`
`(12) Ulllted States Patent
`Rae et a].
`
`(10) Patent N0.:
`(45) Date of Patent:
`
`US 7,529,357 B1
`*May 5, 2009
`
`(54) INMATE MANAGEMENT AND CALL
`PROCESSING SYSTEMS AND METHODS
`
`3,798,382 A
`3,813,495 A
`
`3/1974 Hoven
`5/1974 Conerly
`
`(75) Inventors: Robert L. Rae, Plano, TX (US); Stuart
`Rosen?eld, Plano, TX (US)
`
`(73) Assignee: Evercom Systems, Inc., Dallas, TX
`(Us)
`
`(Continued)
`
`EP
`
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`0185365 Al
`6/1986
`
`( * ) Notice:
`
`Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this
`patent is extended or adjusted under 35
`U.S.C. 154(b) by 0 days.
`
`This patent is subject to a terminal (115.
`C1 amen
`
`(21) Appl. N0.: 11/777,168
`_
`(22) Flledi
`
`Jlll- 12: 2007
`
`Related US. Application Data
`(63) Continuation-in-part of application No. 10/642,532,
`?led on Aug, 15, 2003,
`
`(51) Int. Cl.
`(2006.01)
`H04M 3/20
`(52) US. Cl. .................. .. 379/189; 379/88.25; 379/306;
`370/261; 370/3951
`(58) Field of Classi?cation Search ............... .. 379/188,
`379/8825, 189, 306; 370/261’ 395
`See application ?le for Complete Search history
`_
`References Clted
`
`(56)
`
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`7/1963 Semon
`3,096,404 A
`3,113,185 A 12/1963 Semon
`3,350,515 A 10/1967 Semon
`3,397,288 A
`8/1968 Semon
`3,398,288 A
`8/1968 Sanders et a1.
`3,626,107 A 12/1971 Armstrong et a1.
`3,660,610 A
`5/1972 Hestad et a1.
`3,676,605 A
`7/1972 Johnson
`
`(Continued)
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`
`Bobb Swope, et 31., US. Appl. No. 09/640,831, Entitled “System and
`Method for Reverse Billing for Telephone Call,” ?led Aug. 17,2000.
`(Reference not included).
`
`(Commued)
`Primary ExamineriGerald Gauthier
`(74) Attorney, Agent, or FirmiFenWick & West LLP
`
`(57)
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`Disclosed are systems and methods that provide centralized
`or nodal inmate management and telephone call processing
`capabilities to controlled environment facilities. An inmate
`management and call processing system serves a plurality of
`facilities and includes an inmate information database. The
`database is shared across the facilities and contains inmate
`records that may be accessed and modi?ed by each facility as
`the inmate is transferred among those facilities. Each inmate
`record may include, among other information, contact infor
`mation of third parties Whom may be noti?ed of the inmate’ s
`arrest and/ or subsequent transfers of the inmate to different
`facilities. The inmate management and telephone call pro
`cessing system may use third party contact information to
`establish accounts used to charge calls or transactions made
`by an inmate While residing at the facility. Some systems may
`also provide call processing, video conferencing, e-mail,
`voicemail, and/or videomail applications, and the like to the
`facilities.
`
`20 Claims, 3 Drawing Sheets
`
`TELEPHONE TERMTNAL OFF HOOK T»
`
`cALL PRDCESSWG GATEWAY
`UNK BETWEEN
`EsTABLTsHEs
`TELEPHONE TERMINAL AND
`cALL PROCESSING PLATEom
`
`& m
`
`cALL APPLIcATmN MANAGEMENT
`ITH cALLER
`SVSTEM INTERACTS w
`AND COLLECTS DATA
`
`7 30a
`
`cALL AFPLicATioN MANAGEMENT
`svsTEM lNTERACTS WlTH
`VALIDA'HON sYsTEu To
`DETERMINE cALL TREATM
`ENT
`
`61:04
`
`cALL APPLICATION MANAGEMENT
`SYSTEM coMNEcrs cALL
`
`CONNECT CALL
`
`CALL APPLicAnoN MANAGEMENT
`SYSTEM WTERACTS wmi
`OTHER
`
`YES
`
`cALL APPLlCATlON MANAGEMENT
`SYSTEM RELEASES cALL
`
`310
`
`GTL 1001
`IPR of U.S. Pat. No. 7,529,357
`
`
`
`US. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`3,829,617
`3,851,121
`3,864,519
`3,952,160
`3,985,956
`3,997,731
`4,001,513
`4,002,848
`4,027,109
`4,054,756
`4,055,730
`4,122,308
`4,156,799
`4,188,508
`4,196,317
`4,310,726
`4,319,091
`4,326,123
`4,333,056
`4,371,752
`4,387,274
`4,405,833
`4,439,636
`4,445,211
`4,477,698
`4,518,825
`4,538,030
`4,540,855
`4,552,996
`4,559,416
`4,585,904
`4,593,157
`4,595,983
`4,602,129
`4,626,630
`4,629,829
`4,644,109
`4,686,699
`4,696,028
`4,696,031
`4,698,840
`4,712,230
`4,723,273
`4,726,057
`4,727,577
`4,731,818
`4,736,405
`4,737,982
`4,746,786
`4,763,350
`4,766,604
`4,768,223
`4,768,227
`4,769,834
`4,777,647
`4,782,516
`4,791,640
`4,794,642
`4,797,910
`4,799,255
`4,802,207
`4,803,718
`4,815,120
`4,825,460
`4,839,917
`4,850,011
`4,868,873
`4,885,765
`4,890,317
`4,896,348
`4,899,358
`
`8/1974
`11/1974
`2/1975
`4/1976
`10/1976
`12/1976
`1/1977
`1/1977
`5/1977
`10/1977
`10/1977
`10/1978
`5/1979
`2/1980
`4/1980
`1/1982
`3/1982
`4/1982
`6/1982
`2/1983
`6/1983
`9/1983
`3/1984
`4/1984
`10/1984
`5/1985
`8/1985
`9/1985
`11/1985
`12/1985
`4/1986
`6/1986
`6/1986
`7/1986
`12/1986
`12/1986
`2/1987
`8/1987
`9/1987
`9/1987
`10/1987
`12/1987
`2/1988
`2/1988
`2/1988
`3/1988
`4/1988
`4/1988
`5/1988
`8/1988
`8/1988
`8/1988
`8/1988
`9/1988
`10/1988
`11/1988
`12/1988
`12/1988
`1/1989
`1/1989
`1/1989
`2/1989
`3/1989
`4/1989
`6/1989
`7/1989
`9/1989
`12/1989
`12/1989
`1/1990
`2/1990
`
`Caithamer et al.
`Marvin
`Owen
`Pasternack et al.
`Monti et al.
`Wilmot et al.
`Naylor
`Stein
`Smith et al.
`Comella et al.
`Stapleford et al.
`Weinberger et al.
`Cave
`Rogers et al.
`Bartelink
`Asmuth
`Meri
`Hosterman
`Cave
`Matthews et al.
`Stein et al.
`Cave et al.
`Newkirk et al.
`Webber
`SZlam et al.
`Brinkerhoff et al.
`Fossett et al.
`SZlam et al.
`de Bergh
`Theis et al.
`Mincone et al.
`Usdan
`Gehalo et al.
`Matthews et al.
`Waldman
`Puhl et al.
`Takeda et al.
`Wilkie
`Morganstein et al.
`Freudberg et al.
`Dively et al.
`Rice et al.
`Diesel et al.
`Doerry et al.
`Frey et al.
`Clark, Jr. et al.
`Akiyama
`Boratgis et al.
`Heberle et al.
`Immendorfer et al.
`Axberg
`Kino shita et al.
`Dively et al.
`Billinger et al.
`Smith et al.
`Maybach et al.
`Sand
`ArbabZadah et al.
`Daudelin
`Billinger et al.
`Uchida
`Neil et al.
`Kosich
`Carter et al.
`Oliver
`Delmege et al.
`Kamil
`Shirakawa
`Hird et al.
`Grantland et al.
`Blakley
`
`US 7,529,357 B1
`Page 2
`
`4,899,375
`4,901,341
`4,908,852
`4,916,733
`4,920,562
`4,922,519
`4,922,520
`4,924,488
`4,924,501
`4,932,062
`4,933,966
`4,933,967
`4,935,956
`4,937,856
`4,937,862
`4,943,995
`4,944,001
`4,947,422
`4,947,425
`4,979,214
`4,991,203
`4,993,062
`4,993,068
`5,003,595
`5,008,923
`5,020,095
`5,022,067
`5,023,869
`5,023,906
`5,033,088
`5,054,059
`5,063,593
`5,093,858
`5,109,405
`5,131,024
`5,134,651
`5,150,357
`5,153,907
`5,155,761
`5,163,083
`5,164,989
`5,181,237
`5,187,740
`5,193,110
`5,200,995
`5,210,789
`5,216,702
`5,218,636
`5,220,501
`5,222,120
`5,229,764
`5,247,569
`5,255,305
`5,274,698
`5,276,731
`5,283,825
`5,283,829
`5,287,401
`5,305,312
`5,309,505
`5,311,589
`5,319,701
`5,319,702
`5,321,754
`5,323,448
`5,325,421
`5,325,427
`5,327,489
`5,329,578
`5,333,181
`5,335,266
`5,345,501
`5,345,595
`
`2/1990
`2/1990
`3/1990
`4/1990
`4/1990
`5/1990
`5/1990
`5/1990
`5/1990
`6/1990
`6/1990
`6/1990
`6/1990
`6/1990
`6/1990
`7/1990
`7/1990
`8/1990
`8/1990
`12/1990
`2/1991
`2/1991
`2/1991
`3/1991
`4/1991
`5/1991
`6/1991
`6/1991
`6/1991
`7/1991
`10/1991
`11/1991
`3/1992
`4/1992
`7/1992
`7/1992
`9/1992
`10/1992
`10/1992
`11/1992
`11/1992
`1/1993
`2/1993
`3/1993
`4/1993
`5/1993
`6/1993
`6/1993
`6/1993
`6/1993
`7/1993
`9/1993
`10/1993
`12/1993
`1/1994
`2/1994
`2/1994
`2/1994
`4/1994
`5/1994
`5/1994
`6/1994
`6/1994
`6/1994
`6/1994
`6/1994
`6/1994
`7/1994
`7/1994
`7/1994
`8/1994
`9/1994
`9/1994
`
`Bauer et al.
`Carter et al.
`Hird et al.
`Smith et al.
`Hird et al.
`Daudelin
`Bernard et al.
`Kosich
`Cheeseman et al.
`Hamilton
`Hird et al.
`Lo et al.
`Hellwarth et al.
`Natarajan
`Kosich
`Daudelin et al.
`KiZuik et al.
`Smith et al.
`GriZmala et al.
`Hamilton
`KakiZawa
`Dula et al.
`Piosenka et al.
`Collins et al.
`Kitamura et al.
`Morganstein et al.
`Hughes
`Grover et al.
`Novas
`Shipman
`Stern et al.
`Kwon
`Hird et al.
`Morganstein
`Pugh et al.
`Ortiz et al.
`Hopner et al.
`Pugh et al.
`Hammond
`Dowden et al.
`Brandman et al.
`Dowden et al.
`Swaim et al.
`Jones et al.
`Gaukel et al.
`Jeffus et al.
`Ramsden
`Hamilton
`Lawlor et al.
`McLeod et al.
`Matchett et al.
`Cave
`Sattar
`Jang
`Arbel et al.
`Druckman et al.
`Anderson
`Lin
`Fornek et al.
`SZlam et al.
`Bennett et al.
`Hird et al.
`Kitchin et al.
`Fisher et al.
`Biggs et al.
`Hou et al.
`Dighe
`Anderson et al.
`Brennan et al.
`Biggs
`Richardson, Jr. et al.
`Shelton
`Johnson et al.
`
`
`
`US 7,529,357 B1
`Page 3
`
`9/1994 Katz
`5,351,285 A
`9/1994 Bhattacharyya et al.
`5,351,287 A
`5,355,403 A 10/1994 Richardson, Jr. et al.
`5,369,699 A 11/1994 Page et al.
`5,375,161 A 12/1994 Fuller et al.
`5,381,474 A
`1/1995 Lahdemaki et al.
`5,394,465 A
`2/1995 Jo
`5,416,831 A
`5/1995 Chewning,III et al.
`5,425,087 A
`6/1995 Gerber et al.
`5,428,662 A
`6/1995 Hamilton
`5,442,696 A
`8/1995 Lindberg et al.
`5,450,485 A
`9/1995 Hamilton
`5,452,347 A
`9/1995 Iglehart et al.
`5,455,819 A 10/1995 Sugiyama
`5,461,665 A 10/1995 Shur et al.
`5,465,293 A 11/1995 Chiller et al.
`5,465,387 A 11/1995 Mukherjee
`5,471,519 A 11/1995 Howe et al.
`5,473,686 A 12/1995 Virdee
`5,483,582 A
`1/1996 Pugh et al.
`5,483,593 A
`1/1996 Gupta et al.
`5,485,507 A
`1/1996 Brown et al.
`5,497,414 A
`3/1996 Bartholomew
`5,504,810 A
`4/1996 McNair
`5,524,141 A
`6/1996 Braun et al.
`5,524,145 A
`6/1996 Parker
`5,535,261 A
`7/1996 Brown et al.
`5,539,812 A
`7/1996 Kitchin et al.
`5,544,231 A
`8/1996 Cho
`5,566,229 A 10/1996 Hou et al.
`5,577,116 A 11/1996 Townsendet al.
`5,583,920 A 12/1996 Wheeler, Jr.
`5,583,934 A 12/1996 Zhou
`5,606,604 A
`2/1997 Rosenblatt et al.
`5,617,471 A
`4/1997 Rogers et al.
`5,619,561 A
`4/1997 Reese
`5,627,887 A
`5/1997 Freedman
`5,634,126 A
`5/1997 Norell
`5,651,056 A
`7/1997 Eting et al.
`5,655,013 A
`8/1997 Gainsboro
`5,722,418 A
`3/1998 Bro
`5,724,404 A
`3/1998 Garcia et al.
`5,742,905 A
`4/1998 Pepe et al.
`5,745,553 A
`4/1998 Mirville et al.
`5,745,558 A
`4/1998 Richardson, Jr. et al.
`5,757,781 A
`5/1998 Gilman et al.
`5,768,355 A
`6/1998 Salibriciet al.
`5,777,558 A
`7/1998 Pennypacker et al.
`5,796,811 A
`8/1998 McFarlen
`5,799,068 A
`8/1998 Kikinis et al.
`5,805,685 A
`9/1998 McFarlen
`5,809,125 A
`9/1998 Gammino
`5,844,978 A 12/1998 Reuss et al.
`5,859,907 A
`1/1999 Kawahara et al.
`5,862,519 A
`1/1999 Sharma et al.
`5,867,559 A
`2/1999 Jorgensen et al.
`5,875,230 A
`2/1999 Ganley et al.
`5,883,945 A
`3/1999 Richardson, Jr. et al.
`5,907,602 A
`5/1999 Peel et al.
`5,923,746 A
`7/1999 Baker et al.
`5926533 A
`7/1999 Gainsboro
`5,937,042 A
`8/1999 sofman
`5,943,403 A
`8/1999 Richardson, Jr. etal.
`5,946,386 A
`8/1999 Rogers et al.
`5,960,064 A
`9/1999 Foladare et al.
`6,031,895 A
`2/2000 Cohnet al.
`6,052,454 A
`4/2000 Keketal.
`6,064,963 A
`5/2000 Gainsboro
`6,072,860 A
`6/2000 Kek et al.
`6,075,843 A
`6/2000 Cave
`6,097,804 A
`8/2000 Gilbert et al.
`6,134,320 A 10/2000 Swan et al.
`
`6,141,406 A 10/2000 Johnson
`6,169,789 B1
`1/2001 Rao et al.
`RE37,073 E
`2/2001 Hammond
`6,188,751 B1
`2/2001 Scherer
`6,249,570 B1
`6/2001 Glowny et al.
`6,320,946 B1
`11/2001 EnZmann et al.
`6,320,948 B1
`11/2001 Heilmann et al.
`6,324,280 B2 11/2001 Dunn et al.
`6,363,065 B1
`3/2002 Thornton et al.
`6,366,653 B1
`4/2002 Yeh et al.
`6,381,321 B1
`4/2002 Brown et al.
`6,404,764 B1
`6/2002 Jones et al.
`6,404,857 B1
`6/2002 Blair et al.
`6,404,870 B1
`6/2002 Kia
`6,445,682 B1
`9/2002 Weitz
`6,480,590 B1
`11/2002 Ku
`6,487,200 B1
`11/2002 Fraser
`6,496,477 B1
`12/2002 Perkins et al.
`6,529,500 B1
`3/2003 Pandharipande
`6,529,602 B1
`3/2003 Walker et al.
`6,553,336 B1
`4/2003 Johnson et al.
`6,560,323 B2
`5/2003 Gainsboro
`6,560,325 B2
`5/2003 Brown et al.
`6,611,583 B1* 8/2003 Gainsboro ................ .. 379/188
`6,654,722 B1
`11/2003 Aldous et al.
`6,665,380 B1* 12/2003 Cree et al. ............. .. 379/88.25
`6,687,360 B2
`2/2004 Kung et al.
`6,731,630 B1
`5/2004 Schuster et al.
`6,788,775 B1
`9/2004 Simpson
`6,795,444 B1
`9/2004 Vo et al.
`6,816,469 B1
`11/2004 Kung et al.
`6,876,647 B2
`4/2005 Celi, Jr.
`6,904,139 B2
`6/2005 Brown et al.
`6,920,209 B1
`7/2005 Gainsboro
`6,985,478 B2
`1/2006 Pogossiants et al.
`7,039,171 B2
`5/2006 Gickler
`7,042,992 B1
`5/2006 Falcone et al.
`7,046,782 B2
`5/2006 Miller
`7,085,359 B2
`8/2006 Crites et al.
`7,302,053 B2 11/2007 Chang et al.
`7,333,798 B2
`2/2008 Hodge
`7,360,087 B2
`4/2008 Jorgensen et al.
`7,360,090 B1
`4/2008 Doskow et al.
`2001/0028649 A1 10/2001 Pogossiants et al.
`2001/0036821 A1 11/2001 Gainsboro et al.
`2001/0041590 A1 11/2001 Silberfenig et al.
`2002/0071537 A1
`6/2002 Gainsboro
`2002/0141386 A1 10/2002 Minert et al.
`2002/0176403 A1 11/2002 Radian
`2003/0002639 A1
`1/2003 Huie
`2003/0023714 A1
`1/2003 Ziegler et al.
`2003/0133558 A1
`7/2003 Kung et al.
`2003/0185204 A1 10/2003 Murdock
`2004/0052218 A1
`3/2004 Knappe
`2006/0209797 A1
`9/2006 Anisimov et al.
`2006/0285650 A1 12/2006 Hodge
`2006/0286962 A1 12/2006 Davis
`2007/0071206 A1
`3/2007 Gainsboro et al.
`2007/0115924 A1
`5/2007 Schneider et al.
`2007/0242658 A1 10/2007 Rae et al.
`2007/0263812 A1 11/2007 Polozolaet al.
`2008/0040780 A1
`2/2008 Reinhold
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`0814583 A2 0/1997
`1 175 074
`V2002
`2600850
`l2/1987
`2134749 A
`8/1984
`5_30193
`2/1993
`63.03305
`10/1994
`63-033054
`12/1994
`2002157627
`4/2003
`2003110758 A
`4/2003
`
`EP
`EP
`FR
`GB
`Jp
`JP
`JP
`JP
`JP
`
`
`
`US 7,529,357 B1
`Page 4
`
`W0
`W0
`W0
`W0
`
`WO 96/20448 A1
`WO 97/22208 A2
`WO 98/13993 A1
`WO 00/54491 A1
`
`7/1996
`6/1997
`4/1998
`9/2000
`
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`
`Michael Lord, U.S. Appl. No. 09/955,253, Entitled “Method and
`Apparatus for Exchanging Data Between a Primary Computer Sys
`tem to Ensure Transactional Reconciliation Between the Systems,”
`?led Nov. 27, 2001. (Reference not included).
`Nadia Draizin, et al., U.S. Appl. No. 10/022,946, Entitled “A Method
`for Determining an Entity Responsible for Billing a Called Party,”
`?led Dec. 17, 2001. (Reference not included).
`John J. Viola, et al., U.S. Appl. No. 10/135,878, Entitled “Information
`Management and Movement System and Method,” ?led Apr. 29,
`2002. (Reference not included).
`Richard Falcone, et al., U.S. Appl. No. 10/190,315, Entitled “Sys
`tems and Methods for Offering a Service to a Party Associated with
`a Blocked Call,” ?led Jul. 3, 2002. (Reference not included).
`Michael Lord, U.S.Appl. No. 10/252,956, Entitled“Three-Way Tele
`phone Call Prevention System and Method,” ?led Sep. 20, 2002.
`(Reference not included).
`Dick Falcone, et al., U.S. Appl. No. 10/135,883, Entitled “Optimiz
`ing Pro?tability in Business Transactions,” ?led Nov. 25, 2003. (Ref
`erence not included).
`Marc Hite, et al., U.S. Appl. No. 10/437,839, Entitled “Intelligent
`Queuing of Transaction Records,” ?led May 14, 2003. (Reference not
`included).
`Richard Falcone, et al., U.S. Appl. No. 10/360,248, Entitled “Sys
`tems and Methods for Account Establishment and Transaction Man
`agement Using Interrupt Messaging,” ?led Feb. 7, 2003. (Reference
`not included).
`Richard Falcone, et al., U.S. Appl. No. 10/360,442, Entitled “Sys
`tems and Methods for Transaction Authorization Determination,”
`?led Feb. 7, 2003. (Reference not included).
`“SciDyn VoIP Technology Now Available for Call Control Solu
`tions”, SciDynTM Press Release, [online] [Retrieved on Nov. 4, 2005]
`Retrieved from: http://www.scidyn.com/news/pr/0122pr.html.
`“Call ControliCommander IIz”, SciDynTM Products, [online]
`[Retrieved on Nov. 4, 2005] Retrieved from http://www.scidyn.com/
`product s/ c ommander2 .html.
`“Smart Features for Optimizing Your Network”, SciDynTM Bub
`bleLINK®, [online] [Retrieved on Nov. 4, 2005] Retrieved from:
`http://www.scidyn.com/products/bubblehtml.
`“BubbleLINK® Software Architecture”, SciDynTM, The Voice of IP
`TechnologyTM, [online] [Retrieved on Nov. 4, 2005] Retrieved from:
`http://www.scidyn.com/products/BubbleLink%20White.pdf.
`“ShoreTel- Intelligent Phone Systems”, ShoreTel, [online]
`[Retrieved on Nov. 4, 2005] Retrieved from: http://www.shoretel.
`com/STCorp/products/architecture.aspx.
`. Close Enough to
`.
`Anderson, Susan, “Three-Way Call Detect .
`Perfect?” Correctional Communications Quarterly, pp. 16-20, Oct.
`1993.
`Bahl, L. “A Maximum Likelihood Approach to Continuous Speech
`Recovery,” Readings in Speech Recognition, Ed. A. Waibel and K.
`Lee, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, pp. 308-319, IEEE 1983.
`
`Batten, A. “Personal Communications Service and the Intelligent
`Network,” British Telecommunications Engineering, vol. 9, pp.
`88-91, Aug. 1990.
`DPD/120-JP Product on Display at Communications Tokyo ’0 1 , Apr.
`2-5, 1991 (Product described in U.S. Patent No. 5,218,636).
`European Examination Report, EP07251570.3, May 29, 2008, 5
`pages.
`LazerVoice, Digital Recording System Inmate Services, 1997-1998,
`Schlumberger Technologies, Inc. / LazerVoice STIL V0222
`LazerVoice User’s ManualiVersion 2.22, pp. 1-41, published Apr.
`28, 1998 by Schlumberger Technologies, Inc ./LazerVuze of Mobile,
`Alabama.
`“LazerPhone Inmate Telephone System, Users Manual version 1.0,”
`pp. 1-29, published Oct. 1998 by Schlumberger Technologies, Inc./
`Global Tel*Link of Mobile, Alabama.
`LazerPhone, Powerful Performance Uncompromising Standards,
`1998.
`Lee, K., “Large-Vocabulary Speaker-Independent Continuous
`Speech Recognition Using HMM,” Carnegie Mellon University
`Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, CMU-CS-88
`148, Apr. 1988.
`OSSGR, vol. 3, “Feature Speci?c Documents,” Technical Ref. TSY
`000271 FSD 85-01-0100 Calling Card ServiceiPublished by Bell
`Communications Research-Revision #3, Dated Mar. 1988.
`OSSGR, vol. 3, “Feature Speci?c Documents,” Technical Ref. TSY
`000271 FSD 85-01-0200 Collect BillingiPublished by Bell Com
`munications Research-Revision #3, Dated Mar. 1988.
`PCT International Search Report, PCT/US99/ 09493, Aug. 20, 1999,
`5 pages.
`PCT Written Opinion, PCT/US99/09493, Feb. 9, 2000, 12 pages.
`“PPCS (Prison Prepaid Card System)”, DiaVox Technologies, Inc.,
`Nov. 2000, 10 pages.
`Scidyn Commander 3-Way Call Detection System [online]
`[Retrieved on Jun. 20, 2006] Retrieved from: http://wwwscidyn.
`com/products/Commander%203-way%20Detection.pdf, 5 pages.
`“System 20” Value Added Communications (VAC), Nov. 1992, Bro
`chure (4 pages).
`Telematic “ConQuest III Inmate Telephone System,” Nov. 1992.
`Thermos, P., “Two Attacks Against VoIP,” Security Focus,
`XP-00244627, Apr. 4, 2006, pp. 1-8.
`U.S. Appl. No. 09/229,385, Cree et al., ?led Jan. 1999 (Reference not
`included).
`U.S. Appl. No. 09/905,014, Spadaro et al., Entitled “Public Tele
`phone Control with Voice Over Internet Protocol Transmission,” ?led
`Jul. 13, 2001 (Reference not included).
`U.S. Appl. No. 10/642,532, Rae et al., Entitled “Centralized Cell
`Processing,” ?led Aug. 15, 2003 (Reference not included).
`U.S. Appl. No. 10/646,638, Rae et al., ?ledAug. 22, 2003 (Reference
`not included).
`U.S. Appl. No. 10/800,473, Rae et al., Entitled “Call Processing with
`Voice Over Internet Protocol Transmission,” ?led Mar. 15, 2004
`(Reference not included).
`U.S. Appl. No. 11/777,168, Rae et al., Entitled “Inmate Management
`and Call Processing Systems and Methods,” ?led Jul. 12, 2007 (Ref
`erence not included).
`“VoIP the Evolving Solution and the Evolving Threat,” Internet Secu
`rity System, Inc., XP-002444626, 2004, pp. 1-7.
`* cited by examiner
`
`
`
`US. Patent
`
`May 5, 2009
`
`Sheet 1 of3
`
`US 7,529,357 B1
`
`l
`I
`g; 192 -
`01m
`5E5
`2,15
`531%
`“83;”:
`4i
`i
`E ;
`
`;
`1
`
`1
`i
`1%
`;
`
`l
`
`SiPIMGCP
`CARRIER
`191 am,» My
`D33
`
`CAM
`110 w
`
`"51s
`117 M\ G
`
`___,
`
`SAN
`
`Q V 116
`J
`,w 121
`E JAM
`
`MEDiA
`GATEWAY
`
`u
`
`111 k
`
`,
`
`- we
`
`EP FRAME
`NETWORK
`
`m 130
`
`VALiQAYIQN
`
`uwxumomzas
`CALL ACTMTY
`DETECTiON
`m
`
`3% ‘E 11%;
`CALL
`TREATMENT
`
`1 15
`
`
`
`US. Patent
`
`May 5, 2009
`
`Sheet 2 of3
`
`US 7,529,357 B1
`
`FIG. 2
`
`START
`
`1
`
`RECEiXIE
`RECOFBD
`
`“W281
`
`‘(as
`
`NOTIFY
`THIRD PARYY?
`
`NO
`
`saw
`
`mnmcmzom q“ 203
`
`,
`
`_
`
`NO
`
`SETUP
`ACCOUNT?
`
`YES
`
`f
`
`COLLECT
`I?FORMATIGN
`FROM THERD PARTY
`
`a
`"" 205
`
`1
`
`ESTABLISH ix
`ACCOLENT
`* 205
`
`
`
`US. Patent
`
`May 5, 2009
`
`Sheet 3 of3
`
`US 7,529,357 B1
`
`FIG. 3
`
`TELEPHONE TERMTNAL OFF HOOK
`
`301
`
`CALL PROCESSING GATEWAY
`ESTABLTSHES LINK BETWEEN
`TELEPHONE TERMENAL AND
`CALL PROCESSING PLATFORM
`
`302
`
`CALL. APPLECATEON MANAGEMENT
`SYSTEM iNTERACTs WiTI-E CALLER 1” 303
`AND CCLLECTs DATA
`
`CALL APPLIGATION MANAGEMENT
`$Y$TEM aNTERACTs WETH
`VALIDATJON SYSTEM To
`DETERMINE CALL TREATMENT
`
`3G4
`
`AUTHORiZED?
`
`,LLE 30?
`"
`CALL APPLTCATTON MANAGEMENT
`SYSTEM CONNECTS CALL
`
`CALL APPLICA‘FTON
`MANAGEMENT
`SYSTEM DOES NOT
`CONNECT CALL
`
`CALL APPLTCATTON MANAGEMENT
`SYSTEM TNTERACTS WTTH OTHER
`SYSTEMS
`
`\W 308
`
`CALL
`TERMTNATED?
`
`NO
`
`CALL APPLICATION MANAGEMENT
`SYSTEM RELEASES CALL
`
`
`
`US 7,529,357 B1
`
`1
`INMATE MANAGEMENT AND CALL
`PROCESSING SYSTEMS AND METHODS
`
`CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED
`APPLICATIONS
`
`This Application is a continuation-in-part of US. patent
`application Ser. No. 10/642,532 entitled “Centralized Call
`Processing,” ?led on Aug. 15, 2003, and it is related to co
`pending and commonly assigned US. patent applications
`Ser. No 10/ 135,878 entitled “Information Management and
`Movement System and Method,” ?ledApr. 29, 2002, Ser. No.
`10/ 135,883 entitled “Optimizing Pro?tability in Business
`Transactions,” ?led Apr. 29, 2002, Ser. No. 10/190,315
`entitled “System and Methods for Offering a Service to a
`Party Associated With a Blocked Call,” ?led Jul. 3, 2002, Ser.
`No. 09/640,831 entitled “System and Method for Reverse
`Billing of a Telephone Call,” ?led Aug. 17, 2000, Ser. No.
`10/022,946 entitled “Method for Determining an Entity
`Responsible for Billing a Called Party,” ?led Dec. 17, 2001,
`Ser. No. 10/217,956 entitled “System and Method for Call
`Treatment,” ?ledAug. 12, 2002, Ser. No. 10/252,956 entitled
`“Three-Way Telephone Call Prevention System and
`Method,” ?led Sep. 20, 2002, Ser. No. 09/995,253 entitled
`“Method and Apparatus for Exchanging Data BetWeen a Pri
`mary Computer System and an External Computer System to
`Ensure Transaction Reconciliation BetWeen the Systems,”
`?led Nov. 27, 2001, Ser. No. 10,360,248 entitled “System and
`Method for Account Establishment and Transaction Manage
`ment Using Interrupt Messaging,” ?led Feb. 7, 2003, Ser. No.
`10/360,442 entitled “Systems and Methods for Transaction
`Authorization Determination,” ?led Feb. 7, 2003, Ser. No.
`10/437,839 entitled “Intelligent Queuing of Transaction
`Requests,” ?led May 14, 2003, Ser. No. 10/420,585 entitled
`“System and Method for Detecting Unauthorized Call Activ
`ity,” ?ledApr. 22, 2003, Ser. No. 10/ 602,233 entitled “System
`and Method for Transaction and Information Management,”
`?led Jun. 24,2003, Ser. No. 10/ 640,505 entitled “Called Party
`Controlled Message Delivery,” ?led Aug. 13, 2003, Ser. No.
`10/720,732 entitled “Information Management and Move
`ment System and Method,” ?led Nov. 24, 2003, Ser. No.
`10/828,735 entitled “Systems and Methods for Real-Time
`Obligation Search, Payment, and Update,” ?led Apr. 21,
`2006, Ser. No. 10/ 836,976 entitled “Systems and Methods for
`Transaction and Information Management,” ?led Apr. 30,
`2004, Ser. No. 10/720,848 entitled “Information Manage
`ment and Movement System and Method,” ?led Nov. 24,
`2003, Ser No. 10/ 952,327 entitled “Systems and Methods for
`Management and Dissemination of Information for Con
`trolled Environment Facility,” ?led Sep. 28, 2004, Ser. No.
`11/182,625 entitled “Systems and Methods for Acquiring,
`Accessing, and Analyzing Investigative Information,” ?led
`Jul. 15, 2005, and Ser. No. 10/ 800,473 entitled “Call process
`ing With Voice over Internet Protocol Transmission,” ?led on
`Mar. 15, 2004, the disclosures of Which are hereby incorpo
`rated herein by reference.
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`TECHNICAL FIELD
`
`The present invention relates generally to information sys
`tems, and more particularly, to systems and methods for
`inmate management and call processing.
`
`60
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`Considerable time and expense is involved in accepting an
`inmate at a controlled environment facility. In most cases, an
`
`65
`
`2
`individual may be ?rst identi?ed on the street by a member of
`the police department as having an outstanding Warrant for
`arrest, or may otherWise be taken into custody by police or an
`of?cer of the court. The arresting of?cer may then complete
`some paperwork identifying the individual, describing the
`reason for arrest or detention, list any impounded property,
`etc. This initial information may be collected, for instance, in
`a patrol car or the like. Thereafter, the arrestee may be trans
`ported to a local controlled environment facility such as, for
`example, police stations, department of corrections, juvenile
`facilities, municipal or county jails, etc., for further process
`ing and/ or incarceration.
`In general, there is a period of time When the arrest is
`temporarily incarcerated in a controlled environment facility
`but has not been fully processed as an inmate thereof. For
`example, the arrestee may have been photographed, ?nger
`printed, and entered into an initial set of books at the facility,
`but he or she may not yet have been arraigned (i.e., brought
`before a judge to hear the charges and to set bail). Before
`being fully processed into the controlled environment facility,
`an arrestee may go through a classi?cation process, medical
`examination, hygienic processing (e.g., shoWer and delous
`ing), etc. In connection With these procedures, staff members
`may be required to complete a ?le in an inmate management
`system.
`In some situations, the arrestee may be placed in a tempo
`rary holding cell. Often the laW requires that arrestees be
`given access to a telephone for placing one or more calls to
`seek assistance from someone outside of the controlled envi
`ronment facility, such as a friend or family member, an attor
`ney, a bail bondsman, etc. Today, local controlled environ
`ment facilities such as police stations and the like may not
`monitor, control, or even charge for those calls, particularly
`When the calls originate from holding cells. Typically, only
`the ?rst call made by the arrestee must be provided free of
`charge. Nonetheless, local facilities do not ordinarily have the
`means to charge for subsequent calls, or even limit the amount
`of calls made a particular arrestee. As a result, the arrestee’s
`phone calls are often provided as free service and Without any
`control or monitoring.
`Furthermore, after the arrestee becomes an inmate of a ?rst
`controlled environment facility, he or she is oftentimes trans
`ferred to a second such facility. These transfers may take
`place, for example, based on the expected length of incarcera
`tion, jurisdiction Where the crime took place, type of crime
`committed, etc. For instance, an inmate may be temporarily
`held at a local police station, and then moved to a county jail.
`After residing Within the county jail for a period of time, the
`inmate may then be moved to a state or federal prison. Today
`each police, county, state, and federal authority implements
`its oWn inmate data collection and management system.
`Therefore, at each step in the inmate’s incarceration history
`beginning With his or her arrest up until his or her last transfer,
`redundant information is gathered and processed by each
`facility. The information collected by these different facilities
`is not connected in any Way, and investigators must visit or
`contact each such entity When seeking information related to
`a single case or person.
`
`BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`
`The present invention is directed to systems and methods
`that provide centralized or nodal inmate management and
`telephone call processing capabilities to controlled environ
`ment facilities and laW enforcement agencies. In one embodi
`ment, an inmate management and call processing system of
`the present invention serves a plurality of controlled environ
`
`
`
`US 7,529,357 B1
`
`3
`ment facilities such as, for example, police stations, detention
`centers, juvenile facilities, county and municipal jails, state
`penitentiaries, federal prisons, and the like. The inmate man
`agement and call processing system preferably includes an
`inmate information database to provide data aggregation and
`sharing capabilities across several facilities, in addition to call
`processing functionality.
`Each controlled environment facility may utiliZe the
`inmate management and call processing system to store,
`retrieve, and/ or modify a record associated With an arrestee or
`inmate in the inmate information database. To that end, high
`bandWidth persistent data connections may be provided
`betWeen the controlled environment facilities and the inmate
`management and call processing system for data processing
`use, such as by management terminals and/ or other data pro
`cessing systems (e.g., commerce computer systems, justice
`application management computer systems, various periph
`eral devices, etc.) disposed at the facilities.
`When a person is arrested for the ?rst time, an inmate
`record may be created that comprises a code, personal iden
`ti?cation number (PIN), or some other form of identi?cation
`(e.g., uniquely generated code, biometrics, etc.) that is asso
`ciated With him or her. Alternatively, if the arrestee has been
`arrested before, the arresting o?ice may retrieve an existing
`record and update that record With neW information. In some
`embodiments, another code or number may be created for the
`particular incident giving rise to the arrest, and that incident
`may be linked to the arrestee. An arresting of?cer or laW
`enforcement staff collects personal and/ or incident-related
`information from the arrestee and adds that information to an
`inmate record. In one embodiment, the inmate record
`includes a list of third parties connected With the arrestee
`(e. g., family, friends, attorneys, etc.) along With their contact
`information. After the record is stored in the inmate manage
`ment and call processing system, the system may proactively
`operate to notify one or more of those third parties about the
`arrest (e.g., by telephone, email, or the like).
`In one embodiment, the inmate management and call pro
`ces sing system of the present invention establishes an account
`associated With a third party Whose contact information is
`re?ected in the inmate’s record. The account may be a pre
`paid account, a post-paid account, and debit account, a credit
`account, or the like. To set up the account, the inmate man
`agement and call processing system may request additional
`information directly from the third party, for example, during
`the arrest and/ or transfer noti?cation process. In one embodi
`ment, the inmate management and call processing system
`establishes a ?rst account for telephone calls and/ or transac
`tions (e.g., purchasing or commissary items) made by the
`inmate While the inmate is at a ?rst controlled environment
`facility (e.g., municipal jail). In another embodiment, the
`inmate management and call processing system may create a
`second account or update the ?rst account upon the inmate’s
`transfer to a second controlled environment facility (e.g.,
`county jail).
`Moreover, as the arrestee is moved or transferred among
`different controlled environment facilities (e.g., from police
`department to county jail), the receiving facility may access
`the inmate management and call processing system and
`retrieve the inmate’s record from the inmate database. The
`receiving facility may also modify the inmate’ s record and/or
`add data collected upon the inmate’s arrival and/or during his
`or her stay. In this manner, an inmate’s entire incarceration
`history beginning With his or her arrest is maintained in a
`centraliZed or nodal database. As such, the inmate manage
`ment and call processing systems provides for data sharing,
`aggregation, and/or analysis across multiple facilities served,
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`4
`Whether a?iliated (such as facilities of a particular city,
`county, or state or facilities having an association, e. g., sher
`if? s association) or non-af?liated (such as all facilities served
`by the service provider). Information, such as inmate booking
`information, dossiers, etc., may be shared across several
`facilities.
`In one embodiment, the inmate management and call pro
`cessing system of the present invention also provides call
`processing, video conferencing, e-mail, videomail, and/or
`voicemail applications, and the like to one or more of the
`plurality of controlled environment facilities that it serves.
`Data connections betWeen the controlled environment facili
`ties and the inmate management and call processing system
`may also carry telephone call content. For example, Voice
`over Internet Protocol (VoIP) may be utiliZed to carry calls
`from a location at Which calling services are provided to an
`inmate management and call processing system providing all
`or substantially all call processing functionality, such as call
`ing party identi?cation, call validation, call routing,