Trials@uspto.gov
`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`
`
`Paper 32
`Entered: January 20, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`MACRONIX INTERNATIONAL CO., LTD., MACRONIX ASIA
`LIMITED, MACRONIX (HONG KONG) CO., LTD., and
`MACRONIX AMERICA, INC.,
`Petitioners,
`v.
`SPANSION LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`Case IPR2014-00103 (Patent 6,369,416 B1)
`Case IPR2014-00104 (Patent 6,459,625 B1)
`Case IPR2014-00105 (Patent 6,731,536 B1)
`Case IPR2014-00108 (Patent 7,151,027 B1)
` Case IPR2014-00898 (Patent 7,151,027 B1)1
`
`
`Before HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP, DEBRA K. STEPHENS, JUSTIN
`T. ARBES, and RICHARD E. RICE, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`RICE, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`ORDER
`Trial Hearing
`37 C.F.R. § 42.70
`
`
`1 This Order addresses an issue that is identical in the five cases. We
`exercise our discretion to issue one Order to be filed in each case. The
`parties are not authorized to use this style heading for any subsequent
`papers. This Order supersedes the previous Trial Hearing Orders in these
`cases.
`
`
`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`
`
`Paper 32
`Entered: January 20, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`MACRONIX INTERNATIONAL CO., LTD., MACRONIX ASIA
`LIMITED, MACRONIX (HONG KONG) CO., LTD., and
`MACRONIX AMERICA, INC.,
`Petitioners,
`v.
`SPANSION LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`Case IPR2014-00103 (Patent 6,369,416 B1)
`Case IPR2014-00104 (Patent 6,459,625 B1)
`Case IPR2014-00105 (Patent 6,731,536 B1)
`Case IPR2014-00108 (Patent 7,151,027 B1)
` Case IPR2014-00898 (Patent 7,151,027 B1)1
`
`
`Before HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP, DEBRA K. STEPHENS, JUSTIN
`T. ARBES, and RICHARD E. RICE, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`RICE, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`ORDER
`Trial Hearing
`37 C.F.R. § 42.70
`
`
`1 This Order addresses an issue that is identical in the five cases. We
`exercise our discretion to issue one Order to be filed in each case. The
`parties are not authorized to use this style heading for any subsequent
`papers. This Order supersedes the previous Trial Hearing Orders in these
`cases.
`
`
`
`IPR2014-00103, IPR2014-00104, IPR2014-00105,
`IPR2014-00108, and IPR2014-00898
`
`
`Both parties have requested oral argument in each of the five cases.
`The requests for oral argument are granted.
`Oral argument will commence on the ninth floor of Madison Building
`East, 600 Dulany Street, Alexandria, Virginia, at the following times:
`(1)
`in Cases IPR2014-00108 and IPR2014-00898, on
`January 29, 2015, at 9:00 am Eastern Time;
`(2)
`in Case IPR2014-00104, on January 29, 2015, at
`1:00 pm Eastern Time;
`(3)
`in Case IPR2014-00103, on February 4 , 2015, at
`9:00 am Eastern Time; and
`(4)
`in Case IPR2014-00105, on February 4, 2015, at
`1:00 pm Eastern Time.
`As indicated above, oral argument in Cases IPR2014-00108 and IPR2014-
`00898 will be held at the same place and time.
`Each party is allotted one hour total argument time for each of Cases
`IPR2014-00103, IPR2014-00104, and IPR2014-00105. Each party is
`allotted one hour total argument time to address both Cases IPR2014-00108
`and IPR2014-00898.
`Petitioner will open each hearing by presenting its arguments
`regarding the challenged claims for which the Board instituted trial. Patent
`Owner will then respond to Petitioner’s arguments and, if it so desires, may
`address any Motion to Exclude that it filed in the case or cases being heard.
`Each party may reserve rebuttal time, but Patent Owner may use rebuttal
`time only to respond to Petitioner’s arguments in opposition to a Motion to
`Exclude.
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2014-00103, IPR2014-00104, IPR2014-00105,
`IPR2014-00108, and IPR2014-00898
`
`
`We will provide a court reporter for each hearing, and the reporter’s
`transcript will constitute the official record of the hearing. Each hearing will
`be open to the public via in-person attendance on a first-come, first-served
`basis. If the parties have any concern about disclosing confidential
`information, they are requested to contact us at least 10 days in advance of
`the hearing to discuss the matter.
`The parties are reminded that, under 37 C.F.R. § 42.53(f)(7), a
`proponent of deposition testimony must file such testimony as an exhibit.
`We will not consider any deposition testimony that has not been filed in
`accordance with our rules. Furthermore, under 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(b),
`demonstrative exhibits must be served at least five business days before the
`hearing. We request that such exhibits be filed at least two business days
`before the hearing. The parties are directed to St. Jude Medical, Cardiology
`Division, Inc. v. The Board of Regents of the University of Michigan,
`IPR2013-00041, Paper 65 (PTAB Jan. 27, 2014), for guidance regarding the
`appropriate content of demonstrative exhibits. The parties must initiate a
`conference call with us at least two business days before the hearing to
`present any objection regarding the propriety of any demonstrative exhibit.
`Any objection to demonstrative exhibits that is not presented timely will be
`considered waived. We ask the parties to confine demonstrative exhibit
`objections to those identifying egregious violations that are prejudicial to the
`administration of justice.
`The parties are reminded that, during the hearing, the presenter must
`identify clearly and specifically each demonstrative exhibit referenced (e.g.,
`by slide or screen number) to ensure the clarity and accuracy of the
`reporter’s transcript.
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`IPR2014-00103, IPR2014-00104, IPR2014-00105,
`IPR2014-00108, and IPR2014-00898
`
`
`We expect lead counsel for each party to be present in person at the
`hearing. If a party anticipates that its lead counsel will not be attending the
`oral argument, the parties should initiate a joint telephone conference with
`the Board no later than two business days prior to the oral hearing to discuss
`the matter. Any counsel of record, however, may present the party’s
`argument. A party’s argument may be divided, but interruptions for change
`of counsel should be kept to a minimum.
`The parties are reminded to direct their requests for audio-visual
`equipment to Trials@uspto.gov. Requests for special equipment will not be
`honored unless presented in a separate communication directed to the above
`email address not less than five days before the hearing. If the request is not
`received timely, the equipment may not be available on the day of the
`hearing.
`Accordingly, it is
`ORDERED that oral argument for these proceedings shall take place
`on the ninth floor of Madison Building East, 600 Dulany Street, Alexandria,
`beginning:
`in Cases IPR2014-00108 and IPR2014-00898, on January 29,
`(1)
`2015, at 9:00 am Eastern Time;
`(2)
`in Case IPR2014-00104, on January 29, 2015, at 1:00 pm
`Eastern Time;
`(3)
`in Case IPR2014-00103, on February 4 , 2015, at 9:00 am
`Eastern Time; and
`(4)
`in Case IPR2014-00105, on February 4, 2015, at 1:00 pm
`Eastern Time.
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`IPR2014-00103, IPR2014-00104, IPR2014-00105,
`IPR2014-00108, and IPR2014-00898
`
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Michael M. Murray
`Andrew R. Sommer
`WINSTON & STRAWN
`mmurray@winston.com
`asommer@winston.com
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`J. Steven Baughman
`Gabrielle E. Higgins
`Mark Rowland
`Andrew N. Thomases
`ROPES & GRAY LLP
`steven.baughman@ropesgray.com
`gabrielle.higgins@ropesgray.com
`mark.rowland@ropesgray.com
`Andrew.Thomases@ropesgray.com
`SpansionPTABService@ropesgray.com
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
