UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`____________
`
`DR. MICHAEL FARMWALD and RPX CORPORATION
`
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`PARKERVISION, INC.,
`
`Patent Owner.
`
`____________
`
`Case IPR2014-00947
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,061,551
`
`____________
`
`PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER
`(DEFAULT PROTECTIVE ORDER)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Farmwald and RPX Exhibit 1062, pg. 1
`Farmwald and RPX v. ParkerVision
`IPR2014-00947
`
`
`
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`____________
`
`DR. MICHAEL FARMWALD and RPX CORPORATION
`
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`PARKERVISION, INC.,
`
`Patent Owner.
`
`____________
`
`Case IPR2014-00947
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,061,551
`
`____________
`
`PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER
`(DEFAULT PROTECTIVE ORDER)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Farmwald and RPX Exhibit 1062, pg. 1
`Farmwald and RPX v. ParkerVision
`IPR2014-00947
`
`
`
`Proposed Protective Order
`Case IPR2014-00947
`U.S. Patent No. 6,061,551
`
`
`STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`This standing protective order governs the treatment and filing of
`
`confidential information, including documents and testimony.
`
`1.
`
`Confidential information shall be clearly marked “PROTECTIVE
`
`ORDER MATERIAL.”
`
`2.
`
`Access to confidential information is limited to the following
`
`individuals who have executed the acknowledgment appended to this order:
`
`
`
`
`
`(A) Parties. Persons who are owners of a patent involved in the
`
`proceeding and other persons who are named parties to the proceeding.
`
`
`
`
`
`(B) Party Representatives. Representatives of record for a party in
`
`the proceeding.
`
`
`
`
`
`(C) Experts. Retained experts of a party in the proceeding who
`
`further certify in the Acknowledgement that they are not a competitor to any party,
`
`or a consultant for, or employed by, such a competitor with respect to the subject
`
`matter of the proceeding.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(D)
`
`In-house counsel. In-house counsel of a party.
`
`(E) Other Employees of a Party. Employees, consultants or other
`
`persons performing work for a party, other than in-house counsel and in-house
`
`counsel’s support staff, who sign the Acknowledgement shall be extended access
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`Farmwald and RPX Exhibit 1062, pg. 2
`Farmwald and RPX v. ParkerVision
`IPR2014-00947
`
`
`
`to confidential information only upon agreement of the parties or by order of the
`
`Proposed Protective Order
`Case IPR2014-00947
`U.S. Patent No. 6,061,551
`
`
`Board upon a motion brought by the party seeking to disclose confidential
`
`information to that person. The party opposing disclosure to that person shall have
`
`the burden of proving that such person should be restricted from access to
`
`confidential information.
`
`
`
`
`
`(F) The Office. Employees and representatives of the Office who
`
`have a need for access to the confidential information shall have such access
`
`without the requirement to sign an Acknowledgement. Such employees and
`
`representatives shall include the Director, members of the Board and their clerical
`
`staff, other support personnel, court reporters, and other persons acting on behalf of
`
`the Office.
`
`
`
`
`
`(G) Support Personnel. Administrative assistants, clerical staff,
`
`court reporters and other support personnel of the foregoing persons who are
`
`reasonably necessary to assist those persons in the proceeding shall not be required
`
`to sign an Acknowledgement, but shall be informed of the terms and requirements
`
`of the Protective Order by the person they are supporting who receives confidential
`
`information.
`
`
`
`3.
`
`Persons receiving confidential information shall use reasonable efforts
`
`to maintain the confidentiality of the information, including:
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`Farmwald and RPX Exhibit 1062, pg. 3
`Farmwald and RPX v. ParkerVision
`IPR2014-00947
`
`
`
`(A) Maintaining such information in a secure location to which
`
`Proposed Protective Order
`Case IPR2014-00947
`U.S. Patent No. 6,061,551
`
`
`
`
`
`
`persons not authorized to receive the information shall not have access;
`
`
`
`
`
`(B) Otherwise using reasonable efforts to maintain the
`
`confidentiality of the information, which efforts shall be no less rigorous than those
`
`the recipient uses to maintain the confidentiality of information not received from
`
`the disclosing party;
`
`
`
`
`
`(C) Ensuring that support personnel of the recipient who have
`
`access to the confidential information understand and abide by the obligation to
`
`maintain the confidentiality of information received that is designated as
`
`confidential; and
`
`
`
`
`
`(D) Limiting the copying of confidential information to a
`
`reasonable number of copies needed for conduct of the proceeding and maintaining
`
`a record of the locations of such copies.
`
`
`
`4.
`
`Persons receiving confidential information shall use the following
`
`procedures to maintain the confidentiality of the information:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(A) Documents and Information Filed With the Board.
`
`
`
`(i) A party may file documents or information with the
`
`Board under seal, together with a non-confidential description of the nature of the
`
`confidential information that is under seal and the reasons why the information is
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`Farmwald and RPX Exhibit 1062, pg. 4
`Farmwald and RPX v. ParkerVision
`IPR2014-00947
`
`
`
`confidential and should not be made available to the public. The submission shall
`
`Proposed Protective Order
`Case IPR2014-00947
`U.S. Patent No. 6,061,551
`
`
`be treated as confidential and remain under seal, unless, upon motion of a party
`
`and after a hearing on the issue, or sua sponte, the Board determines that the
`
`documents or information do not to qualify for confidential treatment.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(ii) Where confidentiality is alleged as to some but not all of
`
`the information submitted to the Board, the submitting party shall file confidential
`
`and non-confidential versions of its submission, together with a Motion to Seal the
`
`confidential version setting forth the reasons why the information redacted from
`
`the non-confidential version is confidential and should not be made available to the
`
`public. The non-confidential version of the submission shall clearly indicate the
`
`locations of information that has been redacted. The confidential version of the
`
`submission shall be filed under seal. The redacted information shall remain under
`
`seal unless, upon motion of a party and after a hearing on the issue, or sua sponte,
`
`the Board determines that some or all of the redacted information does not qualify
`
`for confidential treatment.
`
`
`
`
`
`(B) Documents and Information Exchanged Among the Parties.
`
`Information designated as confidential that is disclosed to another party during
`
`discovery or other proceedings before the Board shall be clearly marked as
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`Farmwald and RPX Exhibit 1062, pg. 5
`Farmwald and RPX v. ParkerVision
`IPR2014-00947
`
`
`
`“PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL” and shall be produced in a manner that
`
`Proposed Protective Order
`Case IPR2014-00947
`U.S. Patent No. 6,061,551
`
`
`maintains its confidentiality.
`
`
`
`5.
`
`Standard Acknowledgement of Protective Order. The form attached
`
`as Appendix A may be used to acknowledge a protective order and gain access to
`
`information covered by the protective order.
`
`Agreed upon by the parties.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PARKERVISION, INC.
`Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By /Michael Q. Lee/
` Michael Q. Lee
` (Reg. No. 35,239)
` mlee@skgf.com
`
` Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein &
` Fox P.L.L.C.
`1100 New York Avenue, N.W.
`
` Washington, D.C. 20005
`
`Tel. (202) 371-2600
`
`Fax. (202) 371-2540
`
`Dated: June 12, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DR. MICHAEL FARMWALD and
`RPX CORPORATION
`Petitioners
`
`
`
`By /W. Todd Baker/
`W. Todd Baker
`(Reg. No. 45,265)
`CPDocketBaker@oblon.com
`
`
`
`
`
`Oblon, McClelland, Maier &
`Neustadt, LLP
`1940 Duke Street
`Alexandria, VA 22314
`Tel. (703) 413-3000
`Fax. (703) 413-2220
`
`Dated: June 12, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`6
`
`Farmwald and RPX Exhibit 1062, pg. 6
`Farmwald and RPX v. ParkerVision
`IPR2014-00947
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`APPENDIX A
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`____________
`
`DR. MICHAEL FARMWALD and RPX CORPORATION
`
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`PARKERVISION, INC.,
`
`Patent Owner.
`
`____________
`
`Case IPR2014-00947
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,061,551
`
`____________
`
`
`
`Standard Acknowledgment for Access to Protective Order Material
`
`
`
`
`
`Farmwald and RPX Exhibit 1062, pg. 7
`Farmwald and RPX v. ParkerVision
`IPR2014-00947
`
`
`
`Standard Acknowledgment for Access to Protective Order Material
`
`Case IPR2014-00947
`U.S. Patent No. 6,061,551
`
`
`I ________________________, affirm that I have read the Protective Order;
`
`that I will abide by its terms;
`
`that I will use the confidential information only in connection with this
`
`proceeding and for no other purpose;
`
`that I will only allow access to support staff who are reasonably necessary to
`
`assist me in this proceeding;
`
`that prior to any disclosure to such support staff I informed or will inform
`
`them of the requirements of the Protective Order;
`
`that I am personally responsible for the requirements of the terms of the
`
`Protective Order and I agree to submit to the jurisdiction of the Office and the
`
`United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia for purposes of
`
`enforcing the terms of the Protective Order and providing remedies for its breach.
`
`SIGNED this _______ day of _________________________ 20____ at
`
`______________________________________.
`
`
`
`____________________________
`(signature)
`
`
`__________________________
`(print name)
`
`2
`
`Farmwald and RPX Exhibit 1062, pg. 8
`Farmwald and RPX v. ParkerVision
`IPR2014-00947
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
