R PXRATIONAL PATENT ’
`
`The Market for Patents and
`
`Patent Litigation
`
`
`
`Mallun Yen
`
`Executive Vice President
`
`Corporate Development
`
`Patent Institutions Summit
`
`Stanford University
`
`May 21, 2012
`
`E; 2012 RPX CORPORATION
`
`CONF‘DENT‘AL: DO NOT COPY. DISTRIBUTE, BROADCAST OR INCORPORATE THESE
`MATERIALS WlTHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN CONSENT OF RPX AND THE AUTHORS
`
`PV 2017
`PV 2017
`|PR2014—00947
`IPR2014-00947
`RPX v. ParkerVision
`RPX v. ParkerVision
`
`
`
`The Market for Patents and
`
`Patent Litigation
`
`
`
`Mallun Yen
`
`Executive Vice President
`
`Corporate Development
`
`Patent Institutions Summit
`
`Stanford University
`
`May 21, 2012
`
`E; 2012 RPX CORPORATION
`
`CONF‘DENT‘AL: DO NOT COPY. DISTRIBUTE, BROADCAST OR INCORPORATE THESE
`MATERIALS WlTHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN CONSENT OF RPX AND THE AUTHORS
`
`PV 2017
`PV 2017
`|PR2014—00947
`IPR2014-00947
`RPX v. ParkerVision
`RPX v. ParkerVision
`
`
`
`RPX Reduces Patent Risk for Operating Companies
`
`
`Unique
`50mm"
`
`Strong
`P°rtf°"°
`
`r
`b
`
`115+ member companies
`30 litigations resolved/200+ dismissals
`
`v Over $350M in patent purchases
`b
`2,500+ assets
`
`
`
` I
`
`Aligned
`'"terEStS
`
`Market
`Intelligence
`
`> Members receive license to entire portfolio
`> Will never assert or litigate patents
`
`b Unmatched patent experience
`b
`Preeminent market intelligence, data and insights
`
`RATIDNAJ. PATENT'
`RP)‘
`
`© 2012 RPX CORPORATEON. ALL RlGHTS RESERVED
`
`2
`
`PV 2017
`PV 2017
`|PR2014—00947
`IPR2014-00947
`RPX v. ParkerVision
`RPX v. ParkerVision
`
`
`
`Supply of Available Portfolios Has Increased
`
`
`Open Market Portfolios Received: 21% Increase in 2011
`
`261
`
`255
`
`20101H
`
`2010 2H
`
`2011 1H
`
`20112H
`
`Source: RPX Research
`
`I
`RAW PATENT“
`R P)‘
`
`© 2012 RPX CORPORATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
`
`3
`
`PV 2017
`PV 2017
`|PR2014-00947
`IPR2014-00947
`RPX v. ParkerVision
`RPX v. ParkerVision
`
`
`
`Volume of Transactions Increasing
`
`
`46% Increase in 2011 Compared to 2010
`
`112
`
`120
`
`187
`
`153
`
`
`
`1H2010
`
`2H 2010
`
`1H 2011
`
`2H 2011
`
`Source: RPX Research
`
`I
`RAW PATENT“
`R P)‘
`
`© 2012 RPX CORPORATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
`
`4
`
`PV 2017
`PV 2017
`|PR2014-00947
`IPR2014-00947
`RPX v. ParkerVision
`RPX v. ParkerVision
`
`
`
`Open Market Portfolios Balanced Across Sectors
`
`
`Q12011— 02 2011
`
`Semiconductors
`18%
`
`Consumer Electronics
`
`and PCs
`1 3%
`
`
`
`Other
`0
`12 A:
`
`E-Commerce and
`Software
`23%
`
`Networking
`10%
`
`
`Financial Services
`
`
`M D1
`.0 '?
`Communications and
`.
`Dewces
`15%
`
`3%
`Media Content and
`.
`.
`.
`Distribution
`6%
`
`Source: RPX Research
`
`—I
`
`Banging:-
`
`© 2012 RPX CORPORATiON. ALL RTGHTS RESERVED
`
`5
`
`PV 2017
`PV 2017
`|PR2014—00947
`IPR2014-00947
`RPX v. ParkerVision
`RPX v. ParkerVision
`
`
`
`Post-Sale: Timeline of NPE Patent Litigation Campaign
`
`A Marketing
`
`Start Of ‘ Assertion activity
`marketing
`
`Trans—
`action
`
`filed
`
`A ~20-defendants
`
`Suit #1
`filed
`
`A ~20 defendants
`.
`8“” #2
`mad
`
`A ~20 defendants
`Suit #3
`
`RPX Litigation
`USPTO Assignment
`RPX Open Market
`Data
`source
`Database
`Database
`Database
`
`
`Own Experience
`
`R P)’
`amumh-
`
`© 2012 RPX CORPORATiON. ALL RiGHTS RESERVED
`
`5
`
`PV 2017
`PV 2017
`|PR2014—00947
`IPR2014-00947
`RPX v. ParkerVision
`RPX v. ParkerVision
`
`
`
`Growing Frequency of ITC NPE Driven Investigations
`
`
`NPE ITC Investigations
`
`Respondents in NPE ITC
`Investigations
`
`O
`
`15
`
`2005
`
`2006
`
`2007
`
`2008
`
`2009
`
`2010
`
`2011
`
`2005
`
`2006
`
`2007
`
`2008
`
`2009
`
`2010
`
`2011
`
`Source: RPX Research and EDES
`
`I
`BWEAZN‘T'
`
`© 2012 RPX CORPORATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
`
`7
`
`PV 2017
`PV 2017
`|PR2014—00947
`IPR2014-00947
`RPX v. ParkerVision
`RPX v. ParkerVision
`
`
`
`Growing Percentage of NPE Driven Cases
`
`
`ITC'InVestigatio-ns
`
`District Court Cases
`
`
`
`2005
`
`2006
`
`2007
`
`2000
`
`"2009
`
`2010
`
`2011
`
`2005
`
`2006
`
`2007
`
`2008
`
`2009
`
`2010
`
`2011
`
`I Total Investigations/Cases
`Source: RPX Research and EDIS
`
`Em WP
`RPX
`© 2012 RPX CORPORATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
`8
`
`PV 2017
`PV 2017
`|PR2014-00947
`IPR2014-00947
`RPX v. ParkerVision
`RPX v. ParkerVision
`
`
`
`Growing Percentage of NPE Driven Cases
`
`
`ITc Investigations
`
`District Court Cases
`
`
`
`2005
`
`2005
`
`2007
`
`2000
`
`2009
`
`2010
`
`2011
`
`2005
`
`2006
`
`2007
`
`2008
`
`2009
`
`2010
`
`2011
`
`I Total InvestigationsICases
`Source: RPX Research and EDIS
`
`I
`Em WENT
`RP)‘
`
`I NPE Investigationleases
`
`© 2012 RPX CORPORATION.
`
`IALL RIGHTS RESERVED
`
`El
`
`PV 2017
`PV 2017
`|PR2014-00947
`IPR2014-00947
`RPX v. ParkerVision
`RPX v. ParkerVision
`
`
`
`Growing Percentage of NPE Driven Cases
`
`
`ch Investigations
`
`2000-1011: 00001.
`
`District Court Cases
`
`20004011:¢17'K
`
`
`
`2005
`
`2006
`
`2007
`
`2008
`
`2009
`
`2010
`
`2011
`
`2005
`
`2005
`
`2007
`
`2003
`
`2009
`
`2010
`
`2011
`
`I Total InvestigationsICases
`Source: RPX Research and EDIS
` I
`Emu. PATENT
`RP)‘
`© 2012 RPX CORPORATION.
`IALL RIGHTS RESERVED
`10
`
`*I' %of N'PEinvestigations/Cases
`
`I NPEInvestigationleases
`
`PV 2017
`PV 2017
`|PR2014-00947
`IPR2014-00947
`RPX v. ParkerVision
`RPX v. ParkerVision
`
`
`
`Growing Percentage of NPE RespondentsIDefendants
`
`
`ITc Respondents
`
`District Court Defendants
`
`467
`
`99
`
`216
`
`127
`
`280
`
`266
`
`167
`
`2005
`
`2006
`
`2007
`
`2003
`
`2009
`
`2010
`
`2011
`
`2005
`
`2006
`
`2007
`
`2008
`
`2009
`
`2010
`
`2011
`
`I Total Respondentsmefendants
`Source: RPX Research and EDIS
`
`Em WENT
`RPX
`© 2012 RPX CORPORATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
`11
`
`PV 2017
`PV 2017
`|PR2014-00947
`IPR2014-00947
`RPX v. ParkerVision
`RPX v. ParkerVision
`
`
`
`Growing Percentage of NPE RespondentsIDefendants
`
`
`ch Respondents
`
`District Court Defendants
`
`97
`
`235
`
`2005
`
`2006
`
`2007
`
`2008
`
`2009
`
`2010
`
`2011
`
`2005
`
`2005
`
`2007
`
`2008
`
`2009
`
`2010
`
`2011
`
`I Total InvestigationsICases
`Source: RPX Research and EDIS
`
`I
`Emu. PATENT“
`RP)‘
`
`I NPE Respondentleefendants
`
`© 2012 RPX CORPORATION.
`
`IALL RIGHTS RESERVED
`
`12
`
`PV 2017
`PV 2017
`|PR2014-00947
`IPR2014-00947
`RPX v. ParkerVision
`RPX v. ParkerVision
`
`
`
`Growing Percentage of NPE RespondentsIDefendants
`
`
`ch Respondents
`
`2000-2011: 973316
`
`District Court Defendants
`
`20054011: #3251-
`
`
`
`2005
`
`2006
`
`2007
`
`2003
`
`2009
`
`.2010
`
`2011
`
`2005
`
`2006
`
`2007
`
`2008
`
`2009
`
`2010
`
`2011
`
`I Total Respondents/Defendants
`Source: RPX Research and EDIS
` (
`RAMA}. PATENT“
`R P)‘
`(Q 2012 RPX CORPORATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
`13
`
`"'F %of NPE Respondents!
`Defendants
`
`I NPE Respondentleefendants
`
`PV 2017
`PV 2017
`|PR2014-00947
`IPR2014-00947
`RPX v. ParkerVision
`RPX v. ParkerVision
`
`
`
`Average Defendants on the Rise in NPE Actions
`
`
`ITC Investigations
`
`- District Court Cases
`
`16.2
`
`14.7
`
`
`
`2005
`
`2006
`
`2007
`
`2003
`
`2009
`
`2010
`
`2011
`
`2005
`
`2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
`
`2011
`
`I Total Respondentstefendants
`Source: RPX Research and EDIS
`
`
`— % of NPE Respondents!
`Defendants
`
`RP)’
`“mum:
`
`to 2012 RPX CORPORATiON. ALL RrGHTs RESERVED
`
`14
`
`PV 2017
`PV 2017
`|PR2014—00947
`IPR2014-00947
`RPX v. ParkerVision
`RPX v. ParkerVision
`
`
`
`RPX Global Client Network
`
`
`Ensa
`Erlcsson AB
`
`F—Seoure
`Cram and Barrel giggles & Noble
`Motorola Mobiiity 'iBMy
`Nokia
`
`NOW?“
`Walgreens
`Novell
`ST Er
`Nuance
`
`é
`Sonus Networks
`Systemax
`Verizon
`
`
`
`
`Vlingo
`
`.
`Microsoft
`
`
`
`Salko Epsun clsc'o
`'r-Mob'lle
`
`Elpidl
`5353/
`
`
`
`
`Fujitsu
`9009"
`
`Hitachi HP
`AVG
`
`
`Red Hat
`NEG
`IDT
`
`Sunbelt
`Pioneer
`Intel
`
`
`Sony
`'ntult
`
`
`
`Rack
`
`LIEWE
`
`ON Semicond
`H
`|
`
`Palo Alto Networks
`WDWW
`
`Broadcom
`
`Polycom
`Direc'N
`
`Qualco‘m‘m
`ESET
`
`QulckLoglI:
`-'
`
`y Redplne Signals
`Leap Wireless
`p
`Shoretel
`I Symantec
`TlVo
`Vivitek
`Zynga
`Partial client list due to confidentiality obligations
`
`
`m
`
`@2012 RPX CORPORATION. _ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
`
`15
`
`PV 2017
`PV 2017
`|PR2014-00947
`IPR2014-00947
`RPX v. ParkerVision
`RPX v. ParkerVision
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
