throbber
Feb. 5, 174
`
`3,790,492
`M. J. FULWYLER
`METHOD FOR PRODUCTION OF UNIFORM MICROSPHERES
`
`Filed March 11, 1971'
`
`E
`
`. E >
`
`m R
`
`| w\ wM
`I W @N
`n a‘
`
`0% 2% M w
`IE 0
`
`V
`
`_
`
`_ _ _ _ _
`
`M C
`
`
`
`JMZZ?IQ Ema mml?ikmdd m0 mwm§32
`
`~ _. _ . _ _ _ m
`
`_ _ _ _ _ 8
`
`_ _ _ _ _ _ W%
`
`4 Q Q N
`
`3 Q E
`
`1 4L
`
`I C
`
`. m
`
`O
`
`I .w% w M
`.O
`U N
`
`CA
`3 m F
`BY’
`M4
`
`'
`
`INVENTOR.
`
`_
`
`Mack J Fu/wy/er ‘
`
`Luminex Ex. 1010
`Luminex/Irori - Page 1
`
`

`
`3,790,492
`Patented Feb. 5, 1974
`
`1
`
`3,790,492
`METHOD FOR PRODUCTION OF UNIFORM
`MICROSPHERES
`Mack J. Fulwyler, Los Alamos, N. Mex., assignor to the
`United States of America as represented by the United
`States Atomic Energy Commission
`Filed Mar. 11, 1971, Ser. No. 123,362
`Int. Cl. C09k 3/00
`U.S. Cl. 252-301.1 R
`
`1 Claim
`
`ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE
`Uniform microspheres having any desired diameter
`within the range of about 2 to 40 microns are readily
`produced by introducing a laminar jet of a core liquid
`carrying material in solution or suspension within a lami
`nar flowing sheath liquid, said core liquid jet being pe
`riodically disturbed, allowing the droplets of core liquid
`thus produced to remain suspended within the sheath
`liquid for a time sufficient for the material suspended or
`dissolved in said droplets to form condensed microspheres,
`and removing said microspheres from the sheath liquid.
`The variation in diameter of the microspheres is about
`2%, which is near the accuracy limitation of the measur
`ing instrumentation.
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`The invention described herein was made in the course
`of, or under, a contract with the U.S. Atomic Energy Com
`mission. It relates to a method and apparatus for prepar
`ing uniform microspheres of various materials through
`dispersal of uniform droplets of a ?rst (core) liquid con
`taining an appropriate material in solution or suspension
`in a second (sheath) liquid immiscible with the core
`liquid and condensation of the material suspended or dis
`solved in the core liquid droplets.
`Small microspheres of very uniform volume have utility
`in a number of ?elds. For example, uniform plastic micro
`spheres having known and controllable physical and op
`tical properties are of great aid in developing instruments
`for biological cell analysis. They are also highly useful
`in the calibration of such instruments. Uniform volume
`microspheres of uranium oxide and plutonium oxide pro
`vide useful reactor fuel materials. Microspheres of radio
`active materials that are uniform in size and volume are
`highly desirable for use in many biological studies, includ
`ing those concerning deposition of various sizes of blood
`borne particles in the lungs, distribution of fetal blood
`?ow, and distribution of cardiac output. An example of
`work of this type is reported in “Preparation of Meta
`bolizable Radioactive Human Serum Albumin Micro
`spheres for Studies of the Circulation,” I. Zolle, B. A.
`Rhodes, and H. N. Wagner, Jr., Internat. J. Appl. Isotopes
`21,155—167 (1970).
`A Well-known technique for forming microspheres in
`volves the use of two liquids which coexist as distinct
`phases with a boundary surface and therefore have sur
`face tension between them. For such a surface tension to
`exist, however, it is essential that the two liquids be im‘
`miscible. Droplets of a ?rst liquid, henceforth called the
`core liquid, in which a material is dissolved or suspended,
`are formed in a moving stream of the second liquid,
`henceforth called the sheath liquid. The liquid of the
`droplets is slightly soluble in the sheath liquid and con
`sequently diffuses out, leaving a spherical particle. Micro
`
`2
`spheres can be produced by this technique over a wide
`range of diameters from a few microns to many hundreds
`of microns. The size of the microspheres depends on the
`size of the droplets formed and on the amount of mate
`rial dissolved or suspended in the droplets.
`Clinton et al. in U.S. Pat. 3,290,122, issued Dec. 6,
`1966, disclose the application of this technique to the
`preparation of oxide gel microspheres from sols. They use
`a two-?uid nozzle in which droplets of the core liquid
`are produced by concurrently introducing a ?ne stream of
`the core liquid and a surrounding stream of the sheath
`liquid into a droplet forming zone through a central aper
`ture and a concentric annular aperture, with the flow rate
`of the sheath liquid being substantially greater than that
`of the core liquid. The literature indicates that to produce
`uniformly sized droplets with a two-?uid nozzle, the
`sheath liquid ?ow must be laminar, and the core liquid
`should be injected in such a manner as to minimize tur
`bulence.
`Haas et al. in U.S. Pat. 3,331,898, issued July 18, 1967,
`disclose a method of preparing gel microsphere wherein
`the core liquid is formed into droplets by passing the core
`liquid stream through small ori?ces into the sheath liquid
`stream at an angle to the direction of ?ow of the sheath
`liquid. Droplets of core liquid are produced by the high
`shearing force that results.
`A signi?cant problem with gel microspheres produced
`by the methods disclosed in U.S. Pats. 3,290,122 and
`3,331,898 is that they are not uniform in size. The ex
`amples disclosed within these two patents show a Wide
`spread in diameters of the microspheres formed. For many
`applications, such variation in size cannot be tolerated.
`Wymer, “Laboratory and Engineering Studies of Sol-Gel
`Processes at Oak Ridge National Laboratory,” ORNL
`TM~2205, pp. 33-39 (1968), discloses that droplets
`formed from capillaries vibrated transversely by an elec
`trodynamic device are more uniformly sized than those
`from a two-?uid nozzle or a shear disperser. However,
`even these droplets produce microspheres having an unde~
`sirably wide range of sizes.
`In addition, the disclosure of Wymer is limited to the
`production of microspheres having an average diameter
`in excess of 250 microns. He does not disclose the pro
`duction of very small microspheres, i.e., those having di
`ameters less than 50 microns. It is well known in the art
`that techniques useful for the production of fairly large
`microspheres, that is, those having diameters in excess
`of several hundred microns are not generally applicable
`to the production of very small microspheres.
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`I have now found that by using a two-?uid nozzle in
`which a laminar jet of a core liquid carrying material in
`solution or suspension is introduced within a laminar flow
`ing sheath liquid and periodically disturbed, very uni
`formly sized droplets and hence very uniformly sized gel
`microspheres can be readily produced. The laminar sheath
`?ow maintains a uniform separation of the droplets, thus
`preventing droplet coalescence to give larger droplets and
`therefore larger microspheres. The periodic disturbance
`may be introduced into the core liquid jet either axially
`or transversely; however, it is essential that it have a uni
`form frequency. The optimum frequency is determined by
`the diameter and velocity of the jet. Because of the reso
`nant nature of the system, under a given set of conditions
`several suitable frequencies are usually available.
`
`l0
`
`15
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`55
`
`60
`
`Luminex Ex. 1010
`Luminex/Irori - Page 2
`
`

`
`3,790,492
`3
`4
`Moreover, the method and apparatus that I have devel
`across nozzle 7 to vary periodically. Although FIG. 1
`oped are not limited to the production of gel microspheres
`shows the periodic disturbance applied axially to the core
`but are useful in the production of a wide variety of very
`liquid jet, there is no requirement that the disturbance be
`small uniformly sized microspheres, i.e., those having
`introduced axially. A transverse periodic disturbance will
`diameters ranging vfrom several microns to about 40 mi
`produce essentially the same results.
`crons. For example, my invention is easily directed toward
`The size of the droplets 12 formed is dependent on the
`the production of plastic microspheres useful in the cali
`size of nozzle 7 and on the rate of ?ow through nozzle 7.
`bration of instrumentation such as Coulter cell counters.
`Th size of the microspheres that are produced from the
`To my knowledge, there is no other process that can
`droplets in turn depends on the droplet size and the
`readily produce uniformly sized plastic microspheres in
`amount of material held in solution or suspension within
`the 4 to 30 microns range. I have found that the variation
`the droplets. The volume and thereby the diameter of a
`in diameter of the microspheres produced by the method
`microsphere produced from a droplet of a known size is
`and apparatus of my invention is about 2%, which is near
`easily controlled by varying the concentration of solute or
`the accuracy limitation of the measuring instrumentation.
`suspended material in the droplets. For example, to
`double the diameter of the microspheres produced from
`droplets of a known size, it is necessary to increase the
`concentration of solute or suspended material within the
`droplets by a factor of 2a or 8.
`The rate of droplet formation and hence of micro
`spheres formation is dependent on the frequency of dis
`turbance of the core liquid, as [for example, by means of
`oscillator 4, and upon the flow rates of the core liquid
`and the sheath liquid in region 21 of FIG. 1.
`On FIGS. 2 and 3 the horizontal axis represents particle
`volume on a linear scale and the vertical axis represents
`the number of particles per volume increment. On FIG. 2
`th horizontal axis also represents particle ?uorescence on
`a linear scale. The curves of FIGS. 2 and 3 were obtained
`with a modi?ed Coulter counter used as the measuring
`device. Modal value of these volume distributions is de
`termined by an optical measurement of microsphere diam
`eter. It will be apparent that a measurement of the
`volume of these microspheres gives a sensitive indication
`of the diameter of the microspheres.
`The coe?icient of variation for the volume distribution
`is determined according to the following equation.
`
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`
`FIG. 1 is a schematic illustrating an apparatus useful in
`the practice of the invention.
`FIG. 2 illustrates the degree of uniformity of volume
`and of ?uorescence of representative plastic microspheres
`produced according to the process of this invention.
`FIG. 3 illustrates the degree of uniformity of volume of
`representative zirconia microspheres produced according
`to the process of this invention.
`As shown in FIG. 1, core liquid 16 stored in reservoir
`1 at a desired pressure ?ows through a suitable line 2 to
`vibration chamber 3 where vibrational energy is intro
`duced at a desired frequency by means of an oscillator 4.
`The core liquid then flows through line 5 into injection
`tube 6 and emerges from nozzle 7 as a jet 11. Injection
`tube 6, which is centered coaxially in ?ow chamber 10,
`extends vertically from ?ow chamber 10 through end
`closure 18 and only partially through the length of ?ow
`chamber 10. Sheath liquid 17 stored at a desired pressure
`in reservoir 8 flows through line 9 to ?ow chamber 10,
`around injection tube 6 and core liquid jet 11 and emerges
`from nozzle 19 to be collected in a stirred beaker 14.
`Neither the location of sheath liquid inlet 20 nor the shape
`of ?ow chamber 10 are critical except as they may cause
`the flow of sheath liquid through region 21 to be non~
`laminar. It is essential that sheath liquid ?ow in region 21
`where the sheath liquid surrounds core liquid jet 11 and
`newly formed core liquid droplets 12 be laminar.
`Because of the vibrational energy imparted to the core
`liquid ?ow at vibration chamber 3, the pressure at nozzle 7
`varies periodically around the pressure maintained in core
`liquid reservoir 1. As a consequence, the velocity of core
`liquid jet 11 varies periodically, producing minute disturb
`ances or bunching on jet 11. By producing these ditsurb
`ances at a proper frequency, determined by the jet diam
`eter and velocity, they are made to grow in amplitude by
`surface tension until jet 11 is broken into evenly spaced,
`uniformly sized droplets 12. Because both the sheath
`liquid flow and core liquid ?ow are laminar, droplets 12
`once produced maintain substantially constant spacing as
`they emerge from nozzle 19 and ?ow 13 to beaker 14
`where they are dispersed. Maintenance of such uniform
`spacing between droplets is essential if collisions between
`droplets and hence coalescence to give droplets with
`volumes 2, 3, or 4 times that of single droplets is to be
`minimized before the droplets are dispersed in beaker 14.
`Collision and coalescence of droplets is a major reason for
`the formation of nonuniform microspheres.
`It is therefore critical to this invention that a laminar
`core liquid jet 11 be periodically disturbed when it enters
`into a laminar ?ow of sheath liquid as in region 21 of flow
`chamber 10. The periodic disturbance may take the form
`of axial velocity modulation of the core liquid. One man
`ner in which such axial velocity modulation can be readily
`achieved is shown by vibration chamber 3 and oscillator
`4 of FIG. 1. However, the vibrational energy can be intro~
`duced in a manner other than that shown in FIG. 1. Alter
`natively, the entire injection tube 6 can be vibrated along
`its long axis, or vibrational energy can be introduced into
`the sheath liquid ?ow, causing the pressure difference
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`Full width at half maximum
`1
`Modal value
`X 100X—_C'V'
`2.35
`
`The last factor in the equation represents approximately
`the relationship between resolution and coef?cient of vari
`ation for Gausian distribution.
`
`DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED
`EMBODIMENTS
`
`The apparatus of FIG. 1 can be used to produce uni
`form microspheres having any desired diameter within the
`range of about 2 to 40 microns although these limits have
`been challenged. The inside diameter of nozzle 7 is 50
`microns while that of nozzle 19 is 1 mm. The ID. of
`?ow chamber 22 is 3 mm. Typically, the core liquid is held
`in reservoir 1 at a pressure of about 50 p.s.i., while the
`sheath liquid is held in reservoir 8 at a pressure of about
`30 p.s.i. Under these conditions the flow rates of core and
`sheath liquid through region 21 are about 0.9 cc./min.
`and about 110 cc./min., respectively. Note that the diow
`rate through an ori?ce of given size under a set pressure
`ditference is dependent on the viscosity of the liquid. The
`oscillator 4 normally operates at a frequency of about 20
`kHz. This results in droplets and therefore microspheres
`being formed at a rate of about 20,000 per second.
`
`EXAMPLE I
`
`The apparatus of FIG. 1 was used to produce uniform
`thoria microspheres in the following manner. A core
`liquid consisting of an aqueous solution containing 4.15
`mg./cc. of thoria sol was placed in reservoir 1 at a pres
`sure of 50 p.s.i. A sheath liquid consisting of 2-ethyl-l
`hexanol containing 0.2% by volume of ammonium hy
`droxide, 0.005% by volume of Ethomeen S/ 15, and
`0.05% by volume of Triton X-100 was placed in res
`ervoir 8 at a pressure of 30‘ p.s.i. Ethomeen 8/15 is a
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`70
`
`75
`
`Luminex Ex. 1010
`Luminex/Irori - Page 3
`
`

`
`5
`surfactant which consists of an ethylene oxide condensa
`tion product of the primary fatty tertiary aminess. Triton
`X-100 is a surfactant product of Rohm & HaasCompany
`which consists of alkylphenoxy polyethoxy ethanol with
`9 or 10 oxyethylene groups. At these respective pressures,
`the ?ow rate of the core liquid was approximately 0.9
`cc. /min. while that of the sheath liquid was approximately
`110 cc./min. Once flow of core liquid and sheath liquid
`had commenced through injection tube 6 and flow cham
`ber 22, respectively, oscillator 4 was operated at a frequen~
`cy of about 19.2 kHz. This imparted a periodic disturb
`ance to the core liquid and produced 19,200 droplets per
`second from the core liquid jet emerging from nozzle 7.
`Nozzle 7 had an I.D. of 50 microns. These droplets were
`held in a spaced relationship to each other by the laminar
`flow of sheath liquid through region 21 of the apparatus
`of FIG. 1. The droplets and their surrounding sheath
`liquid were allowed to ?ow into a beaker which was
`magnetically stirred. The water in the droplets is slightly
`soluble in the 2-ethylhexanol so that it diffuses out, leav
`ing gelled microspheres. The droplets are left in the sheath
`liquid for a time su?icient for the microspheres to gel.
`In this particular example, the droplets were left in the
`2-ethylhexanol for approximately 20 minutes. The gelled
`microspheres thus produced had diameters of 14 microns.
`They were then dried at 180° C. and calcined at 950°
`C. The thoria microspheres produced on calcining had
`diameters of 8.3 microns. The volume distribution of
`these microspheres was similar to that shown in FIG. 3
`for zirconia microspheres produced in a similar manner.
`
`EXAMPLE II
`
`The apparatus of FIG. 1 was used to produce uniform
`zirconia microspheres in the following manner. A core
`liquid consisting of an aqueous solution containing 5.3
`mg./cc. of zirconia sol was placed in reservoir 1 at a
`pressure of 49 p.s.i. A sheath liquid consisting of 2-ethyl
`l-hexanol containing 0.1% by volume of ammonium hy
`droxide and 0.05% by volume of Triton X~100 was
`placed in reservoir 8 at a pressure of 34 p.s.i. Triton X
`100 is a surfactant which consists of alkylphenoxy poly
`ethoxy ethanol with 9 or 10 oxyethylene groups. At these
`respective pressures, the ?ow rate of the core liquid was
`approximately 0.6 cc./min. while that of the sheath
`liquid was approximately 100 cc./min. Once ?ow of core
`liquid and sheath liquid had commenced through injec
`tion tube 6 and ?ow chamber 22, respectively, oscillator
`4 was operated at a frequency of about 20.6 kHz. This
`imparted a periodic disturbance to the core liquid and
`produced 20,600 droplets per second from the core liquid
`jet emerging from nozzle 7. Nozzle 7 had an ID. of 50
`microns. These droplets were held in spaced relationship
`to each other by the laminar ?ow of sheath liquid through
`region 21 of the apparatus of FIG. 1. The droplets and
`their surrounding sheath liquid were allowed to ?ow into
`a beaker which was magnetically stirred. The water in
`the droplets diffused into the Z-ethylhexanol in the man
`ner described in Example I. The droplets were left in the
`Z-ethylhexanol for approximately 20 minutes. The gelled
`microspheres thus produced had diameters of 18 microns.
`They were then removed, dried, and calcined at 950° C.
`The zirconia microspheres produced on calcining had
`diameters of 10 microns. The coe?icient of variation in
`volume of the microspheres, as calculated from the curve
`shown in FIG. 3, was 3.7%.
`
`EXAMPLE III
`
`The apparatus of FIG. 1 was used to produce uniform
`polystyrene microspheres containing a ?uoroescent dye in
`the following manner. A core liquid consisting of a 25%
`dichloroethane-75% dichloromethane solution containing
`0.0533% by wt./vol. of polystyrene and 1.5><10—5 g./l.
`of solvent of a ?uorescent dye was placed in reservoir 1
`at a pressure of 6 p.s.i. The dye was Maxilon Brilliant
`
`3,790,492
`6
`Flavine 10GFF (63040) manufactured by Geigy Com
`pany. A sheath liquid consisting of water containing
`0.15% by volume of Liquinox was placed in reservoir 8
`at a pressure of 4.2 p.s.i. Liquinox is a surfactant pro
`duced by Alconox, Inc. At these respective pressures, the
`?ow rate of the core liquid was approximately 0.17 cc./
`min. while that of the sheath liquid was approximately
`60 cc./min. Once ?ow of core liquid and sheath liquid
`had commenced through injection tube 6 and ?ow cham~
`ber 22, respectively, oscillator 4 was operated at a frequen
`cy of about 6,300 cycles/ second. This imparted a periodic
`disturbance to the core liquid and produced 6,300 droplets
`per second from the core liquid jet emerging from nozzle
`7. Nozzle 7 had an I.D. of 31 microns. These droplets
`were held in a spaced relationship to each other by the
`laminar ?ow of sheath liquid through region 21 of the
`apparatus of FIG. 1. The droplets and their surrounding
`sheath liquid were allowed to ?ow into a beaker which
`was magnetically stirred. The solvent in the droplets is
`slightly soluble in the water of the sheath liquid so that
`it diffuses out, leaving solid microspheres of polystyrene.
`The droplets were left in the water for approximately 20
`minutes. The polystyrene microspheres produced had
`diameters of 10 microns. The coe?icient of variation in
`volume of the microspheres, as calculated from the vol
`ume curve of FIG. 2, was 2.9%. The coefficient of varia—
`tion in ?uorescence, as calculated from the ?uorescence
`curve of FIG. 2, was 4%.
`Examples I and II disclose the formation of small very
`uniform microspheres of thoria and zirconia from a start
`ing material comprising an aqueous sol of the oxide. It
`is well known in the art that numerous metal oxides form
`such sols and can be reduced to gels by appropriate dehy
`dration techniques. In particular, Clinton et al. in U.S. Pat.
`3,290,122 disclose the formation of microspheres by the
`“sol-gel” process from actinide metal oxides. On the basis
`of that patent and various other disclosures in the liter
`ature, one of reasonable skill in the art will realize that
`my method of forming small uniform microspheres is
`not limited to formation of thoria and zirconia micro
`spheres but is applicable to the production of a wide
`variety of metal oxide and mixed metal oxide gel micro
`spheres in accordance with sol-gel techniques. For ex
`ample, such techniques are described in some detail in the
`International Atomic Energy Agency document “Sol-Gel
`Processes for Ceramic Nuclear Fuels” (Vienna, 1968).
`US. Pat. 3,290,122 is hereby incorporated into and made
`a part of this application by reference.
`In US. vPat. 3,422,167, issued Jan. 14, 1969, Bowman
`et al. disclose metal oxide gel microspheres of alumina,
`zirconia, hafnia, europia, thoria, urania, plutonia, and
`mixtures thereof formed by jetting a corresponding metal
`oxide sol into a freezing medium, freezing, subsequently
`dehydrating by vacuum distillation after removal of the
`freezing medium, and calcining into ?red product. US.
`Pat. 3,422,167 is hereby incorporated into and made a
`part of this application by reference. In US. Pat. 3,551,
`533, issued Dec. 29, 1970, Monforte et al. disclose the
`formation of uniform spheres of a wide variety of mate
`rials by freeze-drying an atomized solution. Again, it will
`be readily understood that my method of forming small
`uniform microspheres is easily adapted to such freeze
`dry techniques by using a sheath liquid that will serve
`as an appropriate freezing medium.
`What is claimed is:
`1. A method for producing uniformly sized particles
`which comprises introducing through a two-fluid nozzle a
`laminar jet of a stable hydrous oxide sol core liquid into
`a laminar ?ow sheath liquid consisting of an organic liquid
`having a water solubility of 0.3 to 10 volume percent
`and a solubility in water of less than one volume percent
`and containing a surfactant, said core liquid jet being
`periodically disturbed prior to its introduction into the
`laminar ?ow sheath liquid, to form uniformly sized drop
`lets of core liquid in uniform space relation within said
`
`70
`
`15
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`75
`
`Luminex Ex. 1010
`Luminex/Irori - Page 4
`
`

`
`7
`laminar ?ow sheath liquid, allowing the droplets of core
`liquid thus produced to remain within the sheath liquid
`for a time suf?cient for the material to form condensed
`spheres between 2 and 40 microns in diameter and then
`’ removing said spheres from the sheath liquid.
`
`3,790,492
`
`8
`3,352,950 11/1967 ‘Helton et al _________ __ 264—.5
`3,463,842
`8/1969 Flack et a1, ____ __ 252_301_1 s
`3,617,534 11/1971 Flack et a1, ____ __ 252__301,1S
`
`5 STEPHEN J. LECHERT, JR., Primary Examiner
`
`References Cited
`UNITED STATES PATENTS
`
`264——-5
`
`U.S. Cl. X.R.
`
`l
`
`3,331,898
`3,340,567
`
`7/1967 Haaset a1 ___________ __ 264—.5 10
`9/1967 Flack et a1. ______ __ 264—.5X
`
`Luminex Ex. 1010
`Luminex/Irori - Page 5

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket