Yes.
`
`Now, have you shown us claim one of the '518 patent
`
`Can I go back to the checklist?
`
`Let me help you out. You haven't shown us claim one
`
`09:24:50
`
`22
`
`of the '518 patent, have you?
`
`09:24:52
`
`23
`
`09:24:53
`
`24
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`No, I didn't think so.
`
`Okay. And do you have an understanding as to whether
`
`09:24:55
`
`25
`
`claim one of the '518 patent is individually asserted?
`
`RPX-Farmwald Ex. 1015, p 23
`
`

`

` 24
`
`09:25:00
`
` 1
`
`09:25:02
`
` 2
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`I believe it is not.
`
`But, nonetheless, do we still have to show that its
`
`09:25:05
`
` 3
`
`elements are met to prove claim 27?
`
`09:25:08
`
` 4
`
`A
`
`Yes.
`
`09:25:08
`
` 5
`
`MR. BUDWIN: And can I see slide 127?
`
`09:25:10
`
` 6
`
`BY MR. BUDWIN:
`
`09:25:11
`
` 7
`
`Q
`
`Now, there's several elements here for claim one of
`
`09:25:13
`
` 8
`
`the '518 patent?
`
`09:25:15
`
` 9
`
`09:25:16
`
`10
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Yes.
`
`Now, again, have you prepared a demonstrative that
`
`09:25:18
`
`11
`
`will help us see which of these elements have already been
`
`09:25:21
`
`12
`
`proven by the other evidence?
`
`09:25:23
`
`13
`
`A
`
`Yes.
`
`09:25:24
`
`14
`
`MR. BUDWIN: And can I see slide 128?
`
`09:25:26
`
`15
`
`BY MR. BUDWIN:
`
`09:25:26
`
`16
`
`Q
`
`This is probably going to be one of our favorite
`
`09:25:29
`
`17
`
`slides of the day.
`
`09:25:30
`
`18
`
`What are you showing us here, Dr. Prucnal?
`
`09:25:32
`
`19
`
`A
`
`We're going to show correspondence between claim 82,
`
`09:25:34
`
`20
`
`which I've already discussed, and claim one. And color
`
`09:25:37
`
`21
`
`coded are the elements of claim one that are similar or
`
`09:25:43
`
`22
`
`identical to claim 82.
`
`09:25:45
`
`23
`
`Q
`
`And so by proving claim 82 of the '518 patent, have
`
`09:25:48
`
`24
`
`you also proven all of the elements of claim one of the
`
`09:25:51
`
`25
`
`'518 patent?
`
`RPX-Farmwald Ex. 1015, p 24
`
`

`

` 25
`
`09:25:52
`
` 1
`
`A
`
`Yes.
`
`09:25:53
`
` 2
`
`MR. BUDWIN: Can we see slide 129, Mr. Moreno?
`
`09:25:57
`
` 3
`
`BY MR. BUDWIN:
`
`09:25:57
`
` 4
`
`09:25:59
`
` 5
`
`09:26:00
`
` 6
`
`Q
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`So can we check the first limitation?
`
`Yes.
`
`Now, the next limitation is further comprising the
`
`09:26:03
`
` 7
`
`step of transferring energy to a load during the off-time?
`
`09:26:09
`
` 8
`
`A
`
`Yes.
`
`09:26:09
`
` 9
`
`MR. BUDWIN: And if we advance to slide 130.
`
`09:26:12
`
`10
`
`BY MR. BUDWIN:
`
`09:26:13
`
`11
`
`Q
`
`Are there any claim constructions that are applicable
`
`09:26:15
`
`12
`
`to this term?
`
`09:26:16
`
`13
`
`09:26:18
`
`14
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`No.
`
`Now, if we look back to the patent, which is PX-2 at
`
`09:26:24
`
`15
`
`figure 82A, can you explain to us briefly what it means,
`
`09:26:28
`
`16
`
`transferring energy to a load during the off-time?
`
`09:26:35
`
`17
`
`A
`
`Yes. When the switch is closed, the energy is
`
`09:26:40
`
`18
`
`transferred into the capacitor and that's the on-time.
`
`09:26:45
`
`19
`
`During the off-time, the switch is open. And during
`
`09:26:47
`
`20
`
`that time, the capacitor is discharged into the load. And
`
`09:26:52
`
`21
`
`that's transferring energy.
`
`09:26:54
`
`22
`
`Q
`
`And is that con

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket