throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Paper 26
`Entered: June 9, 2015
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`GLOBAL TEL*LINK CORPORATION,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`SECURUS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`
`
`Case IPR2014-00824 (Patent 8,340,260 B1)
`Case IPR2014-00825 (Patent 7,529,357 B1)
`____________
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Before KEVIN F. TURNER, BARBARA A. BENOIT, and
`GEORGIANNA W. BRADEN, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`BENOIT, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Trial Hearing
`37 C.F.R. § 42.70
`
`

`

`IPR2014-00824 (Patent 8,340,260 B1)
`IPR2014-00825 (Patent 7,529,357 B1)
`
`On December 8, 2014, we entered a Decision to Institute a trial in
`each of IPR2014-00824 (Paper 9) and IPR2014-00825 (Paper 9). A
`Scheduling Order issued in each case set the date for oral hearing, if
`requested by either party, as July 7, 2015. Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70,
`both Petitioner and Patent Owner have requested an oral hearing in each
`proceeding. These requests are granted.
`Oral argument for IPR2014-00824 and IPR2014-00825 will be held
`on July 7, 2015 on the ninth floor of Madison Building East, 600 Dulany
`Street, Alexandria, Virginia.
`Commencing at 12:00 PM ET on July 7, 2015, oral argument for the
`issues in IPR2014-00824 and IPR2014-00825 will be held. Each party will
`have 45 minutes of argument time. Any representation made by counsel at
`this hearing is applicable to and useable in each proceeding that has an
`underlying basis for the representation, including IPR2014-00493
`(challenging U.S. Patent 7,899,167) and IPR2014-00749 (challenging
`U.S. Patent No. 8,577,003) involving the same parties. Petitioner bears the
`ultimate burden of proof that the claims at issue are unpatentable.
`Therefore, Petitioner will proceed first to present its case with regard to the
`challenged claims and grounds on which we instituted trial in this
`proceeding. Patent Owner then will argue its opposition to Petitioner’s case.
`Finally, Petitioner may use any time it reserved to rebut Patent Owner’s
`opposition.
`The Board will provide a court reporter for the hearing and the
`reporter’s transcript will constitute the official record of the hearing. The
`hearing will be open to the public for in-person attendance that will be
`accommodated on a first-come, first-served basis. If the parties have any
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2014-00824 (Patent 8,340,260 B1)
`IPR2014-00825 (Patent 7,529,357 B1)
`
`concern about disclosing confidential information, they are to contact the
`Board at least 10 days in advance of the hearing to discuss the matter.
`The parties are reminded that under 37 C.F.R. § 42.53(f)(7), a
`proponent of deposition testimony must file such testimony as an exhibit.
`The Board will not consider any deposition testimony that has not been so
`filed.
`
`Furthermore, under 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(b), demonstrative exhibits must
`be served at least five business days before the hearing. The parties shall
`provide a courtesy copy of any demonstrative exhibits to the Board at least
`five business days prior to the hearing by emailing them to
`Trials@uspto.gov. The parties shall not file any demonstrative exhibits in
`these proceedings without prior authorization from the Board.
`The parties must file any objections to the demonstratives with the
`Board at least three business days before the hearing. Any objection to the
`demonstrative exhibits that is not presented timely will be considered
`waived. The objections should identify with particularity which
`demonstratives are subject to objection, and include a short (one sentence or
`less) statement of the reason for each objection. No argument or further
`explanation is permitted. The Board will consider the objections and
`schedule a conference if deemed necessary. Otherwise, the Board will
`reserve ruling on the objections until after the oral argument. The parties are
`directed to St. Jude Medical, Cardiology Division, Inc. v. The Board of
`Regents of the University of Michigan, IPR2013-00041 (PTAB January 27,
`2014) (Paper 65), for guidance regarding the appropriate content of
`demonstrative exhibits.
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2014-00824 (Patent 8,340,260 B1)
`IPR2014-00825 (Patent 7,529,357 B1)
`
`The Board expects lead counsel for each party to be present at oral
`
`hearing, although any backup counsel may make the actual presentation, in
`whole or in part. If lead counsel for either party will not be in attendance at
`oral hearing, the Board should be notified via a joint telephone conference
`call no later than two business days prior to the oral hearing to discuss the
`matter.
`Any special requests for audio visual equipment should be directed to
`Trials@uspto.gov. Requests for special equipment will not be honored
`unless presented in a separate communication not less than five days before
`the hearing directed to the above email address.
`At least one judge will be participating remotely via a
`videoconferencing device and will not be able to view the projection screen
`in the hearing room. The parties are reminded that the presenter must
`identify clearly and specifically each demonstrative exhibit (e.g., by slide or
`screen number) referenced during the hearing to avoid confusion, and to
`ensure the clarity and accuracy of the reporter’s transcript.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`IPR2014-00824 (Patent 8,340,260 B1)
`IPR2014-00825 (Patent 7,529,357 B1)
`
`PETITIONER:
`Lori A. Gordon
`Michael B. Ray
`STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX
`lgordon-PTAB@skgf.com
`mray-PTAB@skgf.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`Justin B. Kimble
`Jeffrey R. Bragalone
`BRAGALONE CONROY P.C.
`jkimble-IPR@bcpc-law.com
`jbragalone@bcpc-law.com
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket