`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`APPLE, INC.
`Petitioner,
`
`and TWITTER INC. and YELP INC.
`Petitioners (by Joinder)
`
`v.
`
`EVOLUTIONARY INTELLIGENCE, LLC,
`Patent Owner
`
`Case IPR 2014-0086
`Patent No. 7,010,536
`
`
`
`
`NOTICE OF STIPULATION EXTENDING DUE
`DATES 1-4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The parties to Case 2014-00086, Apple Inc. and Evolutionary Intelligence
`
`LLC, and Case 2014-00812 (which was joined with Case 2014-00086 by the Board
`
`on June 25, 2014), Twitter Inc., Yelp Inc., and Evolutionary Intelligence LLC, by
`
`and through their counsel of record, have stipulated as follows:
`
`1. On April 25, 2014, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board issued a
`
`Scheduling Order in the Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent 7,010,536
`
`(Case IPR 2014-00086) setting forth due dates for this trial.
`
`2. The Scheduling Order states that the parties may stipulate to different
`
`dates for DUE DATES 1 through 5 (earlier or later, but no later than
`
`DUE DATE 6).
`
`3. On July 7, 2014, counsel for petitioner Apple and patent owner
`
`Evolutionary Intelligence appeared before the Board to discuss a
`
`possible motion for extension of DUE DATES 1-4. (Counsel for
`
`joining parties Twitter and Yelp were not notified of the call by the
`
`Board and did not participate.) In that conference call, Apple and
`
`Evolutionary agreed to a stipulation of these deadlines by one week.
`
`4. In subsequent communications on July 7, 2014, counsel for Twitter
`
`and Yelp also agreed to the stipulation described above.
`
`5. Accordingly, DUE DATES 1 through 4 are each moved and extended
`
`by one week. The new deadlines are as follows:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`a. DUE DATE 1 (response to petition and motion to amend the
`
`patent) – JULY 18, 2014.
`
`b. DUE DATE 2 (Petitioner’s reply to Patent Owner’s response
`
`and opposition to any motion to amend the patent) –
`
`OCTOBER 17, 2014
`
`c. DUE DATE 3 (Patent Owner’s reply to Petitioner’s opposition
`
`to any motion to amend the patent) – NOVEMBER 14, 2014
`
`d. DUE DATE 4 (any motion to file an observation on the
`
`testimony of a reply witness) – DECEMBER 5, 2014
`
`Dated: July 7, 2014
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`
`
` /s/Anthony J. Patek/
`Anthony J. Patek. No. 66,463
`Attorney for Evolutionary Intelligence
`
`Gutride Safier LLP
`835 Douglass Street
`San Francisco, CA 94114
`Tel: (415) 639-9090
`Dir: (415) 505-6226
`Fax: (415) 449-6469
`anthony@gutridesafier.com
`
` /s/Jeffrey Kushan/
`Jeffrey Kushan
`Attorney for Apple, Inc.
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Jeffrey P. Kushan & Douglas I. Lewis
`Sidley Austin LLP
`1501 K Street, N.W.,
`Washington, D.C. 20005
`jkushan@sidley.com
`dilewis@sidley.com
`
` /s/Vaibhov P. Kadaba/
`Vaibhav P. Kadaba
`Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
`1100 Peachtree Street NE, Suite 2800
`Atlanta , GA 30309-4528 USA
`Telephone: (404) 532-6959
`Fax: (404) 541-3258
`wkadaba@kilpatricktownsend.com
`rtadlock@kilpatricktownsend.com
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`I hereby certify, pursuant to 37 CFR § 42.6, that on July 7, 2014, the same
`day as the filing of the above document, a true and correct copy of the foregoing
`STIPULATION EXTENDING DEADLINES is being served via email, by
`agreement between the parties, on the following:
`
`
`Counsel for Petitioner Apple, Inc.
`Jeffrey P. Kushan & Douglas I. Lewis
`Sidley Austin LLP
`1501 K Street, N.W.,
`Washington, D.C. 20005
`jkushan@sidley.com
`dilewis@sidley.com
`
`Counsel for Joining Parties Twitter Inc. and Yelp Inc.
`Vaibhav P. Kadaba & Robert D. Tadlock
`Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
`1100 Peachtree Street NE, Suite 2800
`Atlanta , GA 30309-4528 USA
`Telephone: (404) 532-6959
`Fax: (404) 541-3258
`wkadaba@kilpatricktownsend.com
`rtadlock@kilpatricktownsend.com
`
`
` /s/Anthony J. Patek/
`Anthony J. Patek. No. 66,463
`Attorney for Patent Owner
`
`Gutride Safier LLP
`835 Douglass Street
`San Francisco, CA 94114
`Tel: (415) 639-9090
`Dir: (415) 505-6226
`Fax: (415) 449-6469
`anthony@gutridesafier.com
`
`4
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
