throbber

`
`
`
`
`
`In the Matter of
`
`UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
`WASHINGTON, D.C.
`
`Before The Honorable E. James Gildea
`Administrative Law Judge
`
`
`Investigation No. 337-TA-893
`
`CERTAIN FLASH MEMORY CHIPS
`AND PRODUCTS CONTAINING SAME
`
`
`
`SECOND JOINT SUBMISSION REGARDING
`PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF DISPUTED CLAIM TERMS
`
`
`
`Complainant Spansion LLC ("Spansion"), Respondents Macronix International Co., Ltd.,
`
`Macronix America, Inc., Macronix Asia Limited, Macronix (Hong Kong) Co., Ltd., Acer Inc.,
`
`Acer America Corporation, ASUSTek Computer Inc., Asus Computer International, Belkin
`
`International, Inc., D-Link Corporation, D-Link Systems, Inc., Nintendo Co., Ltd., Nintendo of
`
`America, Inc. and Netgear Inc. (collectively, "Respondents"), and the Commission Investigative
`
`Staff Attorney ("Staff") (collectively, "the parties") have continued to streamline the issues
`
`regarding claim construction. The parties submit the attached revised joint list showing each
`
`party's proposed construction of the remaining disputed claim terms. The parties have also
`
`expanded the list of agreed-upon constructions, which are set forth in a separate table at the end
`
`of this document.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`IPR2014-00898
`Exhibit MX027II-1006, p. 1
`
`

`

`
`
`Dated: February 12, 2014
`
`/s/ Paul M. Bartkowski
`Tom M. Schaumberg
`Paul M. Bartkowski
`ADDUCI, MASTRIANI & SCHAUMBERG, LLP
`1133 Connecticut Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, DC 20036
`Telephone: 202.467.6300
`Facsimile: 202.466.2006
`
`Andrew N. Thomases
`Mark D. Rowland
`ROPES & GRAY LLP
`1900 University Avenue, 6th Floor
`East Palo Alto, California 94303
`Telephone: 650.617.4712
`Facsimile: 650.566.4275
`
`Dalila Argaez Wendlandt
`ROPES & GRAY LLP
`800 Boylston Street
`Boston, Massachusetts 02199
`Telephone: 617.951.7884
`Facsimile: 617.235.0551
`
`Counsel for Complainant Spansion LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`SPAN701414.docx
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Thomas L. Jarvis
`Thomas L. Jarvis, Esq.
`WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
`1700 K Street, N.W.
`Washington, DC 20006-3817
`Telephone: 202.282.5000
`Facsimile: 202.282.5100
`
`Counsel for Respondents Macronix
`International Co., Ltd., Macronix America,
`Inc., Macronix Asia Limited, Macronix
`(Hong Kong) Co., Ltd., Acer Inc., Acer
`America Corporation, ASUSTek Computer
`Inc., Asus Computer International, Belkin
`International, Inc., D-Link Corporation,
`D-Link Systems, Inc., Nintendo Co., Ltd.,
`Nintendo of America, Inc. and Netgear Inc.
`
`
`/s/ Monica Bhattacharyya
`Monica Bhattacharyya
`OFFICE OF UNFAIR IMPORT INVESTIGATIONS
`U.S. International Trade Commission
`500 E Street SW, Suite 401
`Washington, DC 20436
`Telephone: 202.205.1848
`Facsimile: 202.205.2158
`
`
`2
`
`IPR2014-00898
`Exhibit MX027II-1006, p. 2
`
`

`

`
`
`
`PROPOSED CONSTRUCTIONS OF DISPUTED CLAIM TERMS
`
`Term (Claim)
`Preambles:
`"A method of forming a contact
`in a flash memory device that
`improves the depth of focus
`(DOF) margin and the overlay
`margin between a plurality
`stacked gate layers and the
`respective contact"
`('124 claim 1) ('922 claim 1)
`
`U.S. Patent Nos. 6,900,124 & 7,018,922
`Complainant's Construction
`Respondents' Construction
`Preamble is not limiting; no
`Preamble is a limitation.
`construction necessary.
`
`If a construction is required, the
`Respondents' proposed
`terms are addressed below and
`construction is as follows, with
`in the table of agreed-upon
`additional terms addressed
`constructions.
`below and in the table of
`agreed-upon constructions:
`"a method of forming a contact
`for a flash memory device
`where the shape of the contact
`results in improved depth of
`focus of the contact and
`improved overlay margin
`between the contact and the
`stacked gate layers thus
`allowing a reduction in distance
`between stacked gate layers"
`
`Staff's Construction
`Preamble is not limiting; no
`construction is necessary.
`If a construction is required, the
`terms are addressed below and
`in the table of agreed-upon
`constructions.
`
`"flash memory device"
`('124 claims 1, 6) ('922 claim 1)
`
`Preamble is not limiting; no
`construction necessary.
`If construction is required: "a
`type of erasable electronic
`memory media that can be
`rewritten and can hold its
`content without power."
`
`erasable and rewritable
`electronic memory media that
`can hold its content without
`power
`
`Preamble is not limiting; no
`construction necessary.
`If construction is required: "a
`type of erasable electronic
`memory media that can be
`rewritten and can hold its
`content without power."
`
`1
`
`IPR2014-00898
`Exhibit MX027II-1006, p. 3
`
`

`

`
`
`Term (Claim)
`"stacked gate layer(s)"
`('124 claims 1-3, 5-8)
`('922 claims 1-3, 5)
`
`"major axis"
`('124 claims 1, 2, 5, 7, 10)
`('922 claims 1, 2, 5)
`
`"minor axis"
`('124 claims 1, 3, 5, 8, 10)
`('922 claims 1, 3, 5)
`
`"DOF limit"
`('124 claim 1) ('922 claims 1)
`
`U.S. Patent Nos. 6,900,124 & 7,018,922
`Complainant's Construction
`Respondents' Construction
`structure(s) made up of
`a structure of a flash memory
`multiple stacked layers that
`device that includes a floating
`include a gate
`gate and a control gate in a
`stacked configuration
`
`the longest axis of an elongated
`shape
`
`the shortest axis of an
`elongated shape
`
`longest diameter of the contact
`hole and is substantially
`parallel to the stacked gate
`layers
`
`the shortest diameter of the
`contact hole and is substantially
`perpendicular to the stacked
`gate layers
`
`Staff's Construction
`a structure of a flash memory
`device that includes a floating
`gate and a control gate in a
`stacked configuration
`
`the longest axis of an elongated
`shape
`
`the shortest axis of an
`elongated shape
`
`a threshold past which the three
`dimensional region of the
`portion of the photoresist to be
`exposed is no longer within
`specifications
`
`the smallest DOF that can be
`tolerated in manufacturing to
`achieve an adequate result
`
`the smallest DOF that can be
`tolerated in manufacturing to
`achieve an adequate result
`
`2
`
`IPR2014-00898
`Exhibit MX027II-1006, p. 4
`
`

`

`
`
`Term (Claim)
`"the contact hole is
`dimensioned along the major
`axis so as to maintain focus of
`an image of the contact hole as
`the minor axis is reduced in
`size towards a DOF limit."
`('124 claim 1, '922 claim 1)
`
`
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent Nos. 6,900,124 & 7,018,922
`Complainant's Construction
`Respondents' Construction
`the contact hole is shaped so
`the contact hole is shaped so
`that the major axis of the
`that the major axis of the
`contact hole is sized to
`contact hole is sized to
`maintain focus of an image of
`maintain focus of an image of
`the contact hole while the
`the contact hole while the
`minor axis is sized such that the
`minor axis is shorter than the
`patterning capability
`diameter of a circular contact
`approaches or is close to a DOF
`hole whose feature size is at the
`limit
`DOF limit
`
`Staff's Construction
`the contact hole is shaped so
`that the major axis of the
`contact hole is sized to
`maintain focus of an image of
`the contact hole while the
`minor axis is shorter than the
`diameter of a circular contact
`hole whose feature size is at the
`DOF limit
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`IPR2014-00898
`Exhibit MX027II-1006, p. 5
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent No. 6,369,416
`Complainant's Construction
`Respondents' Construction
`stacked structures that each
`semiconductor structures each
`include a gate
`having a floating gate and a
`control gate in a stacked
`configuration
`
`Staff's Construction
`semiconductor structures each
`having a floating gate and a
`control gate in a stacked
`configuration
`
`"a side defining a sloped
`profile":
`
`"a side defining a sloped
`profile":
`
`"a side defining a sloped
`profile":
`
` a
`
` side of the contact, between
`the base of the contact and the
`top of the contact, having a
`sloped profile
`
`"an angle between the side of
`the at least on[e] contact and a
`surface of a substrate":
`
`an angle formed by two lines
`corresponding to the sloped
`profile of the side of the contact
`and to a surface of a substrate
`
` a
`
` side of the contact, between
`the base of the contact and the
`top of the contact, having a
`profile such that no point on the
`profile has a vertical slope
`relative to the surface of the
`substrate
`
`"an angle between the side of
`the at least on[e] contact and a
`surface of a substrate":
`
`an angle formed by two lines
`corresponding to (1) a line
`taken along the side of the
`contact from the top of the
`contact to the bottom of the
`contact, and (2) a line taken
`along the surface of a substrate
`
` a
`
` side of the contact that is
`sloped near the substrate
`
`"an angle between the side of
`the at least on[e] contact and a
`surface of a substrate":
`
`an angle formed by two lines
`corresponding to the sloped
`profile of the side of the contact
`and to a surface of a substrate
`
`4
`
`
`
`Term (Claim)
`"gate stacks" (claim 1)
`
`"the at least one contact having
`a side defining a sloped profile
`including an angle between the
`side of the at least on[e]
`contact and a surface of a
`substrate" (claim 1)
`
`IPR2014-00898
`Exhibit MX027II-1006, p. 6
`
`

`

`Staff's Construction
`"a second side defining a
`sloped profile":
`
` a
`
` second side of the contact,
`between the base of the contact
`and the top of the contact,
`having a sloped profile
`
`"a second angle between the
`second side of the contact and a
`surface of a substrate":
`
` a
`
` second angle formed by two
`lines corresponding to the
`sloped profile of the second
`side of the contact and to the
`surface of a substrate
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,369,416
`Complainant's Construction
`Respondents' Construction
`"a second side defining a
`"a second side defining a
`sloped profile":
`sloped profile":
`
` a
`
` second side of the contact,
`between the base of the contact
`and the top of the contact,
`having a profile such that no
`point on the profile has a
`vertical slope relative to the
`surface of the substrate
`
`"a second angle between the
`second side of the contact and
`the surface of a substrate":
`
`an angle formed by two lines
`corresponding to (1) a line
`taken along a second side of the
`contact from the top of the
`contact to the bottom of the
`contact, and (2) a line taken
`along the surface of a substrate
`
` a
`
` second side of the contact that
`is sloped near the substrate
`
`"a second angle between the
`second side of the contact and
`the surface of a substrate":
`
` a
`
` second angle formed by two
`lines corresponding to the
`sloped profile of the second
`side of the contact and to the
`surface of a substrate
`
`
`
`Term (Claim)
`"the at least one contact hole
`having a second side defining a
`sloped profile including a
`second angle between the
`second side of the contact and
`the surface of a substrate"
`(claim 2)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`IPR2014-00898
`Exhibit MX027II-1006, p. 7
`
`

`

`Staff's Construction
`"a memory array"
`
`an area of a memory device
`including operational
`components used in the process
`of storing data
`
`"a periphery"
`
`an area of a memory device
`outside of the memory array in
`which periphery components
`are formed
`
`U.S. Patent 7,151,027
`Complainant's Construction Respondents' Construction
`"a memory array":
`"a memory array":
`
`an area of a memory device
`including operational
`components used in the
`process of storing data
`
`"a periphery":
`
`an area of a memory device
`outside of the memory array
`in which periphery
`components are formed
`
` repeating pattern of
`transistors forming operational
`components used in the process
`of storing data
`
`"a periphery":
`
`an area of a memory device
`outside the memory array that
`includes logic circuits
`
` a
`
`
`
`Term (Claim)
`"at an interface between a
`memory array and a periphery of
`said memory device" (claims 1,
`8)
`
`"proximate to said memory
`array" (claims 1-3, 5, 7-9, 11,
`14)
`
`"proximate to said periphery"
`(claims 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 10, 11,
`14)
`
`at the side of the interface
`closer to the memory array
`
`proximate (i.e., close) to said
`memory array
`
`proximate (i.e., close) to said
`memory array
`
`at the side of the interface
`closer to the periphery
`
`proximate (i.e., close) to said
`periphery
`
`proximate (i.e., close) to said
`periphery
`
`6
`
`IPR2014-00898
`Exhibit MX027II-1006, p. 8
`
`

`

`
`
`Term (Claim)
`"stacked gate etch" (claims 3, 9)
`
`U.S. Patent 7,151,027
`Complainant's Construction Respondents' Construction
`a type of process that etches
`an etching step that etches at
`poly-1 and poly-2 layers, used
`least a portion of a stacked gate
`to form individual transistor
`structures from the polysilicon
`layers
`
`Staff's Construction
`a type of process that etches
`poly-1 and poly-2 layers, used
`to form individual transistor
`structures from the polysilicon
`layers
`
`"second gate etch" (claims 4, 10)
`
`a process that etches poly-2
`layer
`
`an etching step that etches at
`least a portion of a second gate
`
`a process that etches poly-2
`layer
`
`
`
`
`
`7
`
`IPR2014-00898
`Exhibit MX027II-1006, p. 9
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent 6,459,625
`Complainant's Construction
`Respondents' Construction
`Preambles are limiting such
`Preambles are not limiting.
`that the claims are directed to
`methods or system relating to
`the periphery area in a flash
`memory.
`
`For claim 1, the limiting
`language is "a periphery area in
`a flash memory."
`
`For claim 6, the limiting
`language is "a flash memory."
`
`For claim 10, the limiting
`language is "a periphery area of
`a memory device."
`a type of erasable electronic
`memory that can be rewritten
`and can hold its content without
`power
`
`Preambles are not limiting; no
`construction necessary. If
`construction is required, the
`term should be construed
`consistent with other asserted
`patents.
`an area outside the core
`memory area that includes logic
`circuits
`
`
`
`Term (Claim)
`Preambles (claims 1, 6, 10)
`
`"flash memory" (claims 1, 6)
`
`"periphery area" (claims 1, 6,
`10)
`
`a section of a flash memory
`device outside the core cell area
`
`8
`
`Staff's Construction
`Preambles are not limiting.
`
`Preamble is not limiting; no
`construction necessary. If
`construction is required, the
`term should be construed
`consistent with other asserted
`patents.
`a section of a flash memory
`device outside the core cell area
`
`IPR2014-00898
`Exhibit MX027II-1006, p. 10
`
`

`

`
`
`Term (Claim)
`"sub-circuit" (claims 1, 6, 10)
`
`"completing the electrical
`interconnection of said circuit
`components in each respective
`sub-circuit with a second metal
`interconnect layer" (claim 1)
`"complete the electrical
`interconnection of said
`respective transistors within
`said sub-circuits" (claim 6)
`"complete the electrical
`connection of said circuit
`components of said electric
`circuits" (claim 10)
`
`"the minimum source/drain
`spacing rule" (claims 5, 9, 14)
`
`the rule that governs the
`minimum distance between
`adjacent source/drain areas
`
`
`
`
`
`9
`
`U.S. Patent 6,459,625
`Complainant's Construction
`Respondents' Construction
`a collection of one or more
`circuit in the periphery area that
`integrated electric circuits in
`includes all of the components
`the periphery area of a flash
`necessary to perform a
`memory that generally
`particular logic function that
`performs one or more logic
`assists in memory operations
`related functions
`completing electrical
`connections between or among
`the circuit components within
`the sub-circuits using a second
`metal interconnect layer
`complete electrical connections
`between or among the
`transistors within the sub-
`circuits
`complete electrical connections
`between or among the circuit
`components of the electric
`circuits
`
`completing the electrical
`connections between or among
`all of the circuit components in
`each sub-circuit using a second
`metal interconnect layer
`complete the electrical
`connections between or among
`all the transistors within the
`sub-circuits
`complete the electrical
`connections between or among
`all of the circuit components of
`the electric circuits within each
`sub-circuit
`the minimum distance between
`the source and the drain in a
`transistor to minimize the
`probability of device
`malfunction
`
`Staff's Construction
`circuit in the periphery area that
`performs a logic-related
`function that assists in memory
`operations
`
`completing the electrical
`connections between or among
`all of the circuit components in
`each sub-circuit using a second
`metal interconnect layer
`complete the electrical
`connections between or among
`all the transistors within the
`sub-circuits
`complete the electrical
`connections between or among
`all of the circuit components of
`the electric circuits within each
`sub-circuit
`the minimum distance between
`the source and the drain in a
`transistor to minimize the
`probability of device
`malfunction
`
`IPR2014-00898
`Exhibit MX027II-1006, p. 11
`
`

`

`
`
`Term (Claim)
`Preambles (claims 1, 20)
`
`Staff's Construction
`Preambles are limiting with
`respect to the term "Flash
`memory."
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,731,536
`Complainant's Construction
`Respondents' Construction
`The preambles of claims 1 and
`Preambles are not limiting.
`20 limit the claims.
`Claim 1: "protecting Flash
`memory against alterations"
`means "providing the capability
`to prevent alterations of data in
`a Flash memory."
`Claim 20: "having multiple
`degrees of protection" means
`"having a variety of levels for
`preventing alterations of data in
`the memory."
`
`"providing different degrees of
`protection" (claim 1)
`
`"persistently locking a sector
`for preventing modification of
`the sector" (claim 1)
`
`making available a variety of
`levels of preventing alterations
`to data in the memory
`
`the degree of protection that
`has the capability of locking a
`sector to prevent alteration of
`data in that sector in a way that
`retains its locked state across
`power cycles until unlocked
`
`"persistent[ly]" (claim 1, 20)
`
`retains its state across power
`cycles
`
`locking a memory by carrying
`out different types of protection
`
`setting a bit that prevents
`changes to the contents of the
`memory such that the only way
`to change the contents is to
`clear the bit, the bit being more
`difficult to clear than a bit that
`is dynamically locked
`
`not easily switchable back and
`forth between protected and
`unprotected conditions
`
`making available a variety of
`levels of preventing alterations
`to data in the memory
`
`the degree of protection that
`has the capability of locking a
`sector to prevent alteration of
`data in that sector in a way that
`retains its locked state across
`power cycles until unlocked
`
`retains its state across power
`cycles
`
`10
`
`IPR2014-00898
`Exhibit MX027II-1006, p. 12
`
`

`

`
`
`Term (Claim)
`"dynamically locking a sector
`which prevents modification of
`the sector without first resetting
`a protection bit" (claim 1)
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,731,536
`Complainant's Construction
`Respondents' Construction
`the degree of protection that
`setting a bit that prevents
`has the capability of locking a
`changes to the contents of the
`sector to prevent alteration of
`memory such that the only way
`data in the sector until a
`to change the contents is to
`protection bit is reset through a
`clear the bit, the bit being less
`write command, a hardware
`difficult to clear than a bit that
`reset, or a power cycle
`is persistently locked
`
`Staff's Construction
`the degree of protection that
`has the capability of locking a
`sector to prevent alteration of
`data in the sector until a
`protection bit is reset through a
`write command, a hardware
`reset, or a power cycle
`
`"dynamic[ally]" (claims 1, 20)
`
`changeable through a write
`command, a hardware reset, or
`a power cycle
`
`easily switchable back and
`forth between protected and
`unprotected conditions
`
`changeable through a write
`command, a hardware reset, or
`a power cycle
`
`"at least one Persistent
`Protection Bit (PPB) which has
`to be cleared in order to change
`the contents of the memory"
`(claim 20)
`
`at least one non-volatile bit that
`corresponds to at least a sector
`in the memory, retains its state
`across power cycles, and has to
`be cleared to modify data
`stored in the memory
`
`"A method of claim 20"
`(claim 21)
`
`A memory of claim 20
`
`"A method of claim 21"
`(claims 22 and 23)
`
`A memory of claim 21
`
`a bit that, when set, prevents
`changes to the contents of the
`memory such that the only way
`to change the contents is to
`clear the bit, the PPB being
`more difficult to clear than the
`DPB
`
`No construction necessary.
`Alternatively, "method" means
`"process."
`
`No construction necessary.
`Alternatively, "method" means
`"process."
`
`at least one non-volatile bit that
`corresponds to at least a sector
`in the memory, retains its state
`across power cycles, and, when
`set, has to be cleared to modify
`data stored in the memory
`
`A memory of claim 20
`
`A memory of claim 21
`
`
`
`11
`
`IPR2014-00898
`Exhibit MX027II-1006, p. 13
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`AGREED-UPON CONSTRUCTIONS
`
`U.S. Patent Nos. 6,900,124 & 7,018,922
`Term (Claim)
`Agreed-Upon Construction
`"depth of focus (DOF)"
`the range of lens-wafer distances over
`('124 claim 1) ('922 claim 1)
`which exposed photoresist will generate
`line widths within specifications and
`
`adequate resist profiles
`
`"depth of focus margin"
`('124 claim 1) ('922 claim 1)
`
`"overlay margin"
`('124 claim 1) ('922 claim 1)
`
`"an elliptical shape"
`('124 claims 1, 6)
`
`If the preamble is limiting and
`construction is required, the parties have
`agreed upon the following construction:
`"the amount of depth of focus."
`
`If the preamble is limiting and
`construction is required, the parties have
`agreed upon the following construction:
`"the tolerance to errors in the lateral
`positioning between features that were
`patterned on different lithographic
`layers."
`
`a shape close to an ellipse having a major
`axis and a minor axis where the major
`axis is greater than the minor axis
`
`12
`
`IPR2014-00898
`Exhibit MX027II-1006, p. 14
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Term (Claim)
`"poly-2 layer" (claims 1 and 8)
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,151,027
`Agreed-Upon Construction
`a polysilicon layer deposited later in time
`than a first polysilicon layer
`
`"such that step size is smoothed out
`reducing an occurrence of stringers from
`spacer etching" (claims 7, 14)
`
`This is an intended result of the process,
`but not a limitation on the claim.
`
`Term (Claim)
`"password mode"
`(claims 9, 12, 14, 15)
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,731,536
`Agreed-Upon Construction
`a mode of operation that requires the use
`of a password
`
`13
`
`IPR2014-00898
`Exhibit MX027II-1006, p. 15
`
`

`

`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`
`I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing SECOND JOINT SUBMISSION
`
`REGARDING PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF DISPUTED CLAIM TERMS was
`served to the parties, in the manner indicated below, this 12th day of February 2014:
`
`
` VIA HAND DELIVERY – 2 Copies
`
`
` VIA HAND DELIVERY
` VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL
`
`(monica.bhattacharyya@usitc.gov)
`
`
`The Honorable E. James Gildea
`Administrative Law Judge
`U.S. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
`500 E Street, S.W., Room 317-E
`Washington, DC 20436
`
`Monica Bhattacharyya, Esq.
`Office of Unfair Import Investigations
`U.S. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
`500 E Street, SW, Room 401-G
`Washington, DC 20436
`
`COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENTS MACRONIX INTERNATIONAL CO., LTD.,
`MACRONIX AMERICA, INC., MACRONIX ASIA LIMITED, MACRONIX
`(HONG KONG) CO., LTD., ACER INC., ACER AMERICA CORPORATION,
`ASUSTEK COMPUTER INC., ASUS COMPUTER INTERNATIONAL,
`BELKIN INTERNATIONAL, INC., D-LINK CORPORATION, D-LINK SYSTEMS, INC.,
`NINTENDO CO., LTD., NINTENDO OF AMERICA, INC. AND NETGEAR INC.
`
` VIA FIRST CLASS MAIL
`Thomas L. Jarvis, Esq.
` VIA OVERNIGHT DELIVERY
`WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
` VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL
`1700 K Street, N W
`
`(ITC893Winstoncourtesy@winston.com)
`Washington, DC 20006-3817
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Kelsey R. Curtis, Paralegal
`ADDUCI, MASTRIANI & SCHAUMBERG, L.L.P.
`
`
`
`
`SPAN100013 E-filing.docx
`
`IPR2014-00898
`Exhibit MX027II-1006, p. 16
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket