`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
` Paper No. 32
` Entered: April 27, 2015
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`WAVEMARKET, INC. D/B/A LOCATION LABS
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`LOCATIONET SYSTEMS, LTD.
`Patent Owner
`____________
`
`Case IPR2014-00920
`Patent 6,771,970
`____________
`
`
`Before KRISTEN L. DROESCH, SHERIDAN K. SNEDDEN,
`and GLENN J. PERRY, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`PERRY, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of Proceeding
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2014-00920
`Patent 6,771,970
`
`
`Petitioner requests1 “confirmation” that it’s Reply due April 29, 2015
`will have a page limit of 25 pages, consistent with the announcement from
`Director Lee dated March 27, 2015.
`Director Lee’s announcement applies to cases that have not yet been
`briefed. It is a matter of panel discretion as to how to apply the new page
`limits to cases already in briefing. In this case, the Petition (Paper 3), Patent
`Owner’s Preliminary Response (Paper 8), and Patent Owner’s Response
`(Paper 28) were all filed in accordance with the originally set page limits.
`To increase the page limit for Petitioner’s Reply would provide an unfair
`advantage to Petitioner. We note that there is no Motion to Amend in this
`case.
`
`
`
`ORDER
`
`Accordingly, it is hereby
`ORDERED that Petitioner’s request for additional pages for its Reply
`is denied.
`
`
`1 Email request dated April 22, 2015.
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case IPR2014-00920
`Patent 6,771,970
`
`For Petitioner
`Mark L. Hogge
`Scott W. Cummings
`DENTONS US LLP
`mark.hogge@dentons.com
`scott.cummings@dentons.com
`
`
`For Patent Owner
`
`Thomas Engellenner
`Reza Mollaaghababa
`Andy Chan
`
`engellennert@pepperlaw.com
`mollaaghababar@pepperlaw.com
`chana@pepperlaw.com
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`