throbber
EXHIBIT 2004 
`
`EXHIBIT 2004
`
`               
`
`

`
`1
`
`2
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`7
`8
`
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Page 1
`
` IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
` BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`________________________________
`TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR
`MANUFACTURING COMPANY, LTD.
`AND TSMC NORTH AMERICA CORP., Case Nos.
` IPR2014-00828
` Petitioners, IPR2014-00856
` IPR2014-01070
`-vs- IPR2014-01022
`ZOND, LLC,
` Patent Owner.
`________________________________
`
` VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION of DR. UWE KORTSHAGEN
` Minneapolis, Minnesota
` January 16th, 2015
`
`Reported by:
`Amy L. Larson, RPR
`Job No. 89385
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`
`Page 2
`
`APPEARANCES:
` RADULESCU
` 350 Fifth Avenue
` New York, NY 10118
` By: Tigran Vardanian, Esq.
` For: Zond, LLC
` DUANE MORRIS
` 100 High Street
` Boston, Massachusetts 02110
` By: Anthony Fitzpatrick, Esq.
` For: Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing
` Company Limited and
` TSMC North America
` HAYNES AND BOONE
` 2323 Victory Avenue
` Dallas, Texas 75219
` By: David McCombs, Esq.
` For: Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing
` Company Limited and
` TSMC North America
` HAYNES AND BOONE
` 2505 N. Plano Road
` Richardson, Texas 75082
` By: Gregory Huh, Esq.
` For: Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing
` Company Limited and
` TSMC North America
` WHITE & CASE
` 701 Thirteenth Street N.W.
` Washington, D.C. 20005
` By: David Tennant, Esq.
` For: Global Foundries
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`1
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`56
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`10
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`15
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`20
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`24
`25
`
`

`
`Page 3
`
`APPEARANCES: (CONT'D.)
` WHITE & CASE
` 3000 El Camino Real
` 5 Palo Alto Square
` Palo Alto, California 94306
` By: Brett Rismiller, Esq.
` For: Global Foundries
`
` FOLEY & LARDNER
` Washington Harbour
` 3000 K Street, N.W.
` Washington, D.C. 20007
` By: John J. Feldhaus, Esq. (via telephone)
`
` BAKER BOTTS
` One Shell Plaza
` 910 Louisiana Street
` Houston, Texas 77002
` By: Robinson Vu, Esq. (via telephone)
` For: Toshiba
`
` ALSO PRESENT: Dean Hibben, Videographer
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`1
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`567
`
`8
`
`9
`10
`11
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`16
`17
`
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`

`
`Page 4
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`INDEX:
`EXAMINATION BY: PAGE
`Mr. Vardanian...............................7
`PREVIOUSLY MARKED EXHIBITS:
`Exhibit Intel 1002
`Declaration of Uwe Kortshagen, Ph.D.
`regarding Claims 1-4, 10-15, 17-18, 24-27,
`and 29 of U.S. Patent No. 6,805,779
`Exhibit Intel 1102
`Declaration of Uwe Kortshagen, Ph.D.
`regarding Claims 5, 6, 8, 19, 22, 23, and 43
`of U.S. Patent No. 6,805,779
`Exhibit TSMC 1201
`U.S. Patent No. 6,805,779 B2
`Exhibit TSMC 1202
`Declaration of Uwe Kortshagen, Ph.D.
`regarding Claims 30-40 of
`U.S. Patent No. 6,805,779
`Exhibit TSMC 1207
`U.S. Patent No. 5,753,886
`Exhibit TSMC 1214
`International Application Published
`Under the Patent Cooperation Treaty
`Publication No. WO 83/01349
`Publication Date 14 April 1983
`Exhibit TSMC 1302
`Declaration of Uwe Kortshagen, Ph.D.
`regarding Claims 16, 28, 41, 42, 45 and 46
`of U.S. Patent No. 6,805,779
`Exhibit TSMC 1402
`Declaration of Uwe Kortshagen, Ph.D.
`regarding Claims 7, 9, 20, 21, 38 and 44
`of U.S. Patent No. 6,805,779
`Exhibit TSMC 1413
`European Patent Application
`No. 84850295.1
`Date of filing 4/10/84
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`
`Page 5
`
` DR. UWE KORTSHAGEN
`THE VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF DR. UWE KORTSHAGEN,
`taken on this 16th day of January, 2015,
`The Commons Hotel, 615 Washington Avenue, S.E.,
`Minneapolis, Minnesota, commencing at
`approximately 8:51 a.m.
`
` P R O C E E D I N G S
`
` THE VIDEOGRAPHER: This is
` video number 1 in the deposition of
` Dr. Uwe Kortshagen in the matter of
` Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company,
` Ltd., et al. vs. Zond, LLC, in the United
` States Patent and Trademark Office before the
` Patent Trial and Appeal Board, cases number
` IPR2014-00828, IPR2014-00856, IPR2014-01070
` and IPR2014-01022.
` This deposition is being held at
` The Commons Hotel in Minneapolis, Minnesota,
` on January 16th, 2015, at approximately
` 8:51 a.m. My name is Dean Hibben, I'm the
` legal video specialist from TSG Reporting,
` Incorporated headquartered at 747 Third
` Avenue, New York, New York. The court
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`
`7 8
`
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`

`
`Page 6
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` DR. UWE KORTSHAGEN
`reporter is Amy Larson in association with
`TSG Reporting.
` Will counsel please introduce yourselves.
` MR. VARDANIAN: Tigran Vardanian
`with Radulescu, LLC, on behalf of patent
`owner Zond, LLC.
` MR. FITZPATRICK: Anthony
`Fitzpatrick from Duane, Morris, LLP, on
`behalf of petitioners Taiwan Semiconductor
`Manufacturing Company Limited and TSMC North
`America.
` MR. TENNANT: David Tennant of
`White & Case on behalf of Global Foundries
`U.S. Inc., Global Foundries Dresden Module
`One LLC & Co. KG, Global Foundries Dresden
`Module Two LLC & Co. KG.
` MR. MCCOMBS: David McCombs with
`Haynes & Boone on behalf TSMC, TSMC North
`America and Fujitsu.
` MR. HUH: Gregory Huh on behalf of
`TSMC, TSMC North America and Fujitsu.
` MR. RISMILLER: Brett Rismiller
`with White & Case on behalf of Global
`Foundries U.S. Inc., Global Foundries Dresden
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`
`Page 7
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` DR. UWE KORTSHAGEN
`Module One, LLC & Co. KG and Global Foundries
`Dresden Module, Two LLC & Co. KG.
` THE VIDEOGRAPHER: And those on
`the phone, please.
` MR. FELDHAUS: John Feldhaus of
`Foley & Lardner for petitioners Renaissance
`Electronics Corporation and Renaissance
`Electronics America, Inc.
` MR. VU: Robinson Vu with
`Baker, Botts for Toshiba.
` THE VIDEOGRAPHER: And would the
`court reporter please swear in the witness.
`
` DR. UWE KORTSHAGEN,
` a witness in the above-entitled action,
` after having been first duly sworn,
` was deposed and says as follows:
`
` MR. FITZPATRICK: Before we begin,
`I'll just note for the record that all
`objections will apply to all petitioners so
`that we can avoid the need for repetition in
`objections.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`
`Page 8
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` DR. UWE KORTSHAGEN
` EXAMINATION
`BY MR. VARDANIAN:
`Q. Good morning, Dr. Kortshagen.
`A. Good morning, Mr. Vardanian.
`Q. So I'm going to go over just a few quick
` details. I know you've gone through this
` experience several times.
`A. Yes.
`Q. But do you understand that you've taken an
` oath to testify truthfully today?
`A. I do understand.
`Q. And you will testify truthfully today, yes?
`A. I will.
`Q. You understand that I'm going to ask you
` questions?
`A. Yes.
`Q. And that you have an obligation to answer my
` questions?
`A. I understand.
`Q. And that even if your counsel objects to my
` questions, you still have to answer them. Do
` you understand that?
`A. I understand.
`Q. And one exception to that is if your counsel
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`
`Page 9
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` DR. UWE KORTSHAGEN
` is instructing you to not -- not respond
` under claim of privilege or attorney/client
` privilege or work product. Do you understand
` that?
`A. I understand. Thank you.
`Q. If you don't understand a question or you
` would like me to rephrase, please ask me to
` do so and I will do so; is that fair?
`A. I will do that, yes.
`Q. If I ask you a question and you answer it,
` I'm going to assume that you understood it;
` is that fair?
`A. That is fair, yes.
`Q. Are you taking any medication that would
` impair your ability to testify truthfully
` today, sir?
`A. I'm suffering a little bit from a cold, I
` have taken some aspirin. I don't think that
` this impairs my ability to testify.
`Q. Okay. So today we are not going to talk
` about Wang and Mozgrin, how great is that?
`A. That is relief.
`Q. So we're going to talk about Iwamura as one
` of the things we're going to talk about, and
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`
`Page 10
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` DR. UWE KORTSHAGEN
` I'm going to pass to you what has been marked
` as Exhibit TSMC 1207. So you've seen this
` document before, correct?
`A. I have, yes.
`Q. This is the Iwamura patent on which you
` provided some opinions in the -- in your
` declaration in support of the petitioners, I
` guess, petitions?
`A. That is correct.
`Q. Okay. So before we get into the substance of
` the patent, can you tell me what do you
` understand metastable atoms to be?
`A. Metastable atoms are a kind of excited atoms
` and metastable atoms have a -- compared to
` other excited atoms, a long lifetime because
` they are not allowed to transition to the
` ground state of the atoms through dipole
` radiation.
`Q. So you've mentioned a couple of terms, I'd
` like to clarify them as well. You mentioned
` ground state atoms.
`A. Yes.
`Q. What do you understand those to be?
`A. Ground state atoms is the state of atoms at
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`
`Page 11
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` DR. UWE KORTSHAGEN
` which the electrons in those atoms occupy
` their lowest energy state.
`Q. So you can't -- an atom cannot have an energy
` state lower than the ground state; is that
` fair?
`A. I think that is fair, yes.
`Q. And you also mentioned excited atoms as -- it
` seemed like as a broader category. So is it
` fair to say that not all excited atoms are
` metastable atoms?
` MR. TENNANT: Object to the form.
` THE WITNESS: That is fair to say,
` that not all excited atoms are metastable,
` that is correct, yes.
`BY MR. VARDANIAN:
`Q. So let's take a look at the Exhibit TSMC
` 1207. I'll just refer to it as Iwamura
` patent going forward.
` So let's take a look at the abstract on
` the front page. So in the first sentence --
` in the second sentence of the abstract, do
` you see where it says, "In a gas introduction
` passage, the gas capable of plasma discharge
` is preexcited to raise its level of
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`
`Page 12
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` DR. UWE KORTSHAGEN
` excitation"?
`A. Yes, I do see that.
`Q. And then the next sentence states, "A first
` pair of plasma generation electrodes
` downstream along the gas flow passage use the
` preexcited gas to generate the plasma in the
` first plasma generation position."
` Do you see that?
`A. I do.
`Q. So let's turn to Figure 1 of this patent.
`A. (Complies.)
`Q. And so the way I understood your declaration
` and your interpretation of the patent, the
` Iwamura patent is you are saying there's a --
` a pre -- preexcitement area in Figure -- you
` know, depicted in Figure 1, that's probably
` the most upstream of the -- of the areas that
` you identify in the declaration; is that
` fair?
` MR. FITZPATRICK: Object to the
` form.
`BY MR. VARDANIAN:
`Q. Let me withdraw. Let me -- that may have
` been confusing.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`
`Page 13
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` DR. UWE KORTSHAGEN
` If I understood your declaration
` correctly, you generally point to three areas
` in Figure 1: One is the preexcitation area,
` the other one is the first plasma generation
` area, and the third is the second plasma
` generation area; is that fair?
` MR. FITZPATRICK: Object to the
` form.
` THE WITNESS: So I have to admit
` that in preparing for this deposition, I
` reviewed a lot of documents, and that at this
` point in order to answer your question
` accurately, if you have a question concerning
` my declaration and how specifically I -- I
` named the area that includes the window 22
` and the UV source 24, whether I caught that
` preexcitation unit or something else, it
` would be very helpful for me to actually look
` at my declaration.
`BY MR. VARDANIAN:
`Q. And we'll get there.
`A. Okay.
`Q. You mentioned that you reviewed a lot of
` documents.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`
`Page 14
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` DR. UWE KORTSHAGEN
`A. Yes.
`Q. What documents did you review in preparation
` for this deposition?
`A. Well, I did review my declarations. I did
` review the board decisions. I did review, I
` think, to a certain degree, all the exhibits
` of this particular patent, in particular
` Iwamura, the Angelbeck, Pinsley patent, yes,
` and several more.
`Q. Let me give you one of your declarations so
` that it helps move this along. I'll pass to
` you what has been previously marked as
` Exhibit TSMC 1202.
`A. Uh-huh.
`Q. That's one of your declarations in connection
` with the -- with the '779 patent, correct?
`A. That is correct, yes.
`Q. And when I'm referring to '779 patent, the
` full number for that patent is 68,085,779; is
` that correct?
`A. Yes, this is what it says on my declaration,
` yes.
`Q. Okay. So let's -- let's turn to page 45 and
` see if that refreshes your recollection, so
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`
`Page 15
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` DR. UWE KORTSHAGEN
` --
`A. Thank you.
`Q. For page 45, do you see the last sentence --
` the last full sentence on the page states,
` "Iwamura's device includes a preexcitation
` unit"? Do you see that?
`A. Page 45 --
`Q. 48.
`A. Oh, 48.
`Q. I misspoke, sorry.
`A. Sorry. 45. Yes, you're right.
`Q. Tony knows that I have trouble reading back
` numbers.
`A. Uh-huh.
`Q. So the top-most area, you're calling
` preexcitation unit in your declaration,
` correct?
`A. Yes.
`Q. And then the area 26 on -- on Figure --
` Figure 1, what do you call that?
`A. (Reviews document.)
`Q. Let me see if I can help you. Oh, go ahead,
` sorry.
`A. Yes, so in paragraph 113 of my declaration,
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`
`Page 16
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` DR. UWE KORTSHAGEN
` we're adopting the term which Iwamura has
` actually used, the first plasma generation
` unit.
`Q. Great.
`A. So I call it the first plasma generation
` unit.
`Q. Okay. And there is a second plasma
` generation unit depicted on Figure 1,
` correct?
`A. That's correct, yes.
`Q. And what is that element on Figure 1 of the
` Iwamura patent?
`A. Second plasma generation unit would consist
` out of -- the unit which is labeled with the
` letter B, and it's -- includes a power supply
` 34 and two electrodes which are labeled with
` 30.
`Q. So the second -- the second plasma generation
` unit is inside the treatment chamber, is that
` correct, treatment chamber number 10?
` MR. FITZPATRICK: Object to form.
` THE WITNESS: Yes, I believe it is
` called the treatment chamber number 10, yes.
`BY MR. VARDANIAN:
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`
`Page 17
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` DR. UWE KORTSHAGEN
`Q. So in terms of positions, is it fair to say
` that the preexcitation unit that's, you know,
` most upstream, next down stream comes the
` first plasma generation unit and then the
` most down stream area is the second plasma
` generation unit; is that fair?
`A. I think if you are -- if you are using the
` words "upstream" and "downstream," you are
` already recognizing that there is a gas flow,
` which is shown on Figure 1, a gas entering at
` position 20 and leaving the reactor at
` position 12, and so according to this gas
` flow and the gas passing through the unit
` from the top to the bottom, it would be
` correct to say that the most upstream element
` is the preexcitation unit followed by the
` first plasma generation unit followed by the
` second plasma generation unit.
`Q. Is it your understanding that the gas in the
` Iwamura device is supposed to flow without
` interruption?
` MR. FITZPATRICK: Object to form.
` THE WITNESS: It's my
` understanding that it would be very desirable
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`
`Page 18
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` DR. UWE KORTSHAGEN
` to have this gas flow because Iwamura's
` device relies on the gas flow for
` transporting the excited species through the
` reactor.
`BY MR. VARDANIAN:
`Q. You mentioned excited species. What were
` referring to?
`A. With excited species, I would refer to either
` atoms or molecules of the treatment gas.
` Excuse me, I should correct that. I
` should say if I say excited species, I'm
` actually referring to the excited atoms or
` the excited molecules within a treatment gas.
`Q. And you're referring to a treatment gas.
` What kind of treatment gases does Iwamura
` disclose?
`A. So without going to my declaration and/or
` reading the entire patent, I do remember
` three: mainly helium, argon, and oxygen.
`Q. Does Iwamura distinguish between treatment
` gases and other types of gases that are to be
` used in its device?
` MR. FITZPATRICK: Object to the
` form.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`
`Page 19
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` DR. UWE KORTSHAGEN
` THE WITNESS: I right now do not
` know this. I'm also not a hundred percent
` sure that Iwamura actually uses the term
` "treatment gas," so maybe that is a term
` which I just used, and I'm not sure if
` Iwamura uses the exact same term.
`BY MR. VARDANIAN:
`Q. Is it your opinion that the Iwamura is
` disclosing argon as a treatment gas?
` MR. FITZPATRICK: Object to the
` form of the question.
` THE WITNESS: Well -- well, at
` this point, I am not certain whether Iwamura
` labels argon as a treatment gas.
`BY MR. VARDANIAN:
`Q. You also mentioned helium. Does Iwamura
` disclose helium as a treatment gas, in your
` opinion?
` MR. FITZPATRICK: Object to the
` form of the question.
` THE WITNESS: Well, maybe we -- so
` I do think that I need to take a moment to
` try to identify the mention of helium and
` argon in the patent to read exact language.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`
`Page 20
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` DR. UWE KORTSHAGEN
` If you have it in front of you --
`BY MR. VARDANIAN:
`Q. Let me see if I can point you to a disclosure
` that I'm looking at and maybe that will help
` move this along.
` If you go to column 8 of the Iwamura
` patent, do you see the paragraph that starts
` at line 10?
`A. I do.
`Q. And the first sentence states, "In this way,
` the plasma state is maintained in plasma
` regions A and B, and then a treatment gas is
` added to the helium gas supplied through gas
` supply 20."
` Do you see that?
`A. I do, yes.
`Q. And just -- just so we're on the same page
` the regions -- the plasma regions A and B
` that's -- that are referred to in this
` sentence are respectively the same -- the
` same first plasma generation unit and second
` plasma generation unit we were talking about
` before, correct?
`A. Yes.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`
`Page 21
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` DR. UWE KORTSHAGEN
`Q. And you can see here that Iwamura actually
` does use the term "treatment gas." Do you
` see that?
`A. Yes, correct.
`Q. And he is actually distinguishing treatment
` gas from helium gas, doesn't he, in this
` sentence?
` MR. FITZPATRICK: Object to the
` form of the question.
` THE WITNESS: Yes, I think this is
` how I would read the sentence, yes.
`BY MR. VARDANIAN:
`Q. And he was generally using the term "helium"
` as one type of noble gases that could be
` contemplated in the patent, correct?
` MR. FITZPATRICK: Object to the
` form of the question.
`BY MR. VARDANIAN:
`Q. Let me rephrase that, because, actually, I'm
` not sure whether Iwamura is a he or a she.
` Let me refer to it as "it" or as a
` "patent." So does the Iwamura patent -- I
` guess let me with -- strike that.
` What I'm trying to get at is in
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`
`Page 22
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` DR. UWE KORTSHAGEN
` discussing helium in this particular sentence
` but earlier in the patent he is using helium
` and argon as interchangeable examples as the
` kind of gas that you preexcite and then --
` and then -- and then generate plasmas from;
` is that fair?
` MR. FITZPATRICK: Object to the
` form of the question.
` THE WITNESS: Could you be so kind
` to point me in the patent to where he talks
` about helium and argon.
`BY MR. VARDANIAN:
`Q. So before I do and I will -- as I'm looking
` for it, you -- you've read the Iwamura patent
` carefully, right?
`A. I did read it, yes.
`Q. You've read it carefully, right?
` MR. FITZPATRICK: Object to the
` form of the question.
` THE WITNESS: I really believe it
` depends on your definition of what you mean
` with "carefully."
`BY MR. VARDANIAN:
`Q. Okay. Fair enough.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`
`Page 23
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` DR. UWE KORTSHAGEN
` Do you have an understanding of what
` "reading carefully" means in your view?
` MR. FITZPATRICK: Object to the
` form of the question.
` THE WITNESS: I do believe that I
` did read the patent as carefully as was -- I
` was able to with the amount of time I was
` able to devote to this.
`BY MR. VARDANIAN:
`Q. How much time did you devote to this?
`A. To the preparation for this deposition
` overall?
`Q. Well, you said "this." What were you
` referring to?
`A. I was referring to the preparation for this
` deposition.
`Q. Right. So how much time did you spend
` preparing for this deposition?
`A. I believe maybe a total of 12 to 15 hours.
`Q. So let's take a look at column 7, we're
` actually not --
`A. Column 7.
`Q. -- not very far.
` Before we do that, one last question:
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`
`Page 24
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` DR. UWE KORTSHAGEN
` You understood everything that was described
` in the Iwamura patent, right?
` MR. TENNANT: Objection to form.
` THE WITNESS: In general, when you
` read technical papers, it's very difficult to
` know whether you really understood
` everything, so I cannot right now point you
` to any particular item which I know that I
` did not understand, but I also cannot put on
` the record that I am certain that I
` understood everything.
`BY MR. VARDANIAN:
`Q. That's how I feel about reading scientific
` papers too, but you're the expert here, so as
` an expert here, sitting here today you can't
` tell me that you understood the Iwamura
` patent completely?
` MR. FITZPATRICK: Object to the
` form of the question, asked and answered.
`BY MR. VARDANIAN:
`Q. Let me rephrase. Can you tell me, as an
` expert sitting here today, that you
` understood completely the Iwamura patent?
` MR. FITZPATRICK: Object to the
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`
`Page 25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` DR. UWE KORTSHAGEN
` form of the question, asked and answered.
` THE WITNESS: I believe that I
` understood the essential elements of the
` Iwamura patent.
`BY MR. VARDANIAN:
`Q. Let's take a look at -- at column 7, line 47,
` I think, the -- the --
`A. Uh-huh.
`Q. Actually, it's probably line 48. Do you see
` the sentence --
`A. I do.
`Q. -- that starts with, "First, an inert gas
` such as helium or argon is introduced to gas
` supply 20 to replace the air in treatment
` chamber 10"? Do you see that?
`A. I do see that. Thank you.
`Q. So going back to my earlier question when I
` was saying that Iwamura is using helium gas
` as interchangeable examples of inert gas, is
` that -- do you agree with that statement?
`A. Yes, this is what this particular sentence
` seems to imply, yes.
`Q. Okay. So let's -- let's go back to the
` sentence in column 8, line 10. We already
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`
`Page 26
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` DR. UWE KORTSHAGEN
` established that Iwamura distinguishes helium
` from treatment gas.
` Do you agree with me that, you know,
` based on the disclosures that I showed you in
` column 7, Iwamura also distinguishes argon
` gas from treatment gas?
` MR. FITZPATRICK: Object to the
` form of the question.
` THE WITNESS: So in column 7,
` Iwamura lists helium and argon as examples
` for an inert gas, and in column 8, Iwamura,
` at least this place, makes a distinction
` between a treatment gas and helium that is
` used.
` So I'm not sure that from that -- first
` of all, this sentence is -- does not talk
` about argon, so I don't want to put words
` into Iwamura's mouth which are not here, and
` so I'm not sure that you can just from these
` two quotes conclude that argon would not be
` used as a treatment gas.
`BY MR. VARDANIAN:
`Q. So sitting here today, as an expert viewing
` this disclosure, you can't tell me that it
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`
`Page 27
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` DR. UWE KORTSHAGEN
` can be inferred from the -- from this
` passage, that argon gas would be
` distinguished from treatment gas in Iwamura's
` patent?
` MR. FITZPATRICK: Object to the
` form of the question.
` THE WITNESS: I really believe
` that the distinction between what is a
` treatment gas and what is an inert gas very
` much depends on the application that you have
` in mind, and I do not recall that Iwamura is
` specifically targeted at one application, but
` rather a disclosure, but that Iwamura rather
` is a disclosure of a plasma apparatus, a
` plasma generation apparatus and a method, and
` as such, I am not sure that the distinction
` between treatment gas and inert gas is
` necessarily that meaningful because it will
` depend on a particular application that you
` have in mind.
`BY MR. VARDANIAN:
`Q. All right. So you'll agree with me -- excuse
` me -- that Iwamura does distinguish between
` inert gas and treatment gas; agreed?
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`
`Page 28
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` DR. UWE KORTSHAGEN
` MR. FITZPATRICK: Object to form.
` THE WITNESS: I agree with you
` that right here in this sentence, in column
` 8, line 10, Iwamura distinguishes between the
` treatment gas that is added to helium gas and
` that helium in this particular sentence is
` not labeled as a treatment gas.
`BY MR. VARDANIAN:
`Q. Right. And earlier you testified that you --
` you recall at least three types of gases that
` are disclosed as treatment gases in Iwamura,
` right?
` MR. FITZPATRICK: Object to the
` form of the question.
` THE WITNESS: It is very possible
` that earlier I may have used the term
` "treatment gas" somewhat loosely and without
` at that moment being aware of the specific
` meaning that Iwamura seems to give it in --
` in this particular sentence.
`BY MR. VARDANIAN:
`Q. So terms can be even -- even technical terms
` can be used loosely, correct?
` MR. FITZPATRICK: Object to the
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`
`Page 29
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` DR. UWE KORTSHAGEN
` form of the question.
` THE WITNESS: They certainly
` should not be used loosely.
`BY MR. VARDANIAN:
`Q. But you used them loosely just a few minutes
` ago, right?
` MR. FITZPATRICK: Object to the
` form of the question.
` THE WITNESS: I certainly should
` have been more careful, and I should have
` asked for more time for reading the patent
` before I actually answered your question. I
` will try to avoid not being as accurate as
` possible.
`BY MR. VARDANIAN:
`Q. Earlier today you testified that Iwamura
` discloses helium as a treatment gas, correct?
` MR. FITZPATRICK: Object to the
` form of the question.
` THE WITNESS: So because we have
` now probably gone around helium and its
` labeling as a treatment gas or not being
` labeled as a treatment gas for 20 or 30
` questions, I don't exactly recall what I said
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`
`Page 30
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` DR. UWE KORTSHAGEN
` earlier today, so if you would like me to
` answer your question, maybe then you can read
` me the answer that I've given earlier.
`BY MR. VARDANIAN:
`Q. So my question to you earlier today was:
` What kind of treatment gases does Iwamura
` disclose? And your answer, and I'm reading
` this from the -- from the record was: So
` without going to my declaration or reading
` the entire patent, I do remember three:
` mainly helium, argon, and oxygen.
` That statement was incorrect, right?
` MR. FITZPATRICK: Object to the
` form of the question.
` THE WITNESS: Well, now that I do
` have the patent in front of me and am able to
` look at the language in the patent without
` having to rely on my recollection of a term
` to which I did not pay as much attention
` because I did not feel that it was as
` essential to the patent as you seem to think
` it is, now that I do have the patent in front
` of me, I feel that my earlier statement
` should have been that Iwamura seems to
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`
`Page 31
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` DR. UWE KORTSHAGEN
` distinguish between gases that he calls inert
` gases and he lists argon and helium as an
` example and treatment gases where he lists
` molecular oxygen and also carbon tetra
` fluoride as examples.
`BY MR. VARDANIAN:
`Q. Does he provide any other examples of
` treatment gases in his patent?
` Let me rephrase. Does Iwamura disclose
` any other treatment gases?
`A. I do not recall right now. I'll be happy to
` read the patent to discover whether he does.
`Q. So with your understanding of the Iwamura
` patent, can you explain to me why is this
` reference using different type of gases as
` inert gases and treatment gases?
`A. So I believe that everyone of -- of ordinary
` skill in the art will understand that in the
` area of plasma processing, there are
` different gases used for different
` applications, and that some gases, like inert
` gases, argon and hel

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket